Would it be possible to have a GMO that produces chocolate?An ammonia - not water - based alien race that breaths hydrogen. Is it believable/possible?“You have that power too”Is it possible to have life that feeds on thermal energy?What do humans have that plants need?Why would orcs have tusks?Plant that produces a lot of vegetable oil?

How should I face my manager if I make a mistake because a senior coworker explained something incorrectly to me?

In an emergency, how do I find and share my position?

Is a butterfly one or two animals?

Why is observed clock rate < 3MHz on Arduino Uno?

Concatenation of the result of a function with a mutable default argument in python

Why can't an Airbus A330 dump fuel in an emergency?

Factoring the square of this polynomial?

What is wrong about this application of Kirchhoffs Current Law?

The teacher logged me in as administrator for doing a short task, is the whole system now compromised?

How would a situation where rescue is impossible be handled by the crew?

Why didn’t Doctor Strange stay in the original winning timeline?

Why does my house heat up, even when it's cool outside?

LeetCode: Pascal's Triangle C#

Why doesn't the Falcon-9 first stage use three legs to land?

Why were movies shot on film shot at 24 frames per second?

Are required indicators necessary for radio buttons?

Brexit and backstop: would changes require unanimous approval by all EU countries? Does Ireland hold a veto?

Script that helps people make better choices

What does it mean to have a subnet mask /32?

How to write triplets in 4/4 time without using a 3 on top of the notes all the time

IndexOptimize - Configuration

How is "sein" conjugated in this sub-sentence?

How to compare two different formulations of a problem?

Why did MS-DOS applications built using Turbo Pascal fail to start with a division by zero error on faster systems?



Would it be possible to have a GMO that produces chocolate?


An ammonia - not water - based alien race that breaths hydrogen. Is it believable/possible?“You have that power too”Is it possible to have life that feeds on thermal energy?What do humans have that plants need?Why would orcs have tusks?Plant that produces a lot of vegetable oil?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


I am inspired by some people who apparently believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows.



I know that for sweet, delicious chocolate to come into existence, we need to do things to cocoa. Ferment it, grind it, mix it, bake it. That's boring. Besides, as cheap as human labour comes, animal don't unionise.



Would it be possible for us to engineer a creature (preferably an animal) that produces chocolate from its teats (or other parts)?



Conditions:



  1. I am willing to accept all kinds of animals, i.e.: if aphids are a better choice for the task, so be it.

  2. Due to the above, the final product doesn't have to be milk chocolate. The goal is met when we have the raw, bitter stuff.

  3. If chocolate is not possible, then cocoa butter, cocoa solids or a mix of both are acceptable.









share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    does it have to be an animals or could it be a plant or fungi?
    $endgroup$
    – John
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @John I am going for animals because sessile beings already failed hard at this. If you think a plant or fungus would do it, by all means, I am interested.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    45 mins ago

















6












$begingroup$


I am inspired by some people who apparently believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows.



I know that for sweet, delicious chocolate to come into existence, we need to do things to cocoa. Ferment it, grind it, mix it, bake it. That's boring. Besides, as cheap as human labour comes, animal don't unionise.



Would it be possible for us to engineer a creature (preferably an animal) that produces chocolate from its teats (or other parts)?



Conditions:



  1. I am willing to accept all kinds of animals, i.e.: if aphids are a better choice for the task, so be it.

  2. Due to the above, the final product doesn't have to be milk chocolate. The goal is met when we have the raw, bitter stuff.

  3. If chocolate is not possible, then cocoa butter, cocoa solids or a mix of both are acceptable.









share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    does it have to be an animals or could it be a plant or fungi?
    $endgroup$
    – John
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @John I am going for animals because sessile beings already failed hard at this. If you think a plant or fungus would do it, by all means, I am interested.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    45 mins ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


I am inspired by some people who apparently believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows.



I know that for sweet, delicious chocolate to come into existence, we need to do things to cocoa. Ferment it, grind it, mix it, bake it. That's boring. Besides, as cheap as human labour comes, animal don't unionise.



Would it be possible for us to engineer a creature (preferably an animal) that produces chocolate from its teats (or other parts)?



Conditions:



  1. I am willing to accept all kinds of animals, i.e.: if aphids are a better choice for the task, so be it.

  2. Due to the above, the final product doesn't have to be milk chocolate. The goal is met when we have the raw, bitter stuff.

  3. If chocolate is not possible, then cocoa butter, cocoa solids or a mix of both are acceptable.









share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am inspired by some people who apparently believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows.



I know that for sweet, delicious chocolate to come into existence, we need to do things to cocoa. Ferment it, grind it, mix it, bake it. That's boring. Besides, as cheap as human labour comes, animal don't unionise.



Would it be possible for us to engineer a creature (preferably an animal) that produces chocolate from its teats (or other parts)?



Conditions:



  1. I am willing to accept all kinds of animals, i.e.: if aphids are a better choice for the task, so be it.

  2. Due to the above, the final product doesn't have to be milk chocolate. The goal is met when we have the raw, bitter stuff.

  3. If chocolate is not possible, then cocoa butter, cocoa solids or a mix of both are acceptable.






reality-check biology






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 45 mins ago







Renan

















asked 8 hours ago









RenanRenan

65.3k20 gold badges152 silver badges318 bronze badges




65.3k20 gold badges152 silver badges318 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    does it have to be an animals or could it be a plant or fungi?
    $endgroup$
    – John
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @John I am going for animals because sessile beings already failed hard at this. If you think a plant or fungus would do it, by all means, I am interested.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    45 mins ago
















  • $begingroup$
    does it have to be an animals or could it be a plant or fungi?
    $endgroup$
    – John
    2 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @John I am going for animals because sessile beings already failed hard at this. If you think a plant or fungus would do it, by all means, I am interested.
    $endgroup$
    – Renan
    45 mins ago















$begingroup$
does it have to be an animals or could it be a plant or fungi?
$endgroup$
– John
2 hours ago





$begingroup$
does it have to be an animals or could it be a plant or fungi?
$endgroup$
– John
2 hours ago













$begingroup$
@John I am going for animals because sessile beings already failed hard at this. If you think a plant or fungus would do it, by all means, I am interested.
$endgroup$
– Renan
45 mins ago




$begingroup$
@John I am going for animals because sessile beings already failed hard at this. If you think a plant or fungus would do it, by all means, I am interested.
$endgroup$
– Renan
45 mins ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















13











$begingroup$

Ok, so this seems pretty simple. There are three basic things that happen to turn cocoa beans into something reasonably approximating chocolate.



1: Fermentation



Counterintuitively, the first step in turning Cocoa beans into chocolate is getting RID of the sugars that are already there, allowing the natural yeasts and micro-organisms to turn the sugars in a ripe bean into alcohol, and then acetic acid. This is critical in generating the aromas and flavors that we associate with chocolate.



Fermentation is also a pretty common process in digestion though, so it's totally plausible that an organism could eat the beans and, in the process of digesting them, complete the fermentation.



2: Roasting



The roasting does a few things. It removes the husks from the actual choco-meat, it sterilizes the choco-meat, and it does some more chemstry to improve the flavor. In the case of an animal, the first of those items can be handled by chewing, the second is... probably just not going to happen, and the third can be managed by the appropriate acidic environment in the digestive system.



3: Addition of sugar
The easiest way to manage this is for our animal to supplement its diet of cocoa beans with other stuff that has lots of sugar. Fruits, for example, sugar cane depending on location, stuff like that.



All of that having been said, there's a clear answer right here.



BEES!



Big, freaking, cretaceous sized monster bees. They do the honey thing, but ALSO like to have a gnosh on cocoa beans. The two things get mixed together and then vomited up into giant beehives just like modern bees do honey, only more choco-tastic.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$










  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Chocolate coming from a beehive?!? Shut up and take my money!
    $endgroup$
    – MongoTheGeek
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Side note, one of Milton Hershey's trick to get milk chocolate to set properly was the addition of wax.
    $endgroup$
    – MongoTheGeek
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @MongoTheGeek sure, why not? Bees are already turning botanical compounds into delicious, magical substance. Seems like the easiest starting point for some good old fashioned Mad Science.
    $endgroup$
    – Morris The Cat
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Slurm! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_and_the_Slurm_Factory
    $endgroup$
    – puppetsock
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A decent part of the cooking is breaking down alkaloids which you could engineer them to not produce in the first place.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    2 hours ago


















2











$begingroup$

Considering all the ingredients are biological products there is no reason you can't. Although it might be easier to just engineer the cacao plant considering all the ingredients are already present. Dark chocolate fruit sounds amazing. You need to engineer them to produce it in the fruit flesh instead of just the seeds, producing fewer alkaloids will help as well that is where the bitterness comes from.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    2











    $begingroup$

    You might want to have a look at this patent about artificial chocolate flavor



    https://patents.google.com/patent/US2835590A/en



    If it is possible to produce the flavor in the laboratory it should be possible to maybe create certain bacteria to do the job for you. You might however need more than one kind and they would still need to grow in big and controlled storages. I’m not a bio engineer but maybe someone else can give a more profound answer to my claim.



    Once you have the flavor you probably can produce something similar in taste to natural chocolate.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor



    World Peace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$






















      2











      $begingroup$

      Chocolate contains theobromine, an alchaloid like caffeine, cocaine etc. All these alchaloid toxins are used by the plants as defense against attackers (though we humans get usually oddly addicted to those which do not kills us immediately).



      Which animals already produce toxins? Some tetraodontiformes fishes, several spiders, several snakes, several insects.



      You would need to add more to just theobromine, but you have already the reactor.



      Insects, spiders and snakes would have little individual production, but the first two can compensate with large numbers per unit surface. Plus spiders could produce chocolate in convenient filaments, instead of their silk.



      The tetraodontiformes fishes could have their whole body made of chocolate, similarly to how its bowels and skin are already packed with tetrodotoxin.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$














      • $begingroup$
        I've never heard a puffer fish called a tetrodon ball fish... even google doesn't seem to have heard of that form!
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        6 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @Starish Prime, fixed
        $endgroup$
        – L.Dutch
        6 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @StarfishPrime they're also known as puffers! Or pufferfish.
        $endgroup$
        – Renan
        5 hours ago


















      1











      $begingroup$

      Since it is already the case that goats have been modified to produce spider silk in their milk, it would not be a big stretch to have them make the chemical components of chocolate.



      However, since there are between 300 and 500 different chemicals in chocolate it might be a lot easier just to get chocolate from the plants we already do. Probably to get non-lethal and pleasant tasting chocolate would take a lot of "nudging, poking, probing, twiddling, fiddling, and messing around."






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$










      • 2




        $begingroup$
        "You can take the chocolate out of the goat, but you can't take the goat out of the chocolate"
        $endgroup$
        – Morris The Cat
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Even getting it from the plants is difficult, because there are all sorts of weird phase changes and ageing effects during the production process. Part of the reason why there are so many different subtle (and not so subtle) flavours of stuff that all claim to be chocolate (some more convincingly than others).
        $endgroup$
        – Starfish Prime
        6 hours ago














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153512%2fwould-it-be-possible-to-have-a-gmo-that-produces-chocolate%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      13











      $begingroup$

      Ok, so this seems pretty simple. There are three basic things that happen to turn cocoa beans into something reasonably approximating chocolate.



      1: Fermentation



      Counterintuitively, the first step in turning Cocoa beans into chocolate is getting RID of the sugars that are already there, allowing the natural yeasts and micro-organisms to turn the sugars in a ripe bean into alcohol, and then acetic acid. This is critical in generating the aromas and flavors that we associate with chocolate.



      Fermentation is also a pretty common process in digestion though, so it's totally plausible that an organism could eat the beans and, in the process of digesting them, complete the fermentation.



      2: Roasting



      The roasting does a few things. It removes the husks from the actual choco-meat, it sterilizes the choco-meat, and it does some more chemstry to improve the flavor. In the case of an animal, the first of those items can be handled by chewing, the second is... probably just not going to happen, and the third can be managed by the appropriate acidic environment in the digestive system.



      3: Addition of sugar
      The easiest way to manage this is for our animal to supplement its diet of cocoa beans with other stuff that has lots of sugar. Fruits, for example, sugar cane depending on location, stuff like that.



      All of that having been said, there's a clear answer right here.



      BEES!



      Big, freaking, cretaceous sized monster bees. They do the honey thing, but ALSO like to have a gnosh on cocoa beans. The two things get mixed together and then vomited up into giant beehives just like modern bees do honey, only more choco-tastic.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$










      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Chocolate coming from a beehive?!? Shut up and take my money!
        $endgroup$
        – MongoTheGeek
        8 hours ago







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Side note, one of Milton Hershey's trick to get milk chocolate to set properly was the addition of wax.
        $endgroup$
        – MongoTheGeek
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @MongoTheGeek sure, why not? Bees are already turning botanical compounds into delicious, magical substance. Seems like the easiest starting point for some good old fashioned Mad Science.
        $endgroup$
        – Morris The Cat
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Slurm! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_and_the_Slurm_Factory
        $endgroup$
        – puppetsock
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        A decent part of the cooking is breaking down alkaloids which you could engineer them to not produce in the first place.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        2 hours ago















      13











      $begingroup$

      Ok, so this seems pretty simple. There are three basic things that happen to turn cocoa beans into something reasonably approximating chocolate.



      1: Fermentation



      Counterintuitively, the first step in turning Cocoa beans into chocolate is getting RID of the sugars that are already there, allowing the natural yeasts and micro-organisms to turn the sugars in a ripe bean into alcohol, and then acetic acid. This is critical in generating the aromas and flavors that we associate with chocolate.



      Fermentation is also a pretty common process in digestion though, so it's totally plausible that an organism could eat the beans and, in the process of digesting them, complete the fermentation.



      2: Roasting



      The roasting does a few things. It removes the husks from the actual choco-meat, it sterilizes the choco-meat, and it does some more chemstry to improve the flavor. In the case of an animal, the first of those items can be handled by chewing, the second is... probably just not going to happen, and the third can be managed by the appropriate acidic environment in the digestive system.



      3: Addition of sugar
      The easiest way to manage this is for our animal to supplement its diet of cocoa beans with other stuff that has lots of sugar. Fruits, for example, sugar cane depending on location, stuff like that.



      All of that having been said, there's a clear answer right here.



      BEES!



      Big, freaking, cretaceous sized monster bees. They do the honey thing, but ALSO like to have a gnosh on cocoa beans. The two things get mixed together and then vomited up into giant beehives just like modern bees do honey, only more choco-tastic.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$










      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Chocolate coming from a beehive?!? Shut up and take my money!
        $endgroup$
        – MongoTheGeek
        8 hours ago







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Side note, one of Milton Hershey's trick to get milk chocolate to set properly was the addition of wax.
        $endgroup$
        – MongoTheGeek
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @MongoTheGeek sure, why not? Bees are already turning botanical compounds into delicious, magical substance. Seems like the easiest starting point for some good old fashioned Mad Science.
        $endgroup$
        – Morris The Cat
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Slurm! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_and_the_Slurm_Factory
        $endgroup$
        – puppetsock
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        A decent part of the cooking is breaking down alkaloids which you could engineer them to not produce in the first place.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        2 hours ago













      13












      13








      13





      $begingroup$

      Ok, so this seems pretty simple. There are three basic things that happen to turn cocoa beans into something reasonably approximating chocolate.



      1: Fermentation



      Counterintuitively, the first step in turning Cocoa beans into chocolate is getting RID of the sugars that are already there, allowing the natural yeasts and micro-organisms to turn the sugars in a ripe bean into alcohol, and then acetic acid. This is critical in generating the aromas and flavors that we associate with chocolate.



      Fermentation is also a pretty common process in digestion though, so it's totally plausible that an organism could eat the beans and, in the process of digesting them, complete the fermentation.



      2: Roasting



      The roasting does a few things. It removes the husks from the actual choco-meat, it sterilizes the choco-meat, and it does some more chemstry to improve the flavor. In the case of an animal, the first of those items can be handled by chewing, the second is... probably just not going to happen, and the third can be managed by the appropriate acidic environment in the digestive system.



      3: Addition of sugar
      The easiest way to manage this is for our animal to supplement its diet of cocoa beans with other stuff that has lots of sugar. Fruits, for example, sugar cane depending on location, stuff like that.



      All of that having been said, there's a clear answer right here.



      BEES!



      Big, freaking, cretaceous sized monster bees. They do the honey thing, but ALSO like to have a gnosh on cocoa beans. The two things get mixed together and then vomited up into giant beehives just like modern bees do honey, only more choco-tastic.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Ok, so this seems pretty simple. There are three basic things that happen to turn cocoa beans into something reasonably approximating chocolate.



      1: Fermentation



      Counterintuitively, the first step in turning Cocoa beans into chocolate is getting RID of the sugars that are already there, allowing the natural yeasts and micro-organisms to turn the sugars in a ripe bean into alcohol, and then acetic acid. This is critical in generating the aromas and flavors that we associate with chocolate.



      Fermentation is also a pretty common process in digestion though, so it's totally plausible that an organism could eat the beans and, in the process of digesting them, complete the fermentation.



      2: Roasting



      The roasting does a few things. It removes the husks from the actual choco-meat, it sterilizes the choco-meat, and it does some more chemstry to improve the flavor. In the case of an animal, the first of those items can be handled by chewing, the second is... probably just not going to happen, and the third can be managed by the appropriate acidic environment in the digestive system.



      3: Addition of sugar
      The easiest way to manage this is for our animal to supplement its diet of cocoa beans with other stuff that has lots of sugar. Fruits, for example, sugar cane depending on location, stuff like that.



      All of that having been said, there's a clear answer right here.



      BEES!



      Big, freaking, cretaceous sized monster bees. They do the honey thing, but ALSO like to have a gnosh on cocoa beans. The two things get mixed together and then vomited up into giant beehives just like modern bees do honey, only more choco-tastic.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 8 hours ago









      Morris The CatMorris The Cat

      7,7361 gold badge20 silver badges43 bronze badges




      7,7361 gold badge20 silver badges43 bronze badges










      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Chocolate coming from a beehive?!? Shut up and take my money!
        $endgroup$
        – MongoTheGeek
        8 hours ago







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Side note, one of Milton Hershey's trick to get milk chocolate to set properly was the addition of wax.
        $endgroup$
        – MongoTheGeek
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @MongoTheGeek sure, why not? Bees are already turning botanical compounds into delicious, magical substance. Seems like the easiest starting point for some good old fashioned Mad Science.
        $endgroup$
        – Morris The Cat
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Slurm! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_and_the_Slurm_Factory
        $endgroup$
        – puppetsock
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        A decent part of the cooking is breaking down alkaloids which you could engineer them to not produce in the first place.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        2 hours ago












      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Chocolate coming from a beehive?!? Shut up and take my money!
        $endgroup$
        – MongoTheGeek
        8 hours ago







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Side note, one of Milton Hershey's trick to get milk chocolate to set properly was the addition of wax.
        $endgroup$
        – MongoTheGeek
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        @MongoTheGeek sure, why not? Bees are already turning botanical compounds into delicious, magical substance. Seems like the easiest starting point for some good old fashioned Mad Science.
        $endgroup$
        – Morris The Cat
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Slurm! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_and_the_Slurm_Factory
        $endgroup$
        – puppetsock
        7 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        A decent part of the cooking is breaking down alkaloids which you could engineer them to not produce in the first place.
        $endgroup$
        – John
        2 hours ago







      8




      8




      $begingroup$
      Chocolate coming from a beehive?!? Shut up and take my money!
      $endgroup$
      – MongoTheGeek
      8 hours ago





      $begingroup$
      Chocolate coming from a beehive?!? Shut up and take my money!
      $endgroup$
      – MongoTheGeek
      8 hours ago





      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      Side note, one of Milton Hershey's trick to get milk chocolate to set properly was the addition of wax.
      $endgroup$
      – MongoTheGeek
      7 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Side note, one of Milton Hershey's trick to get milk chocolate to set properly was the addition of wax.
      $endgroup$
      – MongoTheGeek
      7 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      @MongoTheGeek sure, why not? Bees are already turning botanical compounds into delicious, magical substance. Seems like the easiest starting point for some good old fashioned Mad Science.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      @MongoTheGeek sure, why not? Bees are already turning botanical compounds into delicious, magical substance. Seems like the easiest starting point for some good old fashioned Mad Science.
      $endgroup$
      – Morris The Cat
      7 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Slurm! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_and_the_Slurm_Factory
      $endgroup$
      – puppetsock
      7 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Slurm! en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fry_and_the_Slurm_Factory
      $endgroup$
      – puppetsock
      7 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      A decent part of the cooking is breaking down alkaloids which you could engineer them to not produce in the first place.
      $endgroup$
      – John
      2 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      A decent part of the cooking is breaking down alkaloids which you could engineer them to not produce in the first place.
      $endgroup$
      – John
      2 hours ago













      2











      $begingroup$

      Considering all the ingredients are biological products there is no reason you can't. Although it might be easier to just engineer the cacao plant considering all the ingredients are already present. Dark chocolate fruit sounds amazing. You need to engineer them to produce it in the fruit flesh instead of just the seeds, producing fewer alkaloids will help as well that is where the bitterness comes from.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



















        2











        $begingroup$

        Considering all the ingredients are biological products there is no reason you can't. Although it might be easier to just engineer the cacao plant considering all the ingredients are already present. Dark chocolate fruit sounds amazing. You need to engineer them to produce it in the fruit flesh instead of just the seeds, producing fewer alkaloids will help as well that is where the bitterness comes from.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Considering all the ingredients are biological products there is no reason you can't. Although it might be easier to just engineer the cacao plant considering all the ingredients are already present. Dark chocolate fruit sounds amazing. You need to engineer them to produce it in the fruit flesh instead of just the seeds, producing fewer alkaloids will help as well that is where the bitterness comes from.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Considering all the ingredients are biological products there is no reason you can't. Although it might be easier to just engineer the cacao plant considering all the ingredients are already present. Dark chocolate fruit sounds amazing. You need to engineer them to produce it in the fruit flesh instead of just the seeds, producing fewer alkaloids will help as well that is where the bitterness comes from.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          JohnJohn

          41.6k11 gold badges60 silver badges140 bronze badges




          41.6k11 gold badges60 silver badges140 bronze badges
























              2











              $begingroup$

              You might want to have a look at this patent about artificial chocolate flavor



              https://patents.google.com/patent/US2835590A/en



              If it is possible to produce the flavor in the laboratory it should be possible to maybe create certain bacteria to do the job for you. You might however need more than one kind and they would still need to grow in big and controlled storages. I’m not a bio engineer but maybe someone else can give a more profound answer to my claim.



              Once you have the flavor you probably can produce something similar in taste to natural chocolate.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor



              World Peace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              $endgroup$



















                2











                $begingroup$

                You might want to have a look at this patent about artificial chocolate flavor



                https://patents.google.com/patent/US2835590A/en



                If it is possible to produce the flavor in the laboratory it should be possible to maybe create certain bacteria to do the job for you. You might however need more than one kind and they would still need to grow in big and controlled storages. I’m not a bio engineer but maybe someone else can give a more profound answer to my claim.



                Once you have the flavor you probably can produce something similar in taste to natural chocolate.






                share|improve this answer










                New contributor



                World Peace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  You might want to have a look at this patent about artificial chocolate flavor



                  https://patents.google.com/patent/US2835590A/en



                  If it is possible to produce the flavor in the laboratory it should be possible to maybe create certain bacteria to do the job for you. You might however need more than one kind and they would still need to grow in big and controlled storages. I’m not a bio engineer but maybe someone else can give a more profound answer to my claim.



                  Once you have the flavor you probably can produce something similar in taste to natural chocolate.






                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor



                  World Peace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  $endgroup$



                  You might want to have a look at this patent about artificial chocolate flavor



                  https://patents.google.com/patent/US2835590A/en



                  If it is possible to produce the flavor in the laboratory it should be possible to maybe create certain bacteria to do the job for you. You might however need more than one kind and they would still need to grow in big and controlled storages. I’m not a bio engineer but maybe someone else can give a more profound answer to my claim.



                  Once you have the flavor you probably can produce something similar in taste to natural chocolate.







                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor



                  World Peace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 8 hours ago





















                  New contributor



                  World Peace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.








                  answered 8 hours ago









                  World PeaceWorld Peace

                  1964 bronze badges




                  1964 bronze badges




                  New contributor



                  World Peace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




                  New contributor




                  World Peace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.


























                      2











                      $begingroup$

                      Chocolate contains theobromine, an alchaloid like caffeine, cocaine etc. All these alchaloid toxins are used by the plants as defense against attackers (though we humans get usually oddly addicted to those which do not kills us immediately).



                      Which animals already produce toxins? Some tetraodontiformes fishes, several spiders, several snakes, several insects.



                      You would need to add more to just theobromine, but you have already the reactor.



                      Insects, spiders and snakes would have little individual production, but the first two can compensate with large numbers per unit surface. Plus spiders could produce chocolate in convenient filaments, instead of their silk.



                      The tetraodontiformes fishes could have their whole body made of chocolate, similarly to how its bowels and skin are already packed with tetrodotoxin.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$














                      • $begingroup$
                        I've never heard a puffer fish called a tetrodon ball fish... even google doesn't seem to have heard of that form!
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Starish Prime, fixed
                        $endgroup$
                        – L.Dutch
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @StarfishPrime they're also known as puffers! Or pufferfish.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Renan
                        5 hours ago















                      2











                      $begingroup$

                      Chocolate contains theobromine, an alchaloid like caffeine, cocaine etc. All these alchaloid toxins are used by the plants as defense against attackers (though we humans get usually oddly addicted to those which do not kills us immediately).



                      Which animals already produce toxins? Some tetraodontiformes fishes, several spiders, several snakes, several insects.



                      You would need to add more to just theobromine, but you have already the reactor.



                      Insects, spiders and snakes would have little individual production, but the first two can compensate with large numbers per unit surface. Plus spiders could produce chocolate in convenient filaments, instead of their silk.



                      The tetraodontiformes fishes could have their whole body made of chocolate, similarly to how its bowels and skin are already packed with tetrodotoxin.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$














                      • $begingroup$
                        I've never heard a puffer fish called a tetrodon ball fish... even google doesn't seem to have heard of that form!
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Starish Prime, fixed
                        $endgroup$
                        – L.Dutch
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @StarfishPrime they're also known as puffers! Or pufferfish.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Renan
                        5 hours ago













                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      Chocolate contains theobromine, an alchaloid like caffeine, cocaine etc. All these alchaloid toxins are used by the plants as defense against attackers (though we humans get usually oddly addicted to those which do not kills us immediately).



                      Which animals already produce toxins? Some tetraodontiformes fishes, several spiders, several snakes, several insects.



                      You would need to add more to just theobromine, but you have already the reactor.



                      Insects, spiders and snakes would have little individual production, but the first two can compensate with large numbers per unit surface. Plus spiders could produce chocolate in convenient filaments, instead of their silk.



                      The tetraodontiformes fishes could have their whole body made of chocolate, similarly to how its bowels and skin are already packed with tetrodotoxin.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Chocolate contains theobromine, an alchaloid like caffeine, cocaine etc. All these alchaloid toxins are used by the plants as defense against attackers (though we humans get usually oddly addicted to those which do not kills us immediately).



                      Which animals already produce toxins? Some tetraodontiformes fishes, several spiders, several snakes, several insects.



                      You would need to add more to just theobromine, but you have already the reactor.



                      Insects, spiders and snakes would have little individual production, but the first two can compensate with large numbers per unit surface. Plus spiders could produce chocolate in convenient filaments, instead of their silk.



                      The tetraodontiformes fishes could have their whole body made of chocolate, similarly to how its bowels and skin are already packed with tetrodotoxin.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 5 hours ago









                      Renan

                      65.3k20 gold badges152 silver badges318 bronze badges




                      65.3k20 gold badges152 silver badges318 bronze badges










                      answered 6 hours ago









                      L.DutchL.Dutch

                      109k33 gold badges256 silver badges524 bronze badges




                      109k33 gold badges256 silver badges524 bronze badges














                      • $begingroup$
                        I've never heard a puffer fish called a tetrodon ball fish... even google doesn't seem to have heard of that form!
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Starish Prime, fixed
                        $endgroup$
                        – L.Dutch
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @StarfishPrime they're also known as puffers! Or pufferfish.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Renan
                        5 hours ago
















                      • $begingroup$
                        I've never heard a puffer fish called a tetrodon ball fish... even google doesn't seem to have heard of that form!
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @Starish Prime, fixed
                        $endgroup$
                        – L.Dutch
                        6 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        @StarfishPrime they're also known as puffers! Or pufferfish.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Renan
                        5 hours ago















                      $begingroup$
                      I've never heard a puffer fish called a tetrodon ball fish... even google doesn't seem to have heard of that form!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Starfish Prime
                      6 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      I've never heard a puffer fish called a tetrodon ball fish... even google doesn't seem to have heard of that form!
                      $endgroup$
                      – Starfish Prime
                      6 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      @Starish Prime, fixed
                      $endgroup$
                      – L.Dutch
                      6 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @Starish Prime, fixed
                      $endgroup$
                      – L.Dutch
                      6 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      @StarfishPrime they're also known as puffers! Or pufferfish.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Renan
                      5 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      @StarfishPrime they're also known as puffers! Or pufferfish.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Renan
                      5 hours ago











                      1











                      $begingroup$

                      Since it is already the case that goats have been modified to produce spider silk in their milk, it would not be a big stretch to have them make the chemical components of chocolate.



                      However, since there are between 300 and 500 different chemicals in chocolate it might be a lot easier just to get chocolate from the plants we already do. Probably to get non-lethal and pleasant tasting chocolate would take a lot of "nudging, poking, probing, twiddling, fiddling, and messing around."






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$










                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        "You can take the chocolate out of the goat, but you can't take the goat out of the chocolate"
                        $endgroup$
                        – Morris The Cat
                        7 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        Even getting it from the plants is difficult, because there are all sorts of weird phase changes and ageing effects during the production process. Part of the reason why there are so many different subtle (and not so subtle) flavours of stuff that all claim to be chocolate (some more convincingly than others).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago
















                      1











                      $begingroup$

                      Since it is already the case that goats have been modified to produce spider silk in their milk, it would not be a big stretch to have them make the chemical components of chocolate.



                      However, since there are between 300 and 500 different chemicals in chocolate it might be a lot easier just to get chocolate from the plants we already do. Probably to get non-lethal and pleasant tasting chocolate would take a lot of "nudging, poking, probing, twiddling, fiddling, and messing around."






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$










                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        "You can take the chocolate out of the goat, but you can't take the goat out of the chocolate"
                        $endgroup$
                        – Morris The Cat
                        7 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        Even getting it from the plants is difficult, because there are all sorts of weird phase changes and ageing effects during the production process. Part of the reason why there are so many different subtle (and not so subtle) flavours of stuff that all claim to be chocolate (some more convincingly than others).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago














                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      Since it is already the case that goats have been modified to produce spider silk in their milk, it would not be a big stretch to have them make the chemical components of chocolate.



                      However, since there are between 300 and 500 different chemicals in chocolate it might be a lot easier just to get chocolate from the plants we already do. Probably to get non-lethal and pleasant tasting chocolate would take a lot of "nudging, poking, probing, twiddling, fiddling, and messing around."






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Since it is already the case that goats have been modified to produce spider silk in their milk, it would not be a big stretch to have them make the chemical components of chocolate.



                      However, since there are between 300 and 500 different chemicals in chocolate it might be a lot easier just to get chocolate from the plants we already do. Probably to get non-lethal and pleasant tasting chocolate would take a lot of "nudging, poking, probing, twiddling, fiddling, and messing around."







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 7 hours ago









                      puppetsockpuppetsock

                      3,5294 silver badges19 bronze badges




                      3,5294 silver badges19 bronze badges










                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        "You can take the chocolate out of the goat, but you can't take the goat out of the chocolate"
                        $endgroup$
                        – Morris The Cat
                        7 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        Even getting it from the plants is difficult, because there are all sorts of weird phase changes and ageing effects during the production process. Part of the reason why there are so many different subtle (and not so subtle) flavours of stuff that all claim to be chocolate (some more convincingly than others).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago













                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        "You can take the chocolate out of the goat, but you can't take the goat out of the chocolate"
                        $endgroup$
                        – Morris The Cat
                        7 hours ago










                      • $begingroup$
                        Even getting it from the plants is difficult, because there are all sorts of weird phase changes and ageing effects during the production process. Part of the reason why there are so many different subtle (and not so subtle) flavours of stuff that all claim to be chocolate (some more convincingly than others).
                        $endgroup$
                        – Starfish Prime
                        6 hours ago








                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      "You can take the chocolate out of the goat, but you can't take the goat out of the chocolate"
                      $endgroup$
                      – Morris The Cat
                      7 hours ago




                      $begingroup$
                      "You can take the chocolate out of the goat, but you can't take the goat out of the chocolate"
                      $endgroup$
                      – Morris The Cat
                      7 hours ago












                      $begingroup$
                      Even getting it from the plants is difficult, because there are all sorts of weird phase changes and ageing effects during the production process. Part of the reason why there are so many different subtle (and not so subtle) flavours of stuff that all claim to be chocolate (some more convincingly than others).
                      $endgroup$
                      – Starfish Prime
                      6 hours ago





                      $begingroup$
                      Even getting it from the plants is difficult, because there are all sorts of weird phase changes and ageing effects during the production process. Part of the reason why there are so many different subtle (and not so subtle) flavours of stuff that all claim to be chocolate (some more convincingly than others).
                      $endgroup$
                      – Starfish Prime
                      6 hours ago


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153512%2fwould-it-be-possible-to-have-a-gmo-that-produces-chocolate%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                      Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                      Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)