How is water heavier than petrol, even though its molecular weight is less than petrol?Why is ice less dense than water?Why won't a block less dense than water fully submerge?Is a block of cotton heavier than a block of iron?How does water pressure manifest itself on the molecular level?Why is alcohol less dense than water?What is weight/mass of cumulus cloud?Mass, Weight and InertiaHow does the lowered surface tension of soapy water make it better for cleaning?When does wet cloth weigh less than dryDoes a non-buoyant (denser than water) object (such as a lead diving weight) weigh any less when submerged in water?

How to retract an idea already pitched to an employer?

What is the giant octopus in the torture chamber for?

Should I compare a std::string to "string" or "string"s?

What's up with this leaf?

Inconsistent behavior of compiler optimization of unused string

What risks are there when you clear your cookies instead of logging off?

How to chain Python function calls so the behaviour is as follows

What should the arbiter and what should have I done in this case?

Payment instructions allegedly from HomeAway look fishy to me

How would a aircraft visually signal "in distress"?

How did they achieve the Gunslinger's shining eye effect in Westworld?

Confusion about off peak timings of London trains

Why is one of Madera Municipal's runways labelled with only "R" on both sides?

Arriving at the same result with the opposite hypotheses

If you had a giant cutting disc 60 miles diameter and rotated it 1000 rps, would the edge be traveling faster than light?

Using a found spellbook as a Sorcerer-Wizard multiclass

Is it a problem if <h4>, <h5> and <h6> are smaller than regular text?

Is open-sourcing the code of a webapp not recommended?

How is water heavier than petrol, even though its molecular weight is less than petrol?

Passing multiple files through stdin (over ssh)

Words that signal future content

How does an ordinary object become radioactive?

PhD - Well known professor or well known school?

Genetic limitations to learn certain instruments



How is water heavier than petrol, even though its molecular weight is less than petrol?


Why is ice less dense than water?Why won't a block less dense than water fully submerge?Is a block of cotton heavier than a block of iron?How does water pressure manifest itself on the molecular level?Why is alcohol less dense than water?What is weight/mass of cumulus cloud?Mass, Weight and InertiaHow does the lowered surface tension of soapy water make it better for cleaning?When does wet cloth weigh less than dryDoes a non-buoyant (denser than water) object (such as a lead diving weight) weigh any less when submerged in water?













13












$begingroup$


Molecular weight of petrol is so much higher than water,
but when it comes to physical property, weight, one litre of water weighs more than one litre of petrol.
How is it possible?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Olivier Lloris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – MSalters
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    2 hours ago















13












$begingroup$


Molecular weight of petrol is so much higher than water,
but when it comes to physical property, weight, one litre of water weighs more than one litre of petrol.
How is it possible?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Olivier Lloris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – MSalters
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    2 hours ago













13












13








13


2



$begingroup$


Molecular weight of petrol is so much higher than water,
but when it comes to physical property, weight, one litre of water weighs more than one litre of petrol.
How is it possible?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Olivier Lloris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




Molecular weight of petrol is so much higher than water,
but when it comes to physical property, weight, one litre of water weighs more than one litre of petrol.
How is it possible?







mass physical-chemistry density molecules






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Olivier Lloris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Olivier Lloris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 39 mins ago









Allure

2,7481028




2,7481028






New contributor



Olivier Lloris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 21 hours ago









Olivier LlorisOlivier Lloris

6613




6613




New contributor



Olivier Lloris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Olivier Lloris is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – MSalters
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    2 hours ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
    $endgroup$
    – MSalters
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
    $endgroup$
    – Acccumulation
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    2 hours ago







3




3




$begingroup$
What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
What do you mean "weighs more"? A kilo of water obviously weighs the same as a kilo of petrol. A molecule weighs less. I suspect you mean a liter of water weighs more. But "weight per volume" or density is a different physical property than weight. Weight by itself is only well-defined for concrete objects. I'm being hyper-precise here, but that is because understanding this starts by understanding the definitions.
$endgroup$
– MSalters
11 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
@MSalters BTW, the terminology for what you're getting at is that weight is an extensive property, while density is an intensive property. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_and_extensive_properties
$endgroup$
– Acccumulation
10 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
$endgroup$
– David White
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Note - water is not denser than all petroleum products. Some of the higher molar mass petroleum species are actually more dense than water.
$endgroup$
– David White
2 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















36












$begingroup$

Density relates to the mass per unit volume. If your molecules are heavier but take up more space, the net result could be more or less mass per unit volume.



When you look at a typical hydrocarbon, it has a lot of carbon and hydrogen. Now atom for atom, oxygen is heavier than carbon (ignoring isotopic abundance, roughly a 16:12 ratio). So if the molecules were otherwise the same shape, if we replaced the carbons with oxygens the hydrocarbon would become heavier (you can’t do that of course - the chemistry is different).



But the larger and more complex shape of the hydrocarbon molecules has another effect. Imagine two elevators. In one elevator we cram a squad of ballet dancers - tall, elegant, and able to be packed very closely. In the other elevator there are a number of people who just went shopping - they carry big bags and generally take a lot of space. It’s quite possible you could get 15 ballet dancers into the first elevator and only five shoppers in the second. So though the dancers might weigh 100 pounds each and the shoppers 200 pounds, the first elevator car will be heavier.



The same analogy can help explain why density of most materials goes down when temperature goes up. Imagine the dancers hear music and start to dance. Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!



Maybe that’s why elevator music is usually so awful?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 8




    $begingroup$
    You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
    $endgroup$
    – Oscar Bravo
    17 hours ago






  • 21




    $begingroup$
    @OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
    $endgroup$
    – Floris
    17 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    9 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
    $endgroup$
    – Floris
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    9 hours ago



















21












$begingroup$

Because water molecules are small and pack tightly together, causing water to have a greater density than petrol.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanchises
    12 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    59 mins ago


















0












$begingroup$

Picture this. You have a basket of foam balls and a basket of wooden balls. Say each basket has the same volume and each ball the same volume as well. Stuff as many foam balls as you can into the 1st basket and do the same for the other basket but with wooden balls. Each of the foam balls weigh 10 grams, and each of the wooden balls weigh 20 grams. You find that you can stuff 3 times more foam balls into the basket than wooden balls. Doing the math, you find that:



10 grams * 3 times more balls > 20 grams.



30 > 20.



This means that even though the foam balls weigh less than the wooden balls, they can be packed together more densely, resulting in a larger total mass than the wooden balls. Hope this clarified anything!






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor



ToeSucc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    3 hours ago


















0












$begingroup$

One of my Chemistry teachers had an interesting way to describe this type of phenomenon.

Because the water molecule is shaped like a triangle, it is possible for the water molecules to "snuggle up" with each other, and pack themselves close together. Like this:
>>>>>>>>>

He claimed that Water molecules behave more like H(100) O(50) that H(2) O.

Now, I'm sure we could think of a dozen reasons why this isn't correct, but: this does show a unique property of water. It relates closely to the answers provided by @Floris and @G. Smith.


If water really were H(100) O(50), would that explain the property of your original question? I believe it would.

$0.02






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor



Scottie H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Olivier Lloris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483992%2fhow-is-water-heavier-than-petrol-even-though-its-molecular-weight-is-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    36












    $begingroup$

    Density relates to the mass per unit volume. If your molecules are heavier but take up more space, the net result could be more or less mass per unit volume.



    When you look at a typical hydrocarbon, it has a lot of carbon and hydrogen. Now atom for atom, oxygen is heavier than carbon (ignoring isotopic abundance, roughly a 16:12 ratio). So if the molecules were otherwise the same shape, if we replaced the carbons with oxygens the hydrocarbon would become heavier (you can’t do that of course - the chemistry is different).



    But the larger and more complex shape of the hydrocarbon molecules has another effect. Imagine two elevators. In one elevator we cram a squad of ballet dancers - tall, elegant, and able to be packed very closely. In the other elevator there are a number of people who just went shopping - they carry big bags and generally take a lot of space. It’s quite possible you could get 15 ballet dancers into the first elevator and only five shoppers in the second. So though the dancers might weigh 100 pounds each and the shoppers 200 pounds, the first elevator car will be heavier.



    The same analogy can help explain why density of most materials goes down when temperature goes up. Imagine the dancers hear music and start to dance. Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!



    Maybe that’s why elevator music is usually so awful?






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 8




      $begingroup$
      You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
      $endgroup$
      – Oscar Bravo
      17 hours ago






    • 21




      $begingroup$
      @OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
      $endgroup$
      – Floris
      17 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      "Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
      $endgroup$
      – UKMonkey
      9 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
      $endgroup$
      – Floris
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
      $endgroup$
      – UKMonkey
      9 hours ago
















    36












    $begingroup$

    Density relates to the mass per unit volume. If your molecules are heavier but take up more space, the net result could be more or less mass per unit volume.



    When you look at a typical hydrocarbon, it has a lot of carbon and hydrogen. Now atom for atom, oxygen is heavier than carbon (ignoring isotopic abundance, roughly a 16:12 ratio). So if the molecules were otherwise the same shape, if we replaced the carbons with oxygens the hydrocarbon would become heavier (you can’t do that of course - the chemistry is different).



    But the larger and more complex shape of the hydrocarbon molecules has another effect. Imagine two elevators. In one elevator we cram a squad of ballet dancers - tall, elegant, and able to be packed very closely. In the other elevator there are a number of people who just went shopping - they carry big bags and generally take a lot of space. It’s quite possible you could get 15 ballet dancers into the first elevator and only five shoppers in the second. So though the dancers might weigh 100 pounds each and the shoppers 200 pounds, the first elevator car will be heavier.



    The same analogy can help explain why density of most materials goes down when temperature goes up. Imagine the dancers hear music and start to dance. Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!



    Maybe that’s why elevator music is usually so awful?






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 8




      $begingroup$
      You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
      $endgroup$
      – Oscar Bravo
      17 hours ago






    • 21




      $begingroup$
      @OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
      $endgroup$
      – Floris
      17 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      "Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
      $endgroup$
      – UKMonkey
      9 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
      $endgroup$
      – Floris
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
      $endgroup$
      – UKMonkey
      9 hours ago














    36












    36








    36





    $begingroup$

    Density relates to the mass per unit volume. If your molecules are heavier but take up more space, the net result could be more or less mass per unit volume.



    When you look at a typical hydrocarbon, it has a lot of carbon and hydrogen. Now atom for atom, oxygen is heavier than carbon (ignoring isotopic abundance, roughly a 16:12 ratio). So if the molecules were otherwise the same shape, if we replaced the carbons with oxygens the hydrocarbon would become heavier (you can’t do that of course - the chemistry is different).



    But the larger and more complex shape of the hydrocarbon molecules has another effect. Imagine two elevators. In one elevator we cram a squad of ballet dancers - tall, elegant, and able to be packed very closely. In the other elevator there are a number of people who just went shopping - they carry big bags and generally take a lot of space. It’s quite possible you could get 15 ballet dancers into the first elevator and only five shoppers in the second. So though the dancers might weigh 100 pounds each and the shoppers 200 pounds, the first elevator car will be heavier.



    The same analogy can help explain why density of most materials goes down when temperature goes up. Imagine the dancers hear music and start to dance. Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!



    Maybe that’s why elevator music is usually so awful?






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Density relates to the mass per unit volume. If your molecules are heavier but take up more space, the net result could be more or less mass per unit volume.



    When you look at a typical hydrocarbon, it has a lot of carbon and hydrogen. Now atom for atom, oxygen is heavier than carbon (ignoring isotopic abundance, roughly a 16:12 ratio). So if the molecules were otherwise the same shape, if we replaced the carbons with oxygens the hydrocarbon would become heavier (you can’t do that of course - the chemistry is different).



    But the larger and more complex shape of the hydrocarbon molecules has another effect. Imagine two elevators. In one elevator we cram a squad of ballet dancers - tall, elegant, and able to be packed very closely. In the other elevator there are a number of people who just went shopping - they carry big bags and generally take a lot of space. It’s quite possible you could get 15 ballet dancers into the first elevator and only five shoppers in the second. So though the dancers might weigh 100 pounds each and the shoppers 200 pounds, the first elevator car will be heavier.



    The same analogy can help explain why density of most materials goes down when temperature goes up. Imagine the dancers hear music and start to dance. Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!



    Maybe that’s why elevator music is usually so awful?







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 18 hours ago









    FlorisFloris

    108k11193329




    108k11193329







    • 8




      $begingroup$
      You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
      $endgroup$
      – Oscar Bravo
      17 hours ago






    • 21




      $begingroup$
      @OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
      $endgroup$
      – Floris
      17 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      "Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
      $endgroup$
      – UKMonkey
      9 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
      $endgroup$
      – Floris
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
      $endgroup$
      – UKMonkey
      9 hours ago













    • 8




      $begingroup$
      You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
      $endgroup$
      – Oscar Bravo
      17 hours ago






    • 21




      $begingroup$
      @OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
      $endgroup$
      – Floris
      17 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      "Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
      $endgroup$
      – UKMonkey
      9 hours ago







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
      $endgroup$
      – Floris
      9 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
      $endgroup$
      – UKMonkey
      9 hours ago








    8




    8




    $begingroup$
    You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
    $endgroup$
    – Oscar Bravo
    17 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You were doing so well with the elevator analogy... And then you had to stick on a Dad joke...
    $endgroup$
    – Oscar Bravo
    17 hours ago




    21




    21




    $begingroup$
    @OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
    $endgroup$
    – Floris
    17 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @OscarBravo sorry. Four time dad - it comes naturally...
    $endgroup$
    – Floris
    17 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    "Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    9 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    "Suddenly 15 of them aren’t going to fit in that elevator!" challenge accepted - but someone make sure the ambulance ready
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    9 hours ago





    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
    $endgroup$
    – Floris
    9 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @UKMonkey pics or it didn’t happen. Make that video.
    $endgroup$
    – Floris
    9 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    9 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    @Floris hold my beer ... nothing bad can happen from this - no promises they all have their feet on the floor :)
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    9 hours ago












    21












    $begingroup$

    Because water molecules are small and pack tightly together, causing water to have a greater density than petrol.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
      $endgroup$
      – Sanchises
      12 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
      $endgroup$
      – David White
      59 mins ago















    21












    $begingroup$

    Because water molecules are small and pack tightly together, causing water to have a greater density than petrol.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
      $endgroup$
      – Sanchises
      12 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
      $endgroup$
      – David White
      59 mins ago













    21












    21








    21





    $begingroup$

    Because water molecules are small and pack tightly together, causing water to have a greater density than petrol.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Because water molecules are small and pack tightly together, causing water to have a greater density than petrol.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 21 hours ago









    G. SmithG. Smith

    14.7k12351




    14.7k12351







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
      $endgroup$
      – Sanchises
      12 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
      $endgroup$
      – David White
      59 mins ago












    • 5




      $begingroup$
      Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
      $endgroup$
      – Sanchises
      12 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
      $endgroup$
      – David White
      59 mins ago







    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanchises
    12 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Specifically, they're packed together tightly due to hydrogen bonds.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanchises
    12 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    59 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    @Sanchises, when hydrogen bonds form in water, the molecules take on a hexagonal structure, ice forms, and the density goes down.
    $endgroup$
    – David White
    59 mins ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    Picture this. You have a basket of foam balls and a basket of wooden balls. Say each basket has the same volume and each ball the same volume as well. Stuff as many foam balls as you can into the 1st basket and do the same for the other basket but with wooden balls. Each of the foam balls weigh 10 grams, and each of the wooden balls weigh 20 grams. You find that you can stuff 3 times more foam balls into the basket than wooden balls. Doing the math, you find that:



    10 grams * 3 times more balls > 20 grams.



    30 > 20.



    This means that even though the foam balls weigh less than the wooden balls, they can be packed together more densely, resulting in a larger total mass than the wooden balls. Hope this clarified anything!






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor



    ToeSucc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
      $endgroup$
      – PM 2Ring
      3 hours ago















    0












    $begingroup$

    Picture this. You have a basket of foam balls and a basket of wooden balls. Say each basket has the same volume and each ball the same volume as well. Stuff as many foam balls as you can into the 1st basket and do the same for the other basket but with wooden balls. Each of the foam balls weigh 10 grams, and each of the wooden balls weigh 20 grams. You find that you can stuff 3 times more foam balls into the basket than wooden balls. Doing the math, you find that:



    10 grams * 3 times more balls > 20 grams.



    30 > 20.



    This means that even though the foam balls weigh less than the wooden balls, they can be packed together more densely, resulting in a larger total mass than the wooden balls. Hope this clarified anything!






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor



    ToeSucc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
      $endgroup$
      – PM 2Ring
      3 hours ago













    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    Picture this. You have a basket of foam balls and a basket of wooden balls. Say each basket has the same volume and each ball the same volume as well. Stuff as many foam balls as you can into the 1st basket and do the same for the other basket but with wooden balls. Each of the foam balls weigh 10 grams, and each of the wooden balls weigh 20 grams. You find that you can stuff 3 times more foam balls into the basket than wooden balls. Doing the math, you find that:



    10 grams * 3 times more balls > 20 grams.



    30 > 20.



    This means that even though the foam balls weigh less than the wooden balls, they can be packed together more densely, resulting in a larger total mass than the wooden balls. Hope this clarified anything!






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor



    ToeSucc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$



    Picture this. You have a basket of foam balls and a basket of wooden balls. Say each basket has the same volume and each ball the same volume as well. Stuff as many foam balls as you can into the 1st basket and do the same for the other basket but with wooden balls. Each of the foam balls weigh 10 grams, and each of the wooden balls weigh 20 grams. You find that you can stuff 3 times more foam balls into the basket than wooden balls. Doing the math, you find that:



    10 grams * 3 times more balls > 20 grams.



    30 > 20.



    This means that even though the foam balls weigh less than the wooden balls, they can be packed together more densely, resulting in a larger total mass than the wooden balls. Hope this clarified anything!







    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor



    ToeSucc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer






    New contributor



    ToeSucc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    answered 4 hours ago









    ToeSuccToeSucc

    1




    1




    New contributor



    ToeSucc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




    New contributor




    ToeSucc is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.













    • $begingroup$
      In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
      $endgroup$
      – PM 2Ring
      3 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
      $endgroup$
      – PM 2Ring
      3 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    3 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    In your analogy, you can pack more foam balls in because they can be compressed, but that's not what's happening wth water vs petrol. Both of those liquids don't compress easily.
    $endgroup$
    – PM 2Ring
    3 hours ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    One of my Chemistry teachers had an interesting way to describe this type of phenomenon.

    Because the water molecule is shaped like a triangle, it is possible for the water molecules to "snuggle up" with each other, and pack themselves close together. Like this:
    >>>>>>>>>

    He claimed that Water molecules behave more like H(100) O(50) that H(2) O.

    Now, I'm sure we could think of a dozen reasons why this isn't correct, but: this does show a unique property of water. It relates closely to the answers provided by @Floris and @G. Smith.


    If water really were H(100) O(50), would that explain the property of your original question? I believe it would.

    $0.02






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor



    Scottie H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      One of my Chemistry teachers had an interesting way to describe this type of phenomenon.

      Because the water molecule is shaped like a triangle, it is possible for the water molecules to "snuggle up" with each other, and pack themselves close together. Like this:
      >>>>>>>>>

      He claimed that Water molecules behave more like H(100) O(50) that H(2) O.

      Now, I'm sure we could think of a dozen reasons why this isn't correct, but: this does show a unique property of water. It relates closely to the answers provided by @Floris and @G. Smith.


      If water really were H(100) O(50), would that explain the property of your original question? I believe it would.

      $0.02






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor



      Scottie H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        One of my Chemistry teachers had an interesting way to describe this type of phenomenon.

        Because the water molecule is shaped like a triangle, it is possible for the water molecules to "snuggle up" with each other, and pack themselves close together. Like this:
        >>>>>>>>>

        He claimed that Water molecules behave more like H(100) O(50) that H(2) O.

        Now, I'm sure we could think of a dozen reasons why this isn't correct, but: this does show a unique property of water. It relates closely to the answers provided by @Floris and @G. Smith.


        If water really were H(100) O(50), would that explain the property of your original question? I believe it would.

        $0.02






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor



        Scottie H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        $endgroup$



        One of my Chemistry teachers had an interesting way to describe this type of phenomenon.

        Because the water molecule is shaped like a triangle, it is possible for the water molecules to "snuggle up" with each other, and pack themselves close together. Like this:
        >>>>>>>>>

        He claimed that Water molecules behave more like H(100) O(50) that H(2) O.

        Now, I'm sure we could think of a dozen reasons why this isn't correct, but: this does show a unique property of water. It relates closely to the answers provided by @Floris and @G. Smith.


        If water really were H(100) O(50), would that explain the property of your original question? I believe it would.

        $0.02







        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor



        Scottie H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer






        New contributor



        Scottie H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        answered 3 hours ago









        Scottie HScottie H

        11




        11




        New contributor



        Scottie H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




        New contributor




        Scottie H is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            Olivier Lloris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Olivier Lloris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Olivier Lloris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Olivier Lloris is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483992%2fhow-is-water-heavier-than-petrol-even-though-its-molecular-weight-is-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

            Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

            19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу