Can someone help me to understand this sentence? “Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes”

Can someone help me to understand this sentence? "Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes"

Watts vs. Volt Amps

GMRES vs Newton-GMRES for Solving nonlinear PDE's

What are the peak hours for public transportation in Paris?

What is the `some` keyword in SwiftUI

What does the term "railed" mean in signal processing?

What can plausibly explain many of my very long and low-tech bridges?

If you had a giant cutting disc 60 miles diameter and rotated it 1000 rps, would the edge be traveling faster than light?

The eyes have it

What's the largest optical telescope mirror ever put in space?

Arriving at the same result with the opposite hypotheses

Investing in a Roth IRA with a Personal Loan?

Does an ice chest packed full of frozen food need ice?

Taxi Services at Didcot

Is open-sourcing the code of a webapp not recommended?

How did they achieve the Gunslinger's shining eye effect in Westworld?

How do governments keep track of their issued currency?

Why would future John risk sending back a T-800 to save his younger self?

How to retract an idea already pitched to an employer?

BGP convergence issue

Can a black dragonborn's acid breath weapon destroy objects?

Are DSA and ECDSA provably secure assuming DL security?

Using "subway" as name for London Underground?

Genetic limitations to learn certain instruments



Can someone help me to understand this sentence? “Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes”







.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















The article link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/alphabet-falls-to-lowest-in-five-months-as-doj-mulls-probe




Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.




I am having hard time understanding this sentence. Especially




"... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes".




What does "appear set to" mean? Is set a verb or a noun? I don't know what kind of grammar it is to put 2 verbs together. Can someone explain it to me?



Also,




agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




I know what each individual word means, but when they combined together, I don't get what the FTC is trying to do with these technology giants. Do they want to supervise these companies or they are trying to split these companies into smaller ones?



One last thing, why does it say "Google parent" instead of "Google's parent"? Is it correct grammar?










share|improve this question




























    2















    The article link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/alphabet-falls-to-lowest-in-five-months-as-doj-mulls-probe




    Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.




    I am having hard time understanding this sentence. Especially




    "... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes".




    What does "appear set to" mean? Is set a verb or a noun? I don't know what kind of grammar it is to put 2 verbs together. Can someone explain it to me?



    Also,




    agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




    I know what each individual word means, but when they combined together, I don't get what the FTC is trying to do with these technology giants. Do they want to supervise these companies or they are trying to split these companies into smaller ones?



    One last thing, why does it say "Google parent" instead of "Google's parent"? Is it correct grammar?










    share|improve this question
























      2












      2








      2


      1






      The article link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/alphabet-falls-to-lowest-in-five-months-as-doj-mulls-probe




      Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.




      I am having hard time understanding this sentence. Especially




      "... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes".




      What does "appear set to" mean? Is set a verb or a noun? I don't know what kind of grammar it is to put 2 verbs together. Can someone explain it to me?



      Also,




      agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




      I know what each individual word means, but when they combined together, I don't get what the FTC is trying to do with these technology giants. Do they want to supervise these companies or they are trying to split these companies into smaller ones?



      One last thing, why does it say "Google parent" instead of "Google's parent"? Is it correct grammar?










      share|improve this question














      The article link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/alphabet-falls-to-lowest-in-five-months-as-doj-mulls-probe




      Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.




      I am having hard time understanding this sentence. Especially




      "... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes".




      What does "appear set to" mean? Is set a verb or a noun? I don't know what kind of grammar it is to put 2 verbs together. Can someone explain it to me?



      Also,




      agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




      I know what each individual word means, but when they combined together, I don't get what the FTC is trying to do with these technology giants. Do they want to supervise these companies or they are trying to split these companies into smaller ones?



      One last thing, why does it say "Google parent" instead of "Google's parent"? Is it correct grammar?







      meaning meaning-in-context word-meaning






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      AlexAlex

      2752412




      2752412




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4















          ... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes.




          "set to" means "prepared to" or "ready to" here, but with a strong implication that they are prepared because it is going to happen. So in effect, "set to" means "highly likely to".



          Consider a parallel construction:




          Jane appears ready to run the race.




          I believe "ready" is a bare initiative form here, and "to run the race" is the object of "ready". Or perhaps it would be better to say that "appears ready" jointly form a phrasal verb, with "to run the race" as its object, and "Jane" as the subject. In that case, "appear set" is also a phrasal verb, with subject "the companies" and object "to undergo U.S. antitrust probes."



          As to




          ... agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




          This means that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) have agreed to divide the task. According to the linked article:




          ... the FTC will oversee antitrust scrutiny into whether Facebook’s practices harm competition in the digital market. Reuters reported that the DOJ has been given jurisdiction over a potential probe of Apple.




          So the split is between The FTC and the DOJ, not a prospective division of the companies into smaller parts.



          "Google parent" is "headlinese" or "journalese". "Google's parent " would be more strictly correct, but in a news story, particularly in a headline or in an opening paragraph (or "lede" as it is known) brevity is of great value, and so two characters and one syllable are saved. This has been used often enough that the form "X parent, Y" for "Y, the parent of X" is in common use, especially in financial journalism. Often the parent company is the one legally involved in some action, but the subsidiary is far better known, as is the case here: Google is much better known than Alphabet. The form "X parent, Y" allows the emphasis to be put on X, the well-known name.



          The question did not ask about it, but some may be confused by the use of "tumbled" in the opening sentence of the article. This means that the stock price fell suddenly and significantly.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

            – Andrew
            6 hours ago












          • @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

            – David Siegel
            6 hours ago











          • Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

            – Lambie
            6 hours ago






          • 1





            @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

            – David Siegel
            5 hours ago


















          0














          Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.



          1) Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc.=those three companies



          2) tumbled = the value of their shares on the stock market fell



          3) appear set to undergo=seem to be ready or prepared for: to be set for



          4) antitrust probes=antitrust is anti-monopoly, basically. The law is the anti-trust law, anti-monopoly law. probes=investigations of them by the Dept. of Justice and the FTC



          5) oversight: that is a function in US government parlance. The FTC has oversight over certain matters, like making sure there are no monopolistic activities. To have oversight=to be in charge of overseeing or making sure organizations or companies behave properly.



          6) to split up oversight=to share it, divide it into two parts; each authority will take half of the work of investigating them. Neither will do the work alone.



          6) In financial news publications, they often do not use the possessive. They just do not. It's a style of financial writing.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "481"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213370%2fcan-someone-help-me-to-understand-this-sentence-apple-inc-tumbled-as-the-comp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4















            ... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes.




            "set to" means "prepared to" or "ready to" here, but with a strong implication that they are prepared because it is going to happen. So in effect, "set to" means "highly likely to".



            Consider a parallel construction:




            Jane appears ready to run the race.




            I believe "ready" is a bare initiative form here, and "to run the race" is the object of "ready". Or perhaps it would be better to say that "appears ready" jointly form a phrasal verb, with "to run the race" as its object, and "Jane" as the subject. In that case, "appear set" is also a phrasal verb, with subject "the companies" and object "to undergo U.S. antitrust probes."



            As to




            ... agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




            This means that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) have agreed to divide the task. According to the linked article:




            ... the FTC will oversee antitrust scrutiny into whether Facebook’s practices harm competition in the digital market. Reuters reported that the DOJ has been given jurisdiction over a potential probe of Apple.




            So the split is between The FTC and the DOJ, not a prospective division of the companies into smaller parts.



            "Google parent" is "headlinese" or "journalese". "Google's parent " would be more strictly correct, but in a news story, particularly in a headline or in an opening paragraph (or "lede" as it is known) brevity is of great value, and so two characters and one syllable are saved. This has been used often enough that the form "X parent, Y" for "Y, the parent of X" is in common use, especially in financial journalism. Often the parent company is the one legally involved in some action, but the subsidiary is far better known, as is the case here: Google is much better known than Alphabet. The form "X parent, Y" allows the emphasis to be put on X, the well-known name.



            The question did not ask about it, but some may be confused by the use of "tumbled" in the opening sentence of the article. This means that the stock price fell suddenly and significantly.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

              – Andrew
              6 hours ago












            • @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

              – David Siegel
              6 hours ago











            • Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago






            • 1





              @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

              – David Siegel
              5 hours ago















            4















            ... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes.




            "set to" means "prepared to" or "ready to" here, but with a strong implication that they are prepared because it is going to happen. So in effect, "set to" means "highly likely to".



            Consider a parallel construction:




            Jane appears ready to run the race.




            I believe "ready" is a bare initiative form here, and "to run the race" is the object of "ready". Or perhaps it would be better to say that "appears ready" jointly form a phrasal verb, with "to run the race" as its object, and "Jane" as the subject. In that case, "appear set" is also a phrasal verb, with subject "the companies" and object "to undergo U.S. antitrust probes."



            As to




            ... agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




            This means that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) have agreed to divide the task. According to the linked article:




            ... the FTC will oversee antitrust scrutiny into whether Facebook’s practices harm competition in the digital market. Reuters reported that the DOJ has been given jurisdiction over a potential probe of Apple.




            So the split is between The FTC and the DOJ, not a prospective division of the companies into smaller parts.



            "Google parent" is "headlinese" or "journalese". "Google's parent " would be more strictly correct, but in a news story, particularly in a headline or in an opening paragraph (or "lede" as it is known) brevity is of great value, and so two characters and one syllable are saved. This has been used often enough that the form "X parent, Y" for "Y, the parent of X" is in common use, especially in financial journalism. Often the parent company is the one legally involved in some action, but the subsidiary is far better known, as is the case here: Google is much better known than Alphabet. The form "X parent, Y" allows the emphasis to be put on X, the well-known name.



            The question did not ask about it, but some may be confused by the use of "tumbled" in the opening sentence of the article. This means that the stock price fell suddenly and significantly.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

              – Andrew
              6 hours ago












            • @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

              – David Siegel
              6 hours ago











            • Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago






            • 1





              @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

              – David Siegel
              5 hours ago













            4












            4








            4








            ... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes.




            "set to" means "prepared to" or "ready to" here, but with a strong implication that they are prepared because it is going to happen. So in effect, "set to" means "highly likely to".



            Consider a parallel construction:




            Jane appears ready to run the race.




            I believe "ready" is a bare initiative form here, and "to run the race" is the object of "ready". Or perhaps it would be better to say that "appears ready" jointly form a phrasal verb, with "to run the race" as its object, and "Jane" as the subject. In that case, "appear set" is also a phrasal verb, with subject "the companies" and object "to undergo U.S. antitrust probes."



            As to




            ... agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




            This means that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) have agreed to divide the task. According to the linked article:




            ... the FTC will oversee antitrust scrutiny into whether Facebook’s practices harm competition in the digital market. Reuters reported that the DOJ has been given jurisdiction over a potential probe of Apple.




            So the split is between The FTC and the DOJ, not a prospective division of the companies into smaller parts.



            "Google parent" is "headlinese" or "journalese". "Google's parent " would be more strictly correct, but in a news story, particularly in a headline or in an opening paragraph (or "lede" as it is known) brevity is of great value, and so two characters and one syllable are saved. This has been used often enough that the form "X parent, Y" for "Y, the parent of X" is in common use, especially in financial journalism. Often the parent company is the one legally involved in some action, but the subsidiary is far better known, as is the case here: Google is much better known than Alphabet. The form "X parent, Y" allows the emphasis to be put on X, the well-known name.



            The question did not ask about it, but some may be confused by the use of "tumbled" in the opening sentence of the article. This means that the stock price fell suddenly and significantly.






            share|improve this answer
















            ... as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes.




            "set to" means "prepared to" or "ready to" here, but with a strong implication that they are prepared because it is going to happen. So in effect, "set to" means "highly likely to".



            Consider a parallel construction:




            Jane appears ready to run the race.




            I believe "ready" is a bare initiative form here, and "to run the race" is the object of "ready". Or perhaps it would be better to say that "appears ready" jointly form a phrasal verb, with "to run the race" as its object, and "Jane" as the subject. In that case, "appear set" is also a phrasal verb, with subject "the companies" and object "to undergo U.S. antitrust probes."



            As to




            ... agreed to split up oversight of technology giants




            This means that the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) have agreed to divide the task. According to the linked article:




            ... the FTC will oversee antitrust scrutiny into whether Facebook’s practices harm competition in the digital market. Reuters reported that the DOJ has been given jurisdiction over a potential probe of Apple.




            So the split is between The FTC and the DOJ, not a prospective division of the companies into smaller parts.



            "Google parent" is "headlinese" or "journalese". "Google's parent " would be more strictly correct, but in a news story, particularly in a headline or in an opening paragraph (or "lede" as it is known) brevity is of great value, and so two characters and one syllable are saved. This has been used often enough that the form "X parent, Y" for "Y, the parent of X" is in common use, especially in financial journalism. Often the parent company is the one legally involved in some action, but the subsidiary is far better known, as is the case here: Google is much better known than Alphabet. The form "X parent, Y" allows the emphasis to be put on X, the well-known name.



            The question did not ask about it, but some may be confused by the use of "tumbled" in the opening sentence of the article. This means that the stock price fell suddenly and significantly.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 6 hours ago

























            answered 6 hours ago









            David SiegelDavid Siegel

            8,3471027




            8,3471027












            • Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

              – Andrew
              6 hours ago












            • @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

              – David Siegel
              6 hours ago











            • Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago






            • 1





              @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

              – David Siegel
              5 hours ago

















            • Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

              – Andrew
              6 hours ago












            • @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

              – David Siegel
              6 hours ago











            • Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

              – Lambie
              6 hours ago






            • 1





              @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

              – David Siegel
              5 hours ago
















            Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

            – Andrew
            6 hours ago






            Good answer. You covered pretty much all the points I was going to make. I would just add that it might have been easier to understand the second sentence if there was some kind of determiner before both "oversight" and "technology giants", e.g. "split up the oversight of these kind of technology giants". Determiners are routinely omitted when they add no useful information to the sentence, and where the grammar allows, but adult English readers know what would most likely have been used.

            – Andrew
            6 hours ago














            @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

            – David Siegel
            6 hours ago





            @Andrew I agree that such a construction would have been clearer. But since many writers, especially journalists, make such omissions often, learners must become able to understand the resulting sentences.

            – David Siegel
            6 hours ago













            Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

            – Lambie
            6 hours ago





            Not sure that set to means highly likely. It means they are prepared for one.

            – Lambie
            6 hours ago




            1




            1





            @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

            – David Siegel
            5 hours ago





            @Lambie Yes it means that they are prepared, but I think that it implies that what they are prepared for will happen. The rest of the article seems to me to confirm that view, and i have also seen "set to" used to cover both meanings at once, particularly is sports contexts; "He is set to break the home-run record in the next three games"

            – David Siegel
            5 hours ago













            0














            Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.



            1) Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc.=those three companies



            2) tumbled = the value of their shares on the stock market fell



            3) appear set to undergo=seem to be ready or prepared for: to be set for



            4) antitrust probes=antitrust is anti-monopoly, basically. The law is the anti-trust law, anti-monopoly law. probes=investigations of them by the Dept. of Justice and the FTC



            5) oversight: that is a function in US government parlance. The FTC has oversight over certain matters, like making sure there are no monopolistic activities. To have oversight=to be in charge of overseeing or making sure organizations or companies behave properly.



            6) to split up oversight=to share it, divide it into two parts; each authority will take half of the work of investigating them. Neither will do the work alone.



            6) In financial news publications, they often do not use the possessive. They just do not. It's a style of financial writing.






            share|improve this answer



























              0














              Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.



              1) Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc.=those three companies



              2) tumbled = the value of their shares on the stock market fell



              3) appear set to undergo=seem to be ready or prepared for: to be set for



              4) antitrust probes=antitrust is anti-monopoly, basically. The law is the anti-trust law, anti-monopoly law. probes=investigations of them by the Dept. of Justice and the FTC



              5) oversight: that is a function in US government parlance. The FTC has oversight over certain matters, like making sure there are no monopolistic activities. To have oversight=to be in charge of overseeing or making sure organizations or companies behave properly.



              6) to split up oversight=to share it, divide it into two parts; each authority will take half of the work of investigating them. Neither will do the work alone.



              6) In financial news publications, they often do not use the possessive. They just do not. It's a style of financial writing.






              share|improve this answer

























                0












                0








                0







                Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.



                1) Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc.=those three companies



                2) tumbled = the value of their shares on the stock market fell



                3) appear set to undergo=seem to be ready or prepared for: to be set for



                4) antitrust probes=antitrust is anti-monopoly, basically. The law is the anti-trust law, anti-monopoly law. probes=investigations of them by the Dept. of Justice and the FTC



                5) oversight: that is a function in US government parlance. The FTC has oversight over certain matters, like making sure there are no monopolistic activities. To have oversight=to be in charge of overseeing or making sure organizations or companies behave properly.



                6) to split up oversight=to share it, divide it into two parts; each authority will take half of the work of investigating them. Neither will do the work alone.



                6) In financial news publications, they often do not use the possessive. They just do not. It's a style of financial writing.






                share|improve this answer













                Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc. tumbled as the companies appear set to undergo U.S. antitrust probes after the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to split up oversight of technology giants.



                1) Google parent Alphabet Inc., Facebook Inc. and Apple Inc.=those three companies



                2) tumbled = the value of their shares on the stock market fell



                3) appear set to undergo=seem to be ready or prepared for: to be set for



                4) antitrust probes=antitrust is anti-monopoly, basically. The law is the anti-trust law, anti-monopoly law. probes=investigations of them by the Dept. of Justice and the FTC



                5) oversight: that is a function in US government parlance. The FTC has oversight over certain matters, like making sure there are no monopolistic activities. To have oversight=to be in charge of overseeing or making sure organizations or companies behave properly.



                6) to split up oversight=to share it, divide it into two parts; each authority will take half of the work of investigating them. Neither will do the work alone.



                6) In financial news publications, they often do not use the possessive. They just do not. It's a style of financial writing.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 5 hours ago









                LambieLambie

                19.2k1643




                19.2k1643



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f213370%2fcan-someone-help-me-to-understand-this-sentence-apple-inc-tumbled-as-the-comp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                    Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                    Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)