Why are they 'nude photos'?Why do people who find it hard to hear say they are “hard of hearing”?Origin of “to have a cow”What does “I’m done” in Serena William’s counter shot to John McEnroe, “I just have people picking on me. I’m done.” means?Why “Many and many A year ago”, not “Many, many years ago? Are they same?'They are' or 'These are'Should we say “they are high enough as they are” or “they are high enough as it is.”?What are the nuances of the British expression “gone” used with time, as in “gone 8” or “gone midnight”?An alternative to “Recent” and How recent is recentA person who truely believes they are an angel, but in reality they are notWhy are 'quarts' called 'quarts'?

Is a request to book a business flight ticket for a graduate student an unreasonable one?

Is English unusual in having no second person plural form?

What happens to unproductive professors?

How do native German speakers usually express skepticism (using even) about a premise?

Misspelling my name on my mathematical publications

How to befriend private nested class

How can I effectively communicate to recruiters that a phone call is not possible?

This one's for Matthew:

How to trigger Authentification of Named Credential created via Apex

Credit score and financing new car

How to drill holes in 3/8" thick steel plates?

How to deal with moral/legal subjects in writing?

Is "I do not want you to go nowhere" a case of "DOUBLE-NEGATIVES" as claimed by Grammarly?

What specific instant in time in the MCU has been depicted the most times?

Does throwing a penny at a train stop the train?

Received a dinner invitation through my employer's email, is it ok to attend?

How to tell someone I'd like to become friends without letting them think I'm romantically interested in them?

What's the point of having a RAID 1 configuration over incremental backups to a secondary drive?

Managing and organizing the massively increased number of classes after switching to SOLID?

Do I have a right to cancel a purchase of foreign currency in the UK?

Employers keep telling me my college isn't good enough - is there any way to fix this?

Are there any medieval light sources without fire?

The tensor product of two monoidal categories

Would dual wielding daggers be a viable choice for a covert bodyguard?



Why are they 'nude photos'?


Why do people who find it hard to hear say they are “hard of hearing”?Origin of “to have a cow”What does “I’m done” in Serena William’s counter shot to John McEnroe, “I just have people picking on me. I’m done.” means?Why “Many and many A year ago”, not “Many, many years ago? Are they same?'They are' or 'These are'Should we say “they are high enough as they are” or “they are high enough as it is.”?What are the nuances of the British expression “gone” used with time, as in “gone 8” or “gone midnight”?An alternative to “Recent” and How recent is recentA person who truely believes they are an angel, but in reality they are notWhy are 'quarts' called 'quarts'?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















Recent news events in the US have resulted in many headlines about "nude photos of young women" and variations.



Obviously it's the women who are nude, not the photos, so why does this phrasing persist? Is it an idiom, or does it just flow better, or is it some other nuance of usage that I haven't seen in other situations?










share|improve this question



















  • 4





    It’s no different than pictures of me playing baseball being called my baseball photos or calling the pictures of me swimming my swimming photos.

    – Jim
    8 hours ago






  • 6





    A nude photo is nude in the same sense that a beer bottle is beer.

    – RegDwigнt
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    For the same reason as there are cat videos

    – marcellothearcane
    7 hours ago











  • See also: vacation photos, yearbook photos

    – TaliesinMerlin
    5 hours ago











  • @RegDwigнt♦ A beer bottle is a beer bottle regardless of whether it contains beer or not.

    – Spencer
    3 hours ago

















4















Recent news events in the US have resulted in many headlines about "nude photos of young women" and variations.



Obviously it's the women who are nude, not the photos, so why does this phrasing persist? Is it an idiom, or does it just flow better, or is it some other nuance of usage that I haven't seen in other situations?










share|improve this question



















  • 4





    It’s no different than pictures of me playing baseball being called my baseball photos or calling the pictures of me swimming my swimming photos.

    – Jim
    8 hours ago






  • 6





    A nude photo is nude in the same sense that a beer bottle is beer.

    – RegDwigнt
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    For the same reason as there are cat videos

    – marcellothearcane
    7 hours ago











  • See also: vacation photos, yearbook photos

    – TaliesinMerlin
    5 hours ago











  • @RegDwigнt♦ A beer bottle is a beer bottle regardless of whether it contains beer or not.

    – Spencer
    3 hours ago













4












4








4








Recent news events in the US have resulted in many headlines about "nude photos of young women" and variations.



Obviously it's the women who are nude, not the photos, so why does this phrasing persist? Is it an idiom, or does it just flow better, or is it some other nuance of usage that I haven't seen in other situations?










share|improve this question
















Recent news events in the US have resulted in many headlines about "nude photos of young women" and variations.



Obviously it's the women who are nude, not the photos, so why does this phrasing persist? Is it an idiom, or does it just flow better, or is it some other nuance of usage that I haven't seen in other situations?







idioms usage attributive-nouns compound-words






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









tchrist

111k30 gold badges300 silver badges480 bronze badges




111k30 gold badges300 silver badges480 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









Jim MackJim Mack

7,3402 gold badges18 silver badges33 bronze badges




7,3402 gold badges18 silver badges33 bronze badges







  • 4





    It’s no different than pictures of me playing baseball being called my baseball photos or calling the pictures of me swimming my swimming photos.

    – Jim
    8 hours ago






  • 6





    A nude photo is nude in the same sense that a beer bottle is beer.

    – RegDwigнt
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    For the same reason as there are cat videos

    – marcellothearcane
    7 hours ago











  • See also: vacation photos, yearbook photos

    – TaliesinMerlin
    5 hours ago











  • @RegDwigнt♦ A beer bottle is a beer bottle regardless of whether it contains beer or not.

    – Spencer
    3 hours ago












  • 4





    It’s no different than pictures of me playing baseball being called my baseball photos or calling the pictures of me swimming my swimming photos.

    – Jim
    8 hours ago






  • 6





    A nude photo is nude in the same sense that a beer bottle is beer.

    – RegDwigнt
    7 hours ago






  • 2





    For the same reason as there are cat videos

    – marcellothearcane
    7 hours ago











  • See also: vacation photos, yearbook photos

    – TaliesinMerlin
    5 hours ago











  • @RegDwigнt♦ A beer bottle is a beer bottle regardless of whether it contains beer or not.

    – Spencer
    3 hours ago







4




4





It’s no different than pictures of me playing baseball being called my baseball photos or calling the pictures of me swimming my swimming photos.

– Jim
8 hours ago





It’s no different than pictures of me playing baseball being called my baseball photos or calling the pictures of me swimming my swimming photos.

– Jim
8 hours ago




6




6





A nude photo is nude in the same sense that a beer bottle is beer.

– RegDwigнt
7 hours ago





A nude photo is nude in the same sense that a beer bottle is beer.

– RegDwigнt
7 hours ago




2




2





For the same reason as there are cat videos

– marcellothearcane
7 hours ago





For the same reason as there are cat videos

– marcellothearcane
7 hours ago













See also: vacation photos, yearbook photos

– TaliesinMerlin
5 hours ago





See also: vacation photos, yearbook photos

– TaliesinMerlin
5 hours ago













@RegDwigнt♦ A beer bottle is a beer bottle regardless of whether it contains beer or not.

– Spencer
3 hours ago





@RegDwigнt♦ A beer bottle is a beer bottle regardless of whether it contains beer or not.

– Spencer
3 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















6















nude ADJECTIVE

...

1.1 [attributive] Depicting or performed by naked people.
‘she won't do any nude scenes’
Lexico







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    This is just a dictionary definition without any explanation whatsoever. Might just as well post a link in a comment. BTW it's no longer Oxford Dictionaries, it's now called Lexico.

    – Mari-Lou A
    6 hours ago












  • @Mari-LouA That makes this answer one of those notorious nomina nuda which people are always railing about. Hard to blame them, really.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago












  • @Mari-LouA ... you are right. Lexico.

    – GEdgar
    5 hours ago


















3














It’s a way to to refer to photos with nude subjects. As you can see from Ngram this expression took off from the ‘60s/70s when pictures portraying nude people, generally women, started to become popular, as in earlier expression used referring to paintings



Nude:




(of a photograph, painting, statue, etc.) being or prominently displaying a representation of the nude human figure.




(Dictionary.com)






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Thanks for the Ngram. It reinforces the idea that the phrase has become an idiom.

    – Jim Mack
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @JimMack Enough of all this beating around the bush already. It's time to let the cat out of the bag and spill the beans: in exactly what fashion could nude photos EVER be considered any sort of "idiom"?? You're clearly barking up the wrong tree here. The elephant in the room is that old familiar refrain, "A simply qualified noun doth never an idiom make." Since it takes two to tango, the ball's in your court now, Roger Federer.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago



















2














Nude photos is a noun phrase that has become idiomatic and manifests in slang such as "nudies" or simply "nudes". The phrase "nude photos of X" does indeed seem like a retro-construction. This phrasing is also more euphemistic or neutral, perhaps, since as you mentioned, technically, it would be "X" who is nude, but "X" is not the grammatical subject (it is instead within the prepositional "of X").



@user240918 and @GEdgar also make good points.



Note Webster:




nude (adj) bare, naked, nude, bald, barren mean deprived of naturally or conventionally appropriate covering. ... nude applies especially to the unclothed human figure.







share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    I think the answer is that it's now idiomatic, as you point out. Many of the other answers and comments seem to just state the obvious.

    – Jim Mack
    7 hours ago











  • @JimMack This is wrong. It is not in any way idiomatic. It means what it literally says. Therefore it is not idiomatic. A cat photo is a photo of a cat. A clock hand is the hand of a clock; it is not a hand that is clocky. Cock crow is not a crow that is cocky. Child photos aren't photos that will someday grow up. Rather, they are photos OF children.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago







  • 3





    It is not idiomatic in the "a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g., rain cats and dogs, see the light)", but it is idiomatic in the second sense "a form of expression natural to a language, person, or group of people." Both are from OED

    – Carly
    4 hours ago


















1














Collocations modifying photo often don't refer to the photo as a physical object. They instead refer to the subject of the photo, or what's depicted in the image.



To demonstrate this, here are the most common collocations for ____ photo according to the Corpus of Contemporary American English. I have bolded the ones that describe the image (source, subject, or whatever) and italicized the ones that describe a property of the physical photograph. Other results are left unchanged. Numbers describe frequency within the corpus.



  • these (434)


  • family (379)


  • two (316)

  • take (243)


  • color (234)


  • AP (225)

  • those (222)

  • taking (180)


  • digital (168)


  • old (160)


  • scene (147)


  • three (135)


  • nude (129)


  • framed (124)


  • satellite (122)


  • black-and-white (113)

  • took (112)


  • aerial (91)


  • four (87)


  • five (84)

  • snapping (82)


  • wedding (63)

Out of these results, a family photo is understood to be a photo of a family, just as a wedding photo is understood to be a photo of a wedding. Similarly, English has other constructions, like nude photo. The same positioning can also describe provenance (AP photo, satellite photo, aerial photo), quality of photo (black-and-white photo, color photo), physical status (framed photo, digital photo), and so on.



Hearers understand nude photo to refer to what's in the photo because of established usage. Also, the idea of a photo in the "nude" does not make much sense, so the physical interpretation of the object is unlikely. Many media objects have this quality; a ___ book can refer to either the physical object (big book, hardcover book) or to a quality of the text inside (a sad book, a scholarly book). A bit of logic and some arbitrary usage rules determine how people interpret collocations involving media objects.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    One can easily see how a photo of a family becomes a family photo. One can also see why that happens: the latter formulation is simpler and easier to integrate into longer sentences. That, however, is not analogous to the present case. If photos of nude women followed the same pattern, it would turn into nude-women photos, but that's not what actually happens. The puzzling question is why does the adjective nude move to photos, while the of women construction remains. Photos of tall women would never become tall photos of women.

    – jsw29
    2 hours ago











  • I don't see the equivalent formation necessarily being photo(s) of nude women. It could easily be photo of a nude. Compare to Dali's Study of a Nude. Nude would thus be an attributive noun in nude photo, just like family in family photo or wedding in wedding photo.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    56 mins ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f504500%2fwhy-are-they-nude-photos%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6















nude ADJECTIVE

...

1.1 [attributive] Depicting or performed by naked people.
‘she won't do any nude scenes’
Lexico







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    This is just a dictionary definition without any explanation whatsoever. Might just as well post a link in a comment. BTW it's no longer Oxford Dictionaries, it's now called Lexico.

    – Mari-Lou A
    6 hours ago












  • @Mari-LouA That makes this answer one of those notorious nomina nuda which people are always railing about. Hard to blame them, really.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago












  • @Mari-LouA ... you are right. Lexico.

    – GEdgar
    5 hours ago















6















nude ADJECTIVE

...

1.1 [attributive] Depicting or performed by naked people.
‘she won't do any nude scenes’
Lexico







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    This is just a dictionary definition without any explanation whatsoever. Might just as well post a link in a comment. BTW it's no longer Oxford Dictionaries, it's now called Lexico.

    – Mari-Lou A
    6 hours ago












  • @Mari-LouA That makes this answer one of those notorious nomina nuda which people are always railing about. Hard to blame them, really.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago












  • @Mari-LouA ... you are right. Lexico.

    – GEdgar
    5 hours ago













6












6








6








nude ADJECTIVE

...

1.1 [attributive] Depicting or performed by naked people.
‘she won't do any nude scenes’
Lexico







share|improve this answer
















nude ADJECTIVE

...

1.1 [attributive] Depicting or performed by naked people.
‘she won't do any nude scenes’
Lexico








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 5 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









GEdgarGEdgar

14.7k2 gold badges23 silver badges46 bronze badges




14.7k2 gold badges23 silver badges46 bronze badges







  • 3





    This is just a dictionary definition without any explanation whatsoever. Might just as well post a link in a comment. BTW it's no longer Oxford Dictionaries, it's now called Lexico.

    – Mari-Lou A
    6 hours ago












  • @Mari-LouA That makes this answer one of those notorious nomina nuda which people are always railing about. Hard to blame them, really.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago












  • @Mari-LouA ... you are right. Lexico.

    – GEdgar
    5 hours ago












  • 3





    This is just a dictionary definition without any explanation whatsoever. Might just as well post a link in a comment. BTW it's no longer Oxford Dictionaries, it's now called Lexico.

    – Mari-Lou A
    6 hours ago












  • @Mari-LouA That makes this answer one of those notorious nomina nuda which people are always railing about. Hard to blame them, really.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago












  • @Mari-LouA ... you are right. Lexico.

    – GEdgar
    5 hours ago







3




3





This is just a dictionary definition without any explanation whatsoever. Might just as well post a link in a comment. BTW it's no longer Oxford Dictionaries, it's now called Lexico.

– Mari-Lou A
6 hours ago






This is just a dictionary definition without any explanation whatsoever. Might just as well post a link in a comment. BTW it's no longer Oxford Dictionaries, it's now called Lexico.

– Mari-Lou A
6 hours ago














@Mari-LouA That makes this answer one of those notorious nomina nuda which people are always railing about. Hard to blame them, really.

– tchrist
5 hours ago






@Mari-LouA That makes this answer one of those notorious nomina nuda which people are always railing about. Hard to blame them, really.

– tchrist
5 hours ago














@Mari-LouA ... you are right. Lexico.

– GEdgar
5 hours ago





@Mari-LouA ... you are right. Lexico.

– GEdgar
5 hours ago













3














It’s a way to to refer to photos with nude subjects. As you can see from Ngram this expression took off from the ‘60s/70s when pictures portraying nude people, generally women, started to become popular, as in earlier expression used referring to paintings



Nude:




(of a photograph, painting, statue, etc.) being or prominently displaying a representation of the nude human figure.




(Dictionary.com)






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Thanks for the Ngram. It reinforces the idea that the phrase has become an idiom.

    – Jim Mack
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @JimMack Enough of all this beating around the bush already. It's time to let the cat out of the bag and spill the beans: in exactly what fashion could nude photos EVER be considered any sort of "idiom"?? You're clearly barking up the wrong tree here. The elephant in the room is that old familiar refrain, "A simply qualified noun doth never an idiom make." Since it takes two to tango, the ball's in your court now, Roger Federer.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago
















3














It’s a way to to refer to photos with nude subjects. As you can see from Ngram this expression took off from the ‘60s/70s when pictures portraying nude people, generally women, started to become popular, as in earlier expression used referring to paintings



Nude:




(of a photograph, painting, statue, etc.) being or prominently displaying a representation of the nude human figure.




(Dictionary.com)






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Thanks for the Ngram. It reinforces the idea that the phrase has become an idiom.

    – Jim Mack
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @JimMack Enough of all this beating around the bush already. It's time to let the cat out of the bag and spill the beans: in exactly what fashion could nude photos EVER be considered any sort of "idiom"?? You're clearly barking up the wrong tree here. The elephant in the room is that old familiar refrain, "A simply qualified noun doth never an idiom make." Since it takes two to tango, the ball's in your court now, Roger Federer.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago














3












3








3







It’s a way to to refer to photos with nude subjects. As you can see from Ngram this expression took off from the ‘60s/70s when pictures portraying nude people, generally women, started to become popular, as in earlier expression used referring to paintings



Nude:




(of a photograph, painting, statue, etc.) being or prominently displaying a representation of the nude human figure.




(Dictionary.com)






share|improve this answer















It’s a way to to refer to photos with nude subjects. As you can see from Ngram this expression took off from the ‘60s/70s when pictures portraying nude people, generally women, started to become popular, as in earlier expression used referring to paintings



Nude:




(of a photograph, painting, statue, etc.) being or prominently displaying a representation of the nude human figure.




(Dictionary.com)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









user240918user240918

29.6k13 gold badges84 silver badges174 bronze badges




29.6k13 gold badges84 silver badges174 bronze badges







  • 1





    Thanks for the Ngram. It reinforces the idea that the phrase has become an idiom.

    – Jim Mack
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @JimMack Enough of all this beating around the bush already. It's time to let the cat out of the bag and spill the beans: in exactly what fashion could nude photos EVER be considered any sort of "idiom"?? You're clearly barking up the wrong tree here. The elephant in the room is that old familiar refrain, "A simply qualified noun doth never an idiom make." Since it takes two to tango, the ball's in your court now, Roger Federer.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago













  • 1





    Thanks for the Ngram. It reinforces the idea that the phrase has become an idiom.

    – Jim Mack
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    @JimMack Enough of all this beating around the bush already. It's time to let the cat out of the bag and spill the beans: in exactly what fashion could nude photos EVER be considered any sort of "idiom"?? You're clearly barking up the wrong tree here. The elephant in the room is that old familiar refrain, "A simply qualified noun doth never an idiom make." Since it takes two to tango, the ball's in your court now, Roger Federer.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago








1




1





Thanks for the Ngram. It reinforces the idea that the phrase has become an idiom.

– Jim Mack
7 hours ago





Thanks for the Ngram. It reinforces the idea that the phrase has become an idiom.

– Jim Mack
7 hours ago




1




1





@JimMack Enough of all this beating around the bush already. It's time to let the cat out of the bag and spill the beans: in exactly what fashion could nude photos EVER be considered any sort of "idiom"?? You're clearly barking up the wrong tree here. The elephant in the room is that old familiar refrain, "A simply qualified noun doth never an idiom make." Since it takes two to tango, the ball's in your court now, Roger Federer.

– tchrist
5 hours ago






@JimMack Enough of all this beating around the bush already. It's time to let the cat out of the bag and spill the beans: in exactly what fashion could nude photos EVER be considered any sort of "idiom"?? You're clearly barking up the wrong tree here. The elephant in the room is that old familiar refrain, "A simply qualified noun doth never an idiom make." Since it takes two to tango, the ball's in your court now, Roger Federer.

– tchrist
5 hours ago












2














Nude photos is a noun phrase that has become idiomatic and manifests in slang such as "nudies" or simply "nudes". The phrase "nude photos of X" does indeed seem like a retro-construction. This phrasing is also more euphemistic or neutral, perhaps, since as you mentioned, technically, it would be "X" who is nude, but "X" is not the grammatical subject (it is instead within the prepositional "of X").



@user240918 and @GEdgar also make good points.



Note Webster:




nude (adj) bare, naked, nude, bald, barren mean deprived of naturally or conventionally appropriate covering. ... nude applies especially to the unclothed human figure.







share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    I think the answer is that it's now idiomatic, as you point out. Many of the other answers and comments seem to just state the obvious.

    – Jim Mack
    7 hours ago











  • @JimMack This is wrong. It is not in any way idiomatic. It means what it literally says. Therefore it is not idiomatic. A cat photo is a photo of a cat. A clock hand is the hand of a clock; it is not a hand that is clocky. Cock crow is not a crow that is cocky. Child photos aren't photos that will someday grow up. Rather, they are photos OF children.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago







  • 3





    It is not idiomatic in the "a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g., rain cats and dogs, see the light)", but it is idiomatic in the second sense "a form of expression natural to a language, person, or group of people." Both are from OED

    – Carly
    4 hours ago















2














Nude photos is a noun phrase that has become idiomatic and manifests in slang such as "nudies" or simply "nudes". The phrase "nude photos of X" does indeed seem like a retro-construction. This phrasing is also more euphemistic or neutral, perhaps, since as you mentioned, technically, it would be "X" who is nude, but "X" is not the grammatical subject (it is instead within the prepositional "of X").



@user240918 and @GEdgar also make good points.



Note Webster:




nude (adj) bare, naked, nude, bald, barren mean deprived of naturally or conventionally appropriate covering. ... nude applies especially to the unclothed human figure.







share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    I think the answer is that it's now idiomatic, as you point out. Many of the other answers and comments seem to just state the obvious.

    – Jim Mack
    7 hours ago











  • @JimMack This is wrong. It is not in any way idiomatic. It means what it literally says. Therefore it is not idiomatic. A cat photo is a photo of a cat. A clock hand is the hand of a clock; it is not a hand that is clocky. Cock crow is not a crow that is cocky. Child photos aren't photos that will someday grow up. Rather, they are photos OF children.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago







  • 3





    It is not idiomatic in the "a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g., rain cats and dogs, see the light)", but it is idiomatic in the second sense "a form of expression natural to a language, person, or group of people." Both are from OED

    – Carly
    4 hours ago













2












2








2







Nude photos is a noun phrase that has become idiomatic and manifests in slang such as "nudies" or simply "nudes". The phrase "nude photos of X" does indeed seem like a retro-construction. This phrasing is also more euphemistic or neutral, perhaps, since as you mentioned, technically, it would be "X" who is nude, but "X" is not the grammatical subject (it is instead within the prepositional "of X").



@user240918 and @GEdgar also make good points.



Note Webster:




nude (adj) bare, naked, nude, bald, barren mean deprived of naturally or conventionally appropriate covering. ... nude applies especially to the unclothed human figure.







share|improve this answer













Nude photos is a noun phrase that has become idiomatic and manifests in slang such as "nudies" or simply "nudes". The phrase "nude photos of X" does indeed seem like a retro-construction. This phrasing is also more euphemistic or neutral, perhaps, since as you mentioned, technically, it would be "X" who is nude, but "X" is not the grammatical subject (it is instead within the prepositional "of X").



@user240918 and @GEdgar also make good points.



Note Webster:




nude (adj) bare, naked, nude, bald, barren mean deprived of naturally or conventionally appropriate covering. ... nude applies especially to the unclothed human figure.








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 7 hours ago









CarlyCarly

2,3033 silver badges15 bronze badges




2,3033 silver badges15 bronze badges







  • 2





    I think the answer is that it's now idiomatic, as you point out. Many of the other answers and comments seem to just state the obvious.

    – Jim Mack
    7 hours ago











  • @JimMack This is wrong. It is not in any way idiomatic. It means what it literally says. Therefore it is not idiomatic. A cat photo is a photo of a cat. A clock hand is the hand of a clock; it is not a hand that is clocky. Cock crow is not a crow that is cocky. Child photos aren't photos that will someday grow up. Rather, they are photos OF children.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago







  • 3





    It is not idiomatic in the "a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g., rain cats and dogs, see the light)", but it is idiomatic in the second sense "a form of expression natural to a language, person, or group of people." Both are from OED

    – Carly
    4 hours ago












  • 2





    I think the answer is that it's now idiomatic, as you point out. Many of the other answers and comments seem to just state the obvious.

    – Jim Mack
    7 hours ago











  • @JimMack This is wrong. It is not in any way idiomatic. It means what it literally says. Therefore it is not idiomatic. A cat photo is a photo of a cat. A clock hand is the hand of a clock; it is not a hand that is clocky. Cock crow is not a crow that is cocky. Child photos aren't photos that will someday grow up. Rather, they are photos OF children.

    – tchrist
    5 hours ago







  • 3





    It is not idiomatic in the "a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g., rain cats and dogs, see the light)", but it is idiomatic in the second sense "a form of expression natural to a language, person, or group of people." Both are from OED

    – Carly
    4 hours ago







2




2





I think the answer is that it's now idiomatic, as you point out. Many of the other answers and comments seem to just state the obvious.

– Jim Mack
7 hours ago





I think the answer is that it's now idiomatic, as you point out. Many of the other answers and comments seem to just state the obvious.

– Jim Mack
7 hours ago













@JimMack This is wrong. It is not in any way idiomatic. It means what it literally says. Therefore it is not idiomatic. A cat photo is a photo of a cat. A clock hand is the hand of a clock; it is not a hand that is clocky. Cock crow is not a crow that is cocky. Child photos aren't photos that will someday grow up. Rather, they are photos OF children.

– tchrist
5 hours ago






@JimMack This is wrong. It is not in any way idiomatic. It means what it literally says. Therefore it is not idiomatic. A cat photo is a photo of a cat. A clock hand is the hand of a clock; it is not a hand that is clocky. Cock crow is not a crow that is cocky. Child photos aren't photos that will someday grow up. Rather, they are photos OF children.

– tchrist
5 hours ago





3




3





It is not idiomatic in the "a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g., rain cats and dogs, see the light)", but it is idiomatic in the second sense "a form of expression natural to a language, person, or group of people." Both are from OED

– Carly
4 hours ago





It is not idiomatic in the "a group of words established by usage as having a meaning not deducible from those of the individual words (e.g., rain cats and dogs, see the light)", but it is idiomatic in the second sense "a form of expression natural to a language, person, or group of people." Both are from OED

– Carly
4 hours ago











1














Collocations modifying photo often don't refer to the photo as a physical object. They instead refer to the subject of the photo, or what's depicted in the image.



To demonstrate this, here are the most common collocations for ____ photo according to the Corpus of Contemporary American English. I have bolded the ones that describe the image (source, subject, or whatever) and italicized the ones that describe a property of the physical photograph. Other results are left unchanged. Numbers describe frequency within the corpus.



  • these (434)


  • family (379)


  • two (316)

  • take (243)


  • color (234)


  • AP (225)

  • those (222)

  • taking (180)


  • digital (168)


  • old (160)


  • scene (147)


  • three (135)


  • nude (129)


  • framed (124)


  • satellite (122)


  • black-and-white (113)

  • took (112)


  • aerial (91)


  • four (87)


  • five (84)

  • snapping (82)


  • wedding (63)

Out of these results, a family photo is understood to be a photo of a family, just as a wedding photo is understood to be a photo of a wedding. Similarly, English has other constructions, like nude photo. The same positioning can also describe provenance (AP photo, satellite photo, aerial photo), quality of photo (black-and-white photo, color photo), physical status (framed photo, digital photo), and so on.



Hearers understand nude photo to refer to what's in the photo because of established usage. Also, the idea of a photo in the "nude" does not make much sense, so the physical interpretation of the object is unlikely. Many media objects have this quality; a ___ book can refer to either the physical object (big book, hardcover book) or to a quality of the text inside (a sad book, a scholarly book). A bit of logic and some arbitrary usage rules determine how people interpret collocations involving media objects.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    One can easily see how a photo of a family becomes a family photo. One can also see why that happens: the latter formulation is simpler and easier to integrate into longer sentences. That, however, is not analogous to the present case. If photos of nude women followed the same pattern, it would turn into nude-women photos, but that's not what actually happens. The puzzling question is why does the adjective nude move to photos, while the of women construction remains. Photos of tall women would never become tall photos of women.

    – jsw29
    2 hours ago











  • I don't see the equivalent formation necessarily being photo(s) of nude women. It could easily be photo of a nude. Compare to Dali's Study of a Nude. Nude would thus be an attributive noun in nude photo, just like family in family photo or wedding in wedding photo.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    56 mins ago
















1














Collocations modifying photo often don't refer to the photo as a physical object. They instead refer to the subject of the photo, or what's depicted in the image.



To demonstrate this, here are the most common collocations for ____ photo according to the Corpus of Contemporary American English. I have bolded the ones that describe the image (source, subject, or whatever) and italicized the ones that describe a property of the physical photograph. Other results are left unchanged. Numbers describe frequency within the corpus.



  • these (434)


  • family (379)


  • two (316)

  • take (243)


  • color (234)


  • AP (225)

  • those (222)

  • taking (180)


  • digital (168)


  • old (160)


  • scene (147)


  • three (135)


  • nude (129)


  • framed (124)


  • satellite (122)


  • black-and-white (113)

  • took (112)


  • aerial (91)


  • four (87)


  • five (84)

  • snapping (82)


  • wedding (63)

Out of these results, a family photo is understood to be a photo of a family, just as a wedding photo is understood to be a photo of a wedding. Similarly, English has other constructions, like nude photo. The same positioning can also describe provenance (AP photo, satellite photo, aerial photo), quality of photo (black-and-white photo, color photo), physical status (framed photo, digital photo), and so on.



Hearers understand nude photo to refer to what's in the photo because of established usage. Also, the idea of a photo in the "nude" does not make much sense, so the physical interpretation of the object is unlikely. Many media objects have this quality; a ___ book can refer to either the physical object (big book, hardcover book) or to a quality of the text inside (a sad book, a scholarly book). A bit of logic and some arbitrary usage rules determine how people interpret collocations involving media objects.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    One can easily see how a photo of a family becomes a family photo. One can also see why that happens: the latter formulation is simpler and easier to integrate into longer sentences. That, however, is not analogous to the present case. If photos of nude women followed the same pattern, it would turn into nude-women photos, but that's not what actually happens. The puzzling question is why does the adjective nude move to photos, while the of women construction remains. Photos of tall women would never become tall photos of women.

    – jsw29
    2 hours ago











  • I don't see the equivalent formation necessarily being photo(s) of nude women. It could easily be photo of a nude. Compare to Dali's Study of a Nude. Nude would thus be an attributive noun in nude photo, just like family in family photo or wedding in wedding photo.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    56 mins ago














1












1








1







Collocations modifying photo often don't refer to the photo as a physical object. They instead refer to the subject of the photo, or what's depicted in the image.



To demonstrate this, here are the most common collocations for ____ photo according to the Corpus of Contemporary American English. I have bolded the ones that describe the image (source, subject, or whatever) and italicized the ones that describe a property of the physical photograph. Other results are left unchanged. Numbers describe frequency within the corpus.



  • these (434)


  • family (379)


  • two (316)

  • take (243)


  • color (234)


  • AP (225)

  • those (222)

  • taking (180)


  • digital (168)


  • old (160)


  • scene (147)


  • three (135)


  • nude (129)


  • framed (124)


  • satellite (122)


  • black-and-white (113)

  • took (112)


  • aerial (91)


  • four (87)


  • five (84)

  • snapping (82)


  • wedding (63)

Out of these results, a family photo is understood to be a photo of a family, just as a wedding photo is understood to be a photo of a wedding. Similarly, English has other constructions, like nude photo. The same positioning can also describe provenance (AP photo, satellite photo, aerial photo), quality of photo (black-and-white photo, color photo), physical status (framed photo, digital photo), and so on.



Hearers understand nude photo to refer to what's in the photo because of established usage. Also, the idea of a photo in the "nude" does not make much sense, so the physical interpretation of the object is unlikely. Many media objects have this quality; a ___ book can refer to either the physical object (big book, hardcover book) or to a quality of the text inside (a sad book, a scholarly book). A bit of logic and some arbitrary usage rules determine how people interpret collocations involving media objects.






share|improve this answer













Collocations modifying photo often don't refer to the photo as a physical object. They instead refer to the subject of the photo, or what's depicted in the image.



To demonstrate this, here are the most common collocations for ____ photo according to the Corpus of Contemporary American English. I have bolded the ones that describe the image (source, subject, or whatever) and italicized the ones that describe a property of the physical photograph. Other results are left unchanged. Numbers describe frequency within the corpus.



  • these (434)


  • family (379)


  • two (316)

  • take (243)


  • color (234)


  • AP (225)

  • those (222)

  • taking (180)


  • digital (168)


  • old (160)


  • scene (147)


  • three (135)


  • nude (129)


  • framed (124)


  • satellite (122)


  • black-and-white (113)

  • took (112)


  • aerial (91)


  • four (87)


  • five (84)

  • snapping (82)


  • wedding (63)

Out of these results, a family photo is understood to be a photo of a family, just as a wedding photo is understood to be a photo of a wedding. Similarly, English has other constructions, like nude photo. The same positioning can also describe provenance (AP photo, satellite photo, aerial photo), quality of photo (black-and-white photo, color photo), physical status (framed photo, digital photo), and so on.



Hearers understand nude photo to refer to what's in the photo because of established usage. Also, the idea of a photo in the "nude" does not make much sense, so the physical interpretation of the object is unlikely. Many media objects have this quality; a ___ book can refer to either the physical object (big book, hardcover book) or to a quality of the text inside (a sad book, a scholarly book). A bit of logic and some arbitrary usage rules determine how people interpret collocations involving media objects.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin

12.1k1 gold badge21 silver badges46 bronze badges




12.1k1 gold badge21 silver badges46 bronze badges







  • 2





    One can easily see how a photo of a family becomes a family photo. One can also see why that happens: the latter formulation is simpler and easier to integrate into longer sentences. That, however, is not analogous to the present case. If photos of nude women followed the same pattern, it would turn into nude-women photos, but that's not what actually happens. The puzzling question is why does the adjective nude move to photos, while the of women construction remains. Photos of tall women would never become tall photos of women.

    – jsw29
    2 hours ago











  • I don't see the equivalent formation necessarily being photo(s) of nude women. It could easily be photo of a nude. Compare to Dali's Study of a Nude. Nude would thus be an attributive noun in nude photo, just like family in family photo or wedding in wedding photo.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    56 mins ago













  • 2





    One can easily see how a photo of a family becomes a family photo. One can also see why that happens: the latter formulation is simpler and easier to integrate into longer sentences. That, however, is not analogous to the present case. If photos of nude women followed the same pattern, it would turn into nude-women photos, but that's not what actually happens. The puzzling question is why does the adjective nude move to photos, while the of women construction remains. Photos of tall women would never become tall photos of women.

    – jsw29
    2 hours ago











  • I don't see the equivalent formation necessarily being photo(s) of nude women. It could easily be photo of a nude. Compare to Dali's Study of a Nude. Nude would thus be an attributive noun in nude photo, just like family in family photo or wedding in wedding photo.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    56 mins ago








2




2





One can easily see how a photo of a family becomes a family photo. One can also see why that happens: the latter formulation is simpler and easier to integrate into longer sentences. That, however, is not analogous to the present case. If photos of nude women followed the same pattern, it would turn into nude-women photos, but that's not what actually happens. The puzzling question is why does the adjective nude move to photos, while the of women construction remains. Photos of tall women would never become tall photos of women.

– jsw29
2 hours ago





One can easily see how a photo of a family becomes a family photo. One can also see why that happens: the latter formulation is simpler and easier to integrate into longer sentences. That, however, is not analogous to the present case. If photos of nude women followed the same pattern, it would turn into nude-women photos, but that's not what actually happens. The puzzling question is why does the adjective nude move to photos, while the of women construction remains. Photos of tall women would never become tall photos of women.

– jsw29
2 hours ago













I don't see the equivalent formation necessarily being photo(s) of nude women. It could easily be photo of a nude. Compare to Dali's Study of a Nude. Nude would thus be an attributive noun in nude photo, just like family in family photo or wedding in wedding photo.

– TaliesinMerlin
56 mins ago






I don't see the equivalent formation necessarily being photo(s) of nude women. It could easily be photo of a nude. Compare to Dali's Study of a Nude. Nude would thus be an attributive noun in nude photo, just like family in family photo or wedding in wedding photo.

– TaliesinMerlin
56 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f504500%2fwhy-are-they-nude-photos%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу