LWC and complex parametersApex Prepopulated Email bodyNeed help writing test Apex ClasseHow to pass a variable's value of child visualforce page to a variable in parent visualforce using jsI am getting Exception FATAL_ERROR|System. LimitException: Maximum stack depth reached: 12Not able to escape quote in visualforce page?fault string: No such parameter param defined for the operation, please check the WSDL for the servicewhat is wrong in this codeNeed to add field in apex class email template - not workingWhy is my Approval Process instance not creating NewWorkItems?Is there any help/ hint while attending trailhead challenge?
How can I add custom success page
Ideas for 3rd eye abilities
How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)
How could a lack of term limits lead to a "dictatorship?"
How can I plot a Farey diagram?
Crop image to path created in TikZ?
Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium
Filling an area between two curves
What does 'script /dev/null' do?
extract characters between two commas?
Was there ever an axiom rendered a theorem?
Copycat chess is back
Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python
COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?
Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Landing in very high winds
Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning
LWC and complex parameters
Apex Prepopulated Email bodyNeed help writing test Apex ClasseHow to pass a variable's value of child visualforce page to a variable in parent visualforce using jsI am getting Exception FATAL_ERROR|System. LimitException: Maximum stack depth reached: 12Not able to escape quote in visualforce page?fault string: No such parameter param defined for the operation, please check the WSDL for the servicewhat is wrong in this codeNeed to add field in apex class email template - not workingWhy is my Approval Process instance not creating NewWorkItems?Is there any help/ hint while attending trailhead challenge?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
add a comment |
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
add a comment |
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
apex lightning-web-components
asked 5 hours ago
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
9,08862239
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
2
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
5 hours ago
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
5 hours ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257074%2flwc-and-complex-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
2
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
5 hours ago
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
5 hours ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
3 hours ago
add a comment |
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
2
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
5 hours ago
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
5 hours ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
3 hours ago
add a comment |
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
answered 5 hours ago
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,08862239
9,08862239
2
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
5 hours ago
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
5 hours ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
5 hours ago
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
5 hours ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
3 hours ago
2
2
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
5 hours ago
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
5 hours ago
1
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
5 hours ago
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
5 hours ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the
Map<String, Object>
datatypes.– tsalb
3 hours ago
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the
Map<String, Object>
datatypes.– tsalb
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257074%2flwc-and-complex-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown