The weakest link Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraTrapped in my CellarFinding the number of ways of crossing a riverThirty genuine and seventy fake coinsEvaporating coins212 weights of 1 gramMinimum number of tries to find the balance!Lots of Gold Stacks and a Balance Scale30 fake coins out of 99 coins1 Fake Coin among N Amount of coinsWhich is heavier, the heaviest of the light or the lightest of the heavy?

Intern got a job offer for same salary than a long term team member

The weakest link

Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?

What is this word supposed to be?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Putting Ant-Man on house arrest

How to keep bees out of canned beverages?

Co-worker works way more than he should

How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?

Multiple options vs single option UI

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

A Paper Record is What I Hamper

A strange hotel

Israeli soda type drink

How do I prove this combinatorial identity

What is the term for a person whose job is to place products on shelves in stores?

Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?

How much of a wave function must reside inside event horizon for it to be consumed by the black hole?

How to have a sharp product image?

finding a tangent line to a parabola

Multiple fireplaces in an apartment building?

Why do distances seem to matter in the Foundation world?

A faster way to compute the largest prime factor



The weakest link



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraTrapped in my CellarFinding the number of ways of crossing a riverThirty genuine and seventy fake coinsEvaporating coins212 weights of 1 gramMinimum number of tries to find the balance!Lots of Gold Stacks and a Balance Scale30 fake coins out of 99 coins1 Fake Coin among N Amount of coinsWhich is heavier, the heaviest of the light or the lightest of the heavy?










7












$begingroup$


I've gotten this riddle and have been struggling with solving it:



Suppose you have 20 stones which have different weights [0 ... n] . You have no way of measuring the weight of any stone individually, instead you can only measure them by putting 10 on each side of a balance. After doing this you see which "group" of stones is heavier. You can do this only 10 times in total. You can also switch the stones from either side to the other as much as you want between the measurements.



Your task is to find a stone for which you can be certain is not the lightest of them all.



All the stones are marked, so you always know which is which. Their appearance or anything similar does not help you with to determine their weight, the only way you can do it is by putting it on the balance.










share|improve this question









New contributor




podloga123 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    7












    $begingroup$


    I've gotten this riddle and have been struggling with solving it:



    Suppose you have 20 stones which have different weights [0 ... n] . You have no way of measuring the weight of any stone individually, instead you can only measure them by putting 10 on each side of a balance. After doing this you see which "group" of stones is heavier. You can do this only 10 times in total. You can also switch the stones from either side to the other as much as you want between the measurements.



    Your task is to find a stone for which you can be certain is not the lightest of them all.



    All the stones are marked, so you always know which is which. Their appearance or anything similar does not help you with to determine their weight, the only way you can do it is by putting it on the balance.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    podloga123 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      7












      7








      7





      $begingroup$


      I've gotten this riddle and have been struggling with solving it:



      Suppose you have 20 stones which have different weights [0 ... n] . You have no way of measuring the weight of any stone individually, instead you can only measure them by putting 10 on each side of a balance. After doing this you see which "group" of stones is heavier. You can do this only 10 times in total. You can also switch the stones from either side to the other as much as you want between the measurements.



      Your task is to find a stone for which you can be certain is not the lightest of them all.



      All the stones are marked, so you always know which is which. Their appearance or anything similar does not help you with to determine their weight, the only way you can do it is by putting it on the balance.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      podloga123 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I've gotten this riddle and have been struggling with solving it:



      Suppose you have 20 stones which have different weights [0 ... n] . You have no way of measuring the weight of any stone individually, instead you can only measure them by putting 10 on each side of a balance. After doing this you see which "group" of stones is heavier. You can do this only 10 times in total. You can also switch the stones from either side to the other as much as you want between the measurements.



      Your task is to find a stone for which you can be certain is not the lightest of them all.



      All the stones are marked, so you always know which is which. Their appearance or anything similar does not help you with to determine their weight, the only way you can do it is by putting it on the balance.







      mathematics






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      podloga123 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      podloga123 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      Brandon_J

      3,873447




      3,873447






      New contributor




      podloga123 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 3 hours ago









      podloga123podloga123

      361




      361




      New contributor




      podloga123 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      podloga123 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      podloga123 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$


          Measure 10 and 10.

          In each subsequent weighing you change one of the originals of one side for one of the originals of the other side.

          At some point, the balance turns around.

          The stone that you have put on the side that has come down is not the lightest, because the other is lighter than that.

          If at the tenth weighing the sides have not been turned around, the only original stone left on the side that is below is not the lightest.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
            $endgroup$
            – Brandon_J
            2 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
            $endgroup$
            – Jaap Scherphuis
            2 hours ago


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Here's how to do it:



          Step one:




          make a measurement, and take note of which side is heavier.




          Then,




          Switch two stones. If the scale tips differently than before, then the stone that you switched to the side that tipped is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.




          If the scale does not tip differently, then




          switch again.




          Eventually, the scale will tip differently. If it does not do so after 10 trials,




          then the remaining stone on the tipped-to side that has not yet been switched is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.




          and you have your answer!






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "559"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            podloga123 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83188%2fthe-weakest-link%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6












            $begingroup$


            Measure 10 and 10.

            In each subsequent weighing you change one of the originals of one side for one of the originals of the other side.

            At some point, the balance turns around.

            The stone that you have put on the side that has come down is not the lightest, because the other is lighter than that.

            If at the tenth weighing the sides have not been turned around, the only original stone left on the side that is below is not the lightest.







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
              $endgroup$
              – Jaap Scherphuis
              2 hours ago















            6












            $begingroup$


            Measure 10 and 10.

            In each subsequent weighing you change one of the originals of one side for one of the originals of the other side.

            At some point, the balance turns around.

            The stone that you have put on the side that has come down is not the lightest, because the other is lighter than that.

            If at the tenth weighing the sides have not been turned around, the only original stone left on the side that is below is not the lightest.







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
              $endgroup$
              – Jaap Scherphuis
              2 hours ago













            6












            6








            6





            $begingroup$


            Measure 10 and 10.

            In each subsequent weighing you change one of the originals of one side for one of the originals of the other side.

            At some point, the balance turns around.

            The stone that you have put on the side that has come down is not the lightest, because the other is lighter than that.

            If at the tenth weighing the sides have not been turned around, the only original stone left on the side that is below is not the lightest.







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




            Measure 10 and 10.

            In each subsequent weighing you change one of the originals of one side for one of the originals of the other side.

            At some point, the balance turns around.

            The stone that you have put on the side that has come down is not the lightest, because the other is lighter than that.

            If at the tenth weighing the sides have not been turned around, the only original stone left on the side that is below is not the lightest.








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            HermesHermes

            4207




            4207











            • $begingroup$
              Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
              $endgroup$
              – Jaap Scherphuis
              2 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
              $endgroup$
              – Brandon_J
              2 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
              $endgroup$
              – Jaap Scherphuis
              2 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
            $endgroup$
            – Brandon_J
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Doh!! You got in a little before me. :) Nice answer; have an upvote.
            $endgroup$
            – Brandon_J
            2 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
            $endgroup$
            – Jaap Scherphuis
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            You didn't explicitly mention this, but it is impossible for the two scales to ever be equal with the given set of stones. But this solution would still work even if the weights were such that the scales could be balanced, provided you know that there is at least one stone that has a unique weight.
            $endgroup$
            – Jaap Scherphuis
            2 hours ago











            2












            $begingroup$

            Here's how to do it:



            Step one:




            make a measurement, and take note of which side is heavier.




            Then,




            Switch two stones. If the scale tips differently than before, then the stone that you switched to the side that tipped is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.




            If the scale does not tip differently, then




            switch again.




            Eventually, the scale will tip differently. If it does not do so after 10 trials,




            then the remaining stone on the tipped-to side that has not yet been switched is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.




            and you have your answer!






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              Here's how to do it:



              Step one:




              make a measurement, and take note of which side is heavier.




              Then,




              Switch two stones. If the scale tips differently than before, then the stone that you switched to the side that tipped is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.




              If the scale does not tip differently, then




              switch again.




              Eventually, the scale will tip differently. If it does not do so after 10 trials,




              then the remaining stone on the tipped-to side that has not yet been switched is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.




              and you have your answer!






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Here's how to do it:



                Step one:




                make a measurement, and take note of which side is heavier.




                Then,




                Switch two stones. If the scale tips differently than before, then the stone that you switched to the side that tipped is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.




                If the scale does not tip differently, then




                switch again.




                Eventually, the scale will tip differently. If it does not do so after 10 trials,




                then the remaining stone on the tipped-to side that has not yet been switched is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.




                and you have your answer!






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Here's how to do it:



                Step one:




                make a measurement, and take note of which side is heavier.




                Then,




                Switch two stones. If the scale tips differently than before, then the stone that you switched to the side that tipped is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.




                If the scale does not tip differently, then




                switch again.




                Eventually, the scale will tip differently. If it does not do so after 10 trials,




                then the remaining stone on the tipped-to side that has not yet been switched is guaranteed to not be the lightest stone.




                and you have your answer!







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 hours ago









                Brandon_JBrandon_J

                3,873447




                3,873447




















                    podloga123 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    podloga123 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    podloga123 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    podloga123 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f83188%2fthe-weakest-link%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                    Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                    Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)