How is water heavier than petrol, even though its molecular weight is less than petrol?Why is ice less dense than water?Why won't a block less dense than water fully submerge?Is a block of cotton heavier than a block of iron?How does water pressure manifest itself on the molecular level?Why is alcohol less dense than water?What is weight/mass of cumulus cloud?Mass, Weight and InertiaHow does the lowered surface tension of soapy water make it better for cleaning?When does wet cloth weigh less than dryDoes a non-buoyant (denser than water) object (such as a lead diving weight) weigh any less when submerged in water?
How to retract an idea already pitched to an employer?
What is the giant octopus in the torture chamber for?
Should I compare a std::string to "string" or "string"s?
What's up with this leaf?
Inconsistent behavior of compiler optimization of unused string
What risks are there when you clear your cookies instead of logging off?
How to chain Python function calls so the behaviour is as follows
What should the arbiter and what should have I done in this case?
Payment instructions allegedly from HomeAway look fishy to me
How would a aircraft visually signal "in distress"?
How did they achieve the Gunslinger's shining eye effect in Westworld?
Confusion about off peak timings of London trains
Why is one of Madera Municipal's runways labelled with only "R" on both sides?
Arriving at the same result with the opposite hypotheses
If you had a giant cutting disc 60 miles diameter and rotated it 1000 rps, would the edge be traveling faster than light?
Using a found spellbook as a Sorcerer-Wizard multiclass
Is it a problem if <h4>, <h5> and <h6> are smaller than regular text?
Is open-sourcing the code of a webapp not recommended?
How is water heavier than petrol, even though its molecular weight is less than petrol?
Passing multiple files through stdin (over ssh)
Words that signal future content
How does an ordinary object become radioactive?
PhD - Well known professor or well known school?
Genetic limitations to learn certain instruments
How is water heavier than petrol, even though its molecular weight is less than petrol?
Why is ice less dense than water?Why won't a block less dense than water fully submerge?Is a block of cotton heavier than a block of iron?How does water pressure manifest itself on the molecular level?Why is alcohol less dense than water?What is weight/mass of cumulus cloud?Mass, Weight and InertiaHow does the lowered surface tension of soapy water make it better for cleaning?When does wet cloth weigh less than dryDoes a non-buoyant (denser than water) object (such as a lead diving weight) weigh any less when submerged in water?
$begingroup$
Molecular weight of petrol is so much higher than water,
but when it comes to physical property, weight, one litre of water weighs more than one litre of petrol.
How is it possible?
mass physical-chemistry density molecules
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Molecular weight of petrol is so much higher than water,
but when it comes to physical property, weight, one litre of water weighs more than one litre of petrol.
How is it possible?
mass physical-chemistry density molecules
New contributor
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
$endgroup$
– David White
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Molecular weight of petrol is so much higher than water,
but when it comes to physical property, weight, one litre of water weighs more than one litre of petrol.
How is it possible?
mass physical-chemistry density molecules
New contributor
$endgroup$
Molecular weight of petrol is so much higher than water,
but when it comes to physical property, weight, one litre of water weighs more than one litre of petrol.
How is it possible?
mass physical-chemistry density molecules
mass physical-chemistry density molecules
New contributor
New contributor
edited 39 mins ago
Allure
2,7481028
2,7481028
New contributor
asked 21 hours ago
Olivier LlorisOlivier Lloris
6613
6613
New contributor
New contributor
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
$endgroup$
– David White
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
$endgroup$
– David White
2 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
11 hours ago
$begingroup$
What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
11 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
$endgroup$
– David White
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
$endgroup$
– David White
2 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Density relates to the mass per unit volume. If your molecules are heavier but take up more space, the net result could be more or less mass per unit volume.
When you look at a typical hydrocarbon, it has a lot of carbon and hydrogen. Now atom for atom, oxygen is heavier than carbon (ignoring isotopic abundance, roughly a 16:12 ratio). So if the molecules were otherwise the same shape, if we replaced the carbons with oxygens the hydrocarbon would become heavier (you can’t do that of course - the chemistry is different).
But the larger and more complex shape of the hydrocarbon molecules has another effect. Imagine two elevators. In one elevator we cram a squad of ballet dancers - tall, elegant, and able to be packed very closely. In the other elevator there are a number of people who just went shopping - they carry big bags and generally take a lot of space. It’s quite possible you could get 15 ballet dancers into the first elevator and only five shoppers in the second. So though the dancers might weigh 100 pounds each and the shoppers 200 pounds, the first elevator car will be heavier.
The same analogy can help explain why density of most materials goes down when temperature goes up. Imagine the dancers hear music and start to dance. Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!
Maybe that’s why elevator music is usually so awful?
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
$endgroup$
– Oscar Bravo
17 hours ago
21
$begingroup$
@OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
$endgroup$
– Floris
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
$endgroup$
– Floris
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because water molecules are small and pack tightly together, causing water to have a greater density than petrol.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
$endgroup$
– David White
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Picture this. You have a basket of foam balls and a basket of wooden balls. Say each basket has the same volume and each ball the same volume as well. Stuff as many foam balls as you can into the 1st basket and do the same for the other basket but with wooden balls. Each of the foam balls weigh 10 grams, and each of the wooden balls weigh 20 grams. You find that you can stuff 3 times more foam balls into the basket than wooden balls. Doing the math, you find that:
10 grams * 3 times more balls > 20 grams.
30 > 20.
This means that even though the foam balls weigh less than the wooden balls, they can be packed together more densely, resulting in a larger total mass than the wooden balls. Hope this clarified anything!
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One of my Chemistry teachers had an interesting way to describe this type of phenomenon.
Because the water molecule is shaped like a triangle, it is possible for the water molecules to "snuggle up" with each other, and pack themselves close together. Like this: >>>>>>>>>
He claimed that Water molecules behave more like H(100) O(50) that H(2) O.
Now, I'm sure we could think of a dozen reasons why this isn't correct, but: this does show a unique property of water. It relates closely to the answers provided by @Floris and @G. Smith.
If water really were H(100) O(50), would that explain the property of your original question? I believe it would.
$0.02
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Olivier Lloris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483992%2fhow-is-water-heavier-than-petrol-even-though-its-molecular-weight-is-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Density relates to the mass per unit volume. If your molecules are heavier but take up more space, the net result could be more or less mass per unit volume.
When you look at a typical hydrocarbon, it has a lot of carbon and hydrogen. Now atom for atom, oxygen is heavier than carbon (ignoring isotopic abundance, roughly a 16:12 ratio). So if the molecules were otherwise the same shape, if we replaced the carbons with oxygens the hydrocarbon would become heavier (you can’t do that of course - the chemistry is different).
But the larger and more complex shape of the hydrocarbon molecules has another effect. Imagine two elevators. In one elevator we cram a squad of ballet dancers - tall, elegant, and able to be packed very closely. In the other elevator there are a number of people who just went shopping - they carry big bags and generally take a lot of space. It’s quite possible you could get 15 ballet dancers into the first elevator and only five shoppers in the second. So though the dancers might weigh 100 pounds each and the shoppers 200 pounds, the first elevator car will be heavier.
The same analogy can help explain why density of most materials goes down when temperature goes up. Imagine the dancers hear music and start to dance. Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!
Maybe that’s why elevator music is usually so awful?
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
$endgroup$
– Oscar Bravo
17 hours ago
21
$begingroup$
@OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
$endgroup$
– Floris
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
$endgroup$
– Floris
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Density relates to the mass per unit volume. If your molecules are heavier but take up more space, the net result could be more or less mass per unit volume.
When you look at a typical hydrocarbon, it has a lot of carbon and hydrogen. Now atom for atom, oxygen is heavier than carbon (ignoring isotopic abundance, roughly a 16:12 ratio). So if the molecules were otherwise the same shape, if we replaced the carbons with oxygens the hydrocarbon would become heavier (you can’t do that of course - the chemistry is different).
But the larger and more complex shape of the hydrocarbon molecules has another effect. Imagine two elevators. In one elevator we cram a squad of ballet dancers - tall, elegant, and able to be packed very closely. In the other elevator there are a number of people who just went shopping - they carry big bags and generally take a lot of space. It’s quite possible you could get 15 ballet dancers into the first elevator and only five shoppers in the second. So though the dancers might weigh 100 pounds each and the shoppers 200 pounds, the first elevator car will be heavier.
The same analogy can help explain why density of most materials goes down when temperature goes up. Imagine the dancers hear music and start to dance. Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!
Maybe that’s why elevator music is usually so awful?
$endgroup$
8
$begingroup$
You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
$endgroup$
– Oscar Bravo
17 hours ago
21
$begingroup$
@OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
$endgroup$
– Floris
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
$endgroup$
– Floris
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Density relates to the mass per unit volume. If your molecules are heavier but take up more space, the net result could be more or less mass per unit volume.
When you look at a typical hydrocarbon, it has a lot of carbon and hydrogen. Now atom for atom, oxygen is heavier than carbon (ignoring isotopic abundance, roughly a 16:12 ratio). So if the molecules were otherwise the same shape, if we replaced the carbons with oxygens the hydrocarbon would become heavier (you can’t do that of course - the chemistry is different).
But the larger and more complex shape of the hydrocarbon molecules has another effect. Imagine two elevators. In one elevator we cram a squad of ballet dancers - tall, elegant, and able to be packed very closely. In the other elevator there are a number of people who just went shopping - they carry big bags and generally take a lot of space. It’s quite possible you could get 15 ballet dancers into the first elevator and only five shoppers in the second. So though the dancers might weigh 100 pounds each and the shoppers 200 pounds, the first elevator car will be heavier.
The same analogy can help explain why density of most materials goes down when temperature goes up. Imagine the dancers hear music and start to dance. Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!
Maybe that’s why elevator music is usually so awful?
$endgroup$
Density relates to the mass per unit volume. If your molecules are heavier but take up more space, the net result could be more or less mass per unit volume.
When you look at a typical hydrocarbon, it has a lot of carbon and hydrogen. Now atom for atom, oxygen is heavier than carbon (ignoring isotopic abundance, roughly a 16:12 ratio). So if the molecules were otherwise the same shape, if we replaced the carbons with oxygens the hydrocarbon would become heavier (you can’t do that of course - the chemistry is different).
But the larger and more complex shape of the hydrocarbon molecules has another effect. Imagine two elevators. In one elevator we cram a squad of ballet dancers - tall, elegant, and able to be packed very closely. In the other elevator there are a number of people who just went shopping - they carry big bags and generally take a lot of space. It’s quite possible you could get 15 ballet dancers into the first elevator and only five shoppers in the second. So though the dancers might weigh 100 pounds each and the shoppers 200 pounds, the first elevator car will be heavier.
The same analogy can help explain why density of most materials goes down when temperature goes up. Imagine the dancers hear music and start to dance. Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!
Maybe that’s why elevator music is usually so awful?
answered 18 hours ago
FlorisFloris
108k11193329
108k11193329
8
$begingroup$
You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
$endgroup$
– Oscar Bravo
17 hours ago
21
$begingroup$
@OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
$endgroup$
– Floris
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
$endgroup$
– Floris
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
add a comment |
8
$begingroup$
You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
$endgroup$
– Oscar Bravo
17 hours ago
21
$begingroup$
@OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
$endgroup$
– Floris
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
$endgroup$
– Floris
9 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
8
8
$begingroup$
You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
$endgroup$
– Oscar Bravo
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
$endgroup$
– Oscar Bravo
17 hours ago
21
21
$begingroup$
@OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
$endgroup$
– Floris
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
$endgroup$
– Floris
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
"Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
$endgroup$
– Floris
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
$endgroup$
– Floris
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
9 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because water molecules are small and pack tightly together, causing water to have a greater density than petrol.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
$endgroup$
– David White
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because water molecules are small and pack tightly together, causing water to have a greater density than petrol.
$endgroup$
5
$begingroup$
Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
$endgroup$
– David White
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Because water molecules are small and pack tightly together, causing water to have a greater density than petrol.
$endgroup$
Because water molecules are small and pack tightly together, causing water to have a greater density than petrol.
answered 21 hours ago
G. SmithG. Smith
14.7k12351
14.7k12351
5
$begingroup$
Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
$endgroup$
– David White
59 mins ago
add a comment |
5
$begingroup$
Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
$endgroup$
– David White
59 mins ago
5
5
$begingroup$
Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
$endgroup$
– Sanchises
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
$endgroup$
– David White
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
@Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
$endgroup$
– David White
59 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Picture this. You have a basket of foam balls and a basket of wooden balls. Say each basket has the same volume and each ball the same volume as well. Stuff as many foam balls as you can into the 1st basket and do the same for the other basket but with wooden balls. Each of the foam balls weigh 10 grams, and each of the wooden balls weigh 20 grams. You find that you can stuff 3 times more foam balls into the basket than wooden balls. Doing the math, you find that:
10 grams * 3 times more balls > 20 grams.
30 > 20.
This means that even though the foam balls weigh less than the wooden balls, they can be packed together more densely, resulting in a larger total mass than the wooden balls. Hope this clarified anything!
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Picture this. You have a basket of foam balls and a basket of wooden balls. Say each basket has the same volume and each ball the same volume as well. Stuff as many foam balls as you can into the 1st basket and do the same for the other basket but with wooden balls. Each of the foam balls weigh 10 grams, and each of the wooden balls weigh 20 grams. You find that you can stuff 3 times more foam balls into the basket than wooden balls. Doing the math, you find that:
10 grams * 3 times more balls > 20 grams.
30 > 20.
This means that even though the foam balls weigh less than the wooden balls, they can be packed together more densely, resulting in a larger total mass than the wooden balls. Hope this clarified anything!
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Picture this. You have a basket of foam balls and a basket of wooden balls. Say each basket has the same volume and each ball the same volume as well. Stuff as many foam balls as you can into the 1st basket and do the same for the other basket but with wooden balls. Each of the foam balls weigh 10 grams, and each of the wooden balls weigh 20 grams. You find that you can stuff 3 times more foam balls into the basket than wooden balls. Doing the math, you find that:
10 grams * 3 times more balls > 20 grams.
30 > 20.
This means that even though the foam balls weigh less than the wooden balls, they can be packed together more densely, resulting in a larger total mass than the wooden balls. Hope this clarified anything!
New contributor
$endgroup$
Picture this. You have a basket of foam balls and a basket of wooden balls. Say each basket has the same volume and each ball the same volume as well. Stuff as many foam balls as you can into the 1st basket and do the same for the other basket but with wooden balls. Each of the foam balls weigh 10 grams, and each of the wooden balls weigh 20 grams. You find that you can stuff 3 times more foam balls into the basket than wooden balls. Doing the math, you find that:
10 grams * 3 times more balls > 20 grams.
30 > 20.
This means that even though the foam balls weigh less than the wooden balls, they can be packed together more densely, resulting in a larger total mass than the wooden balls. Hope this clarified anything!
New contributor
New contributor
answered 4 hours ago
ToeSuccToeSucc
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
$endgroup$
– PM 2Ring
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One of my Chemistry teachers had an interesting way to describe this type of phenomenon.
Because the water molecule is shaped like a triangle, it is possible for the water molecules to "snuggle up" with each other, and pack themselves close together. Like this: >>>>>>>>>
He claimed that Water molecules behave more like H(100) O(50) that H(2) O.
Now, I'm sure we could think of a dozen reasons why this isn't correct, but: this does show a unique property of water. It relates closely to the answers provided by @Floris and @G. Smith.
If water really were H(100) O(50), would that explain the property of your original question? I believe it would.
$0.02
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One of my Chemistry teachers had an interesting way to describe this type of phenomenon.
Because the water molecule is shaped like a triangle, it is possible for the water molecules to "snuggle up" with each other, and pack themselves close together. Like this: >>>>>>>>>
He claimed that Water molecules behave more like H(100) O(50) that H(2) O.
Now, I'm sure we could think of a dozen reasons why this isn't correct, but: this does show a unique property of water. It relates closely to the answers provided by @Floris and @G. Smith.
If water really were H(100) O(50), would that explain the property of your original question? I believe it would.
$0.02
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One of my Chemistry teachers had an interesting way to describe this type of phenomenon.
Because the water molecule is shaped like a triangle, it is possible for the water molecules to "snuggle up" with each other, and pack themselves close together. Like this: >>>>>>>>>
He claimed that Water molecules behave more like H(100) O(50) that H(2) O.
Now, I'm sure we could think of a dozen reasons why this isn't correct, but: this does show a unique property of water. It relates closely to the answers provided by @Floris and @G. Smith.
If water really were H(100) O(50), would that explain the property of your original question? I believe it would.
$0.02
New contributor
$endgroup$
One of my Chemistry teachers had an interesting way to describe this type of phenomenon.
Because the water molecule is shaped like a triangle, it is possible for the water molecules to "snuggle up" with each other, and pack themselves close together. Like this: >>>>>>>>>
He claimed that Water molecules behave more like H(100) O(50) that H(2) O.
Now, I'm sure we could think of a dozen reasons why this isn't correct, but: this does show a unique property of water. It relates closely to the answers provided by @Floris and @G. Smith.
If water really were H(100) O(50), would that explain the property of your original question? I believe it would.
$0.02
New contributor
New contributor
answered 3 hours ago
Scottie HScottie H
11
11
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Olivier Lloris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Olivier Lloris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Olivier Lloris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Olivier Lloris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483992%2fhow-is-water-heavier-than-petrol-even-though-its-molecular-weight-is-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
11 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
$endgroup$
– David White
2 hours ago