What's the largest optical telescope mirror ever put in space?What's the largest aperture telescope sent beyond the Earth-Moon system?What's the largest optical lens put in space?Where did Herschel Space Telescope go in 2013?What's the largest aperture telescope sent beyond the Earth-Moon system?Infrared space interferometry - Why isn't it being done?What's the largest optical lens put in space?
Genetic limitations to learn certain instruments
What's the largest optical telescope mirror ever put in space?
Do any instruments not produce overtones?
Was the Tamarian language in "Darmok" inspired by Jack Vance's "The Asutra"?
Where does "0 packages can be updated." come from?
Russian equivalents of "no love lost"
When conversion from Integer to Single may lose precision
How to chain Python function calls so the behaviour is as follows
How to tell your grandparent to not come to fetch you with their car?
What can I, as a user, do about offensive reviews in App Store?
Confusion about off peak timings of London trains
Why only the fundamental frequency component is said to give useful power?
What is wrong with this proof that symmetric matrices commute?
Winning Strategy for the Magician and his Apprentice
Words that signal future content
Should I give professor gift at the beginning of my PhD?
Can Platform License Users access the Standard Order Object?
Find duplicated column value in CSV
Was there a priest on the Titanic who stayed on the ship giving confession to as many as he could?
Comparing and find out which feature has highest shape area in QGIS?
What is the actual quality of machine translations?
How would a aircraft visually signal in distress?
Interview not reimboursed if offer is made but not accepted
Is using haveibeenpwned to validate password strength rational?
What's the largest optical telescope mirror ever put in space?
What's the largest aperture telescope sent beyond the Earth-Moon system?What's the largest optical lens put in space?Where did Herschel Space Telescope go in 2013?What's the largest aperture telescope sent beyond the Earth-Moon system?Infrared space interferometry - Why isn't it being done?What's the largest optical lens put in space?
$begingroup$
As a follow-on question to What's the largest optical lens put in space? I'd like to as about mirrors this time.
Question: What's the largest optical telescope mirror ever put in space?
Optical could include infrared, visible and ultraviolet, but not microwaves. It also needs to be a single mirror, not an array of separate sub-mirrors like the JWST design. It could be a telescope's objective mirror or a part of an optical assembly of mixed elements, or it could still be in its shipping crate. It could be curved or flat, as long as it's used in an optical telescope.
Answers to What's the largest aperture telescope sent beyond the Earth-Moon system? are in the 0.5 to 1.4 meter ballpark for deep space, but what about closer to home?
space-telescope optical record
asked 9 hours ago
uhohuhoh
43.8k20172564
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a follow-on question to What's the largest optical lens put in space? I'd like to as about mirrors this time.
Question: What's the largest optical telescope mirror ever put in space?
Optical could include infrared, visible and ultraviolet, but not microwaves. It also needs to be a single mirror, not an array of separate sub-mirrors like the JWST design. It could be a telescope's objective mirror or a part of an optical assembly of mixed elements, or it could still be in its shipping crate. It could be curved or flat, as long as it's used in an optical telescope.
Answers to What's the largest aperture telescope sent beyond the Earth-Moon system? are in the 0.5 to 1.4 meter ballpark for deep space, but what about closer to home?
space-telescope optical record
asked 9 hours ago
uhohuhoh
43.8k20172564
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
No problem, added a potential solution to that question based on what was said here for you :).
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a follow-on question to What's the largest optical lens put in space? I'd like to as about mirrors this time.
Question: What's the largest optical telescope mirror ever put in space?
Optical could include infrared, visible and ultraviolet, but not microwaves. It also needs to be a single mirror, not an array of separate sub-mirrors like the JWST design. It could be a telescope's objective mirror or a part of an optical assembly of mixed elements, or it could still be in its shipping crate. It could be curved or flat, as long as it's used in an optical telescope.
Answers to What's the largest aperture telescope sent beyond the Earth-Moon system? are in the 0.5 to 1.4 meter ballpark for deep space, but what about closer to home?
space-telescope optical record
asked 9 hours ago
uhohuhoh
43.8k20172564
$endgroup$
As a follow-on question to What's the largest optical lens put in space? I'd like to as about mirrors this time.
Question: What's the largest optical telescope mirror ever put in space?
Optical could include infrared, visible and ultraviolet, but not microwaves. It also needs to be a single mirror, not an array of separate sub-mirrors like the JWST design. It could be a telescope's objective mirror or a part of an optical assembly of mixed elements, or it could still be in its shipping crate. It could be curved or flat, as long as it's used in an optical telescope.
Answers to What's the largest aperture telescope sent beyond the Earth-Moon system? are in the 0.5 to 1.4 meter ballpark for deep space, but what about closer to home?
space-telescope optical record
space-telescope optical record
asked 9 hours ago
uhohuhoh
43.8k20172564
asked 9 hours ago
uhohuhoh
43.8k20172564
edited 8 hours ago
uhoh
asked 9 hours ago
uhohuhoh
43.8k20172564
asked 9 hours ago
uhohuhoh
43.8k20172564
asked 9 hours ago
uhohuhoh
43.8k20172564
43.8k20172564
$begingroup$
No problem, added a potential solution to that question based on what was said here for you :).
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No problem, added a potential solution to that question based on what was said here for you :).
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
No problem, added a potential solution to that question based on what was said here for you :).
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
No problem, added a potential solution to that question based on what was said here for you :).
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I could only find two real candidates that exist currently, using the following diagram and other sources:
More specifically:
TL;DR:
- Name: collection area / diameter
- Kepler Telescope: 0.708 m**2 / 0.95 m
- Hubble Telescope: 4.525 m**2 / 2.4 m
- JWST (All Mirror): 25 m**2 / 6.5 m
- JWST (One Mirror): Could Not Find, does someone want to share this?
Those, as far as I know, would be the known candidates for a orbital single-mirror telescope (two of which are not single mirror). This leaves us with Kepler and Hubble, which isn't actually a straightforward comparison. Hubble has the larger surface area, however, Kepler is better at resolving exoplanets than Hubble:
Kepler's 115 deg2 field of view gives it a much higher probability of detecting Earth-sized planets than the Hubble Space Telescope, which has a field of view of only 10 sq. arc-minutes. Moreover, Kepler is dedicated to detecting planetary transits, while the Hubble Space Telescope is used to address a wide range of scientific questions, and rarely looks continuously at just one star-field.
It accomplishes this by using improved technology acquired since the launch of Hubble in 1990, as Kepler was launched in 2009. Even James-Webb telescope will not dethrone Hubble (despite it's resolution being a large factor better) because it will have many mirrors all of which are smaller than Hubble's.
However, if you're literally just asking which is physically more massive? Hubble wins.
Feel free to correct any misleading information in my answers, I'm by no means an expert.
answered 9 hours ago
Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn
3,55211550
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"I guess we should have named it the Merely Whelmingly Large Telescope!"
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The JWST mirror segments are 1.32 m flat-to-flat.
$endgroup$
– user71659
3 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The winner (as of 2019) would be the ESA Herschel Space Observatory with a focal mirror of 3.5M/11.5ft (Image Source)
Optical could include infrared, visible and ultraviolet, but not microwaves.
Herschel covers both far infrared and microwaves (55–672 µm) and so doesn't show up on some lists of optical telescopes, but it counts as far as the current question is defined.
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope would be second at 2.4M/8ft.
If/when the James Webb Observatory makes it up, it will be the largest at 6.5M/21.3ft. While the question excludes JWST, it should be noted that it probably will not be possible with current rocket technology to put a Hubble-esque mirror of that size into space
If the Hubble Space Telescope's 2.4 meter mirror were scaled to be large enough for Webb, it would be too heavy to launch into orbit. The Webb team had to find new ways to build the mirror so that it would be light enough - only one-tenth of the mass of Hubble's mirror per unit area - yet very strong.
answered 2 hours ago
MachavityMachavity
2,60511037
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
fyi I have just asked Where did Herschel Space Telescope go in 2013?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36548%2fwhats-the-largest-optical-telescope-mirror-ever-put-in-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I could only find two real candidates that exist currently, using the following diagram and other sources:
More specifically:
TL;DR:
- Name: collection area / diameter
- Kepler Telescope: 0.708 m**2 / 0.95 m
- Hubble Telescope: 4.525 m**2 / 2.4 m
- JWST (All Mirror): 25 m**2 / 6.5 m
- JWST (One Mirror): Could Not Find, does someone want to share this?
Those, as far as I know, would be the known candidates for a orbital single-mirror telescope (two of which are not single mirror). This leaves us with Kepler and Hubble, which isn't actually a straightforward comparison. Hubble has the larger surface area, however, Kepler is better at resolving exoplanets than Hubble:
Kepler's 115 deg2 field of view gives it a much higher probability of detecting Earth-sized planets than the Hubble Space Telescope, which has a field of view of only 10 sq. arc-minutes. Moreover, Kepler is dedicated to detecting planetary transits, while the Hubble Space Telescope is used to address a wide range of scientific questions, and rarely looks continuously at just one star-field.
It accomplishes this by using improved technology acquired since the launch of Hubble in 1990, as Kepler was launched in 2009. Even James-Webb telescope will not dethrone Hubble (despite it's resolution being a large factor better) because it will have many mirrors all of which are smaller than Hubble's.
However, if you're literally just asking which is physically more massive? Hubble wins.
Feel free to correct any misleading information in my answers, I'm by no means an expert.
answered 9 hours ago
Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn
3,55211550
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"I guess we should have named it the Merely Whelmingly Large Telescope!"
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The JWST mirror segments are 1.32 m flat-to-flat.
$endgroup$
– user71659
3 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I could only find two real candidates that exist currently, using the following diagram and other sources:
More specifically:
TL;DR:
- Name: collection area / diameter
- Kepler Telescope: 0.708 m**2 / 0.95 m
- Hubble Telescope: 4.525 m**2 / 2.4 m
- JWST (All Mirror): 25 m**2 / 6.5 m
- JWST (One Mirror): Could Not Find, does someone want to share this?
Those, as far as I know, would be the known candidates for a orbital single-mirror telescope (two of which are not single mirror). This leaves us with Kepler and Hubble, which isn't actually a straightforward comparison. Hubble has the larger surface area, however, Kepler is better at resolving exoplanets than Hubble:
Kepler's 115 deg2 field of view gives it a much higher probability of detecting Earth-sized planets than the Hubble Space Telescope, which has a field of view of only 10 sq. arc-minutes. Moreover, Kepler is dedicated to detecting planetary transits, while the Hubble Space Telescope is used to address a wide range of scientific questions, and rarely looks continuously at just one star-field.
It accomplishes this by using improved technology acquired since the launch of Hubble in 1990, as Kepler was launched in 2009. Even James-Webb telescope will not dethrone Hubble (despite it's resolution being a large factor better) because it will have many mirrors all of which are smaller than Hubble's.
However, if you're literally just asking which is physically more massive? Hubble wins.
Feel free to correct any misleading information in my answers, I'm by no means an expert.
answered 9 hours ago
Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn
3,55211550
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"I guess we should have named it the Merely Whelmingly Large Telescope!"
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The JWST mirror segments are 1.32 m flat-to-flat.
$endgroup$
– user71659
3 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I could only find two real candidates that exist currently, using the following diagram and other sources:
More specifically:
TL;DR:
- Name: collection area / diameter
- Kepler Telescope: 0.708 m**2 / 0.95 m
- Hubble Telescope: 4.525 m**2 / 2.4 m
- JWST (All Mirror): 25 m**2 / 6.5 m
- JWST (One Mirror): Could Not Find, does someone want to share this?
Those, as far as I know, would be the known candidates for a orbital single-mirror telescope (two of which are not single mirror). This leaves us with Kepler and Hubble, which isn't actually a straightforward comparison. Hubble has the larger surface area, however, Kepler is better at resolving exoplanets than Hubble:
Kepler's 115 deg2 field of view gives it a much higher probability of detecting Earth-sized planets than the Hubble Space Telescope, which has a field of view of only 10 sq. arc-minutes. Moreover, Kepler is dedicated to detecting planetary transits, while the Hubble Space Telescope is used to address a wide range of scientific questions, and rarely looks continuously at just one star-field.
It accomplishes this by using improved technology acquired since the launch of Hubble in 1990, as Kepler was launched in 2009. Even James-Webb telescope will not dethrone Hubble (despite it's resolution being a large factor better) because it will have many mirrors all of which are smaller than Hubble's.
However, if you're literally just asking which is physically more massive? Hubble wins.
Feel free to correct any misleading information in my answers, I'm by no means an expert.
answered 9 hours ago
Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn
3,55211550
$endgroup$
I could only find two real candidates that exist currently, using the following diagram and other sources:
More specifically:
TL;DR:
- Name: collection area / diameter
- Kepler Telescope: 0.708 m**2 / 0.95 m
- Hubble Telescope: 4.525 m**2 / 2.4 m
- JWST (All Mirror): 25 m**2 / 6.5 m
- JWST (One Mirror): Could Not Find, does someone want to share this?
Those, as far as I know, would be the known candidates for a orbital single-mirror telescope (two of which are not single mirror). This leaves us with Kepler and Hubble, which isn't actually a straightforward comparison. Hubble has the larger surface area, however, Kepler is better at resolving exoplanets than Hubble:
Kepler's 115 deg2 field of view gives it a much higher probability of detecting Earth-sized planets than the Hubble Space Telescope, which has a field of view of only 10 sq. arc-minutes. Moreover, Kepler is dedicated to detecting planetary transits, while the Hubble Space Telescope is used to address a wide range of scientific questions, and rarely looks continuously at just one star-field.
It accomplishes this by using improved technology acquired since the launch of Hubble in 1990, as Kepler was launched in 2009. Even James-Webb telescope will not dethrone Hubble (despite it's resolution being a large factor better) because it will have many mirrors all of which are smaller than Hubble's.
However, if you're literally just asking which is physically more massive? Hubble wins.
Feel free to correct any misleading information in my answers, I'm by no means an expert.
answered 9 hours ago
Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn
3,55211550
edited 8 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn
3,55211550
answered 9 hours ago
Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn
3,55211550
answered 9 hours ago
Magic Octopus UrnMagic Octopus Urn
3,55211550
3,55211550
2
$begingroup$
"I guess we should have named it the Merely Whelmingly Large Telescope!"
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The JWST mirror segments are 1.32 m flat-to-flat.
$endgroup$
– user71659
3 mins ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
"I guess we should have named it the Merely Whelmingly Large Telescope!"
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The JWST mirror segments are 1.32 m flat-to-flat.
$endgroup$
– user71659
3 mins ago
2
2
$begingroup$
"I guess we should have named it the Merely Whelmingly Large Telescope!"
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"I guess we should have named it the Merely Whelmingly Large Telescope!"
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The JWST mirror segments are 1.32 m flat-to-flat.
$endgroup$
– user71659
3 mins ago
$begingroup$
The JWST mirror segments are 1.32 m flat-to-flat.
$endgroup$
– user71659
3 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The winner (as of 2019) would be the ESA Herschel Space Observatory with a focal mirror of 3.5M/11.5ft (Image Source)
Optical could include infrared, visible and ultraviolet, but not microwaves.
Herschel covers both far infrared and microwaves (55–672 µm) and so doesn't show up on some lists of optical telescopes, but it counts as far as the current question is defined.
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope would be second at 2.4M/8ft.
If/when the James Webb Observatory makes it up, it will be the largest at 6.5M/21.3ft. While the question excludes JWST, it should be noted that it probably will not be possible with current rocket technology to put a Hubble-esque mirror of that size into space
If the Hubble Space Telescope's 2.4 meter mirror were scaled to be large enough for Webb, it would be too heavy to launch into orbit. The Webb team had to find new ways to build the mirror so that it would be light enough - only one-tenth of the mass of Hubble's mirror per unit area - yet very strong.
answered 2 hours ago
MachavityMachavity
2,60511037
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
fyi I have just asked Where did Herschel Space Telescope go in 2013?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The winner (as of 2019) would be the ESA Herschel Space Observatory with a focal mirror of 3.5M/11.5ft (Image Source)
Optical could include infrared, visible and ultraviolet, but not microwaves.
Herschel covers both far infrared and microwaves (55–672 µm) and so doesn't show up on some lists of optical telescopes, but it counts as far as the current question is defined.
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope would be second at 2.4M/8ft.
If/when the James Webb Observatory makes it up, it will be the largest at 6.5M/21.3ft. While the question excludes JWST, it should be noted that it probably will not be possible with current rocket technology to put a Hubble-esque mirror of that size into space
If the Hubble Space Telescope's 2.4 meter mirror were scaled to be large enough for Webb, it would be too heavy to launch into orbit. The Webb team had to find new ways to build the mirror so that it would be light enough - only one-tenth of the mass of Hubble's mirror per unit area - yet very strong.
answered 2 hours ago
MachavityMachavity
2,60511037
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
fyi I have just asked Where did Herschel Space Telescope go in 2013?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The winner (as of 2019) would be the ESA Herschel Space Observatory with a focal mirror of 3.5M/11.5ft (Image Source)
Optical could include infrared, visible and ultraviolet, but not microwaves.
Herschel covers both far infrared and microwaves (55–672 µm) and so doesn't show up on some lists of optical telescopes, but it counts as far as the current question is defined.
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope would be second at 2.4M/8ft.
If/when the James Webb Observatory makes it up, it will be the largest at 6.5M/21.3ft. While the question excludes JWST, it should be noted that it probably will not be possible with current rocket technology to put a Hubble-esque mirror of that size into space
If the Hubble Space Telescope's 2.4 meter mirror were scaled to be large enough for Webb, it would be too heavy to launch into orbit. The Webb team had to find new ways to build the mirror so that it would be light enough - only one-tenth of the mass of Hubble's mirror per unit area - yet very strong.
answered 2 hours ago
MachavityMachavity
2,60511037
$endgroup$
The winner (as of 2019) would be the ESA Herschel Space Observatory with a focal mirror of 3.5M/11.5ft (Image Source)
Optical could include infrared, visible and ultraviolet, but not microwaves.
Herschel covers both far infrared and microwaves (55–672 µm) and so doesn't show up on some lists of optical telescopes, but it counts as far as the current question is defined.
NASA's Hubble Space Telescope would be second at 2.4M/8ft.
If/when the James Webb Observatory makes it up, it will be the largest at 6.5M/21.3ft. While the question excludes JWST, it should be noted that it probably will not be possible with current rocket technology to put a Hubble-esque mirror of that size into space
If the Hubble Space Telescope's 2.4 meter mirror were scaled to be large enough for Webb, it would be too heavy to launch into orbit. The Webb team had to find new ways to build the mirror so that it would be light enough - only one-tenth of the mass of Hubble's mirror per unit area - yet very strong.
answered 2 hours ago
MachavityMachavity
2,60511037
edited 48 mins ago
answered 2 hours ago
MachavityMachavity
2,60511037
answered 2 hours ago
MachavityMachavity
2,60511037
answered 2 hours ago
MachavityMachavity
2,60511037
2,60511037
$begingroup$
fyi I have just asked Where did Herschel Space Telescope go in 2013?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
fyi I have just asked Where did Herschel Space Telescope go in 2013?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
fyi I have just asked Where did Herschel Space Telescope go in 2013?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
fyi I have just asked Where did Herschel Space Telescope go in 2013?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36548%2fwhats-the-largest-optical-telescope-mirror-ever-put-in-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
No problem, added a potential solution to that question based on what was said here for you :).
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
8 hours ago