Why exactly was Star Wars: Clone Wars (2003) excluded from Disney Canon?What was the origin of Asajj Ventress from the “Star Wars: The Clone Wars” TV show?Is Star Wars: The Clone Wars animated TV series canon?Star Wars Clone Wars Military RanksWhy did Disney cancel “Star Wars: The Clone Wars” TV series?Is Star Wars: Clone Wars (Tartakovsky) still part of the official Star Wars canon?Now that the Star Wars franchise belongs to Disney, who owns the rights to Star Wars the Clone Wars?Is there an explanation for the inconsistency in the Mandalorians between the Clone Wars and Rebels?Why are tracked vehicles rarely used/seen?What does Disney consider to be Star Wars canon?Who is the earliest named character to live in Disney Star Wars canon?
Was adding milk to tea started to reduce employee tea break time?
Why did the Japanese attack the Aleutians at the same time as Midway?
Find values of x so that the matrix is invertible
Measuring mystery distances
Is this floating-point optimization allowed?
What does "Fotze" really mean?
How to check the quality of an audio sample?
Back to the nineties!
Create dashed intersections with labels using pgfplots and tikz
Should you avoid redundant information after dialogue?
What would be the ideal melee weapon made of "Phase Metal"?
If the derivative of a function is square of it then it is constant
TikZ Can I draw an arrow by specifying the initial point, direction, and length?
Why does the autopilot disengage even when it does not receive pilot input?
Would letting a multiclass character rebuild their character to be single-classed be game-breaking?
Find the wrong number in the given series: 6, 12, 21, 36, 56, 81?
To accent or not to accent in Greek
nginx serves wrong domain site. It doenst shows default site if no configuration applies
Rearranging the formula
Did any of the founding fathers anticipate Lysander Spooner's criticism of the constitution?
How can I legally visit the United States Minor Outlying Islands in the Pacific?
Hacker Rank : Electronics Shop
How does one stock fund's charge of 1% more in operating expenses than another fund lower expected returns by 10%?
Why limit to revolvers?
Why exactly was Star Wars: Clone Wars (2003) excluded from Disney Canon?
What was the origin of Asajj Ventress from the “Star Wars: The Clone Wars” TV show?Is Star Wars: The Clone Wars animated TV series canon?Star Wars Clone Wars Military RanksWhy did Disney cancel “Star Wars: The Clone Wars” TV series?Is Star Wars: Clone Wars (Tartakovsky) still part of the official Star Wars canon?Now that the Star Wars franchise belongs to Disney, who owns the rights to Star Wars the Clone Wars?Is there an explanation for the inconsistency in the Mandalorians between the Clone Wars and Rebels?Why are tracked vehicles rarely used/seen?What does Disney consider to be Star Wars canon?Who is the earliest named character to live in Disney Star Wars canon?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I've often wondered why Tartakovsky's Clone Wars mini-series/pilot was deliberately excluded from Star Wars canon. While there are some minor continuity issues, as the wikipedia page mentions, it's not that difficult to come up with ideas to patch up those problems in the story. Star Wars has often been a fairly evolving mythos, so it's not totally unprecedented.
Tartakovsky's Clone Wars was pretty sweet, but it was also ultra-violent, as Samurai Jack often was. Which makes me wonder if Disney didn't like it.
Are there any official details about why it was excluded? Was there some single individual who made the call?
Or was it always the plan even from inception to exclude Clone Wars?
star-wars clone-wars
add a comment |
I've often wondered why Tartakovsky's Clone Wars mini-series/pilot was deliberately excluded from Star Wars canon. While there are some minor continuity issues, as the wikipedia page mentions, it's not that difficult to come up with ideas to patch up those problems in the story. Star Wars has often been a fairly evolving mythos, so it's not totally unprecedented.
Tartakovsky's Clone Wars was pretty sweet, but it was also ultra-violent, as Samurai Jack often was. Which makes me wonder if Disney didn't like it.
Are there any official details about why it was excluded? Was there some single individual who made the call?
Or was it always the plan even from inception to exclude Clone Wars?
star-wars clone-wars
2
Maybe redundancy with the other one having a super similar name? They don’t sell this show on iTunes anymore.
– Stormblessed
8 hours ago
add a comment |
I've often wondered why Tartakovsky's Clone Wars mini-series/pilot was deliberately excluded from Star Wars canon. While there are some minor continuity issues, as the wikipedia page mentions, it's not that difficult to come up with ideas to patch up those problems in the story. Star Wars has often been a fairly evolving mythos, so it's not totally unprecedented.
Tartakovsky's Clone Wars was pretty sweet, but it was also ultra-violent, as Samurai Jack often was. Which makes me wonder if Disney didn't like it.
Are there any official details about why it was excluded? Was there some single individual who made the call?
Or was it always the plan even from inception to exclude Clone Wars?
star-wars clone-wars
I've often wondered why Tartakovsky's Clone Wars mini-series/pilot was deliberately excluded from Star Wars canon. While there are some minor continuity issues, as the wikipedia page mentions, it's not that difficult to come up with ideas to patch up those problems in the story. Star Wars has often been a fairly evolving mythos, so it's not totally unprecedented.
Tartakovsky's Clone Wars was pretty sweet, but it was also ultra-violent, as Samurai Jack often was. Which makes me wonder if Disney didn't like it.
Are there any official details about why it was excluded? Was there some single individual who made the call?
Or was it always the plan even from inception to exclude Clone Wars?
star-wars clone-wars
star-wars clone-wars
edited 8 hours ago
Mark Rogers
asked 8 hours ago
Mark RogersMark Rogers
15.2k13 gold badges89 silver badges143 bronze badges
15.2k13 gold badges89 silver badges143 bronze badges
2
Maybe redundancy with the other one having a super similar name? They don’t sell this show on iTunes anymore.
– Stormblessed
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Maybe redundancy with the other one having a super similar name? They don’t sell this show on iTunes anymore.
– Stormblessed
8 hours ago
2
2
Maybe redundancy with the other one having a super similar name? They don’t sell this show on iTunes anymore.
– Stormblessed
8 hours ago
Maybe redundancy with the other one having a super similar name? They don’t sell this show on iTunes anymore.
– Stormblessed
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Dave Filoni, showrunner of Star Wars: the Clone Wars discussed this in an interview. In short, the Jedi were wildly overpowered and the entire thing had such glaring canonical errors that it was easier to simply remove it from the official canon than try to explain why it was so different to the rest of the accepted stories.
Filoni: The way George explained it to me going in was that THE CLONE WARS micro-series was really an experiment to see what kind of audience there was for Star Wars in an animated form. There have been droids and Ewoks, but that was a long time ago. So he brought out THE CLONE WARS micro-series, and it was super action-packed and exciting and really short installments. And it proved that people wanted to see STAR WARS in a lot of different mediums. So when we into doing this, I think that, now that George is done with the prequels, he wanted to reestablish the rules a little bit more, like "Mace Windu can't take out hundreds of battle droids by himself, otherwise the arena on Geonosis would've been a wipeout; [The jedi] would've won, and there be no Clone Wars. Those are exciting installments, but we don't tie directly into them; we tie more directly into the film that preceded us, ATTACK OF THE CLONES, and the one that comes after us, REVENGE OF THE SITH. We take cues from [Tartakovsky's series]. I definitely pay a big homage to them in some of the design look of it. Anakin wears an outfit that was definitely inspired by what we saw in the other CLONE WARS. But there's no direct link-up.
Mr. Beaks Enlists in THE CLONE WARS with Director Dave Filoni!!
Tartakovsky himself was told that it was to "clean" the canon.
I think George is brilliant. And I think he just wants to ... I don't
know the reasoning, exactly. But from any sense that I can make out of
it, he just wants it to be clean. But there's so much fiction that's
out with "Star Wars," I don't think it would matter."
Tartakovsky Talks About The State Of His SW: Clone Wars Micro-Series
2
Which wouldn't be so much of an issue if Lucas had had a better sense of scale to begin with and hadn't made all the armies too small. A hundred droids for each of the ten thousand Jedi in the galaxy would be 1 million, which is nothing compared to the tens of millions of soldiers in World War II on one planet, and is about one for every million of the trillion residents of Coruscant.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
2
@Adamant - Scaling is a big problem in Star Wars. There's supposedly 25000 Star Destroyers in the galaxy and yet only 27 are present at the decisive battle against the Rebellion
– Valorum
7 hours ago
2
I swear that George Lucas just took the total number of soldiers in WWII, turned them into clones and droids, and spread them out over about 10^(24) times the volume.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215946%2fwhy-exactly-was-star-wars-clone-wars-2003-excluded-from-disney-canon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Dave Filoni, showrunner of Star Wars: the Clone Wars discussed this in an interview. In short, the Jedi were wildly overpowered and the entire thing had such glaring canonical errors that it was easier to simply remove it from the official canon than try to explain why it was so different to the rest of the accepted stories.
Filoni: The way George explained it to me going in was that THE CLONE WARS micro-series was really an experiment to see what kind of audience there was for Star Wars in an animated form. There have been droids and Ewoks, but that was a long time ago. So he brought out THE CLONE WARS micro-series, and it was super action-packed and exciting and really short installments. And it proved that people wanted to see STAR WARS in a lot of different mediums. So when we into doing this, I think that, now that George is done with the prequels, he wanted to reestablish the rules a little bit more, like "Mace Windu can't take out hundreds of battle droids by himself, otherwise the arena on Geonosis would've been a wipeout; [The jedi] would've won, and there be no Clone Wars. Those are exciting installments, but we don't tie directly into them; we tie more directly into the film that preceded us, ATTACK OF THE CLONES, and the one that comes after us, REVENGE OF THE SITH. We take cues from [Tartakovsky's series]. I definitely pay a big homage to them in some of the design look of it. Anakin wears an outfit that was definitely inspired by what we saw in the other CLONE WARS. But there's no direct link-up.
Mr. Beaks Enlists in THE CLONE WARS with Director Dave Filoni!!
Tartakovsky himself was told that it was to "clean" the canon.
I think George is brilliant. And I think he just wants to ... I don't
know the reasoning, exactly. But from any sense that I can make out of
it, he just wants it to be clean. But there's so much fiction that's
out with "Star Wars," I don't think it would matter."
Tartakovsky Talks About The State Of His SW: Clone Wars Micro-Series
2
Which wouldn't be so much of an issue if Lucas had had a better sense of scale to begin with and hadn't made all the armies too small. A hundred droids for each of the ten thousand Jedi in the galaxy would be 1 million, which is nothing compared to the tens of millions of soldiers in World War II on one planet, and is about one for every million of the trillion residents of Coruscant.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
2
@Adamant - Scaling is a big problem in Star Wars. There's supposedly 25000 Star Destroyers in the galaxy and yet only 27 are present at the decisive battle against the Rebellion
– Valorum
7 hours ago
2
I swear that George Lucas just took the total number of soldiers in WWII, turned them into clones and droids, and spread them out over about 10^(24) times the volume.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Dave Filoni, showrunner of Star Wars: the Clone Wars discussed this in an interview. In short, the Jedi were wildly overpowered and the entire thing had such glaring canonical errors that it was easier to simply remove it from the official canon than try to explain why it was so different to the rest of the accepted stories.
Filoni: The way George explained it to me going in was that THE CLONE WARS micro-series was really an experiment to see what kind of audience there was for Star Wars in an animated form. There have been droids and Ewoks, but that was a long time ago. So he brought out THE CLONE WARS micro-series, and it was super action-packed and exciting and really short installments. And it proved that people wanted to see STAR WARS in a lot of different mediums. So when we into doing this, I think that, now that George is done with the prequels, he wanted to reestablish the rules a little bit more, like "Mace Windu can't take out hundreds of battle droids by himself, otherwise the arena on Geonosis would've been a wipeout; [The jedi] would've won, and there be no Clone Wars. Those are exciting installments, but we don't tie directly into them; we tie more directly into the film that preceded us, ATTACK OF THE CLONES, and the one that comes after us, REVENGE OF THE SITH. We take cues from [Tartakovsky's series]. I definitely pay a big homage to them in some of the design look of it. Anakin wears an outfit that was definitely inspired by what we saw in the other CLONE WARS. But there's no direct link-up.
Mr. Beaks Enlists in THE CLONE WARS with Director Dave Filoni!!
Tartakovsky himself was told that it was to "clean" the canon.
I think George is brilliant. And I think he just wants to ... I don't
know the reasoning, exactly. But from any sense that I can make out of
it, he just wants it to be clean. But there's so much fiction that's
out with "Star Wars," I don't think it would matter."
Tartakovsky Talks About The State Of His SW: Clone Wars Micro-Series
2
Which wouldn't be so much of an issue if Lucas had had a better sense of scale to begin with and hadn't made all the armies too small. A hundred droids for each of the ten thousand Jedi in the galaxy would be 1 million, which is nothing compared to the tens of millions of soldiers in World War II on one planet, and is about one for every million of the trillion residents of Coruscant.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
2
@Adamant - Scaling is a big problem in Star Wars. There's supposedly 25000 Star Destroyers in the galaxy and yet only 27 are present at the decisive battle against the Rebellion
– Valorum
7 hours ago
2
I swear that George Lucas just took the total number of soldiers in WWII, turned them into clones and droids, and spread them out over about 10^(24) times the volume.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Dave Filoni, showrunner of Star Wars: the Clone Wars discussed this in an interview. In short, the Jedi were wildly overpowered and the entire thing had such glaring canonical errors that it was easier to simply remove it from the official canon than try to explain why it was so different to the rest of the accepted stories.
Filoni: The way George explained it to me going in was that THE CLONE WARS micro-series was really an experiment to see what kind of audience there was for Star Wars in an animated form. There have been droids and Ewoks, but that was a long time ago. So he brought out THE CLONE WARS micro-series, and it was super action-packed and exciting and really short installments. And it proved that people wanted to see STAR WARS in a lot of different mediums. So when we into doing this, I think that, now that George is done with the prequels, he wanted to reestablish the rules a little bit more, like "Mace Windu can't take out hundreds of battle droids by himself, otherwise the arena on Geonosis would've been a wipeout; [The jedi] would've won, and there be no Clone Wars. Those are exciting installments, but we don't tie directly into them; we tie more directly into the film that preceded us, ATTACK OF THE CLONES, and the one that comes after us, REVENGE OF THE SITH. We take cues from [Tartakovsky's series]. I definitely pay a big homage to them in some of the design look of it. Anakin wears an outfit that was definitely inspired by what we saw in the other CLONE WARS. But there's no direct link-up.
Mr. Beaks Enlists in THE CLONE WARS with Director Dave Filoni!!
Tartakovsky himself was told that it was to "clean" the canon.
I think George is brilliant. And I think he just wants to ... I don't
know the reasoning, exactly. But from any sense that I can make out of
it, he just wants it to be clean. But there's so much fiction that's
out with "Star Wars," I don't think it would matter."
Tartakovsky Talks About The State Of His SW: Clone Wars Micro-Series
Dave Filoni, showrunner of Star Wars: the Clone Wars discussed this in an interview. In short, the Jedi were wildly overpowered and the entire thing had such glaring canonical errors that it was easier to simply remove it from the official canon than try to explain why it was so different to the rest of the accepted stories.
Filoni: The way George explained it to me going in was that THE CLONE WARS micro-series was really an experiment to see what kind of audience there was for Star Wars in an animated form. There have been droids and Ewoks, but that was a long time ago. So he brought out THE CLONE WARS micro-series, and it was super action-packed and exciting and really short installments. And it proved that people wanted to see STAR WARS in a lot of different mediums. So when we into doing this, I think that, now that George is done with the prequels, he wanted to reestablish the rules a little bit more, like "Mace Windu can't take out hundreds of battle droids by himself, otherwise the arena on Geonosis would've been a wipeout; [The jedi] would've won, and there be no Clone Wars. Those are exciting installments, but we don't tie directly into them; we tie more directly into the film that preceded us, ATTACK OF THE CLONES, and the one that comes after us, REVENGE OF THE SITH. We take cues from [Tartakovsky's series]. I definitely pay a big homage to them in some of the design look of it. Anakin wears an outfit that was definitely inspired by what we saw in the other CLONE WARS. But there's no direct link-up.
Mr. Beaks Enlists in THE CLONE WARS with Director Dave Filoni!!
Tartakovsky himself was told that it was to "clean" the canon.
I think George is brilliant. And I think he just wants to ... I don't
know the reasoning, exactly. But from any sense that I can make out of
it, he just wants it to be clean. But there's so much fiction that's
out with "Star Wars," I don't think it would matter."
Tartakovsky Talks About The State Of His SW: Clone Wars Micro-Series
answered 8 hours ago
ValorumValorum
432k122 gold badges3185 silver badges3358 bronze badges
432k122 gold badges3185 silver badges3358 bronze badges
2
Which wouldn't be so much of an issue if Lucas had had a better sense of scale to begin with and hadn't made all the armies too small. A hundred droids for each of the ten thousand Jedi in the galaxy would be 1 million, which is nothing compared to the tens of millions of soldiers in World War II on one planet, and is about one for every million of the trillion residents of Coruscant.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
2
@Adamant - Scaling is a big problem in Star Wars. There's supposedly 25000 Star Destroyers in the galaxy and yet only 27 are present at the decisive battle against the Rebellion
– Valorum
7 hours ago
2
I swear that George Lucas just took the total number of soldiers in WWII, turned them into clones and droids, and spread them out over about 10^(24) times the volume.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Which wouldn't be so much of an issue if Lucas had had a better sense of scale to begin with and hadn't made all the armies too small. A hundred droids for each of the ten thousand Jedi in the galaxy would be 1 million, which is nothing compared to the tens of millions of soldiers in World War II on one planet, and is about one for every million of the trillion residents of Coruscant.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
2
@Adamant - Scaling is a big problem in Star Wars. There's supposedly 25000 Star Destroyers in the galaxy and yet only 27 are present at the decisive battle against the Rebellion
– Valorum
7 hours ago
2
I swear that George Lucas just took the total number of soldiers in WWII, turned them into clones and droids, and spread them out over about 10^(24) times the volume.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
2
2
Which wouldn't be so much of an issue if Lucas had had a better sense of scale to begin with and hadn't made all the armies too small. A hundred droids for each of the ten thousand Jedi in the galaxy would be 1 million, which is nothing compared to the tens of millions of soldiers in World War II on one planet, and is about one for every million of the trillion residents of Coruscant.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
Which wouldn't be so much of an issue if Lucas had had a better sense of scale to begin with and hadn't made all the armies too small. A hundred droids for each of the ten thousand Jedi in the galaxy would be 1 million, which is nothing compared to the tens of millions of soldiers in World War II on one planet, and is about one for every million of the trillion residents of Coruscant.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
2
2
@Adamant - Scaling is a big problem in Star Wars. There's supposedly 25000 Star Destroyers in the galaxy and yet only 27 are present at the decisive battle against the Rebellion
– Valorum
7 hours ago
@Adamant - Scaling is a big problem in Star Wars. There's supposedly 25000 Star Destroyers in the galaxy and yet only 27 are present at the decisive battle against the Rebellion
– Valorum
7 hours ago
2
2
I swear that George Lucas just took the total number of soldiers in WWII, turned them into clones and droids, and spread them out over about 10^(24) times the volume.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
I swear that George Lucas just took the total number of soldiers in WWII, turned them into clones and droids, and spread them out over about 10^(24) times the volume.
– Adamant
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f215946%2fwhy-exactly-was-star-wars-clone-wars-2003-excluded-from-disney-canon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Maybe redundancy with the other one having a super similar name? They don’t sell this show on iTunes anymore.
– Stormblessed
8 hours ago