How to deal with the mirrored components of a FFT? And another questionAnalysing 2500 frequencies using FFT with an input vector of 2048 samples?DFT and then IDFT does not provide the same signalFFT of Square Wave and Sin WaveObtaining power spectrum from ACF, FFT using Matlab and FFTWExtracting amplitudes of components from FFTConsidering the FFT of Real & Complex SignalsWindow period(overlap) and FFTDiscontinuities in the FFTNormalize FFT signal (DC part)How do I calculate peak amplitude of the signal components after zero padding and FFT?

What is the purpose of the yellow wired panels on the IBM 360 Model 20?

Can a UK national work as a paid shop assistant in the USA?

Why does the painters tape have to be blue?

Count all vowels in string

How does the Earth's center produce heat?

Navigating a quick return to previous employer

Possibility of faking someone's public key

One word for 'the thing that attracts me'?

Have any humans orbited the Earth in anything other than a prograde orbit?

Why A=2 and B=1 in the call signs for Spirit and Opportunity?

Are there guidelines for finding good names for LaTeX 2e packages and control sequences defined in these packages?

Why is 'additive' EQ more difficult to use than 'subtractive'?

Writing "hahaha" versus describing the laugh

Are there historical examples of audiences drawn to a work that was "so bad it's good"?

Are runways booked by airlines to land their planes?

What is the limit to a Glyph of Warding's trigger?

Visual Block Mode edit with sequential number

Status of proof by contradiction and excluded middle throughout the history of mathematics?

Determine direction of mass transfer

Why did other houses not demand this?

Storing voxels for a voxel Engine in C++

ifconfig shows UP while ip link shows DOWN

Why did it take so long for Germany to allow electric scooters / e-rollers on the roads?

Why did Drogon spare this character?



How to deal with the mirrored components of a FFT? And another question


Analysing 2500 frequencies using FFT with an input vector of 2048 samples?DFT and then IDFT does not provide the same signalFFT of Square Wave and Sin WaveObtaining power spectrum from ACF, FFT using Matlab and FFTWExtracting amplitudes of components from FFTConsidering the FFT of Real & Complex SignalsWindow period(overlap) and FFTDiscontinuities in the FFTNormalize FFT signal (DC part)How do I calculate peak amplitude of the signal components after zero padding and FFT?













1












$begingroup$


I'm trying to simulate the behavior of my FFT spectrum analyzer, I am using Mathematica, but my questions are more conceptual than technical implementation of code...I hope.



If we consider a simple cosine wave transient signal $y(t) = A cos(2 pi nu_0 t)$, where $A = 1$ and $nu_0 = 24$ $rmHz$. This signal is sampled at some time interval $dt$ and this gives me 2048 points (2048 because of my device), I want to resolve this data to some frequency resolution, $Delta f$, and from the Fourier limit: $t_sample = 1/Deltaf$ so my sample rate, $S_r = 1/dt$ is adjusted accordingly.



I then take the absolute value of the FFT of these 2048 points and reconstruct the frequency component using $Delta f$ (in this example $Delta f = 0.0625$ $rmHz$, this value is because of my device and the features I want to resolve) and the index of the resultant FFT, and get this:



enter image description here



I understand that the symmetric appearance of an FFT comes from the real and imaginary components having the same response to signals -- the absolute value of their responses will be the same. But the phase of the real and imaginary parts is shifted by $pi / 4$. This gives us our mirrored appearance.



FIRST QUESTION: Usually I would just throw the right hand frequencies away and multiply the amplitude of what is left by $2$. Is this the correct approach or should I reverse the order of one half of these 2048 points and then add them together (intuitively I would say no, because both halves should be identical so multiplying by $2$ should suffice)? What is the best method of reconstructing the frequency component/axis?



SECOND QUESTION: This is something I just don't understand. If I increase the frequency of my transient signal $nu_0$ then the two mirrored peaks move closer to each other, converging in the center. This makes sense. If I keep increasing $nu_0$ of the transient arbitrarily (past $124$ $rmHz$ which corresponds to the limit of frequencies) however I still see a peak, in fact I see this oscillating behavior of the peaks just bouncing back and forth as I further increase the frequency -- Why?! Is this natural or because of the way I define my frequencies.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm trying to simulate the behavior of my FFT spectrum analyzer, I am using Mathematica, but my questions are more conceptual than technical implementation of code...I hope.



    If we consider a simple cosine wave transient signal $y(t) = A cos(2 pi nu_0 t)$, where $A = 1$ and $nu_0 = 24$ $rmHz$. This signal is sampled at some time interval $dt$ and this gives me 2048 points (2048 because of my device), I want to resolve this data to some frequency resolution, $Delta f$, and from the Fourier limit: $t_sample = 1/Deltaf$ so my sample rate, $S_r = 1/dt$ is adjusted accordingly.



    I then take the absolute value of the FFT of these 2048 points and reconstruct the frequency component using $Delta f$ (in this example $Delta f = 0.0625$ $rmHz$, this value is because of my device and the features I want to resolve) and the index of the resultant FFT, and get this:



    enter image description here



    I understand that the symmetric appearance of an FFT comes from the real and imaginary components having the same response to signals -- the absolute value of their responses will be the same. But the phase of the real and imaginary parts is shifted by $pi / 4$. This gives us our mirrored appearance.



    FIRST QUESTION: Usually I would just throw the right hand frequencies away and multiply the amplitude of what is left by $2$. Is this the correct approach or should I reverse the order of one half of these 2048 points and then add them together (intuitively I would say no, because both halves should be identical so multiplying by $2$ should suffice)? What is the best method of reconstructing the frequency component/axis?



    SECOND QUESTION: This is something I just don't understand. If I increase the frequency of my transient signal $nu_0$ then the two mirrored peaks move closer to each other, converging in the center. This makes sense. If I keep increasing $nu_0$ of the transient arbitrarily (past $124$ $rmHz$ which corresponds to the limit of frequencies) however I still see a peak, in fact I see this oscillating behavior of the peaks just bouncing back and forth as I further increase the frequency -- Why?! Is this natural or because of the way I define my frequencies.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm trying to simulate the behavior of my FFT spectrum analyzer, I am using Mathematica, but my questions are more conceptual than technical implementation of code...I hope.



      If we consider a simple cosine wave transient signal $y(t) = A cos(2 pi nu_0 t)$, where $A = 1$ and $nu_0 = 24$ $rmHz$. This signal is sampled at some time interval $dt$ and this gives me 2048 points (2048 because of my device), I want to resolve this data to some frequency resolution, $Delta f$, and from the Fourier limit: $t_sample = 1/Deltaf$ so my sample rate, $S_r = 1/dt$ is adjusted accordingly.



      I then take the absolute value of the FFT of these 2048 points and reconstruct the frequency component using $Delta f$ (in this example $Delta f = 0.0625$ $rmHz$, this value is because of my device and the features I want to resolve) and the index of the resultant FFT, and get this:



      enter image description here



      I understand that the symmetric appearance of an FFT comes from the real and imaginary components having the same response to signals -- the absolute value of their responses will be the same. But the phase of the real and imaginary parts is shifted by $pi / 4$. This gives us our mirrored appearance.



      FIRST QUESTION: Usually I would just throw the right hand frequencies away and multiply the amplitude of what is left by $2$. Is this the correct approach or should I reverse the order of one half of these 2048 points and then add them together (intuitively I would say no, because both halves should be identical so multiplying by $2$ should suffice)? What is the best method of reconstructing the frequency component/axis?



      SECOND QUESTION: This is something I just don't understand. If I increase the frequency of my transient signal $nu_0$ then the two mirrored peaks move closer to each other, converging in the center. This makes sense. If I keep increasing $nu_0$ of the transient arbitrarily (past $124$ $rmHz$ which corresponds to the limit of frequencies) however I still see a peak, in fact I see this oscillating behavior of the peaks just bouncing back and forth as I further increase the frequency -- Why?! Is this natural or because of the way I define my frequencies.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm trying to simulate the behavior of my FFT spectrum analyzer, I am using Mathematica, but my questions are more conceptual than technical implementation of code...I hope.



      If we consider a simple cosine wave transient signal $y(t) = A cos(2 pi nu_0 t)$, where $A = 1$ and $nu_0 = 24$ $rmHz$. This signal is sampled at some time interval $dt$ and this gives me 2048 points (2048 because of my device), I want to resolve this data to some frequency resolution, $Delta f$, and from the Fourier limit: $t_sample = 1/Deltaf$ so my sample rate, $S_r = 1/dt$ is adjusted accordingly.



      I then take the absolute value of the FFT of these 2048 points and reconstruct the frequency component using $Delta f$ (in this example $Delta f = 0.0625$ $rmHz$, this value is because of my device and the features I want to resolve) and the index of the resultant FFT, and get this:



      enter image description here



      I understand that the symmetric appearance of an FFT comes from the real and imaginary components having the same response to signals -- the absolute value of their responses will be the same. But the phase of the real and imaginary parts is shifted by $pi / 4$. This gives us our mirrored appearance.



      FIRST QUESTION: Usually I would just throw the right hand frequencies away and multiply the amplitude of what is left by $2$. Is this the correct approach or should I reverse the order of one half of these 2048 points and then add them together (intuitively I would say no, because both halves should be identical so multiplying by $2$ should suffice)? What is the best method of reconstructing the frequency component/axis?



      SECOND QUESTION: This is something I just don't understand. If I increase the frequency of my transient signal $nu_0$ then the two mirrored peaks move closer to each other, converging in the center. This makes sense. If I keep increasing $nu_0$ of the transient arbitrarily (past $124$ $rmHz$ which corresponds to the limit of frequencies) however I still see a peak, in fact I see this oscillating behavior of the peaks just bouncing back and forth as I further increase the frequency -- Why?! Is this natural or because of the way I define my frequencies.







      fft discrete-signals






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 6 hours ago









      QuantumPenguinQuantumPenguin

      1084




      1084




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          It depends on your spectrum analyzer.



          If you want to analyze a one channel real baseband signal, the mirrored frequencies are redundant. you should keep the first N/2+1 points.



          For communications signals, there can be an I and Q (two reals as a single complex), you want to keep them all. the frequencies will not be (in general) symmetric.



          If you want to calculate the cross spectrum of two reals, there will be mirrored response, but if you want to do something like taking the inverse of the cross spectrum, you should keep both, but only display half.



          It really depends on the actual application. There really isn't a right or wrong way. There are conventions and exceptions. There are niche applications. Spectrum analyzers that are commercial standalone test equipment, usually have lots of buttons, lots of modes.



          for your second question, this is what spectral aliasing looks like if you don't apply an antialiasing filter prior to the DFT.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            0












            $begingroup$

            The most precise way to deal with them is to compare them using the algorythm used in the Wigner timer frequency distribution.



            It's a processing intensive way of comparing the real and imaginary results of the FFT, I am completely ignorant of the other types of FFT implementations.



            The wigner time frequency distribution uses both products to construct a quantum uncertainty distribution, a bell curve of some kind to describe where the amplitude probably was, for the time and frequency domain, a bit like electrons and photons can be in multiple places at once, the time-frequency graph has an unknown and stochastic basis that can be implemented into a graph. It results the most precise FFT frequency graph according to the professors.



            It is one way of processing the real and imaginary signals, there are probably more popular ones, I am a bit ignorant, even a 3rd year maths or physics student can't easily program it.



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_distribution_function#Cross_term_property



            They say In the ancestral physics Wigner quasi-probability distribution has useful physics consequences, required for precision. By contrast, the short-time Fourier transform does not have this feature. Negative features of the WDF are reflective of the Gabor limit of the classical signal and physically unrelated to any possible underlay of quantum structure.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "295"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdsp.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58439%2fhow-to-deal-with-the-mirrored-components-of-a-fft-and-another-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              It depends on your spectrum analyzer.



              If you want to analyze a one channel real baseband signal, the mirrored frequencies are redundant. you should keep the first N/2+1 points.



              For communications signals, there can be an I and Q (two reals as a single complex), you want to keep them all. the frequencies will not be (in general) symmetric.



              If you want to calculate the cross spectrum of two reals, there will be mirrored response, but if you want to do something like taking the inverse of the cross spectrum, you should keep both, but only display half.



              It really depends on the actual application. There really isn't a right or wrong way. There are conventions and exceptions. There are niche applications. Spectrum analyzers that are commercial standalone test equipment, usually have lots of buttons, lots of modes.



              for your second question, this is what spectral aliasing looks like if you don't apply an antialiasing filter prior to the DFT.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                It depends on your spectrum analyzer.



                If you want to analyze a one channel real baseband signal, the mirrored frequencies are redundant. you should keep the first N/2+1 points.



                For communications signals, there can be an I and Q (two reals as a single complex), you want to keep them all. the frequencies will not be (in general) symmetric.



                If you want to calculate the cross spectrum of two reals, there will be mirrored response, but if you want to do something like taking the inverse of the cross spectrum, you should keep both, but only display half.



                It really depends on the actual application. There really isn't a right or wrong way. There are conventions and exceptions. There are niche applications. Spectrum analyzers that are commercial standalone test equipment, usually have lots of buttons, lots of modes.



                for your second question, this is what spectral aliasing looks like if you don't apply an antialiasing filter prior to the DFT.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  It depends on your spectrum analyzer.



                  If you want to analyze a one channel real baseband signal, the mirrored frequencies are redundant. you should keep the first N/2+1 points.



                  For communications signals, there can be an I and Q (two reals as a single complex), you want to keep them all. the frequencies will not be (in general) symmetric.



                  If you want to calculate the cross spectrum of two reals, there will be mirrored response, but if you want to do something like taking the inverse of the cross spectrum, you should keep both, but only display half.



                  It really depends on the actual application. There really isn't a right or wrong way. There are conventions and exceptions. There are niche applications. Spectrum analyzers that are commercial standalone test equipment, usually have lots of buttons, lots of modes.



                  for your second question, this is what spectral aliasing looks like if you don't apply an antialiasing filter prior to the DFT.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  It depends on your spectrum analyzer.



                  If you want to analyze a one channel real baseband signal, the mirrored frequencies are redundant. you should keep the first N/2+1 points.



                  For communications signals, there can be an I and Q (two reals as a single complex), you want to keep them all. the frequencies will not be (in general) symmetric.



                  If you want to calculate the cross spectrum of two reals, there will be mirrored response, but if you want to do something like taking the inverse of the cross spectrum, you should keep both, but only display half.



                  It really depends on the actual application. There really isn't a right or wrong way. There are conventions and exceptions. There are niche applications. Spectrum analyzers that are commercial standalone test equipment, usually have lots of buttons, lots of modes.



                  for your second question, this is what spectral aliasing looks like if you don't apply an antialiasing filter prior to the DFT.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 5 hours ago

























                  answered 5 hours ago









                  Stanley PawlukiewiczStanley Pawlukiewicz

                  6,6922523




                  6,6922523





















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      The most precise way to deal with them is to compare them using the algorythm used in the Wigner timer frequency distribution.



                      It's a processing intensive way of comparing the real and imaginary results of the FFT, I am completely ignorant of the other types of FFT implementations.



                      The wigner time frequency distribution uses both products to construct a quantum uncertainty distribution, a bell curve of some kind to describe where the amplitude probably was, for the time and frequency domain, a bit like electrons and photons can be in multiple places at once, the time-frequency graph has an unknown and stochastic basis that can be implemented into a graph. It results the most precise FFT frequency graph according to the professors.



                      It is one way of processing the real and imaginary signals, there are probably more popular ones, I am a bit ignorant, even a 3rd year maths or physics student can't easily program it.



                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_distribution_function#Cross_term_property



                      They say In the ancestral physics Wigner quasi-probability distribution has useful physics consequences, required for precision. By contrast, the short-time Fourier transform does not have this feature. Negative features of the WDF are reflective of the Gabor limit of the classical signal and physically unrelated to any possible underlay of quantum structure.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$

















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        The most precise way to deal with them is to compare them using the algorythm used in the Wigner timer frequency distribution.



                        It's a processing intensive way of comparing the real and imaginary results of the FFT, I am completely ignorant of the other types of FFT implementations.



                        The wigner time frequency distribution uses both products to construct a quantum uncertainty distribution, a bell curve of some kind to describe where the amplitude probably was, for the time and frequency domain, a bit like electrons and photons can be in multiple places at once, the time-frequency graph has an unknown and stochastic basis that can be implemented into a graph. It results the most precise FFT frequency graph according to the professors.



                        It is one way of processing the real and imaginary signals, there are probably more popular ones, I am a bit ignorant, even a 3rd year maths or physics student can't easily program it.



                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_distribution_function#Cross_term_property



                        They say In the ancestral physics Wigner quasi-probability distribution has useful physics consequences, required for precision. By contrast, the short-time Fourier transform does not have this feature. Negative features of the WDF are reflective of the Gabor limit of the classical signal and physically unrelated to any possible underlay of quantum structure.






                        share|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          The most precise way to deal with them is to compare them using the algorythm used in the Wigner timer frequency distribution.



                          It's a processing intensive way of comparing the real and imaginary results of the FFT, I am completely ignorant of the other types of FFT implementations.



                          The wigner time frequency distribution uses both products to construct a quantum uncertainty distribution, a bell curve of some kind to describe where the amplitude probably was, for the time and frequency domain, a bit like electrons and photons can be in multiple places at once, the time-frequency graph has an unknown and stochastic basis that can be implemented into a graph. It results the most precise FFT frequency graph according to the professors.



                          It is one way of processing the real and imaginary signals, there are probably more popular ones, I am a bit ignorant, even a 3rd year maths or physics student can't easily program it.



                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_distribution_function#Cross_term_property



                          They say In the ancestral physics Wigner quasi-probability distribution has useful physics consequences, required for precision. By contrast, the short-time Fourier transform does not have this feature. Negative features of the WDF are reflective of the Gabor limit of the classical signal and physically unrelated to any possible underlay of quantum structure.






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          The most precise way to deal with them is to compare them using the algorythm used in the Wigner timer frequency distribution.



                          It's a processing intensive way of comparing the real and imaginary results of the FFT, I am completely ignorant of the other types of FFT implementations.



                          The wigner time frequency distribution uses both products to construct a quantum uncertainty distribution, a bell curve of some kind to describe where the amplitude probably was, for the time and frequency domain, a bit like electrons and photons can be in multiple places at once, the time-frequency graph has an unknown and stochastic basis that can be implemented into a graph. It results the most precise FFT frequency graph according to the professors.



                          It is one way of processing the real and imaginary signals, there are probably more popular ones, I am a bit ignorant, even a 3rd year maths or physics student can't easily program it.



                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner_distribution_function#Cross_term_property



                          They say In the ancestral physics Wigner quasi-probability distribution has useful physics consequences, required for precision. By contrast, the short-time Fourier transform does not have this feature. Negative features of the WDF are reflective of the Gabor limit of the classical signal and physically unrelated to any possible underlay of quantum structure.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 4 hours ago

























                          answered 4 hours ago









                          com.prehensiblecom.prehensible

                          30719




                          30719



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Signal Processing Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdsp.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58439%2fhow-to-deal-with-the-mirrored-components-of-a-fft-and-another-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                              Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                              Черчино Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију46°09′29″ СГШ; 9°30′29″ ИГД / 46.15809° СГШ; 9.50814° ИГД / 46.15809; 9.5081446°09′29″ СГШ; 9°30′29″ ИГД / 46.15809° СГШ; 9.50814° ИГД / 46.15809; 9.508143179111„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”Званични веб-сајтпроширитиуу