What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?Set Operations with Empty setsOn the size of a non-empty family of non-empty sets such that every set in the family has a proper subset also in the familyIs $varnothing $ an empty set?Is the empty set a member of any collection of sets?Is the empty set countable?What is an Empty set?Subsets of the empty setWhat's the difference between a null set and an empty set?Do all non-empty sets of natural numbers contain a smallest number?
Strange Sticky Substance on Digital Camera
Should the average user with no special access rights be worried about SMS-based 2FA being theoretically interceptable?
What is the difference between an astronaut in the ISS and a freediver in perfect neutral buoyancy?
Does HTTP HSTS protect a domain from a bad-actor publically-trusted-CA issing a illegitimate valid certificate?
Is it impolite to ask for halal food when traveling to and in Thailand?
Is this a Sherman, and if so what model?
What Secular Civic Space Would Pioneers Build For Small Frontier Towns?
What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?
What's the story to "WotC gave up on fixing Polymorph"?
How do I set a custom order for folders on Windows 7 and 10?
Social leper versus social leopard
How to say "cheat sheet" in French
2000s Animated TV show where teenagers could physically go into a virtual world
Co-Supervisor comes to office to help her students which distracts me
Why are there two fundamental laws of logic?
How to deal with a Homophobic PC
Why is (inf + 0j)*1 == inf + nanj?
Going to France with limited French for a day
I reverse the source code, you negate the input!
Why does this image of Jupiter look so strange?
Guitar tuning (EADGBE), "perfect" fourths?
Examples of "unsuccessful" theories with afterlives
Hilbert's hotel: why can't I repeat it infinitely many times?
What exactly did this mechanic sabotage on the American Airlines 737, and how dangerous was it?
What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?
Set Operations with Empty setsOn the size of a non-empty family of non-empty sets such that every set in the family has a proper subset also in the familyIs $varnothing $ an empty set?Is the empty set a member of any collection of sets?Is the empty set countable?What is an Empty set?Subsets of the empty setWhat's the difference between a null set and an empty set?Do all non-empty sets of natural numbers contain a smallest number?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?
I am not sure if the empty set, in this case, can be considered as a set and make the size 3 or if it is 2 or 0.
thanks
elementary-set-theory
New contributor
Takobell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?
I am not sure if the empty set, in this case, can be considered as a set and make the size 3 or if it is 2 or 0.
thanks
elementary-set-theory
New contributor
Takobell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
$endgroup$
– Alvin Lepik
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's not an empty set.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?
I am not sure if the empty set, in this case, can be considered as a set and make the size 3 or if it is 2 or 0.
thanks
elementary-set-theory
New contributor
Takobell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
What is the size of a set of sets of the empty set , , ?
I am not sure if the empty set, in this case, can be considered as a set and make the size 3 or if it is 2 or 0.
thanks
elementary-set-theory
elementary-set-theory
New contributor
Takobell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Takobell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 9 hours ago
Andrés E. Caicedo
67.1k8 gold badges170 silver badges263 bronze badges
67.1k8 gold badges170 silver badges263 bronze badges
New contributor
Takobell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 10 hours ago
TakobellTakobell
163 bronze badges
163 bronze badges
New contributor
Takobell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Takobell is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$begingroup$
one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
$endgroup$
– Alvin Lepik
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's not an empty set.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
$endgroup$
– Alvin Lepik
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's not an empty set.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
$endgroup$
– Alvin Lepik
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
$endgroup$
– Alvin Lepik
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's not an empty set.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's not an empty set.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
10 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your set can be written as $a,b,c$ where $a$ happens to be the emptyset, $b$ happens to be the set containing the empty set, and $c$ happens to be the set containing the set containing the emptyset.
You should not have any trouble seeing that $a,b,c$ is of size three so long as they are all distinct. The only possible source of confusion in this is in recognizing that each of $emptyset, emptyset$ and $emptyset$ are not only valid possible elements of a set, but are distinct and different than one another. Indeed, they are all valid possible elements of sets and are all different than one another. Remember that the "depth" of each is relevant and is part of what makes these distinct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
$endgroup$
– Takobell
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
As you are only interested in the number of elements in the set and not in the elements themself, you basically just have to count the commas, so your set has three elements, so three is its size.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
- The empty set is indeed an element of this set.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Takobell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3363391%2fwhat-is-the-size-of-a-set-of-sets-of-the-empty-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your set can be written as $a,b,c$ where $a$ happens to be the emptyset, $b$ happens to be the set containing the empty set, and $c$ happens to be the set containing the set containing the emptyset.
You should not have any trouble seeing that $a,b,c$ is of size three so long as they are all distinct. The only possible source of confusion in this is in recognizing that each of $emptyset, emptyset$ and $emptyset$ are not only valid possible elements of a set, but are distinct and different than one another. Indeed, they are all valid possible elements of sets and are all different than one another. Remember that the "depth" of each is relevant and is part of what makes these distinct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
$endgroup$
– Takobell
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Your set can be written as $a,b,c$ where $a$ happens to be the emptyset, $b$ happens to be the set containing the empty set, and $c$ happens to be the set containing the set containing the emptyset.
You should not have any trouble seeing that $a,b,c$ is of size three so long as they are all distinct. The only possible source of confusion in this is in recognizing that each of $emptyset, emptyset$ and $emptyset$ are not only valid possible elements of a set, but are distinct and different than one another. Indeed, they are all valid possible elements of sets and are all different than one another. Remember that the "depth" of each is relevant and is part of what makes these distinct.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
$endgroup$
– Takobell
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Your set can be written as $a,b,c$ where $a$ happens to be the emptyset, $b$ happens to be the set containing the empty set, and $c$ happens to be the set containing the set containing the emptyset.
You should not have any trouble seeing that $a,b,c$ is of size three so long as they are all distinct. The only possible source of confusion in this is in recognizing that each of $emptyset, emptyset$ and $emptyset$ are not only valid possible elements of a set, but are distinct and different than one another. Indeed, they are all valid possible elements of sets and are all different than one another. Remember that the "depth" of each is relevant and is part of what makes these distinct.
$endgroup$
Your set can be written as $a,b,c$ where $a$ happens to be the emptyset, $b$ happens to be the set containing the empty set, and $c$ happens to be the set containing the set containing the emptyset.
You should not have any trouble seeing that $a,b,c$ is of size three so long as they are all distinct. The only possible source of confusion in this is in recognizing that each of $emptyset, emptyset$ and $emptyset$ are not only valid possible elements of a set, but are distinct and different than one another. Indeed, they are all valid possible elements of sets and are all different than one another. Remember that the "depth" of each is relevant and is part of what makes these distinct.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eac0/5eac02f8888ae4bb1d60f15a6f79f1dc11006e18" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eac0/5eac02f8888ae4bb1d60f15a6f79f1dc11006e18" alt=""
JMoravitzJMoravitz
54.4k4 gold badges43 silver badges93 bronze badges
54.4k4 gold badges43 silver badges93 bronze badges
$begingroup$
but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
$endgroup$
– Takobell
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
$endgroup$
– Takobell
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
$endgroup$
– Takobell
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2
$endgroup$
– Takobell
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@TarekHich yes, well, I did include pointing out that $aneq b$, $aneq c$ and $bneq c$ that $a,b,c$ are distinct, and any set $a,b,c$ where $a,b,c$ are distinct is of size three.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
In the event that $x$ and $y$ are distinct and neither are equal to the emptyset, then $emptyset,x,y$ is still of size three. The only reason why $emptyset,a,b$ was of size two in your example in the comment was because $emptyset$ and $a$ were in reality the same element.
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
TarekHich: "but a,b can be writen as ∅, a,b and its size is 2" and JMoravitz: "yes, well". Me: Um, no..... $a,b$ can not be written as $emptyset, a, b$. The empty set is a thing and it is not in $a,b$ and it is in $emptyset, a,b$. Maybe you meant say we can write $a,b$ as $ , a, b$ where "$ $" is nothing. But $emptyset = $ is not nothing. It is something. "$ $" isn't anything at all. $emptyset$ doesn't HAVE anything at all but it IS something.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@fleablood perhaps you missed where I said $a$ is the empty set. Are you implying x,y can't be written in the case that x=y or is somehow different than x? Remember we are dealing with sets and not multisets
$endgroup$
– JMoravitz
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
As you are only interested in the number of elements in the set and not in the elements themself, you basically just have to count the commas, so your set has three elements, so three is its size.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
As you are only interested in the number of elements in the set and not in the elements themself, you basically just have to count the commas, so your set has three elements, so three is its size.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
As you are only interested in the number of elements in the set and not in the elements themself, you basically just have to count the commas, so your set has three elements, so three is its size.
$endgroup$
As you are only interested in the number of elements in the set and not in the elements themself, you basically just have to count the commas, so your set has three elements, so three is its size.
answered 10 hours ago
MatthiasMatthias
884 bronze badges
884 bronze badges
$begingroup$
I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have mixed feelings about this answer. On the one hand it directly gets that a set has a list of things-- that the content of the things doesn't matter. But on the other hand it begs and avoids the questions. Also consider $apple, orange, banana,banana, peach, cherry$. That has has five commas but only four items. And $a,a$ has a comma indicating two items but it actually has only one.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
- The empty set is indeed an element of this set.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
- The empty set is indeed an element of this set.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
- The empty set is indeed an element of this set.
$endgroup$
- The empty set is indeed an element of this set.
answered 10 hours ago
7903766279037662
1709 bronze badges
1709 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Takobell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Takobell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Takobell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Takobell is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3363391%2fwhat-is-the-size-of-a-set-of-sets-of-the-empty-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
one $)$ is meant to be $}$ I believe. There are three elements in the set.
$endgroup$
– Alvin Lepik
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's not an empty set.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
10 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
As you are probably aware, $$ represents the empty set. $$ represents the set containing the empty set, and so on. Your set has in it the empty set, the set containing the empty set, and the set containing the set that contains the empty set. How many distinct elements do you have?
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
The empty set is a set. It just has nothing in it. This set has three things in it. On thing is the empty set, the second thing is a set containing the empty set. The third thing is a set containing a set containing the empty set. That's three things. The things may be nothing more than an empty bag, a bag with an empty bag in it, and a bag containing a bag with an empty bag; so the may have nothing of substance, but they are still things.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago