How can I portray a character with no fear of death, without them sounding utterly bored?Will changing a protagonist into an antagonist alienate readers?Advice on portraying my protagonist's anger without making her insufferableInternal dialogue with a quick thinking first person narratorHow to deal with seriously ill characters and what type of illness should I give themHow to portray a passively arrogant character?“The more fleshed out the character is, the more the reader will care about him”. Always true?Does a character without huge weaknesses need improvement?Can I keep my characters in my book or should I just give up with them?“Calm” vs Adventurous Main ProtagonistHow do I portray irrational anger in first person?
I was given someone else's visa, stamped in my passport
Break down the phrase "shitsurei shinakereba naranaindesu"
Turning an Abelian Group into a Vector Space
Moscow SVO airport, how to avoid scam taxis without pre-booking?
In Endgame, wouldn't Stark have remembered Hulk busting out of the stairwell?
Why haven't the British protested Brexit as ardently like Hong Kongers protest?
What is this "opened" cube called?
What are the in-game differences between WoW Classic and the original 2006 Version
New coworker has strange workplace requirements - how should I deal with them?
Was it illegal to blaspheme God in Antioch in 360.-410.?
How can I improve my formal definitions
Create a list of snaking numbers under 50,000
'spazieren' - walking in a silly and affected manner?
Padding a column of lists
What was Captain Marvel supposed to do once she reached her destination?
Storing milk for long periods of time
What is the following VRP?
Should a TA point out a professor's mistake while attending their lecture?
How to animate a function plot
What is the motivation behind designing a control stick that does not move?
Cheap oscilloscope showing 16 MHz square wave
Can copper pour be used as an alternative to large traces?
Welche normative Autorität hat der Duden? / What's the normative authority of the Duden?
Ask one verbal question to figure out who is blind and who is mute among three persons
How can I portray a character with no fear of death, without them sounding utterly bored?
Will changing a protagonist into an antagonist alienate readers?Advice on portraying my protagonist's anger without making her insufferableInternal dialogue with a quick thinking first person narratorHow to deal with seriously ill characters and what type of illness should I give themHow to portray a passively arrogant character?“The more fleshed out the character is, the more the reader will care about him”. Always true?Does a character without huge weaknesses need improvement?Can I keep my characters in my book or should I just give up with them?“Calm” vs Adventurous Main ProtagonistHow do I portray irrational anger in first person?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Imagine a fantasy hero with a 'time reset' ability like the protagonists of Groundhog Day or Edge of Tomorrow: they can 'rewind time' up to a few hours, resetting their own physical state and the rest of reality to whatever it/they were doing previously while preserving their memory of events, allowing the future to re-play in the same or different ways. Unlike those films, however, the character is not locked into reliving the same day, this is just an ability that's always there for them in life. In my particular idea the character doesn't need to die in order to trigger the effect, they can do so 'at will', but the same question applies in both cases:
How can I avoid having this character sound like a psychopath completely bored all the time?!
It's completely reasonable that a person living with such an ability would develop a complete dispassion for death and personal injury. Yes, they can still be hurt both physically and mentally, and pain is still painful, but all but the most abrupt injuries are equally unthreatening. Similarly the character doesn't really need to fear the short-term consequences of their actions - they can just reset away from any bad experiences.
These are personality traits that I'm finding hard to express without the character coming off as having no real investment in the situation. Obviously it would be very easy for such a person to actually turn into a pretty unsavoury character, but assuming that they have enough moral Plot Armour to remain a vaguely likeable protagonist, how can I give their thoughts enough depth?
For example, my character stumbles upon a thug holding up a store. She would have almost no hesitation in diving in to try and save the day: any disparity in strength or situation is a fairly minor concern; her only real danger is if she gets shot specifically in the head, otherwise she can just replay the situation as many times as it takes to get her desired outcome. But whenever I try to write an internal monologue of such a situation, it either seems like she's not thinking at all (which is certainly not the case, in fact she's thinking furiously), or that she's just completely dispassionate and unfeeling. I want the monologue to still feel adrenaline-fuelled and emotional, it would just be emotional in a subtly different way to what a 'normal person' would be feeling in such a situation, and I'm struggling to get a handle on exactly how.
characters fantasy grammatical-person
New contributor
|
show 2 more comments
Imagine a fantasy hero with a 'time reset' ability like the protagonists of Groundhog Day or Edge of Tomorrow: they can 'rewind time' up to a few hours, resetting their own physical state and the rest of reality to whatever it/they were doing previously while preserving their memory of events, allowing the future to re-play in the same or different ways. Unlike those films, however, the character is not locked into reliving the same day, this is just an ability that's always there for them in life. In my particular idea the character doesn't need to die in order to trigger the effect, they can do so 'at will', but the same question applies in both cases:
How can I avoid having this character sound like a psychopath completely bored all the time?!
It's completely reasonable that a person living with such an ability would develop a complete dispassion for death and personal injury. Yes, they can still be hurt both physically and mentally, and pain is still painful, but all but the most abrupt injuries are equally unthreatening. Similarly the character doesn't really need to fear the short-term consequences of their actions - they can just reset away from any bad experiences.
These are personality traits that I'm finding hard to express without the character coming off as having no real investment in the situation. Obviously it would be very easy for such a person to actually turn into a pretty unsavoury character, but assuming that they have enough moral Plot Armour to remain a vaguely likeable protagonist, how can I give their thoughts enough depth?
For example, my character stumbles upon a thug holding up a store. She would have almost no hesitation in diving in to try and save the day: any disparity in strength or situation is a fairly minor concern; her only real danger is if she gets shot specifically in the head, otherwise she can just replay the situation as many times as it takes to get her desired outcome. But whenever I try to write an internal monologue of such a situation, it either seems like she's not thinking at all (which is certainly not the case, in fact she's thinking furiously), or that she's just completely dispassionate and unfeeling. I want the monologue to still feel adrenaline-fuelled and emotional, it would just be emotional in a subtly different way to what a 'normal person' would be feeling in such a situation, and I'm struggling to get a handle on exactly how.
characters fantasy grammatical-person
New contributor
"her only real danger is if she gets shot specifically in the head" so I assume from this damage to her head would prevent her using her time manipulation and cause death?
– BKlassen
9 hours ago
More that if she were knocked unconscious before being able to reset and then died before regaining consciousness. It only takes a moment's concentration to trigger a reset, and I imagine over time it would become a fairly strong fear/pain reflex.
– Stephen
9 hours ago
2
There are tons of examples of the characters with special powers that make them hard or impossible to kill (Wolverine etc) and while they might have some mental issues, they are most definitely not psychopaths. You may check out Immortal Life Is Cheap TV trope.
– Alexander
8 hours ago
Ok, I see you changed it to "utterly bored". It is also a common trope for invincible characters (more often villains) to stay perfectly nonchalant when threatened with death. Are you looking to avoid that trope?
– Alexander
6 hours ago
Yes, because they make for very shallow, unrelatable characters. Amadeus below makes a great comparison: James Bond in Die Another Day is nonchalant to the point of basically not existing as a character beyond his already-well-formed stereotype.
– Stephen
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Imagine a fantasy hero with a 'time reset' ability like the protagonists of Groundhog Day or Edge of Tomorrow: they can 'rewind time' up to a few hours, resetting their own physical state and the rest of reality to whatever it/they were doing previously while preserving their memory of events, allowing the future to re-play in the same or different ways. Unlike those films, however, the character is not locked into reliving the same day, this is just an ability that's always there for them in life. In my particular idea the character doesn't need to die in order to trigger the effect, they can do so 'at will', but the same question applies in both cases:
How can I avoid having this character sound like a psychopath completely bored all the time?!
It's completely reasonable that a person living with such an ability would develop a complete dispassion for death and personal injury. Yes, they can still be hurt both physically and mentally, and pain is still painful, but all but the most abrupt injuries are equally unthreatening. Similarly the character doesn't really need to fear the short-term consequences of their actions - they can just reset away from any bad experiences.
These are personality traits that I'm finding hard to express without the character coming off as having no real investment in the situation. Obviously it would be very easy for such a person to actually turn into a pretty unsavoury character, but assuming that they have enough moral Plot Armour to remain a vaguely likeable protagonist, how can I give their thoughts enough depth?
For example, my character stumbles upon a thug holding up a store. She would have almost no hesitation in diving in to try and save the day: any disparity in strength or situation is a fairly minor concern; her only real danger is if she gets shot specifically in the head, otherwise she can just replay the situation as many times as it takes to get her desired outcome. But whenever I try to write an internal monologue of such a situation, it either seems like she's not thinking at all (which is certainly not the case, in fact she's thinking furiously), or that she's just completely dispassionate and unfeeling. I want the monologue to still feel adrenaline-fuelled and emotional, it would just be emotional in a subtly different way to what a 'normal person' would be feeling in such a situation, and I'm struggling to get a handle on exactly how.
characters fantasy grammatical-person
New contributor
Imagine a fantasy hero with a 'time reset' ability like the protagonists of Groundhog Day or Edge of Tomorrow: they can 'rewind time' up to a few hours, resetting their own physical state and the rest of reality to whatever it/they were doing previously while preserving their memory of events, allowing the future to re-play in the same or different ways. Unlike those films, however, the character is not locked into reliving the same day, this is just an ability that's always there for them in life. In my particular idea the character doesn't need to die in order to trigger the effect, they can do so 'at will', but the same question applies in both cases:
How can I avoid having this character sound like a psychopath completely bored all the time?!
It's completely reasonable that a person living with such an ability would develop a complete dispassion for death and personal injury. Yes, they can still be hurt both physically and mentally, and pain is still painful, but all but the most abrupt injuries are equally unthreatening. Similarly the character doesn't really need to fear the short-term consequences of their actions - they can just reset away from any bad experiences.
These are personality traits that I'm finding hard to express without the character coming off as having no real investment in the situation. Obviously it would be very easy for such a person to actually turn into a pretty unsavoury character, but assuming that they have enough moral Plot Armour to remain a vaguely likeable protagonist, how can I give their thoughts enough depth?
For example, my character stumbles upon a thug holding up a store. She would have almost no hesitation in diving in to try and save the day: any disparity in strength or situation is a fairly minor concern; her only real danger is if she gets shot specifically in the head, otherwise she can just replay the situation as many times as it takes to get her desired outcome. But whenever I try to write an internal monologue of such a situation, it either seems like she's not thinking at all (which is certainly not the case, in fact she's thinking furiously), or that she's just completely dispassionate and unfeeling. I want the monologue to still feel adrenaline-fuelled and emotional, it would just be emotional in a subtly different way to what a 'normal person' would be feeling in such a situation, and I'm struggling to get a handle on exactly how.
characters fantasy grammatical-person
characters fantasy grammatical-person
New contributor
New contributor
edited 7 hours ago
Stephen
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
StephenStephen
1313 bronze badges
1313 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
"her only real danger is if she gets shot specifically in the head" so I assume from this damage to her head would prevent her using her time manipulation and cause death?
– BKlassen
9 hours ago
More that if she were knocked unconscious before being able to reset and then died before regaining consciousness. It only takes a moment's concentration to trigger a reset, and I imagine over time it would become a fairly strong fear/pain reflex.
– Stephen
9 hours ago
2
There are tons of examples of the characters with special powers that make them hard or impossible to kill (Wolverine etc) and while they might have some mental issues, they are most definitely not psychopaths. You may check out Immortal Life Is Cheap TV trope.
– Alexander
8 hours ago
Ok, I see you changed it to "utterly bored". It is also a common trope for invincible characters (more often villains) to stay perfectly nonchalant when threatened with death. Are you looking to avoid that trope?
– Alexander
6 hours ago
Yes, because they make for very shallow, unrelatable characters. Amadeus below makes a great comparison: James Bond in Die Another Day is nonchalant to the point of basically not existing as a character beyond his already-well-formed stereotype.
– Stephen
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
"her only real danger is if she gets shot specifically in the head" so I assume from this damage to her head would prevent her using her time manipulation and cause death?
– BKlassen
9 hours ago
More that if she were knocked unconscious before being able to reset and then died before regaining consciousness. It only takes a moment's concentration to trigger a reset, and I imagine over time it would become a fairly strong fear/pain reflex.
– Stephen
9 hours ago
2
There are tons of examples of the characters with special powers that make them hard or impossible to kill (Wolverine etc) and while they might have some mental issues, they are most definitely not psychopaths. You may check out Immortal Life Is Cheap TV trope.
– Alexander
8 hours ago
Ok, I see you changed it to "utterly bored". It is also a common trope for invincible characters (more often villains) to stay perfectly nonchalant when threatened with death. Are you looking to avoid that trope?
– Alexander
6 hours ago
Yes, because they make for very shallow, unrelatable characters. Amadeus below makes a great comparison: James Bond in Die Another Day is nonchalant to the point of basically not existing as a character beyond his already-well-formed stereotype.
– Stephen
6 hours ago
"her only real danger is if she gets shot specifically in the head" so I assume from this damage to her head would prevent her using her time manipulation and cause death?
– BKlassen
9 hours ago
"her only real danger is if she gets shot specifically in the head" so I assume from this damage to her head would prevent her using her time manipulation and cause death?
– BKlassen
9 hours ago
More that if she were knocked unconscious before being able to reset and then died before regaining consciousness. It only takes a moment's concentration to trigger a reset, and I imagine over time it would become a fairly strong fear/pain reflex.
– Stephen
9 hours ago
More that if she were knocked unconscious before being able to reset and then died before regaining consciousness. It only takes a moment's concentration to trigger a reset, and I imagine over time it would become a fairly strong fear/pain reflex.
– Stephen
9 hours ago
2
2
There are tons of examples of the characters with special powers that make them hard or impossible to kill (Wolverine etc) and while they might have some mental issues, they are most definitely not psychopaths. You may check out Immortal Life Is Cheap TV trope.
– Alexander
8 hours ago
There are tons of examples of the characters with special powers that make them hard or impossible to kill (Wolverine etc) and while they might have some mental issues, they are most definitely not psychopaths. You may check out Immortal Life Is Cheap TV trope.
– Alexander
8 hours ago
Ok, I see you changed it to "utterly bored". It is also a common trope for invincible characters (more often villains) to stay perfectly nonchalant when threatened with death. Are you looking to avoid that trope?
– Alexander
6 hours ago
Ok, I see you changed it to "utterly bored". It is also a common trope for invincible characters (more often villains) to stay perfectly nonchalant when threatened with death. Are you looking to avoid that trope?
– Alexander
6 hours ago
Yes, because they make for very shallow, unrelatable characters. Amadeus below makes a great comparison: James Bond in Die Another Day is nonchalant to the point of basically not existing as a character beyond his already-well-formed stereotype.
– Stephen
6 hours ago
Yes, because they make for very shallow, unrelatable characters. Amadeus below makes a great comparison: James Bond in Die Another Day is nonchalant to the point of basically not existing as a character beyond his already-well-formed stereotype.
– Stephen
6 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Psychopathy is characterised by persistent antisocial behaviour, impaired empathy and remorse. (source: Wikipedia)
Your character needs to care for others.
Watching a person get hurt, let alone killed, isn't easy. It should never become easy. That's something your character would respond to. That is what distinguishes them from a psychopath.
Now, how does your character respond? That's an interesting question. They can rewind time, sure. But can they protect everyone from harm, always? Do they accept some casualties? How do they decide when to keep on trying for a better result, and when this is as good as it gets?
Moral quandaries of this kind are interesting. Concern for others is a positive trait, it makes the reader see the character in a favourable light.
Your character doesn't fear their own death - that's hardly a new thing in literature. Look for example at Athos from The Three Musketeers. In his case it's depression rather than an actual ability not to get killed, but the end result is the same: he takes extraordinary risks without batting an eyelash. He's all but trying to get himself killed. At the same time he is a well-loved character - because he is principled, noble in his actions, and a true friend. That is, he is a good person in relation to others, even if he is not very good to himself. Which seems similar enough to what you're trying to describe.
add a comment |
What I suspect you're really asking here is, "How do I make scenes involving this character feel adrenaline-filled and emotional?" To answer that question, you have to realize that portraying this character's emotions is only half the problem; the other half is the lack of stakes.
It's one thing for your character to want to prevent injury or death to another person, which is a noble goal. Making the reader feel the same rush the character does is another thing entirely; they'll be spending the scene thinking, "Well, if it goes wrong, just reverse it and try again." Whether or not your character succeeds is essentially a foregone conclusion; eventually, she will. What you need to do is give both your character and the reader a reason to want her to succeed, on this try.
Maybe this ability can only be used a certain number of times per day? Maybe the fewer changes she makes the second time around, the harder it is to make changes on the third? When there's very little at stake, there's very little reason for the reader to care what happens. Even if your character doesn't need to fear her own death, she needs to be risking something when she jumps into a situation.
add a comment |
I would challenge her lack of fear, if her ability can't trigger automatically as stated in comments she should still have some fear of death, things can happen around her that she isn't aware of and there are many things that can happen before she can react to save herself.
We see in Edge of Tomorrow that Tom Cruise's character becomes extremely cavalier about danger because as soon as he dies he wakes up at the start of the day again and there is nothing he needs to do to trigger this. This is not the case for your character, your character is required to consciously reset time and she must still worry about whether she will be able to react. In the situation you described having a gunman hold up a clerk, she may worry there is a second gunman, she may worry she'll blink or look away and the gunman shoots her then.
She may be able to reset time but she still lived through whatever event she reset to avoid. This could lead to her having post traumatic stress from all sorts of events that never happened (have fun explaining that to a therapist).
Lastly, as an author you may know the exact extent of her power but does she? Without having died she would have no way to know if she could reset after that.
add a comment |
007 doesn't come off as a psychopath, but is singularly unafraid of death. In one movie he dives off a cliff, without a parachute, to intercept and land on the wings of a private plane. He's always got zero fear of heights, fights, guns, speed, whatever. Fearlessness is pretty much his central trait.
As Galastel says, you have the wrong notion of "psychopathy", psychopathy isn't about fearlessness, they lack empathy, sympathy, and remorse. Other people are just objects to them, obstacles or tools, they just are incapable of caring about the pain or fear or emotions of other people. (There is evidence now that this is due to actually faulty wiring in their brain, which would make it uncorrectable, not addressable by any therapy or surgery, and quite literally physically impossible for them to care.)
It is possible to be fearless without being a psychopath, other emotions can be intact. That includes love, sympathy, maternal feelings for children, etc.
I'd make it clear, on her first jump, that these feelings are present. For example, she comes across a scene in which a little girl on a bicycle has been struck and killed by car, driven by a young woman, that is now distraught and being arrested. She is asking everybody in the crowd, "When did it happen? How long ago? What time?"
She gets her answer, forty-five minutes. She jumps back in time, abandons whatever she was doing and sprints to the scene like her life depends on it, into the intersection, runs in front of the car to intercept bike and kid, snatches the little girl off the bike, as tires are screeching and the still moving bike, sans kid, is struck, tumbled under the screeching car and rolled into a mangled steel spaghetti.
There was no reason for her to make this time jump, abandon her task and sprint for the intersection other than to save the life of the little girl. You've proved her bona fides as a fearless hero and altruist, she used her time travel power to save a life.
Don't tell us what she is thinking or what she believes, devise a scene to show us what she believes. She is fearless, and will sacrifice her own interests to fearlessly prevent the death of an innocent child.
I'm feeling that "psychopath" is actually the wrong word to describe what I'm getting, but "007 level of dispassion" hits the nail on the head. The utter banality and triviality of, for instance, the late Piers Brosnan films, where the protagonist almost seems bored by the whole thing, is what I'm trying to avoid.
– Stephen
7 hours ago
Well, I hope my answer helps you with that anyway. Fearless of injury or death because you know you can save yourself does not have to imply, in any way, dispassion about your goals, other people, or lack of love for parents, siblings, friends, coworkers, or romantic love for a partner. Or strangers, for that matter. It doesn't even mean she is completely fearless: She doesn't fear death for herself, she can fear the imminent death of a child or a loved one.
– Amadeus
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "166"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Stephen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47711%2fhow-can-i-portray-a-character-with-no-fear-of-death-without-them-sounding-utter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Psychopathy is characterised by persistent antisocial behaviour, impaired empathy and remorse. (source: Wikipedia)
Your character needs to care for others.
Watching a person get hurt, let alone killed, isn't easy. It should never become easy. That's something your character would respond to. That is what distinguishes them from a psychopath.
Now, how does your character respond? That's an interesting question. They can rewind time, sure. But can they protect everyone from harm, always? Do they accept some casualties? How do they decide when to keep on trying for a better result, and when this is as good as it gets?
Moral quandaries of this kind are interesting. Concern for others is a positive trait, it makes the reader see the character in a favourable light.
Your character doesn't fear their own death - that's hardly a new thing in literature. Look for example at Athos from The Three Musketeers. In his case it's depression rather than an actual ability not to get killed, but the end result is the same: he takes extraordinary risks without batting an eyelash. He's all but trying to get himself killed. At the same time he is a well-loved character - because he is principled, noble in his actions, and a true friend. That is, he is a good person in relation to others, even if he is not very good to himself. Which seems similar enough to what you're trying to describe.
add a comment |
Psychopathy is characterised by persistent antisocial behaviour, impaired empathy and remorse. (source: Wikipedia)
Your character needs to care for others.
Watching a person get hurt, let alone killed, isn't easy. It should never become easy. That's something your character would respond to. That is what distinguishes them from a psychopath.
Now, how does your character respond? That's an interesting question. They can rewind time, sure. But can they protect everyone from harm, always? Do they accept some casualties? How do they decide when to keep on trying for a better result, and when this is as good as it gets?
Moral quandaries of this kind are interesting. Concern for others is a positive trait, it makes the reader see the character in a favourable light.
Your character doesn't fear their own death - that's hardly a new thing in literature. Look for example at Athos from The Three Musketeers. In his case it's depression rather than an actual ability not to get killed, but the end result is the same: he takes extraordinary risks without batting an eyelash. He's all but trying to get himself killed. At the same time he is a well-loved character - because he is principled, noble in his actions, and a true friend. That is, he is a good person in relation to others, even if he is not very good to himself. Which seems similar enough to what you're trying to describe.
add a comment |
Psychopathy is characterised by persistent antisocial behaviour, impaired empathy and remorse. (source: Wikipedia)
Your character needs to care for others.
Watching a person get hurt, let alone killed, isn't easy. It should never become easy. That's something your character would respond to. That is what distinguishes them from a psychopath.
Now, how does your character respond? That's an interesting question. They can rewind time, sure. But can they protect everyone from harm, always? Do they accept some casualties? How do they decide when to keep on trying for a better result, and when this is as good as it gets?
Moral quandaries of this kind are interesting. Concern for others is a positive trait, it makes the reader see the character in a favourable light.
Your character doesn't fear their own death - that's hardly a new thing in literature. Look for example at Athos from The Three Musketeers. In his case it's depression rather than an actual ability not to get killed, but the end result is the same: he takes extraordinary risks without batting an eyelash. He's all but trying to get himself killed. At the same time he is a well-loved character - because he is principled, noble in his actions, and a true friend. That is, he is a good person in relation to others, even if he is not very good to himself. Which seems similar enough to what you're trying to describe.
Psychopathy is characterised by persistent antisocial behaviour, impaired empathy and remorse. (source: Wikipedia)
Your character needs to care for others.
Watching a person get hurt, let alone killed, isn't easy. It should never become easy. That's something your character would respond to. That is what distinguishes them from a psychopath.
Now, how does your character respond? That's an interesting question. They can rewind time, sure. But can they protect everyone from harm, always? Do they accept some casualties? How do they decide when to keep on trying for a better result, and when this is as good as it gets?
Moral quandaries of this kind are interesting. Concern for others is a positive trait, it makes the reader see the character in a favourable light.
Your character doesn't fear their own death - that's hardly a new thing in literature. Look for example at Athos from The Three Musketeers. In his case it's depression rather than an actual ability not to get killed, but the end result is the same: he takes extraordinary risks without batting an eyelash. He's all but trying to get himself killed. At the same time he is a well-loved character - because he is principled, noble in his actions, and a true friend. That is, he is a good person in relation to others, even if he is not very good to himself. Which seems similar enough to what you're trying to describe.
answered 9 hours ago
GalastelGalastel
47.4k8 gold badges149 silver badges267 bronze badges
47.4k8 gold badges149 silver badges267 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
What I suspect you're really asking here is, "How do I make scenes involving this character feel adrenaline-filled and emotional?" To answer that question, you have to realize that portraying this character's emotions is only half the problem; the other half is the lack of stakes.
It's one thing for your character to want to prevent injury or death to another person, which is a noble goal. Making the reader feel the same rush the character does is another thing entirely; they'll be spending the scene thinking, "Well, if it goes wrong, just reverse it and try again." Whether or not your character succeeds is essentially a foregone conclusion; eventually, she will. What you need to do is give both your character and the reader a reason to want her to succeed, on this try.
Maybe this ability can only be used a certain number of times per day? Maybe the fewer changes she makes the second time around, the harder it is to make changes on the third? When there's very little at stake, there's very little reason for the reader to care what happens. Even if your character doesn't need to fear her own death, she needs to be risking something when she jumps into a situation.
add a comment |
What I suspect you're really asking here is, "How do I make scenes involving this character feel adrenaline-filled and emotional?" To answer that question, you have to realize that portraying this character's emotions is only half the problem; the other half is the lack of stakes.
It's one thing for your character to want to prevent injury or death to another person, which is a noble goal. Making the reader feel the same rush the character does is another thing entirely; they'll be spending the scene thinking, "Well, if it goes wrong, just reverse it and try again." Whether or not your character succeeds is essentially a foregone conclusion; eventually, she will. What you need to do is give both your character and the reader a reason to want her to succeed, on this try.
Maybe this ability can only be used a certain number of times per day? Maybe the fewer changes she makes the second time around, the harder it is to make changes on the third? When there's very little at stake, there's very little reason for the reader to care what happens. Even if your character doesn't need to fear her own death, she needs to be risking something when she jumps into a situation.
add a comment |
What I suspect you're really asking here is, "How do I make scenes involving this character feel adrenaline-filled and emotional?" To answer that question, you have to realize that portraying this character's emotions is only half the problem; the other half is the lack of stakes.
It's one thing for your character to want to prevent injury or death to another person, which is a noble goal. Making the reader feel the same rush the character does is another thing entirely; they'll be spending the scene thinking, "Well, if it goes wrong, just reverse it and try again." Whether or not your character succeeds is essentially a foregone conclusion; eventually, she will. What you need to do is give both your character and the reader a reason to want her to succeed, on this try.
Maybe this ability can only be used a certain number of times per day? Maybe the fewer changes she makes the second time around, the harder it is to make changes on the third? When there's very little at stake, there's very little reason for the reader to care what happens. Even if your character doesn't need to fear her own death, she needs to be risking something when she jumps into a situation.
What I suspect you're really asking here is, "How do I make scenes involving this character feel adrenaline-filled and emotional?" To answer that question, you have to realize that portraying this character's emotions is only half the problem; the other half is the lack of stakes.
It's one thing for your character to want to prevent injury or death to another person, which is a noble goal. Making the reader feel the same rush the character does is another thing entirely; they'll be spending the scene thinking, "Well, if it goes wrong, just reverse it and try again." Whether or not your character succeeds is essentially a foregone conclusion; eventually, she will. What you need to do is give both your character and the reader a reason to want her to succeed, on this try.
Maybe this ability can only be used a certain number of times per day? Maybe the fewer changes she makes the second time around, the harder it is to make changes on the third? When there's very little at stake, there's very little reason for the reader to care what happens. Even if your character doesn't need to fear her own death, she needs to be risking something when she jumps into a situation.
answered 7 hours ago
PlutoThePlanetPlutoThePlanet
4687 bronze badges
4687 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
I would challenge her lack of fear, if her ability can't trigger automatically as stated in comments she should still have some fear of death, things can happen around her that she isn't aware of and there are many things that can happen before she can react to save herself.
We see in Edge of Tomorrow that Tom Cruise's character becomes extremely cavalier about danger because as soon as he dies he wakes up at the start of the day again and there is nothing he needs to do to trigger this. This is not the case for your character, your character is required to consciously reset time and she must still worry about whether she will be able to react. In the situation you described having a gunman hold up a clerk, she may worry there is a second gunman, she may worry she'll blink or look away and the gunman shoots her then.
She may be able to reset time but she still lived through whatever event she reset to avoid. This could lead to her having post traumatic stress from all sorts of events that never happened (have fun explaining that to a therapist).
Lastly, as an author you may know the exact extent of her power but does she? Without having died she would have no way to know if she could reset after that.
add a comment |
I would challenge her lack of fear, if her ability can't trigger automatically as stated in comments she should still have some fear of death, things can happen around her that she isn't aware of and there are many things that can happen before she can react to save herself.
We see in Edge of Tomorrow that Tom Cruise's character becomes extremely cavalier about danger because as soon as he dies he wakes up at the start of the day again and there is nothing he needs to do to trigger this. This is not the case for your character, your character is required to consciously reset time and she must still worry about whether she will be able to react. In the situation you described having a gunman hold up a clerk, she may worry there is a second gunman, she may worry she'll blink or look away and the gunman shoots her then.
She may be able to reset time but she still lived through whatever event she reset to avoid. This could lead to her having post traumatic stress from all sorts of events that never happened (have fun explaining that to a therapist).
Lastly, as an author you may know the exact extent of her power but does she? Without having died she would have no way to know if she could reset after that.
add a comment |
I would challenge her lack of fear, if her ability can't trigger automatically as stated in comments she should still have some fear of death, things can happen around her that she isn't aware of and there are many things that can happen before she can react to save herself.
We see in Edge of Tomorrow that Tom Cruise's character becomes extremely cavalier about danger because as soon as he dies he wakes up at the start of the day again and there is nothing he needs to do to trigger this. This is not the case for your character, your character is required to consciously reset time and she must still worry about whether she will be able to react. In the situation you described having a gunman hold up a clerk, she may worry there is a second gunman, she may worry she'll blink or look away and the gunman shoots her then.
She may be able to reset time but she still lived through whatever event she reset to avoid. This could lead to her having post traumatic stress from all sorts of events that never happened (have fun explaining that to a therapist).
Lastly, as an author you may know the exact extent of her power but does she? Without having died she would have no way to know if she could reset after that.
I would challenge her lack of fear, if her ability can't trigger automatically as stated in comments she should still have some fear of death, things can happen around her that she isn't aware of and there are many things that can happen before she can react to save herself.
We see in Edge of Tomorrow that Tom Cruise's character becomes extremely cavalier about danger because as soon as he dies he wakes up at the start of the day again and there is nothing he needs to do to trigger this. This is not the case for your character, your character is required to consciously reset time and she must still worry about whether she will be able to react. In the situation you described having a gunman hold up a clerk, she may worry there is a second gunman, she may worry she'll blink or look away and the gunman shoots her then.
She may be able to reset time but she still lived through whatever event she reset to avoid. This could lead to her having post traumatic stress from all sorts of events that never happened (have fun explaining that to a therapist).
Lastly, as an author you may know the exact extent of her power but does she? Without having died she would have no way to know if she could reset after that.
answered 9 hours ago
BKlassenBKlassen
4162 silver badges6 bronze badges
4162 silver badges6 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
007 doesn't come off as a psychopath, but is singularly unafraid of death. In one movie he dives off a cliff, without a parachute, to intercept and land on the wings of a private plane. He's always got zero fear of heights, fights, guns, speed, whatever. Fearlessness is pretty much his central trait.
As Galastel says, you have the wrong notion of "psychopathy", psychopathy isn't about fearlessness, they lack empathy, sympathy, and remorse. Other people are just objects to them, obstacles or tools, they just are incapable of caring about the pain or fear or emotions of other people. (There is evidence now that this is due to actually faulty wiring in their brain, which would make it uncorrectable, not addressable by any therapy or surgery, and quite literally physically impossible for them to care.)
It is possible to be fearless without being a psychopath, other emotions can be intact. That includes love, sympathy, maternal feelings for children, etc.
I'd make it clear, on her first jump, that these feelings are present. For example, she comes across a scene in which a little girl on a bicycle has been struck and killed by car, driven by a young woman, that is now distraught and being arrested. She is asking everybody in the crowd, "When did it happen? How long ago? What time?"
She gets her answer, forty-five minutes. She jumps back in time, abandons whatever she was doing and sprints to the scene like her life depends on it, into the intersection, runs in front of the car to intercept bike and kid, snatches the little girl off the bike, as tires are screeching and the still moving bike, sans kid, is struck, tumbled under the screeching car and rolled into a mangled steel spaghetti.
There was no reason for her to make this time jump, abandon her task and sprint for the intersection other than to save the life of the little girl. You've proved her bona fides as a fearless hero and altruist, she used her time travel power to save a life.
Don't tell us what she is thinking or what she believes, devise a scene to show us what she believes. She is fearless, and will sacrifice her own interests to fearlessly prevent the death of an innocent child.
I'm feeling that "psychopath" is actually the wrong word to describe what I'm getting, but "007 level of dispassion" hits the nail on the head. The utter banality and triviality of, for instance, the late Piers Brosnan films, where the protagonist almost seems bored by the whole thing, is what I'm trying to avoid.
– Stephen
7 hours ago
Well, I hope my answer helps you with that anyway. Fearless of injury or death because you know you can save yourself does not have to imply, in any way, dispassion about your goals, other people, or lack of love for parents, siblings, friends, coworkers, or romantic love for a partner. Or strangers, for that matter. It doesn't even mean she is completely fearless: She doesn't fear death for herself, she can fear the imminent death of a child or a loved one.
– Amadeus
5 hours ago
add a comment |
007 doesn't come off as a psychopath, but is singularly unafraid of death. In one movie he dives off a cliff, without a parachute, to intercept and land on the wings of a private plane. He's always got zero fear of heights, fights, guns, speed, whatever. Fearlessness is pretty much his central trait.
As Galastel says, you have the wrong notion of "psychopathy", psychopathy isn't about fearlessness, they lack empathy, sympathy, and remorse. Other people are just objects to them, obstacles or tools, they just are incapable of caring about the pain or fear or emotions of other people. (There is evidence now that this is due to actually faulty wiring in their brain, which would make it uncorrectable, not addressable by any therapy or surgery, and quite literally physically impossible for them to care.)
It is possible to be fearless without being a psychopath, other emotions can be intact. That includes love, sympathy, maternal feelings for children, etc.
I'd make it clear, on her first jump, that these feelings are present. For example, she comes across a scene in which a little girl on a bicycle has been struck and killed by car, driven by a young woman, that is now distraught and being arrested. She is asking everybody in the crowd, "When did it happen? How long ago? What time?"
She gets her answer, forty-five minutes. She jumps back in time, abandons whatever she was doing and sprints to the scene like her life depends on it, into the intersection, runs in front of the car to intercept bike and kid, snatches the little girl off the bike, as tires are screeching and the still moving bike, sans kid, is struck, tumbled under the screeching car and rolled into a mangled steel spaghetti.
There was no reason for her to make this time jump, abandon her task and sprint for the intersection other than to save the life of the little girl. You've proved her bona fides as a fearless hero and altruist, she used her time travel power to save a life.
Don't tell us what she is thinking or what she believes, devise a scene to show us what she believes. She is fearless, and will sacrifice her own interests to fearlessly prevent the death of an innocent child.
I'm feeling that "psychopath" is actually the wrong word to describe what I'm getting, but "007 level of dispassion" hits the nail on the head. The utter banality and triviality of, for instance, the late Piers Brosnan films, where the protagonist almost seems bored by the whole thing, is what I'm trying to avoid.
– Stephen
7 hours ago
Well, I hope my answer helps you with that anyway. Fearless of injury or death because you know you can save yourself does not have to imply, in any way, dispassion about your goals, other people, or lack of love for parents, siblings, friends, coworkers, or romantic love for a partner. Or strangers, for that matter. It doesn't even mean she is completely fearless: She doesn't fear death for herself, she can fear the imminent death of a child or a loved one.
– Amadeus
5 hours ago
add a comment |
007 doesn't come off as a psychopath, but is singularly unafraid of death. In one movie he dives off a cliff, without a parachute, to intercept and land on the wings of a private plane. He's always got zero fear of heights, fights, guns, speed, whatever. Fearlessness is pretty much his central trait.
As Galastel says, you have the wrong notion of "psychopathy", psychopathy isn't about fearlessness, they lack empathy, sympathy, and remorse. Other people are just objects to them, obstacles or tools, they just are incapable of caring about the pain or fear or emotions of other people. (There is evidence now that this is due to actually faulty wiring in their brain, which would make it uncorrectable, not addressable by any therapy or surgery, and quite literally physically impossible for them to care.)
It is possible to be fearless without being a psychopath, other emotions can be intact. That includes love, sympathy, maternal feelings for children, etc.
I'd make it clear, on her first jump, that these feelings are present. For example, she comes across a scene in which a little girl on a bicycle has been struck and killed by car, driven by a young woman, that is now distraught and being arrested. She is asking everybody in the crowd, "When did it happen? How long ago? What time?"
She gets her answer, forty-five minutes. She jumps back in time, abandons whatever she was doing and sprints to the scene like her life depends on it, into the intersection, runs in front of the car to intercept bike and kid, snatches the little girl off the bike, as tires are screeching and the still moving bike, sans kid, is struck, tumbled under the screeching car and rolled into a mangled steel spaghetti.
There was no reason for her to make this time jump, abandon her task and sprint for the intersection other than to save the life of the little girl. You've proved her bona fides as a fearless hero and altruist, she used her time travel power to save a life.
Don't tell us what she is thinking or what she believes, devise a scene to show us what she believes. She is fearless, and will sacrifice her own interests to fearlessly prevent the death of an innocent child.
007 doesn't come off as a psychopath, but is singularly unafraid of death. In one movie he dives off a cliff, without a parachute, to intercept and land on the wings of a private plane. He's always got zero fear of heights, fights, guns, speed, whatever. Fearlessness is pretty much his central trait.
As Galastel says, you have the wrong notion of "psychopathy", psychopathy isn't about fearlessness, they lack empathy, sympathy, and remorse. Other people are just objects to them, obstacles or tools, they just are incapable of caring about the pain or fear or emotions of other people. (There is evidence now that this is due to actually faulty wiring in their brain, which would make it uncorrectable, not addressable by any therapy or surgery, and quite literally physically impossible for them to care.)
It is possible to be fearless without being a psychopath, other emotions can be intact. That includes love, sympathy, maternal feelings for children, etc.
I'd make it clear, on her first jump, that these feelings are present. For example, she comes across a scene in which a little girl on a bicycle has been struck and killed by car, driven by a young woman, that is now distraught and being arrested. She is asking everybody in the crowd, "When did it happen? How long ago? What time?"
She gets her answer, forty-five minutes. She jumps back in time, abandons whatever she was doing and sprints to the scene like her life depends on it, into the intersection, runs in front of the car to intercept bike and kid, snatches the little girl off the bike, as tires are screeching and the still moving bike, sans kid, is struck, tumbled under the screeching car and rolled into a mangled steel spaghetti.
There was no reason for her to make this time jump, abandon her task and sprint for the intersection other than to save the life of the little girl. You've proved her bona fides as a fearless hero and altruist, she used her time travel power to save a life.
Don't tell us what she is thinking or what she believes, devise a scene to show us what she believes. She is fearless, and will sacrifice her own interests to fearlessly prevent the death of an innocent child.
answered 7 hours ago
AmadeusAmadeus
74.5k7 gold badges99 silver badges244 bronze badges
74.5k7 gold badges99 silver badges244 bronze badges
I'm feeling that "psychopath" is actually the wrong word to describe what I'm getting, but "007 level of dispassion" hits the nail on the head. The utter banality and triviality of, for instance, the late Piers Brosnan films, where the protagonist almost seems bored by the whole thing, is what I'm trying to avoid.
– Stephen
7 hours ago
Well, I hope my answer helps you with that anyway. Fearless of injury or death because you know you can save yourself does not have to imply, in any way, dispassion about your goals, other people, or lack of love for parents, siblings, friends, coworkers, or romantic love for a partner. Or strangers, for that matter. It doesn't even mean she is completely fearless: She doesn't fear death for herself, she can fear the imminent death of a child or a loved one.
– Amadeus
5 hours ago
add a comment |
I'm feeling that "psychopath" is actually the wrong word to describe what I'm getting, but "007 level of dispassion" hits the nail on the head. The utter banality and triviality of, for instance, the late Piers Brosnan films, where the protagonist almost seems bored by the whole thing, is what I'm trying to avoid.
– Stephen
7 hours ago
Well, I hope my answer helps you with that anyway. Fearless of injury or death because you know you can save yourself does not have to imply, in any way, dispassion about your goals, other people, or lack of love for parents, siblings, friends, coworkers, or romantic love for a partner. Or strangers, for that matter. It doesn't even mean she is completely fearless: She doesn't fear death for herself, she can fear the imminent death of a child or a loved one.
– Amadeus
5 hours ago
I'm feeling that "psychopath" is actually the wrong word to describe what I'm getting, but "007 level of dispassion" hits the nail on the head. The utter banality and triviality of, for instance, the late Piers Brosnan films, where the protagonist almost seems bored by the whole thing, is what I'm trying to avoid.
– Stephen
7 hours ago
I'm feeling that "psychopath" is actually the wrong word to describe what I'm getting, but "007 level of dispassion" hits the nail on the head. The utter banality and triviality of, for instance, the late Piers Brosnan films, where the protagonist almost seems bored by the whole thing, is what I'm trying to avoid.
– Stephen
7 hours ago
Well, I hope my answer helps you with that anyway. Fearless of injury or death because you know you can save yourself does not have to imply, in any way, dispassion about your goals, other people, or lack of love for parents, siblings, friends, coworkers, or romantic love for a partner. Or strangers, for that matter. It doesn't even mean she is completely fearless: She doesn't fear death for herself, she can fear the imminent death of a child or a loved one.
– Amadeus
5 hours ago
Well, I hope my answer helps you with that anyway. Fearless of injury or death because you know you can save yourself does not have to imply, in any way, dispassion about your goals, other people, or lack of love for parents, siblings, friends, coworkers, or romantic love for a partner. Or strangers, for that matter. It doesn't even mean she is completely fearless: She doesn't fear death for herself, she can fear the imminent death of a child or a loved one.
– Amadeus
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Stephen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Stephen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Stephen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Stephen is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47711%2fhow-can-i-portray-a-character-with-no-fear-of-death-without-them-sounding-utter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
"her only real danger is if she gets shot specifically in the head" so I assume from this damage to her head would prevent her using her time manipulation and cause death?
– BKlassen
9 hours ago
More that if she were knocked unconscious before being able to reset and then died before regaining consciousness. It only takes a moment's concentration to trigger a reset, and I imagine over time it would become a fairly strong fear/pain reflex.
– Stephen
9 hours ago
2
There are tons of examples of the characters with special powers that make them hard or impossible to kill (Wolverine etc) and while they might have some mental issues, they are most definitely not psychopaths. You may check out Immortal Life Is Cheap TV trope.
– Alexander
8 hours ago
Ok, I see you changed it to "utterly bored". It is also a common trope for invincible characters (more often villains) to stay perfectly nonchalant when threatened with death. Are you looking to avoid that trope?
– Alexander
6 hours ago
Yes, because they make for very shallow, unrelatable characters. Amadeus below makes a great comparison: James Bond in Die Another Day is nonchalant to the point of basically not existing as a character beyond his already-well-formed stereotype.
– Stephen
6 hours ago