Examples of LEGO Rubber Bands Used For Friction Enclosure?LEGO Enclosure ClaspWhat does the acronym MOC stand for?New ways of connecting levels of multi-story modular buildingsWhat is the official term used for building MOC models?MOC planning and designResources for building MOCs with pieces entirely from single setsHow to build ar Z6 (TR-8R) riot control baton for 75114 (First Order Stormtrooper)?draw program for LEGO MOC models?Help in identifying elements used on LEGO Batman movie's DaleksPublishing instructions for MOC based on Lego Technic setLEGO Enclosure Clasp
What exactly is a marshrutka (маршрутка)?
Which is the current decimal separator?
I asked for a graduate student position from a professor. He replied "welcome". What does that mean?
What jurisdiction do Scottish courts have over the Westminster parliament?
In Germany, how can I maximize the impact of my charitable donations?
Is a suit against a University Dorm for changing policies on a whim likely to succeed (USA)?
Double it your way
Why do sellers care about down payments?
Do ibuprofen or paracetamol cause hearing loss?
Why is this weapon searching for a new owner?
I was promised a work PC but still awaiting approval 3 months later so using my own laptop - Is it fair to ask employer for laptop insurance?
Bit one of the Intel 8080's Flags register
why car dealer is insisting on loan v/s cash
What officially disallows US presidents from driving?
Is there any way to land a rover on the Moon without using any thrusters?
What is a realistic time needed to get a properly trained army?
How major are these paintwork & rust problems?
Is low emotional intelligence associated with right-wing and prejudiced attitudes?
Can I fix my boots by gluing the soles back on?
What organs or modifications would be needed for a life biological creature not to require sleep?
What explanation do proponents of a Scotland-NI bridge give for it breaking Brexit impasse?
Where to disclose a zero day vulnerability
How do I say "quirky" in German without sounding derogatory?
Why is my fire extinguisher emptied after one use?
Examples of LEGO Rubber Bands Used For Friction Enclosure?
LEGO Enclosure ClaspWhat does the acronym MOC stand for?New ways of connecting levels of multi-story modular buildingsWhat is the official term used for building MOC models?MOC planning and designResources for building MOCs with pieces entirely from single setsHow to build ar Z6 (TR-8R) riot control baton for 75114 (First Order Stormtrooper)?draw program for LEGO MOC models?Help in identifying elements used on LEGO Batman movie's DaleksPublishing instructions for MOC based on Lego Technic setLEGO Enclosure Clasp
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I'm working on a variant design for a MOC that includes a cover over an open area. The new design is based on a suggestion for a "cookie jar" style design made in another of my questions, LEGO Enclosure Clasp. However, I'm having difficulty identifying which bricks to use to properly implement the idea and need a bit of inspiration. Could someone point me to an example of a set or other MOC design that uses something like brick #2653 (the 1x4 "sliding" piece) in conjunction with a rubber band to generate friction against the side of another piece (if such exists)?
Here's a very rough diagram of what I'm thinking of. The rubber band (red) goes around the inner square and fits into the groove in part #2653 (yellow) but "sticks out" enough so that, unless force is applied to push them past the grey bricks, they should generally stay in place.
My "problem" - and the reason I'm looking for guidance here - is two-fold. First, I have a relatively large (14x16) area around which I need this "gasket". Obviously, if the rubber band were to go around the entire thing, there would need to be some sort of reinforcement behind the grooved bricks to prevent the tension of the rubber band from just pulling them out of place. But, I'm thinking about using a few smaller sections (like one or two of the 1x4 end-to-end), each with their own rubber band. Perhaps a few of these around the perimeter would be sufficient?
The second is that I'm doing all of this virtually through a CAD system before I go looking into purchasing physical bricks and pieces I may or may not need. I've made several variants of the MOC with different ideas for how to implement the cover to refine my ideas as much as possible before I "pull the trigger", so I'd really like to see how someone else might have addressed this particular situation.
moc
New contributor
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment
|
I'm working on a variant design for a MOC that includes a cover over an open area. The new design is based on a suggestion for a "cookie jar" style design made in another of my questions, LEGO Enclosure Clasp. However, I'm having difficulty identifying which bricks to use to properly implement the idea and need a bit of inspiration. Could someone point me to an example of a set or other MOC design that uses something like brick #2653 (the 1x4 "sliding" piece) in conjunction with a rubber band to generate friction against the side of another piece (if such exists)?
Here's a very rough diagram of what I'm thinking of. The rubber band (red) goes around the inner square and fits into the groove in part #2653 (yellow) but "sticks out" enough so that, unless force is applied to push them past the grey bricks, they should generally stay in place.
My "problem" - and the reason I'm looking for guidance here - is two-fold. First, I have a relatively large (14x16) area around which I need this "gasket". Obviously, if the rubber band were to go around the entire thing, there would need to be some sort of reinforcement behind the grooved bricks to prevent the tension of the rubber band from just pulling them out of place. But, I'm thinking about using a few smaller sections (like one or two of the 1x4 end-to-end), each with their own rubber band. Perhaps a few of these around the perimeter would be sufficient?
The second is that I'm doing all of this virtually through a CAD system before I go looking into purchasing physical bricks and pieces I may or may not need. I've made several variants of the MOC with different ideas for how to implement the cover to refine my ideas as much as possible before I "pull the trigger", so I'd really like to see how someone else might have addressed this particular situation.
moc
New contributor
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I for one, haven't seen anything like that in official LEGO sets. Were I to need something similar, I'd probably use pneumatic tubing (as it is thicker, longer and better compressible) or 2x1 Technic rubber axle connectors. The latter is typically used in LEGO sets to provide resistance against tension, compression or sliding while still offering some flexibility.
– zovits
8 hours ago
@zovits - I could have sworn that I had seen it somewhere, but I guess that's why my Google-fu wasn't finding me any results. ;)
– G_Hosa_Phat
3 hours ago
add a comment
|
I'm working on a variant design for a MOC that includes a cover over an open area. The new design is based on a suggestion for a "cookie jar" style design made in another of my questions, LEGO Enclosure Clasp. However, I'm having difficulty identifying which bricks to use to properly implement the idea and need a bit of inspiration. Could someone point me to an example of a set or other MOC design that uses something like brick #2653 (the 1x4 "sliding" piece) in conjunction with a rubber band to generate friction against the side of another piece (if such exists)?
Here's a very rough diagram of what I'm thinking of. The rubber band (red) goes around the inner square and fits into the groove in part #2653 (yellow) but "sticks out" enough so that, unless force is applied to push them past the grey bricks, they should generally stay in place.
My "problem" - and the reason I'm looking for guidance here - is two-fold. First, I have a relatively large (14x16) area around which I need this "gasket". Obviously, if the rubber band were to go around the entire thing, there would need to be some sort of reinforcement behind the grooved bricks to prevent the tension of the rubber band from just pulling them out of place. But, I'm thinking about using a few smaller sections (like one or two of the 1x4 end-to-end), each with their own rubber band. Perhaps a few of these around the perimeter would be sufficient?
The second is that I'm doing all of this virtually through a CAD system before I go looking into purchasing physical bricks and pieces I may or may not need. I've made several variants of the MOC with different ideas for how to implement the cover to refine my ideas as much as possible before I "pull the trigger", so I'd really like to see how someone else might have addressed this particular situation.
moc
New contributor
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm working on a variant design for a MOC that includes a cover over an open area. The new design is based on a suggestion for a "cookie jar" style design made in another of my questions, LEGO Enclosure Clasp. However, I'm having difficulty identifying which bricks to use to properly implement the idea and need a bit of inspiration. Could someone point me to an example of a set or other MOC design that uses something like brick #2653 (the 1x4 "sliding" piece) in conjunction with a rubber band to generate friction against the side of another piece (if such exists)?
Here's a very rough diagram of what I'm thinking of. The rubber band (red) goes around the inner square and fits into the groove in part #2653 (yellow) but "sticks out" enough so that, unless force is applied to push them past the grey bricks, they should generally stay in place.
My "problem" - and the reason I'm looking for guidance here - is two-fold. First, I have a relatively large (14x16) area around which I need this "gasket". Obviously, if the rubber band were to go around the entire thing, there would need to be some sort of reinforcement behind the grooved bricks to prevent the tension of the rubber band from just pulling them out of place. But, I'm thinking about using a few smaller sections (like one or two of the 1x4 end-to-end), each with their own rubber band. Perhaps a few of these around the perimeter would be sufficient?
The second is that I'm doing all of this virtually through a CAD system before I go looking into purchasing physical bricks and pieces I may or may not need. I've made several variants of the MOC with different ideas for how to implement the cover to refine my ideas as much as possible before I "pull the trigger", so I'd really like to see how someone else might have addressed this particular situation.
moc
moc
New contributor
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
G_Hosa_PhatG_Hosa_Phat
1418 bronze badges
1418 bronze badges
New contributor
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I for one, haven't seen anything like that in official LEGO sets. Were I to need something similar, I'd probably use pneumatic tubing (as it is thicker, longer and better compressible) or 2x1 Technic rubber axle connectors. The latter is typically used in LEGO sets to provide resistance against tension, compression or sliding while still offering some flexibility.
– zovits
8 hours ago
@zovits - I could have sworn that I had seen it somewhere, but I guess that's why my Google-fu wasn't finding me any results. ;)
– G_Hosa_Phat
3 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
I for one, haven't seen anything like that in official LEGO sets. Were I to need something similar, I'd probably use pneumatic tubing (as it is thicker, longer and better compressible) or 2x1 Technic rubber axle connectors. The latter is typically used in LEGO sets to provide resistance against tension, compression or sliding while still offering some flexibility.
– zovits
8 hours ago
@zovits - I could have sworn that I had seen it somewhere, but I guess that's why my Google-fu wasn't finding me any results. ;)
– G_Hosa_Phat
3 hours ago
1
1
I for one, haven't seen anything like that in official LEGO sets. Were I to need something similar, I'd probably use pneumatic tubing (as it is thicker, longer and better compressible) or 2x1 Technic rubber axle connectors. The latter is typically used in LEGO sets to provide resistance against tension, compression or sliding while still offering some flexibility.
– zovits
8 hours ago
I for one, haven't seen anything like that in official LEGO sets. Were I to need something similar, I'd probably use pneumatic tubing (as it is thicker, longer and better compressible) or 2x1 Technic rubber axle connectors. The latter is typically used in LEGO sets to provide resistance against tension, compression or sliding while still offering some flexibility.
– zovits
8 hours ago
@zovits - I could have sworn that I had seen it somewhere, but I guess that's why my Google-fu wasn't finding me any results. ;)
– G_Hosa_Phat
3 hours ago
@zovits - I could have sworn that I had seen it somewhere, but I guess that's why my Google-fu wasn't finding me any results. ;)
– G_Hosa_Phat
3 hours ago
add a comment
|
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I personally would steer clear of a "cookie jar" setup. The very suggestion of it's inherent qualities suggests something that wasn't meant to transport, but rather sit on a solid counter. The rubber bands aspect seems potentially problematic as well. Finding one that perfectly fits could prove difficult, and their elasticity would likely try to pinch in-between the tolerances of the bricks. A rubber O-ring, being thicker and firmer, would be better suited for this task. Personally I would opt for simple proven concepts that don't require guesswork and potentially temperamental solutions. If you did manage to figure out a working snug fit, you then would need a big gaudy handle sticking out to remove it with.
That being said, I threw together an example of a proven method for a removable door. It would also incorporate your original idea of wanting a snap for piece of mind.


It's just a very basic design to prove a concept, one that's easy to improve upon. One nice thing about this design is that you don't need a handle to open it, it un-clicks with just the friction of your fingers.
If you really want a cookie jar style lid I would incorporate a few studs onto a tiled edge, similar to how Modular sections are held together. I would suggest the lid have an inner lip to increase stability. Again, proven methods.
For some reason, I thought I had seen something utilizing the "cookie jar" method in a set somewhere, but my Google-fu wasn't getting me any results. I guess this is why. ;) I'll have a look at the sliding door concept as I think it might work better anyway. It doesn't require wasting as much vertical space for the interior of the storage area.
– G_Hosa_Phat
6 hours ago
Okay, I think I have this design mostly done (v2.1 - mecabricks.com/en/models/qxv4dZYYvdJ). I still have a couple of things to tidy up, but I think I like it a lot! There are a couple of things I'm still not sure about - I raised the landing area walls to make sure the exit from the tower was sufficiently covered, and I'm not sure if the small 1x2 plates above and below the ball catch will even actually fit IRL, but overall, I think it's a success. I just need to figure out which of these designs I actually want to build so I can start buying bricks! ;P
– G_Hosa_Phat
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "336"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbricks.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f12689%2fexamples-of-lego-rubber-bands-used-for-friction-enclosure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I personally would steer clear of a "cookie jar" setup. The very suggestion of it's inherent qualities suggests something that wasn't meant to transport, but rather sit on a solid counter. The rubber bands aspect seems potentially problematic as well. Finding one that perfectly fits could prove difficult, and their elasticity would likely try to pinch in-between the tolerances of the bricks. A rubber O-ring, being thicker and firmer, would be better suited for this task. Personally I would opt for simple proven concepts that don't require guesswork and potentially temperamental solutions. If you did manage to figure out a working snug fit, you then would need a big gaudy handle sticking out to remove it with.
That being said, I threw together an example of a proven method for a removable door. It would also incorporate your original idea of wanting a snap for piece of mind.


It's just a very basic design to prove a concept, one that's easy to improve upon. One nice thing about this design is that you don't need a handle to open it, it un-clicks with just the friction of your fingers.
If you really want a cookie jar style lid I would incorporate a few studs onto a tiled edge, similar to how Modular sections are held together. I would suggest the lid have an inner lip to increase stability. Again, proven methods.
For some reason, I thought I had seen something utilizing the "cookie jar" method in a set somewhere, but my Google-fu wasn't getting me any results. I guess this is why. ;) I'll have a look at the sliding door concept as I think it might work better anyway. It doesn't require wasting as much vertical space for the interior of the storage area.
– G_Hosa_Phat
6 hours ago
Okay, I think I have this design mostly done (v2.1 - mecabricks.com/en/models/qxv4dZYYvdJ). I still have a couple of things to tidy up, but I think I like it a lot! There are a couple of things I'm still not sure about - I raised the landing area walls to make sure the exit from the tower was sufficiently covered, and I'm not sure if the small 1x2 plates above and below the ball catch will even actually fit IRL, but overall, I think it's a success. I just need to figure out which of these designs I actually want to build so I can start buying bricks! ;P
– G_Hosa_Phat
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
I personally would steer clear of a "cookie jar" setup. The very suggestion of it's inherent qualities suggests something that wasn't meant to transport, but rather sit on a solid counter. The rubber bands aspect seems potentially problematic as well. Finding one that perfectly fits could prove difficult, and their elasticity would likely try to pinch in-between the tolerances of the bricks. A rubber O-ring, being thicker and firmer, would be better suited for this task. Personally I would opt for simple proven concepts that don't require guesswork and potentially temperamental solutions. If you did manage to figure out a working snug fit, you then would need a big gaudy handle sticking out to remove it with.
That being said, I threw together an example of a proven method for a removable door. It would also incorporate your original idea of wanting a snap for piece of mind.


It's just a very basic design to prove a concept, one that's easy to improve upon. One nice thing about this design is that you don't need a handle to open it, it un-clicks with just the friction of your fingers.
If you really want a cookie jar style lid I would incorporate a few studs onto a tiled edge, similar to how Modular sections are held together. I would suggest the lid have an inner lip to increase stability. Again, proven methods.
For some reason, I thought I had seen something utilizing the "cookie jar" method in a set somewhere, but my Google-fu wasn't getting me any results. I guess this is why. ;) I'll have a look at the sliding door concept as I think it might work better anyway. It doesn't require wasting as much vertical space for the interior of the storage area.
– G_Hosa_Phat
6 hours ago
Okay, I think I have this design mostly done (v2.1 - mecabricks.com/en/models/qxv4dZYYvdJ). I still have a couple of things to tidy up, but I think I like it a lot! There are a couple of things I'm still not sure about - I raised the landing area walls to make sure the exit from the tower was sufficiently covered, and I'm not sure if the small 1x2 plates above and below the ball catch will even actually fit IRL, but overall, I think it's a success. I just need to figure out which of these designs I actually want to build so I can start buying bricks! ;P
– G_Hosa_Phat
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
I personally would steer clear of a "cookie jar" setup. The very suggestion of it's inherent qualities suggests something that wasn't meant to transport, but rather sit on a solid counter. The rubber bands aspect seems potentially problematic as well. Finding one that perfectly fits could prove difficult, and their elasticity would likely try to pinch in-between the tolerances of the bricks. A rubber O-ring, being thicker and firmer, would be better suited for this task. Personally I would opt for simple proven concepts that don't require guesswork and potentially temperamental solutions. If you did manage to figure out a working snug fit, you then would need a big gaudy handle sticking out to remove it with.
That being said, I threw together an example of a proven method for a removable door. It would also incorporate your original idea of wanting a snap for piece of mind.


It's just a very basic design to prove a concept, one that's easy to improve upon. One nice thing about this design is that you don't need a handle to open it, it un-clicks with just the friction of your fingers.
If you really want a cookie jar style lid I would incorporate a few studs onto a tiled edge, similar to how Modular sections are held together. I would suggest the lid have an inner lip to increase stability. Again, proven methods.
I personally would steer clear of a "cookie jar" setup. The very suggestion of it's inherent qualities suggests something that wasn't meant to transport, but rather sit on a solid counter. The rubber bands aspect seems potentially problematic as well. Finding one that perfectly fits could prove difficult, and their elasticity would likely try to pinch in-between the tolerances of the bricks. A rubber O-ring, being thicker and firmer, would be better suited for this task. Personally I would opt for simple proven concepts that don't require guesswork and potentially temperamental solutions. If you did manage to figure out a working snug fit, you then would need a big gaudy handle sticking out to remove it with.
That being said, I threw together an example of a proven method for a removable door. It would also incorporate your original idea of wanting a snap for piece of mind.


It's just a very basic design to prove a concept, one that's easy to improve upon. One nice thing about this design is that you don't need a handle to open it, it un-clicks with just the friction of your fingers.
If you really want a cookie jar style lid I would incorporate a few studs onto a tiled edge, similar to how Modular sections are held together. I would suggest the lid have an inner lip to increase stability. Again, proven methods.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
JohnnyBJohnnyB
2,3662 silver badges24 bronze badges
2,3662 silver badges24 bronze badges
For some reason, I thought I had seen something utilizing the "cookie jar" method in a set somewhere, but my Google-fu wasn't getting me any results. I guess this is why. ;) I'll have a look at the sliding door concept as I think it might work better anyway. It doesn't require wasting as much vertical space for the interior of the storage area.
– G_Hosa_Phat
6 hours ago
Okay, I think I have this design mostly done (v2.1 - mecabricks.com/en/models/qxv4dZYYvdJ). I still have a couple of things to tidy up, but I think I like it a lot! There are a couple of things I'm still not sure about - I raised the landing area walls to make sure the exit from the tower was sufficiently covered, and I'm not sure if the small 1x2 plates above and below the ball catch will even actually fit IRL, but overall, I think it's a success. I just need to figure out which of these designs I actually want to build so I can start buying bricks! ;P
– G_Hosa_Phat
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
For some reason, I thought I had seen something utilizing the "cookie jar" method in a set somewhere, but my Google-fu wasn't getting me any results. I guess this is why. ;) I'll have a look at the sliding door concept as I think it might work better anyway. It doesn't require wasting as much vertical space for the interior of the storage area.
– G_Hosa_Phat
6 hours ago
Okay, I think I have this design mostly done (v2.1 - mecabricks.com/en/models/qxv4dZYYvdJ). I still have a couple of things to tidy up, but I think I like it a lot! There are a couple of things I'm still not sure about - I raised the landing area walls to make sure the exit from the tower was sufficiently covered, and I'm not sure if the small 1x2 plates above and below the ball catch will even actually fit IRL, but overall, I think it's a success. I just need to figure out which of these designs I actually want to build so I can start buying bricks! ;P
– G_Hosa_Phat
5 hours ago
For some reason, I thought I had seen something utilizing the "cookie jar" method in a set somewhere, but my Google-fu wasn't getting me any results. I guess this is why. ;) I'll have a look at the sliding door concept as I think it might work better anyway. It doesn't require wasting as much vertical space for the interior of the storage area.
– G_Hosa_Phat
6 hours ago
For some reason, I thought I had seen something utilizing the "cookie jar" method in a set somewhere, but my Google-fu wasn't getting me any results. I guess this is why. ;) I'll have a look at the sliding door concept as I think it might work better anyway. It doesn't require wasting as much vertical space for the interior of the storage area.
– G_Hosa_Phat
6 hours ago
Okay, I think I have this design mostly done (v2.1 - mecabricks.com/en/models/qxv4dZYYvdJ). I still have a couple of things to tidy up, but I think I like it a lot! There are a couple of things I'm still not sure about - I raised the landing area walls to make sure the exit from the tower was sufficiently covered, and I'm not sure if the small 1x2 plates above and below the ball catch will even actually fit IRL, but overall, I think it's a success. I just need to figure out which of these designs I actually want to build so I can start buying bricks! ;P
– G_Hosa_Phat
5 hours ago
Okay, I think I have this design mostly done (v2.1 - mecabricks.com/en/models/qxv4dZYYvdJ). I still have a couple of things to tidy up, but I think I like it a lot! There are a couple of things I'm still not sure about - I raised the landing area walls to make sure the exit from the tower was sufficiently covered, and I'm not sure if the small 1x2 plates above and below the ball catch will even actually fit IRL, but overall, I think it's a success. I just need to figure out which of these designs I actually want to build so I can start buying bricks! ;P
– G_Hosa_Phat
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
G_Hosa_Phat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Bricks!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbricks.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f12689%2fexamples-of-lego-rubber-bands-used-for-friction-enclosure%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I for one, haven't seen anything like that in official LEGO sets. Were I to need something similar, I'd probably use pneumatic tubing (as it is thicker, longer and better compressible) or 2x1 Technic rubber axle connectors. The latter is typically used in LEGO sets to provide resistance against tension, compression or sliding while still offering some flexibility.
– zovits
8 hours ago
@zovits - I could have sworn that I had seen it somewhere, but I guess that's why my Google-fu wasn't finding me any results. ;)
– G_Hosa_Phat
3 hours ago