How many tone holes are there actually in different orchestral woodwind instruments?Saxophone vs Trumpet: range, overtone series and intonationEasy fingering for C6-D6-E6 on tenor saxophoneIs it possible to play all melody songs on 10 hole diatonic harmonica?How would this woodwind's shape affect its sound?Woodwind v brass instruments - what is the defining characteristic?What are the mechanics behind flute keys used to play chromatic notes?Choosing an instrument to double on

Swapping "Good" and "Bad"

Moving millions of files to a different directory with specfic name patterns

Intern not wearing safety equipment; how could I have handled this differently?

Performance issue in code for reading line and testing for palindrome

A sequence that changes sign finally at infinity?

How to evaluate the performance of open source solver?

Horizontal, Slanted, Stacked Lines in TikZ

How does the Melf's Minute Meteors spell interact with the Evocation wizard's Sculpt Spells feature?

How do I explain that I don't want to maintain old projects?

What factors could lead to bishops establishing monastic armies?

Object's height not a multiple of layer height

What are the effects of abstaining from eating a certain flavor?

My previous employer committed a severe violation of the law and is also being sued by me. How do I explain the situation to future employers?

What's it called when the bad guy gets eaten?

What is the meaning of “Can I have a slice?” In NYC?

Hail hit my roof. Do I need to replace it?

Finding overlapping polygons in two shapefiles and deleting them in R?

Is a request to book a business flight ticket for a graduate student an unreasonable one?

Appropriate conduit for several data cables underground over 300' run

Why does the Antonov AN-225 not have any winglets?

Conditions for Roots of a quadratic equation at infinity

Party going through airport security at separate times?

Distinguish the explanations of Galadriel's test in LotR

Users forgetting to regenerate PDF before sending it



How many tone holes are there actually in different orchestral woodwind instruments?


Saxophone vs Trumpet: range, overtone series and intonationEasy fingering for C6-D6-E6 on tenor saxophoneIs it possible to play all melody songs on 10 hole diatonic harmonica?How would this woodwind's shape affect its sound?Woodwind v brass instruments - what is the defining characteristic?What are the mechanics behind flute keys used to play chromatic notes?Choosing an instrument to double on






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I'm trying to make my own bamboo flute or perhaps "saxophone" of sorts, and before wasting any material I want to have the right construction plans.



I've seen some examples of simple types of bamboo flutes, but they usually seem to be built for one key only, and if you want to play at other keys (or basically playing chromatic notes) you have to either half-hole or use cross-fingering (or both even).



Now, as I've been trying to study the physics behind the sound production of the woodwinds, what I understood is that playing chromatic notes using cross-fingering (=tone holes being closed below the first open tone hole, rather than keeping a continuous series of open tone holes) isn't perfect in terms of intonation, so the chromatic notes are off from what's expected (to my understanding, flat) and thus you can't modulate accurately to all keys differing from the instrument's base key.



To my understanding, the issue for a long time of these instruments' histories is the physiological limitation of the number of fingers humans have, such that we can't place a finger to control each dedicated tone hole in a truly chromatic tone hole-configuration. So I then understood that the mechanical key systems developed for these instruments in their later stages involved enabling each finger the control more than one tone hole in some convoluted interconnected way, and thus I figured there now should be a dedicated tone hole for each chromatic note.



But when I read about the concert flute, I can't figure how many tone holes are actually being controlled. Different places cite different numbers, but on Wikipedia the concert flute is said to usually have 16 tone holes, while the range is 3 octaves. I know it overblows to an octave, so 16+12 (overblow in semitones) is only 28, not 36. Does that mean in the modern concert flute still not all chromatic notes are played without actual (I disregard how the fingers look when pressing the key mechanism) cross-fingering? Does that mean some notes within a flute of a specific keys are known to have somewhat impaired intonation or tone?



And how does the saxophone have it, on the other hand?



The layout I imagined would "only" involve 12 tone holes each a semitone apart (so opening all 12 plays the octave of the bass note), so with the overblow you'll have a range of 2 fully-chromatic octaves with no cross-fingering patterns. I'm still trying to figure out the possible mechanism for operating that.



Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question







New contributor



TLSO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Discussing a question about 3D-printing flutes recently, I came across this book, which might help you: barthopkin.com/books-cds/…

    – Your Uncle Bob
    7 hours ago











  • Looks interesting. I wonder how exhaustive of a read is it, though, and whether you're supposed to accurately be able to design an woodwind scheme after reading it. I've looked through a couple of "online flute calculators", but most weren't very good and didn't allow calculating 12 chromatic tone holes. One calculator called "PVC pipe flute calculator" does allow it, but it misses a couple of things (for examlel, it doesn't tell you/allow you to insert how long is your design's flute). Also, if I set all tone holes to have the same diameter, the distances between them don't get ...

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago











  • I have no idea. But it's only $15, so...

    – Your Uncle Bob
    7 hours ago











  • ... logarithmically shorter like, for examples, a guitar's frets grow closer. Maybe it's different due to air columns' physics... If we're already at it, is it common practice to have all tone holes the same diameter, or is it better to give them different diameters or else they won't maintain similar timbres or volumes?

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago

















3















I'm trying to make my own bamboo flute or perhaps "saxophone" of sorts, and before wasting any material I want to have the right construction plans.



I've seen some examples of simple types of bamboo flutes, but they usually seem to be built for one key only, and if you want to play at other keys (or basically playing chromatic notes) you have to either half-hole or use cross-fingering (or both even).



Now, as I've been trying to study the physics behind the sound production of the woodwinds, what I understood is that playing chromatic notes using cross-fingering (=tone holes being closed below the first open tone hole, rather than keeping a continuous series of open tone holes) isn't perfect in terms of intonation, so the chromatic notes are off from what's expected (to my understanding, flat) and thus you can't modulate accurately to all keys differing from the instrument's base key.



To my understanding, the issue for a long time of these instruments' histories is the physiological limitation of the number of fingers humans have, such that we can't place a finger to control each dedicated tone hole in a truly chromatic tone hole-configuration. So I then understood that the mechanical key systems developed for these instruments in their later stages involved enabling each finger the control more than one tone hole in some convoluted interconnected way, and thus I figured there now should be a dedicated tone hole for each chromatic note.



But when I read about the concert flute, I can't figure how many tone holes are actually being controlled. Different places cite different numbers, but on Wikipedia the concert flute is said to usually have 16 tone holes, while the range is 3 octaves. I know it overblows to an octave, so 16+12 (overblow in semitones) is only 28, not 36. Does that mean in the modern concert flute still not all chromatic notes are played without actual (I disregard how the fingers look when pressing the key mechanism) cross-fingering? Does that mean some notes within a flute of a specific keys are known to have somewhat impaired intonation or tone?



And how does the saxophone have it, on the other hand?



The layout I imagined would "only" involve 12 tone holes each a semitone apart (so opening all 12 plays the octave of the bass note), so with the overblow you'll have a range of 2 fully-chromatic octaves with no cross-fingering patterns. I'm still trying to figure out the possible mechanism for operating that.



Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question







New contributor



TLSO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Discussing a question about 3D-printing flutes recently, I came across this book, which might help you: barthopkin.com/books-cds/…

    – Your Uncle Bob
    7 hours ago











  • Looks interesting. I wonder how exhaustive of a read is it, though, and whether you're supposed to accurately be able to design an woodwind scheme after reading it. I've looked through a couple of "online flute calculators", but most weren't very good and didn't allow calculating 12 chromatic tone holes. One calculator called "PVC pipe flute calculator" does allow it, but it misses a couple of things (for examlel, it doesn't tell you/allow you to insert how long is your design's flute). Also, if I set all tone holes to have the same diameter, the distances between them don't get ...

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago











  • I have no idea. But it's only $15, so...

    – Your Uncle Bob
    7 hours ago











  • ... logarithmically shorter like, for examples, a guitar's frets grow closer. Maybe it's different due to air columns' physics... If we're already at it, is it common practice to have all tone holes the same diameter, or is it better to give them different diameters or else they won't maintain similar timbres or volumes?

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago













3












3








3








I'm trying to make my own bamboo flute or perhaps "saxophone" of sorts, and before wasting any material I want to have the right construction plans.



I've seen some examples of simple types of bamboo flutes, but they usually seem to be built for one key only, and if you want to play at other keys (or basically playing chromatic notes) you have to either half-hole or use cross-fingering (or both even).



Now, as I've been trying to study the physics behind the sound production of the woodwinds, what I understood is that playing chromatic notes using cross-fingering (=tone holes being closed below the first open tone hole, rather than keeping a continuous series of open tone holes) isn't perfect in terms of intonation, so the chromatic notes are off from what's expected (to my understanding, flat) and thus you can't modulate accurately to all keys differing from the instrument's base key.



To my understanding, the issue for a long time of these instruments' histories is the physiological limitation of the number of fingers humans have, such that we can't place a finger to control each dedicated tone hole in a truly chromatic tone hole-configuration. So I then understood that the mechanical key systems developed for these instruments in their later stages involved enabling each finger the control more than one tone hole in some convoluted interconnected way, and thus I figured there now should be a dedicated tone hole for each chromatic note.



But when I read about the concert flute, I can't figure how many tone holes are actually being controlled. Different places cite different numbers, but on Wikipedia the concert flute is said to usually have 16 tone holes, while the range is 3 octaves. I know it overblows to an octave, so 16+12 (overblow in semitones) is only 28, not 36. Does that mean in the modern concert flute still not all chromatic notes are played without actual (I disregard how the fingers look when pressing the key mechanism) cross-fingering? Does that mean some notes within a flute of a specific keys are known to have somewhat impaired intonation or tone?



And how does the saxophone have it, on the other hand?



The layout I imagined would "only" involve 12 tone holes each a semitone apart (so opening all 12 plays the octave of the bass note), so with the overblow you'll have a range of 2 fully-chromatic octaves with no cross-fingering patterns. I'm still trying to figure out the possible mechanism for operating that.



Thanks in advance.










share|improve this question







New contributor



TLSO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm trying to make my own bamboo flute or perhaps "saxophone" of sorts, and before wasting any material I want to have the right construction plans.



I've seen some examples of simple types of bamboo flutes, but they usually seem to be built for one key only, and if you want to play at other keys (or basically playing chromatic notes) you have to either half-hole or use cross-fingering (or both even).



Now, as I've been trying to study the physics behind the sound production of the woodwinds, what I understood is that playing chromatic notes using cross-fingering (=tone holes being closed below the first open tone hole, rather than keeping a continuous series of open tone holes) isn't perfect in terms of intonation, so the chromatic notes are off from what's expected (to my understanding, flat) and thus you can't modulate accurately to all keys differing from the instrument's base key.



To my understanding, the issue for a long time of these instruments' histories is the physiological limitation of the number of fingers humans have, such that we can't place a finger to control each dedicated tone hole in a truly chromatic tone hole-configuration. So I then understood that the mechanical key systems developed for these instruments in their later stages involved enabling each finger the control more than one tone hole in some convoluted interconnected way, and thus I figured there now should be a dedicated tone hole for each chromatic note.



But when I read about the concert flute, I can't figure how many tone holes are actually being controlled. Different places cite different numbers, but on Wikipedia the concert flute is said to usually have 16 tone holes, while the range is 3 octaves. I know it overblows to an octave, so 16+12 (overblow in semitones) is only 28, not 36. Does that mean in the modern concert flute still not all chromatic notes are played without actual (I disregard how the fingers look when pressing the key mechanism) cross-fingering? Does that mean some notes within a flute of a specific keys are known to have somewhat impaired intonation or tone?



And how does the saxophone have it, on the other hand?



The layout I imagined would "only" involve 12 tone holes each a semitone apart (so opening all 12 plays the octave of the bass note), so with the overblow you'll have a range of 2 fully-chromatic octaves with no cross-fingering patterns. I'm still trying to figure out the possible mechanism for operating that.



Thanks in advance.







woodwinds






share|improve this question







New contributor



TLSO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question







New contributor



TLSO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor



TLSO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 9 hours ago









TLSOTLSO

334 bronze badges




334 bronze badges




New contributor



TLSO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




TLSO is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • Discussing a question about 3D-printing flutes recently, I came across this book, which might help you: barthopkin.com/books-cds/…

    – Your Uncle Bob
    7 hours ago











  • Looks interesting. I wonder how exhaustive of a read is it, though, and whether you're supposed to accurately be able to design an woodwind scheme after reading it. I've looked through a couple of "online flute calculators", but most weren't very good and didn't allow calculating 12 chromatic tone holes. One calculator called "PVC pipe flute calculator" does allow it, but it misses a couple of things (for examlel, it doesn't tell you/allow you to insert how long is your design's flute). Also, if I set all tone holes to have the same diameter, the distances between them don't get ...

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago











  • I have no idea. But it's only $15, so...

    – Your Uncle Bob
    7 hours ago











  • ... logarithmically shorter like, for examples, a guitar's frets grow closer. Maybe it's different due to air columns' physics... If we're already at it, is it common practice to have all tone holes the same diameter, or is it better to give them different diameters or else they won't maintain similar timbres or volumes?

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago

















  • Discussing a question about 3D-printing flutes recently, I came across this book, which might help you: barthopkin.com/books-cds/…

    – Your Uncle Bob
    7 hours ago











  • Looks interesting. I wonder how exhaustive of a read is it, though, and whether you're supposed to accurately be able to design an woodwind scheme after reading it. I've looked through a couple of "online flute calculators", but most weren't very good and didn't allow calculating 12 chromatic tone holes. One calculator called "PVC pipe flute calculator" does allow it, but it misses a couple of things (for examlel, it doesn't tell you/allow you to insert how long is your design's flute). Also, if I set all tone holes to have the same diameter, the distances between them don't get ...

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago











  • I have no idea. But it's only $15, so...

    – Your Uncle Bob
    7 hours ago











  • ... logarithmically shorter like, for examples, a guitar's frets grow closer. Maybe it's different due to air columns' physics... If we're already at it, is it common practice to have all tone holes the same diameter, or is it better to give them different diameters or else they won't maintain similar timbres or volumes?

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago
















Discussing a question about 3D-printing flutes recently, I came across this book, which might help you: barthopkin.com/books-cds/…

– Your Uncle Bob
7 hours ago





Discussing a question about 3D-printing flutes recently, I came across this book, which might help you: barthopkin.com/books-cds/…

– Your Uncle Bob
7 hours ago













Looks interesting. I wonder how exhaustive of a read is it, though, and whether you're supposed to accurately be able to design an woodwind scheme after reading it. I've looked through a couple of "online flute calculators", but most weren't very good and didn't allow calculating 12 chromatic tone holes. One calculator called "PVC pipe flute calculator" does allow it, but it misses a couple of things (for examlel, it doesn't tell you/allow you to insert how long is your design's flute). Also, if I set all tone holes to have the same diameter, the distances between them don't get ...

– TLSO
7 hours ago





Looks interesting. I wonder how exhaustive of a read is it, though, and whether you're supposed to accurately be able to design an woodwind scheme after reading it. I've looked through a couple of "online flute calculators", but most weren't very good and didn't allow calculating 12 chromatic tone holes. One calculator called "PVC pipe flute calculator" does allow it, but it misses a couple of things (for examlel, it doesn't tell you/allow you to insert how long is your design's flute). Also, if I set all tone holes to have the same diameter, the distances between them don't get ...

– TLSO
7 hours ago













I have no idea. But it's only $15, so...

– Your Uncle Bob
7 hours ago





I have no idea. But it's only $15, so...

– Your Uncle Bob
7 hours ago













... logarithmically shorter like, for examples, a guitar's frets grow closer. Maybe it's different due to air columns' physics... If we're already at it, is it common practice to have all tone holes the same diameter, or is it better to give them different diameters or else they won't maintain similar timbres or volumes?

– TLSO
7 hours ago





... logarithmically shorter like, for examples, a guitar's frets grow closer. Maybe it's different due to air columns' physics... If we're already at it, is it common practice to have all tone holes the same diameter, or is it better to give them different diameters or else they won't maintain similar timbres or volumes?

– TLSO
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














Every wind instrument has a theoretically infinite range, which is only limited by the player's skill. The first octave is the fundamental, and then all higher notes are played as overtones of that first octave. The second octave is by far the most stable, it's just the entire first octave again but on the second harmonic. The third octave could theoretically be played as the fourth harmonic, but this is harder than it needs to be. On flute, the first half of the third octave is the third harmonic, and the second half is a variety of harmonics. Beyond three octaves, the harmonics become too thin, the realities of physics (edge effects, etc.) start to create chaos, and the fingerings required to tame all of that get too impractical. Look up a fingering chart for altissimo notes and try to imagine playing a scale.



So the minimal number of tone holes is 12. Modern instruments have more, for a variety of reasons:



  • They are extended downwards. The history woodwinds led us to a fingering system where the first octave is D-C#, but it's sorta awkward for an instrument's lowest note to be D because of how often we would like to play in C. So flute is extended to C or B, saxophone to Bb or A, etc.

  • They are extended upwards. There's a somewhat awkward break between the octaves where to go up slightly in pitch requires adding all of the fingers and jumping to the second harmonic. A trill across this break would be extremely difficult. So modern instruments have a few extra keys to extend the range above the base octave so you can do trills or otherwise avoid crossing the break in certain passages. On saxophone, these are the palm keys, and they extend the top of the second octave up to F, and sometimes further.

  • There are duplicate tone holes, used to offer alternate fingerings. Flute doesn't have any of these, but saxophone has an alternate F#, as well as "side" Bb and C, which are required for certain trills and make other passages more fluid.





share|improve this answer























  • So if the flute doesn't have alternate fingerings, it means each chromatic note in effect is produced by opening an additional tone hole in a linear matter? In the saxophone I don't know what happens in effect, but I know it does produce the notes between alternate fingerings differently as I heard an example of their varied sound (which is in both timbre and intonation). In regards to range extention, I assume lowering below the normal base note involves somewhat increasing the actual length of the instrument; in regards to going higher than an octave, I think trills ...

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago











  • ... shouldn't be an issue as long as you can produce the same final all-open note both as an overtone and as a non-overtoned fingering scheme, as you don't need to trill then between an overtoned and a non-overtoned note — and 12 semitones/tone holes provide that. I suppose it still reduces the number of possible melodic phrases you can do without going through overtones at their middle, though. In regards to your point about the flute's third octave using the 3rd harmonic — I read the flute overblows to the 2nd. How can you play the overtone of a fifth an octave above?

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago












  • Flute and sax fingerings are almost identical, but they differ for C in a way that causes sax to need an alternate in some situations, but flute doesn't. Flute uses a different F# fingering that doesn't require an alternate--sax could do the same thing but it would be out of tune. And flute simply lacks the side Bb, and so players just deal with it.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago











  • Extending the instrument down does involve making it longer, by about 6% for every half step. You can see the difference quite clearly once you know what to look for. I have clarinets extended to low Eb that don't fit in most cases, it's been a real pain.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago











  • I'm not sure what you're talking about with regards to avoiding trill keys. If you only have the minimal octave, then there's no overlap. For your last question--the overtones continue infinitely. To keep going up you "overblow" even further. Really, flute doesn't actually blow harder, you aim the air higher across the embouchure hole.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






TLSO is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f86582%2fhow-many-tone-holes-are-there-actually-in-different-orchestral-woodwind-instrume%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














Every wind instrument has a theoretically infinite range, which is only limited by the player's skill. The first octave is the fundamental, and then all higher notes are played as overtones of that first octave. The second octave is by far the most stable, it's just the entire first octave again but on the second harmonic. The third octave could theoretically be played as the fourth harmonic, but this is harder than it needs to be. On flute, the first half of the third octave is the third harmonic, and the second half is a variety of harmonics. Beyond three octaves, the harmonics become too thin, the realities of physics (edge effects, etc.) start to create chaos, and the fingerings required to tame all of that get too impractical. Look up a fingering chart for altissimo notes and try to imagine playing a scale.



So the minimal number of tone holes is 12. Modern instruments have more, for a variety of reasons:



  • They are extended downwards. The history woodwinds led us to a fingering system where the first octave is D-C#, but it's sorta awkward for an instrument's lowest note to be D because of how often we would like to play in C. So flute is extended to C or B, saxophone to Bb or A, etc.

  • They are extended upwards. There's a somewhat awkward break between the octaves where to go up slightly in pitch requires adding all of the fingers and jumping to the second harmonic. A trill across this break would be extremely difficult. So modern instruments have a few extra keys to extend the range above the base octave so you can do trills or otherwise avoid crossing the break in certain passages. On saxophone, these are the palm keys, and they extend the top of the second octave up to F, and sometimes further.

  • There are duplicate tone holes, used to offer alternate fingerings. Flute doesn't have any of these, but saxophone has an alternate F#, as well as "side" Bb and C, which are required for certain trills and make other passages more fluid.





share|improve this answer























  • So if the flute doesn't have alternate fingerings, it means each chromatic note in effect is produced by opening an additional tone hole in a linear matter? In the saxophone I don't know what happens in effect, but I know it does produce the notes between alternate fingerings differently as I heard an example of their varied sound (which is in both timbre and intonation). In regards to range extention, I assume lowering below the normal base note involves somewhat increasing the actual length of the instrument; in regards to going higher than an octave, I think trills ...

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago











  • ... shouldn't be an issue as long as you can produce the same final all-open note both as an overtone and as a non-overtoned fingering scheme, as you don't need to trill then between an overtoned and a non-overtoned note — and 12 semitones/tone holes provide that. I suppose it still reduces the number of possible melodic phrases you can do without going through overtones at their middle, though. In regards to your point about the flute's third octave using the 3rd harmonic — I read the flute overblows to the 2nd. How can you play the overtone of a fifth an octave above?

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago












  • Flute and sax fingerings are almost identical, but they differ for C in a way that causes sax to need an alternate in some situations, but flute doesn't. Flute uses a different F# fingering that doesn't require an alternate--sax could do the same thing but it would be out of tune. And flute simply lacks the side Bb, and so players just deal with it.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago











  • Extending the instrument down does involve making it longer, by about 6% for every half step. You can see the difference quite clearly once you know what to look for. I have clarinets extended to low Eb that don't fit in most cases, it's been a real pain.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago











  • I'm not sure what you're talking about with regards to avoiding trill keys. If you only have the minimal octave, then there's no overlap. For your last question--the overtones continue infinitely. To keep going up you "overblow" even further. Really, flute doesn't actually blow harder, you aim the air higher across the embouchure hole.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago















5














Every wind instrument has a theoretically infinite range, which is only limited by the player's skill. The first octave is the fundamental, and then all higher notes are played as overtones of that first octave. The second octave is by far the most stable, it's just the entire first octave again but on the second harmonic. The third octave could theoretically be played as the fourth harmonic, but this is harder than it needs to be. On flute, the first half of the third octave is the third harmonic, and the second half is a variety of harmonics. Beyond three octaves, the harmonics become too thin, the realities of physics (edge effects, etc.) start to create chaos, and the fingerings required to tame all of that get too impractical. Look up a fingering chart for altissimo notes and try to imagine playing a scale.



So the minimal number of tone holes is 12. Modern instruments have more, for a variety of reasons:



  • They are extended downwards. The history woodwinds led us to a fingering system where the first octave is D-C#, but it's sorta awkward for an instrument's lowest note to be D because of how often we would like to play in C. So flute is extended to C or B, saxophone to Bb or A, etc.

  • They are extended upwards. There's a somewhat awkward break between the octaves where to go up slightly in pitch requires adding all of the fingers and jumping to the second harmonic. A trill across this break would be extremely difficult. So modern instruments have a few extra keys to extend the range above the base octave so you can do trills or otherwise avoid crossing the break in certain passages. On saxophone, these are the palm keys, and they extend the top of the second octave up to F, and sometimes further.

  • There are duplicate tone holes, used to offer alternate fingerings. Flute doesn't have any of these, but saxophone has an alternate F#, as well as "side" Bb and C, which are required for certain trills and make other passages more fluid.





share|improve this answer























  • So if the flute doesn't have alternate fingerings, it means each chromatic note in effect is produced by opening an additional tone hole in a linear matter? In the saxophone I don't know what happens in effect, but I know it does produce the notes between alternate fingerings differently as I heard an example of their varied sound (which is in both timbre and intonation). In regards to range extention, I assume lowering below the normal base note involves somewhat increasing the actual length of the instrument; in regards to going higher than an octave, I think trills ...

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago











  • ... shouldn't be an issue as long as you can produce the same final all-open note both as an overtone and as a non-overtoned fingering scheme, as you don't need to trill then between an overtoned and a non-overtoned note — and 12 semitones/tone holes provide that. I suppose it still reduces the number of possible melodic phrases you can do without going through overtones at their middle, though. In regards to your point about the flute's third octave using the 3rd harmonic — I read the flute overblows to the 2nd. How can you play the overtone of a fifth an octave above?

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago












  • Flute and sax fingerings are almost identical, but they differ for C in a way that causes sax to need an alternate in some situations, but flute doesn't. Flute uses a different F# fingering that doesn't require an alternate--sax could do the same thing but it would be out of tune. And flute simply lacks the side Bb, and so players just deal with it.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago











  • Extending the instrument down does involve making it longer, by about 6% for every half step. You can see the difference quite clearly once you know what to look for. I have clarinets extended to low Eb that don't fit in most cases, it's been a real pain.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago











  • I'm not sure what you're talking about with regards to avoiding trill keys. If you only have the minimal octave, then there's no overlap. For your last question--the overtones continue infinitely. To keep going up you "overblow" even further. Really, flute doesn't actually blow harder, you aim the air higher across the embouchure hole.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago













5












5








5







Every wind instrument has a theoretically infinite range, which is only limited by the player's skill. The first octave is the fundamental, and then all higher notes are played as overtones of that first octave. The second octave is by far the most stable, it's just the entire first octave again but on the second harmonic. The third octave could theoretically be played as the fourth harmonic, but this is harder than it needs to be. On flute, the first half of the third octave is the third harmonic, and the second half is a variety of harmonics. Beyond three octaves, the harmonics become too thin, the realities of physics (edge effects, etc.) start to create chaos, and the fingerings required to tame all of that get too impractical. Look up a fingering chart for altissimo notes and try to imagine playing a scale.



So the minimal number of tone holes is 12. Modern instruments have more, for a variety of reasons:



  • They are extended downwards. The history woodwinds led us to a fingering system where the first octave is D-C#, but it's sorta awkward for an instrument's lowest note to be D because of how often we would like to play in C. So flute is extended to C or B, saxophone to Bb or A, etc.

  • They are extended upwards. There's a somewhat awkward break between the octaves where to go up slightly in pitch requires adding all of the fingers and jumping to the second harmonic. A trill across this break would be extremely difficult. So modern instruments have a few extra keys to extend the range above the base octave so you can do trills or otherwise avoid crossing the break in certain passages. On saxophone, these are the palm keys, and they extend the top of the second octave up to F, and sometimes further.

  • There are duplicate tone holes, used to offer alternate fingerings. Flute doesn't have any of these, but saxophone has an alternate F#, as well as "side" Bb and C, which are required for certain trills and make other passages more fluid.





share|improve this answer













Every wind instrument has a theoretically infinite range, which is only limited by the player's skill. The first octave is the fundamental, and then all higher notes are played as overtones of that first octave. The second octave is by far the most stable, it's just the entire first octave again but on the second harmonic. The third octave could theoretically be played as the fourth harmonic, but this is harder than it needs to be. On flute, the first half of the third octave is the third harmonic, and the second half is a variety of harmonics. Beyond three octaves, the harmonics become too thin, the realities of physics (edge effects, etc.) start to create chaos, and the fingerings required to tame all of that get too impractical. Look up a fingering chart for altissimo notes and try to imagine playing a scale.



So the minimal number of tone holes is 12. Modern instruments have more, for a variety of reasons:



  • They are extended downwards. The history woodwinds led us to a fingering system where the first octave is D-C#, but it's sorta awkward for an instrument's lowest note to be D because of how often we would like to play in C. So flute is extended to C or B, saxophone to Bb or A, etc.

  • They are extended upwards. There's a somewhat awkward break between the octaves where to go up slightly in pitch requires adding all of the fingers and jumping to the second harmonic. A trill across this break would be extremely difficult. So modern instruments have a few extra keys to extend the range above the base octave so you can do trills or otherwise avoid crossing the break in certain passages. On saxophone, these are the palm keys, and they extend the top of the second octave up to F, and sometimes further.

  • There are duplicate tone holes, used to offer alternate fingerings. Flute doesn't have any of these, but saxophone has an alternate F#, as well as "side" Bb and C, which are required for certain trills and make other passages more fluid.






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 8 hours ago









MattPutnamMattPutnam

15.4k2 gold badges35 silver badges57 bronze badges




15.4k2 gold badges35 silver badges57 bronze badges












  • So if the flute doesn't have alternate fingerings, it means each chromatic note in effect is produced by opening an additional tone hole in a linear matter? In the saxophone I don't know what happens in effect, but I know it does produce the notes between alternate fingerings differently as I heard an example of their varied sound (which is in both timbre and intonation). In regards to range extention, I assume lowering below the normal base note involves somewhat increasing the actual length of the instrument; in regards to going higher than an octave, I think trills ...

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago











  • ... shouldn't be an issue as long as you can produce the same final all-open note both as an overtone and as a non-overtoned fingering scheme, as you don't need to trill then between an overtoned and a non-overtoned note — and 12 semitones/tone holes provide that. I suppose it still reduces the number of possible melodic phrases you can do without going through overtones at their middle, though. In regards to your point about the flute's third octave using the 3rd harmonic — I read the flute overblows to the 2nd. How can you play the overtone of a fifth an octave above?

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago












  • Flute and sax fingerings are almost identical, but they differ for C in a way that causes sax to need an alternate in some situations, but flute doesn't. Flute uses a different F# fingering that doesn't require an alternate--sax could do the same thing but it would be out of tune. And flute simply lacks the side Bb, and so players just deal with it.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago











  • Extending the instrument down does involve making it longer, by about 6% for every half step. You can see the difference quite clearly once you know what to look for. I have clarinets extended to low Eb that don't fit in most cases, it's been a real pain.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago











  • I'm not sure what you're talking about with regards to avoiding trill keys. If you only have the minimal octave, then there's no overlap. For your last question--the overtones continue infinitely. To keep going up you "overblow" even further. Really, flute doesn't actually blow harder, you aim the air higher across the embouchure hole.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago

















  • So if the flute doesn't have alternate fingerings, it means each chromatic note in effect is produced by opening an additional tone hole in a linear matter? In the saxophone I don't know what happens in effect, but I know it does produce the notes between alternate fingerings differently as I heard an example of their varied sound (which is in both timbre and intonation). In regards to range extention, I assume lowering below the normal base note involves somewhat increasing the actual length of the instrument; in regards to going higher than an octave, I think trills ...

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago











  • ... shouldn't be an issue as long as you can produce the same final all-open note both as an overtone and as a non-overtoned fingering scheme, as you don't need to trill then between an overtoned and a non-overtoned note — and 12 semitones/tone holes provide that. I suppose it still reduces the number of possible melodic phrases you can do without going through overtones at their middle, though. In regards to your point about the flute's third octave using the 3rd harmonic — I read the flute overblows to the 2nd. How can you play the overtone of a fifth an octave above?

    – TLSO
    7 hours ago












  • Flute and sax fingerings are almost identical, but they differ for C in a way that causes sax to need an alternate in some situations, but flute doesn't. Flute uses a different F# fingering that doesn't require an alternate--sax could do the same thing but it would be out of tune. And flute simply lacks the side Bb, and so players just deal with it.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago











  • Extending the instrument down does involve making it longer, by about 6% for every half step. You can see the difference quite clearly once you know what to look for. I have clarinets extended to low Eb that don't fit in most cases, it's been a real pain.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago











  • I'm not sure what you're talking about with regards to avoiding trill keys. If you only have the minimal octave, then there's no overlap. For your last question--the overtones continue infinitely. To keep going up you "overblow" even further. Really, flute doesn't actually blow harder, you aim the air higher across the embouchure hole.

    – MattPutnam
    7 hours ago
















So if the flute doesn't have alternate fingerings, it means each chromatic note in effect is produced by opening an additional tone hole in a linear matter? In the saxophone I don't know what happens in effect, but I know it does produce the notes between alternate fingerings differently as I heard an example of their varied sound (which is in both timbre and intonation). In regards to range extention, I assume lowering below the normal base note involves somewhat increasing the actual length of the instrument; in regards to going higher than an octave, I think trills ...

– TLSO
7 hours ago





So if the flute doesn't have alternate fingerings, it means each chromatic note in effect is produced by opening an additional tone hole in a linear matter? In the saxophone I don't know what happens in effect, but I know it does produce the notes between alternate fingerings differently as I heard an example of their varied sound (which is in both timbre and intonation). In regards to range extention, I assume lowering below the normal base note involves somewhat increasing the actual length of the instrument; in regards to going higher than an octave, I think trills ...

– TLSO
7 hours ago













... shouldn't be an issue as long as you can produce the same final all-open note both as an overtone and as a non-overtoned fingering scheme, as you don't need to trill then between an overtoned and a non-overtoned note — and 12 semitones/tone holes provide that. I suppose it still reduces the number of possible melodic phrases you can do without going through overtones at their middle, though. In regards to your point about the flute's third octave using the 3rd harmonic — I read the flute overblows to the 2nd. How can you play the overtone of a fifth an octave above?

– TLSO
7 hours ago






... shouldn't be an issue as long as you can produce the same final all-open note both as an overtone and as a non-overtoned fingering scheme, as you don't need to trill then between an overtoned and a non-overtoned note — and 12 semitones/tone holes provide that. I suppose it still reduces the number of possible melodic phrases you can do without going through overtones at their middle, though. In regards to your point about the flute's third octave using the 3rd harmonic — I read the flute overblows to the 2nd. How can you play the overtone of a fifth an octave above?

– TLSO
7 hours ago














Flute and sax fingerings are almost identical, but they differ for C in a way that causes sax to need an alternate in some situations, but flute doesn't. Flute uses a different F# fingering that doesn't require an alternate--sax could do the same thing but it would be out of tune. And flute simply lacks the side Bb, and so players just deal with it.

– MattPutnam
7 hours ago





Flute and sax fingerings are almost identical, but they differ for C in a way that causes sax to need an alternate in some situations, but flute doesn't. Flute uses a different F# fingering that doesn't require an alternate--sax could do the same thing but it would be out of tune. And flute simply lacks the side Bb, and so players just deal with it.

– MattPutnam
7 hours ago













Extending the instrument down does involve making it longer, by about 6% for every half step. You can see the difference quite clearly once you know what to look for. I have clarinets extended to low Eb that don't fit in most cases, it's been a real pain.

– MattPutnam
7 hours ago





Extending the instrument down does involve making it longer, by about 6% for every half step. You can see the difference quite clearly once you know what to look for. I have clarinets extended to low Eb that don't fit in most cases, it's been a real pain.

– MattPutnam
7 hours ago













I'm not sure what you're talking about with regards to avoiding trill keys. If you only have the minimal octave, then there's no overlap. For your last question--the overtones continue infinitely. To keep going up you "overblow" even further. Really, flute doesn't actually blow harder, you aim the air higher across the embouchure hole.

– MattPutnam
7 hours ago





I'm not sure what you're talking about with regards to avoiding trill keys. If you only have the minimal octave, then there's no overlap. For your last question--the overtones continue infinitely. To keep going up you "overblow" even further. Really, flute doesn't actually blow harder, you aim the air higher across the embouchure hole.

– MattPutnam
7 hours ago










TLSO is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















TLSO is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












TLSO is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











TLSO is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f86582%2fhow-many-tone-holes-are-there-actually-in-different-orchestral-woodwind-instrume%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)