Does optical correction give a more aesthetic look to the SBI logo?How to convert my logo into white on a black background without distortion?How to create this soft look around the logo?Why do some logos look dated? How does design age?Why does my logo look pixelatedShould I give a client more logo options after refusing the initial designs?Why does my logo from Logomaker look bad?How many logo variation is too many?How to make a complex logo look goodDoes my logo look like a Worry Stone?Why does the rotating ring optical illusion work?How can I make this logo look more obviously like an icing bag and a crown?
(algebraic topology) question about the cellular approximation theorem
Why does Hellboy file down his horns?
Too many spies!
Why is dry soil hydrophobic? Bad gardener paradox
Why use null function instead of == []
Absconding a company after 1st day of joining
Ragged justification of captions depending on odd/even page
Won 50K! Now what should I do with it
What exactly is the Tension force?
Book or series about stones and a magician named Gwydion
Published paper containing well-known results
School House Points (Python + SQLite)
Why are Japanese translated subtitles non-conversational?
Is a public company able to check out who owns its shares in very detailed format?
Confused about 誘われて (Sasowarete)
What are some symbols representing peasants/oppressed persons fighting back?
Adding a vertical line at the right end of the horizontal line in frac
Are L-functions uniquely determined by their values at negative integers?
Why is "dark" an adverb in this sentence?
How would you write do the dialogues of two characters talking in a chat room?
What impact would a dragon the size of Asia have on the environment?
How to determine port and starboard on a rotating wheel space station?
How to fit a linear model in the Bayesian way in Mathematica?
Remove intersect line for one circle using venndiagram2sets
Does optical correction give a more aesthetic look to the SBI logo?
How to convert my logo into white on a black background without distortion?How to create this soft look around the logo?Why do some logos look dated? How does design age?Why does my logo look pixelatedShould I give a client more logo options after refusing the initial designs?Why does my logo from Logomaker look bad?How many logo variation is too many?How to make a complex logo look goodDoes my logo look like a Worry Stone?Why does the rotating ring optical illusion work?How can I make this logo look more obviously like an icing bag and a crown?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
The design in question here is an official variation of the SBI logo:

Now, I've always felt that the main circular icon feels a bit smaller, and must be corrected by enlarging it a bit to make it look more aesthetic and balanced from both sides. I've seen many many famous designs that do things like this, just to make it look better, so I guess there must be some reason behind it.
Am I correct and if yes, what is the reason for this?
logo icon design-principles optical-illusion
add a comment |
The design in question here is an official variation of the SBI logo:

Now, I've always felt that the main circular icon feels a bit smaller, and must be corrected by enlarging it a bit to make it look more aesthetic and balanced from both sides. I've seen many many famous designs that do things like this, just to make it look better, so I guess there must be some reason behind it.
Am I correct and if yes, what is the reason for this?
logo icon design-principles optical-illusion
add a comment |
The design in question here is an official variation of the SBI logo:

Now, I've always felt that the main circular icon feels a bit smaller, and must be corrected by enlarging it a bit to make it look more aesthetic and balanced from both sides. I've seen many many famous designs that do things like this, just to make it look better, so I guess there must be some reason behind it.
Am I correct and if yes, what is the reason for this?
logo icon design-principles optical-illusion
The design in question here is an official variation of the SBI logo:

Now, I've always felt that the main circular icon feels a bit smaller, and must be corrected by enlarging it a bit to make it look more aesthetic and balanced from both sides. I've seen many many famous designs that do things like this, just to make it look better, so I guess there must be some reason behind it.
Am I correct and if yes, what is the reason for this?
logo icon design-principles optical-illusion
logo icon design-principles optical-illusion
edited 2 hours ago
Wrzlprmft♦
11.4k4 gold badges46 silver badges79 bronze badges
11.4k4 gold badges46 silver badges79 bronze badges
asked 17 hours ago
VikasVikas
6586 silver badges17 bronze badges
6586 silver badges17 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
In typography, this is called an overshoot. And has been a very long-standing practice.
In typeface design, the overshoot of a round or pointed letter (like O or A) is the degree to which it extends higher or lower than a comparably sized "flat" letter (like X or H), to achieve an optical effect of being the same size; it compensates for inaccuracies in human visual perception.
Yes, it makes a difference. Human visual perception is not always a mathematical constant.
So I guess since that is a government bank, they didn't focus much on design?
– Vikas
16 hours ago
@Vikas Well, there's no "law" for good design. And "tweaking" can always happen regardless of the size of the corporation or nature of the business. Some designers see things other's don't or learn more and realize an adjustment would help.
– Scott
16 hours ago
But this is our top bank. I guess their designers are at least better than me. They must have known this.
– Vikas
13 hours ago
@Vikas It seems ironic that the State bank of India uses European script for its logo at all. (And not being Indian, I have no idea what the circular thing is supposed to represent - a keyhole maybe)?
– alephzero
2 hours ago
add a comment |
At first glance, this may look like a typographical overshoot, i.e., round bases and tops of letters extending a bit further up- or downwards than flat ones – which accounts for an optical illusion. However, if you look closely, you will note that the logo and the S already feature an overshoot in the original. Also, in the corrected version, the overshoot of the S is not increased, which would be the logical conclusion if you consider the original overshoot too small. Therefore, there must be more to it.
The reason why the logo needs even more overshoot is that it is darker than the text and on top has a hue similar to the background. This results in an optical illusion similar to the one requiring the typographical overshoot, which the additional overshoot compensates. See this question for a similar problem. For illustration, here is the original with a white logo, thus eliminating the need for this additional overshoot:

add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "174"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126608%2fdoes-optical-correction-give-a-more-aesthetic-look-to-the-sbi-logo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
In typography, this is called an overshoot. And has been a very long-standing practice.
In typeface design, the overshoot of a round or pointed letter (like O or A) is the degree to which it extends higher or lower than a comparably sized "flat" letter (like X or H), to achieve an optical effect of being the same size; it compensates for inaccuracies in human visual perception.
Yes, it makes a difference. Human visual perception is not always a mathematical constant.
So I guess since that is a government bank, they didn't focus much on design?
– Vikas
16 hours ago
@Vikas Well, there's no "law" for good design. And "tweaking" can always happen regardless of the size of the corporation or nature of the business. Some designers see things other's don't or learn more and realize an adjustment would help.
– Scott
16 hours ago
But this is our top bank. I guess their designers are at least better than me. They must have known this.
– Vikas
13 hours ago
@Vikas It seems ironic that the State bank of India uses European script for its logo at all. (And not being Indian, I have no idea what the circular thing is supposed to represent - a keyhole maybe)?
– alephzero
2 hours ago
add a comment |
In typography, this is called an overshoot. And has been a very long-standing practice.
In typeface design, the overshoot of a round or pointed letter (like O or A) is the degree to which it extends higher or lower than a comparably sized "flat" letter (like X or H), to achieve an optical effect of being the same size; it compensates for inaccuracies in human visual perception.
Yes, it makes a difference. Human visual perception is not always a mathematical constant.
So I guess since that is a government bank, they didn't focus much on design?
– Vikas
16 hours ago
@Vikas Well, there's no "law" for good design. And "tweaking" can always happen regardless of the size of the corporation or nature of the business. Some designers see things other's don't or learn more and realize an adjustment would help.
– Scott
16 hours ago
But this is our top bank. I guess their designers are at least better than me. They must have known this.
– Vikas
13 hours ago
@Vikas It seems ironic that the State bank of India uses European script for its logo at all. (And not being Indian, I have no idea what the circular thing is supposed to represent - a keyhole maybe)?
– alephzero
2 hours ago
add a comment |
In typography, this is called an overshoot. And has been a very long-standing practice.
In typeface design, the overshoot of a round or pointed letter (like O or A) is the degree to which it extends higher or lower than a comparably sized "flat" letter (like X or H), to achieve an optical effect of being the same size; it compensates for inaccuracies in human visual perception.
Yes, it makes a difference. Human visual perception is not always a mathematical constant.
In typography, this is called an overshoot. And has been a very long-standing practice.
In typeface design, the overshoot of a round or pointed letter (like O or A) is the degree to which it extends higher or lower than a comparably sized "flat" letter (like X or H), to achieve an optical effect of being the same size; it compensates for inaccuracies in human visual perception.
Yes, it makes a difference. Human visual perception is not always a mathematical constant.
edited 16 hours ago
answered 17 hours ago
ScottScott
155k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
155k14 gold badges214 silver badges433 bronze badges
So I guess since that is a government bank, they didn't focus much on design?
– Vikas
16 hours ago
@Vikas Well, there's no "law" for good design. And "tweaking" can always happen regardless of the size of the corporation or nature of the business. Some designers see things other's don't or learn more and realize an adjustment would help.
– Scott
16 hours ago
But this is our top bank. I guess their designers are at least better than me. They must have known this.
– Vikas
13 hours ago
@Vikas It seems ironic that the State bank of India uses European script for its logo at all. (And not being Indian, I have no idea what the circular thing is supposed to represent - a keyhole maybe)?
– alephzero
2 hours ago
add a comment |
So I guess since that is a government bank, they didn't focus much on design?
– Vikas
16 hours ago
@Vikas Well, there's no "law" for good design. And "tweaking" can always happen regardless of the size of the corporation or nature of the business. Some designers see things other's don't or learn more and realize an adjustment would help.
– Scott
16 hours ago
But this is our top bank. I guess their designers are at least better than me. They must have known this.
– Vikas
13 hours ago
@Vikas It seems ironic that the State bank of India uses European script for its logo at all. (And not being Indian, I have no idea what the circular thing is supposed to represent - a keyhole maybe)?
– alephzero
2 hours ago
So I guess since that is a government bank, they didn't focus much on design?
– Vikas
16 hours ago
So I guess since that is a government bank, they didn't focus much on design?
– Vikas
16 hours ago
@Vikas Well, there's no "law" for good design. And "tweaking" can always happen regardless of the size of the corporation or nature of the business. Some designers see things other's don't or learn more and realize an adjustment would help.
– Scott
16 hours ago
@Vikas Well, there's no "law" for good design. And "tweaking" can always happen regardless of the size of the corporation or nature of the business. Some designers see things other's don't or learn more and realize an adjustment would help.
– Scott
16 hours ago
But this is our top bank. I guess their designers are at least better than me. They must have known this.
– Vikas
13 hours ago
But this is our top bank. I guess their designers are at least better than me. They must have known this.
– Vikas
13 hours ago
@Vikas It seems ironic that the State bank of India uses European script for its logo at all. (And not being Indian, I have no idea what the circular thing is supposed to represent - a keyhole maybe)?
– alephzero
2 hours ago
@Vikas It seems ironic that the State bank of India uses European script for its logo at all. (And not being Indian, I have no idea what the circular thing is supposed to represent - a keyhole maybe)?
– alephzero
2 hours ago
add a comment |
At first glance, this may look like a typographical overshoot, i.e., round bases and tops of letters extending a bit further up- or downwards than flat ones – which accounts for an optical illusion. However, if you look closely, you will note that the logo and the S already feature an overshoot in the original. Also, in the corrected version, the overshoot of the S is not increased, which would be the logical conclusion if you consider the original overshoot too small. Therefore, there must be more to it.
The reason why the logo needs even more overshoot is that it is darker than the text and on top has a hue similar to the background. This results in an optical illusion similar to the one requiring the typographical overshoot, which the additional overshoot compensates. See this question for a similar problem. For illustration, here is the original with a white logo, thus eliminating the need for this additional overshoot:

add a comment |
At first glance, this may look like a typographical overshoot, i.e., round bases and tops of letters extending a bit further up- or downwards than flat ones – which accounts for an optical illusion. However, if you look closely, you will note that the logo and the S already feature an overshoot in the original. Also, in the corrected version, the overshoot of the S is not increased, which would be the logical conclusion if you consider the original overshoot too small. Therefore, there must be more to it.
The reason why the logo needs even more overshoot is that it is darker than the text and on top has a hue similar to the background. This results in an optical illusion similar to the one requiring the typographical overshoot, which the additional overshoot compensates. See this question for a similar problem. For illustration, here is the original with a white logo, thus eliminating the need for this additional overshoot:

add a comment |
At first glance, this may look like a typographical overshoot, i.e., round bases and tops of letters extending a bit further up- or downwards than flat ones – which accounts for an optical illusion. However, if you look closely, you will note that the logo and the S already feature an overshoot in the original. Also, in the corrected version, the overshoot of the S is not increased, which would be the logical conclusion if you consider the original overshoot too small. Therefore, there must be more to it.
The reason why the logo needs even more overshoot is that it is darker than the text and on top has a hue similar to the background. This results in an optical illusion similar to the one requiring the typographical overshoot, which the additional overshoot compensates. See this question for a similar problem. For illustration, here is the original with a white logo, thus eliminating the need for this additional overshoot:

At first glance, this may look like a typographical overshoot, i.e., round bases and tops of letters extending a bit further up- or downwards than flat ones – which accounts for an optical illusion. However, if you look closely, you will note that the logo and the S already feature an overshoot in the original. Also, in the corrected version, the overshoot of the S is not increased, which would be the logical conclusion if you consider the original overshoot too small. Therefore, there must be more to it.
The reason why the logo needs even more overshoot is that it is darker than the text and on top has a hue similar to the background. This results in an optical illusion similar to the one requiring the typographical overshoot, which the additional overshoot compensates. See this question for a similar problem. For illustration, here is the original with a white logo, thus eliminating the need for this additional overshoot:

answered 2 hours ago
Wrzlprmft♦Wrzlprmft
11.4k4 gold badges46 silver badges79 bronze badges
11.4k4 gold badges46 silver badges79 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Graphic Design Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126608%2fdoes-optical-correction-give-a-more-aesthetic-look-to-the-sbi-logo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown