Was there an original and definitive use of alternate dimensions/realities in fiction?What is the first instance of a portal to another world?What was the earliest SF work that used the idea of the “Multiverse”?Is there any evidence that using alternate universe/timeline in a franchise hurts/helps it?Is there a concept of “parallel/alternate” universes/realities in Star Wars canon?Is there a difference between a parallel universe and an alternate universe?What was the first science fiction work to use “credits” as currency?First use of time travel in fictionWhat was the earliest science fiction story to use nanotechnology?What was the first Science Fiction use of Space Sectors?What Was the First Science Fiction Use of Space Quadrants?

Received email from ISP saying one of my devices has malware

What is causing gaps in logs?

Is it good practice to speed up and slow down where not written in a song?

Why do fuses burn at a specific current?

Ways you can end up paying interest on a credit card if you pay the full amount back in due time

Divide Numbers by 0

Tasha's Hideous Laughter used on a deaf person?

Polarity of gas discharge tubes?

Why didn't Thatcher give Hong Kong to Taiwan?

What are the electrical characteristics of a PC gameport?

Can users with the same $HOME have separate bash histories?

What is the motivation behind designing a control stick that does not move?

How to find better food in airports

Given a specific computer system, is it possible to estimate the actual precise run time of a piece of Assembly code

"Practice makes perfect" and "c'est en forgeant qu'on devient forgeron"

Why are CEOs generally fired rather being demoted?

Punishment in pacifist society

Get rows that exist exactly once per day for a given period

'spazieren' - walking in a silly and affected manner?

Why do we need explainable AI?

Is there anything in the universe that cannot be compressed?

What are the French equivalents of "blow away the cobwebs"?

What are ways to record who took the pictures if a camera is used by multiple people?

In Toy Story, are toys the only inanimate objects that become alive? And if so, why?



Was there an original and definitive use of alternate dimensions/realities in fiction?


What is the first instance of a portal to another world?What was the earliest SF work that used the idea of the “Multiverse”?Is there any evidence that using alternate universe/timeline in a franchise hurts/helps it?Is there a concept of “parallel/alternate” universes/realities in Star Wars canon?Is there a difference between a parallel universe and an alternate universe?What was the first science fiction work to use “credits” as currency?First use of time travel in fictionWhat was the earliest science fiction story to use nanotechnology?What was the first Science Fiction use of Space Sectors?What Was the First Science Fiction Use of Space Quadrants?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








26















The fictional device or premise of alternate dimensions or realities seems so common today that it requires almost no explanation when used in stories. But despite how common this is now, it must have some point of origin in fiction.



The earliest example I can think of personally is probably DC's "Crisis on Infinite Earths". An earlier example might be the story with the "evil" James T. Kirk in Star Trek (TOS). But I'd guess these are still fairly contemporary examples.




What was the earliest fictional example of "alternate dimensions"? Or maybe another way to think about the question is was there a definitive early example which established and popularized the concept in fiction as we understand it today?



(I'm asking about the origin of other "dimensions" in the context of fiction, not as used in actual real-world human belief systems.)










share|improve this question





















  • 6





    Like Wonderland and Looking-Glass Land? Are those good examples of alternate dimensions/realities? Or do you want the alternate realities to be science-fictional, with pseudoscientific explanations?

    – user14111
    Aug 29 at 23:52






  • 7





    @user14111, I think the common factor in the OPs two examples are that the alternate realities are in some sense "different versions of the same place" whereas Fairyland for example is in a sense just another place, and travelling there is not really all that different in principle to travelling to another country or another planet, except that you need magic to do it. DaveInCaz, does that sound right to you?

    – Harry Johnston
    Aug 29 at 23:56






  • 2





    Your second and last sentences contradict rather heavily. There's plenty of evidence of something akin to alternate dimensions going back centuries to millennia in various real-world cultures and beliefs. As such, it's highly unlikely the origin of this stuff has anything to do with modern sci-fi from the last century or two. If you're specifically looking for a copy of Earth (or whatever place) that's running a divergent timeline, you might want to specify that in the answers (though I'm still not sure how excluding real-world beliefs makes sense if they predate the sci-fi).

    – MichaelS
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @DaveInCaz: My concern is that the question is explicitly disallowing proper answers by excluding the many real-world examples of stories involving other dimensions in things like ancient Greek and Egyptian religious texts.

    – MichaelS
    2 days ago






  • 7





    "I'm asking about the origin of other "dimensions" in the context of fiction, not as used in actual real-world human belief systems" - ok, but that is the origin in the context of fiction...

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    2 days ago

















26















The fictional device or premise of alternate dimensions or realities seems so common today that it requires almost no explanation when used in stories. But despite how common this is now, it must have some point of origin in fiction.



The earliest example I can think of personally is probably DC's "Crisis on Infinite Earths". An earlier example might be the story with the "evil" James T. Kirk in Star Trek (TOS). But I'd guess these are still fairly contemporary examples.




What was the earliest fictional example of "alternate dimensions"? Or maybe another way to think about the question is was there a definitive early example which established and popularized the concept in fiction as we understand it today?



(I'm asking about the origin of other "dimensions" in the context of fiction, not as used in actual real-world human belief systems.)










share|improve this question





















  • 6





    Like Wonderland and Looking-Glass Land? Are those good examples of alternate dimensions/realities? Or do you want the alternate realities to be science-fictional, with pseudoscientific explanations?

    – user14111
    Aug 29 at 23:52






  • 7





    @user14111, I think the common factor in the OPs two examples are that the alternate realities are in some sense "different versions of the same place" whereas Fairyland for example is in a sense just another place, and travelling there is not really all that different in principle to travelling to another country or another planet, except that you need magic to do it. DaveInCaz, does that sound right to you?

    – Harry Johnston
    Aug 29 at 23:56






  • 2





    Your second and last sentences contradict rather heavily. There's plenty of evidence of something akin to alternate dimensions going back centuries to millennia in various real-world cultures and beliefs. As such, it's highly unlikely the origin of this stuff has anything to do with modern sci-fi from the last century or two. If you're specifically looking for a copy of Earth (or whatever place) that's running a divergent timeline, you might want to specify that in the answers (though I'm still not sure how excluding real-world beliefs makes sense if they predate the sci-fi).

    – MichaelS
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @DaveInCaz: My concern is that the question is explicitly disallowing proper answers by excluding the many real-world examples of stories involving other dimensions in things like ancient Greek and Egyptian religious texts.

    – MichaelS
    2 days ago






  • 7





    "I'm asking about the origin of other "dimensions" in the context of fiction, not as used in actual real-world human belief systems" - ok, but that is the origin in the context of fiction...

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    2 days ago













26












26








26


9






The fictional device or premise of alternate dimensions or realities seems so common today that it requires almost no explanation when used in stories. But despite how common this is now, it must have some point of origin in fiction.



The earliest example I can think of personally is probably DC's "Crisis on Infinite Earths". An earlier example might be the story with the "evil" James T. Kirk in Star Trek (TOS). But I'd guess these are still fairly contemporary examples.




What was the earliest fictional example of "alternate dimensions"? Or maybe another way to think about the question is was there a definitive early example which established and popularized the concept in fiction as we understand it today?



(I'm asking about the origin of other "dimensions" in the context of fiction, not as used in actual real-world human belief systems.)










share|improve this question
















The fictional device or premise of alternate dimensions or realities seems so common today that it requires almost no explanation when used in stories. But despite how common this is now, it must have some point of origin in fiction.



The earliest example I can think of personally is probably DC's "Crisis on Infinite Earths". An earlier example might be the story with the "evil" James T. Kirk in Star Trek (TOS). But I'd guess these are still fairly contemporary examples.




What was the earliest fictional example of "alternate dimensions"? Or maybe another way to think about the question is was there a definitive early example which established and popularized the concept in fiction as we understand it today?



(I'm asking about the origin of other "dimensions" in the context of fiction, not as used in actual real-world human belief systems.)







history-of parallel-universe






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 57 mins ago









JakeGould

9,0335 gold badges53 silver badges100 bronze badges




9,0335 gold badges53 silver badges100 bronze badges










asked Aug 29 at 23:35









DaveInCazDaveInCaz

1,1541 gold badge5 silver badges27 bronze badges




1,1541 gold badge5 silver badges27 bronze badges










  • 6





    Like Wonderland and Looking-Glass Land? Are those good examples of alternate dimensions/realities? Or do you want the alternate realities to be science-fictional, with pseudoscientific explanations?

    – user14111
    Aug 29 at 23:52






  • 7





    @user14111, I think the common factor in the OPs two examples are that the alternate realities are in some sense "different versions of the same place" whereas Fairyland for example is in a sense just another place, and travelling there is not really all that different in principle to travelling to another country or another planet, except that you need magic to do it. DaveInCaz, does that sound right to you?

    – Harry Johnston
    Aug 29 at 23:56






  • 2





    Your second and last sentences contradict rather heavily. There's plenty of evidence of something akin to alternate dimensions going back centuries to millennia in various real-world cultures and beliefs. As such, it's highly unlikely the origin of this stuff has anything to do with modern sci-fi from the last century or two. If you're specifically looking for a copy of Earth (or whatever place) that's running a divergent timeline, you might want to specify that in the answers (though I'm still not sure how excluding real-world beliefs makes sense if they predate the sci-fi).

    – MichaelS
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @DaveInCaz: My concern is that the question is explicitly disallowing proper answers by excluding the many real-world examples of stories involving other dimensions in things like ancient Greek and Egyptian religious texts.

    – MichaelS
    2 days ago






  • 7





    "I'm asking about the origin of other "dimensions" in the context of fiction, not as used in actual real-world human belief systems" - ok, but that is the origin in the context of fiction...

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    2 days ago












  • 6





    Like Wonderland and Looking-Glass Land? Are those good examples of alternate dimensions/realities? Or do you want the alternate realities to be science-fictional, with pseudoscientific explanations?

    – user14111
    Aug 29 at 23:52






  • 7





    @user14111, I think the common factor in the OPs two examples are that the alternate realities are in some sense "different versions of the same place" whereas Fairyland for example is in a sense just another place, and travelling there is not really all that different in principle to travelling to another country or another planet, except that you need magic to do it. DaveInCaz, does that sound right to you?

    – Harry Johnston
    Aug 29 at 23:56






  • 2





    Your second and last sentences contradict rather heavily. There's plenty of evidence of something akin to alternate dimensions going back centuries to millennia in various real-world cultures and beliefs. As such, it's highly unlikely the origin of this stuff has anything to do with modern sci-fi from the last century or two. If you're specifically looking for a copy of Earth (or whatever place) that's running a divergent timeline, you might want to specify that in the answers (though I'm still not sure how excluding real-world beliefs makes sense if they predate the sci-fi).

    – MichaelS
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @DaveInCaz: My concern is that the question is explicitly disallowing proper answers by excluding the many real-world examples of stories involving other dimensions in things like ancient Greek and Egyptian religious texts.

    – MichaelS
    2 days ago






  • 7





    "I'm asking about the origin of other "dimensions" in the context of fiction, not as used in actual real-world human belief systems" - ok, but that is the origin in the context of fiction...

    – BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
    2 days ago







6




6





Like Wonderland and Looking-Glass Land? Are those good examples of alternate dimensions/realities? Or do you want the alternate realities to be science-fictional, with pseudoscientific explanations?

– user14111
Aug 29 at 23:52





Like Wonderland and Looking-Glass Land? Are those good examples of alternate dimensions/realities? Or do you want the alternate realities to be science-fictional, with pseudoscientific explanations?

– user14111
Aug 29 at 23:52




7




7





@user14111, I think the common factor in the OPs two examples are that the alternate realities are in some sense "different versions of the same place" whereas Fairyland for example is in a sense just another place, and travelling there is not really all that different in principle to travelling to another country or another planet, except that you need magic to do it. DaveInCaz, does that sound right to you?

– Harry Johnston
Aug 29 at 23:56





@user14111, I think the common factor in the OPs two examples are that the alternate realities are in some sense "different versions of the same place" whereas Fairyland for example is in a sense just another place, and travelling there is not really all that different in principle to travelling to another country or another planet, except that you need magic to do it. DaveInCaz, does that sound right to you?

– Harry Johnston
Aug 29 at 23:56




2




2





Your second and last sentences contradict rather heavily. There's plenty of evidence of something akin to alternate dimensions going back centuries to millennia in various real-world cultures and beliefs. As such, it's highly unlikely the origin of this stuff has anything to do with modern sci-fi from the last century or two. If you're specifically looking for a copy of Earth (or whatever place) that's running a divergent timeline, you might want to specify that in the answers (though I'm still not sure how excluding real-world beliefs makes sense if they predate the sci-fi).

– MichaelS
2 days ago





Your second and last sentences contradict rather heavily. There's plenty of evidence of something akin to alternate dimensions going back centuries to millennia in various real-world cultures and beliefs. As such, it's highly unlikely the origin of this stuff has anything to do with modern sci-fi from the last century or two. If you're specifically looking for a copy of Earth (or whatever place) that's running a divergent timeline, you might want to specify that in the answers (though I'm still not sure how excluding real-world beliefs makes sense if they predate the sci-fi).

– MichaelS
2 days ago




2




2





@DaveInCaz: My concern is that the question is explicitly disallowing proper answers by excluding the many real-world examples of stories involving other dimensions in things like ancient Greek and Egyptian religious texts.

– MichaelS
2 days ago





@DaveInCaz: My concern is that the question is explicitly disallowing proper answers by excluding the many real-world examples of stories involving other dimensions in things like ancient Greek and Egyptian religious texts.

– MichaelS
2 days ago




7




7





"I'm asking about the origin of other "dimensions" in the context of fiction, not as used in actual real-world human belief systems" - ok, but that is the origin in the context of fiction...

– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
2 days ago





"I'm asking about the origin of other "dimensions" in the context of fiction, not as used in actual real-world human belief systems" - ok, but that is the origin in the context of fiction...

– BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft
2 days ago










11 Answers
11






active

oldest

votes


















42















Maybe not exactly what the OP is looking for, but we'd be remiss if we went without mentioning




Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions



Published in 1884, Flatland depicts a 2-D world inhabited by polygons and lines, which then interacts with a 1-D world inhabited by points, a 3-D world inhabited by a sphere, and a 0-D world which is a point.



While none of these worlds could really be described as alternate or parallel dimensions to our own (or a fictional Earth-like dimension), they could be thought of as alternate dimensions to each other.






share|improve this answer



























  • This is an intriguing answer. Even if the concept of "dimension" in Flatland is somewhat literal, it very well could have influenced the use of that term in its broader sense of "reality". And the story by analogy seems like a potentially huge influence on writers who followed. Some references or evidence of the latter would be fascinating.

    – DaveInCaz
    2 days ago






  • 1





    IIRC, Flatland existed within our universe, as the narrator was a 3-D person observing the 2-D inhabitants who lived on it.

    – Barmar
    2 days ago






  • 10





    @Barmar - the narrator is A. Square, a Flatlander, who has a vision of visiting Lineland and failing to convince the Linelanders of the existence of a second dimension before being visited by a Sphere and eventually is convinced himself of the existence of a third dimension. However, when enboldened by this, he suggests to the Sphere that there might be more dimensions, the Sphere rejects it as a ridiculous concept. And A. Square is imprisoned as a lunatic by his fellow flatlanders when he later attempts to tell them about the 3rd dimension. The Sphere is the only 3D "person".

    – Paul Sinclair
    2 days ago












  • @PaulSinclair Thanks for the correction -- I just remembered that there was some interaction between Flatland and the surrounding 3-D universe.

    – Barmar
    yesterday


















35















1928: "The Blue Dimension", a short story by Francis Flagg, published in Amazing Stories, June 1928, available at the Internet Archive.



The first-person narrator's friend, a retired optometrist, has discovered that there are coexistent worlds separated from ours by different rates of vibration:




"[. . .] Consider that we are living at a certain rate of vibration. Everything vibrating within range of our own rate would manifest itself to us as matter, that is, as concrete material, such as mountains, trees, cats, birds, snakes, etc. Anything below or above our range would to us be merely
space, non-existent. You follow me?"



"Not quite," I confessed.



"Well, let me put it differently. You know there are sounds so high in frequency or pitch that the human ear cannot hear them, and vice versa, so low as to be inaudible."



"I understand that."



"Good. Then please remember that everything we observe around us, the smoke of factories, the red of sunset, houses, trees, animals, men, are all things manifesting themselves to us at varying degrees of vibration. At a certain rate they impinge on the ear as sound, the eye as color, the tongue as taste, the flesh as feeling. If that be true, then there must be a wealth of things all around us we cannot taste, handle or see."



[. . . .]



"Robert," said the Doctor impressively, "the world, as we know it, the world of our five senses, has been pretty well explored. Lots of people think there remains nothing more to discover. But what if someone were to open the way into those hidden realms all around us, the countless planes above and below! Think of the strange races that might be found, the new lands that might be visited, the wealth of knowledge that might be garnered!"




The narrator tries on a pair of goggles the Doctor has devised to see into another dimension:




"I beg you not to be in the least alarmed, no matter what you see. Remember to keep quiet and not to endanger these lenses by any sudden move. Bear in mind the fact that you are in no bodily danger, that I am constantly by your side in this workshop, and tell
me, if you can, what you see."



With that the eye-glasses were brought down until the rest-piece fitted the nose, and the side-flaps drawn back, were made fast in the rear. For a moment I was dazzled. My blinking eyes were lost in a maze of contrasting crystals. Then, so suddenly as to galvanize me with the shock, the crystals merged into one harmonious whole, seemed to expand, clarify, and I was gazing — gazing through the incredible aisles of a blue forest. It was a blue world that I saw. The trees, the giant ferns, the sucker-like blooms, were all blue. Not one prevailing shade of blue, no. The flowers, in some cases, were almost purplish red, and in others, shaded away into the most delicious contrasts of creamy whites and yellows. But the predominating color was blue. What could be seen of
the sky was greenish blue. The very atmosphere had a bluish tinge, as if the winds were colored and could be seen. Whichever way I looked, the blue forest was before me. I turned my head. It was on either side of me — behind me. A shiver of fear ran down my back.




After demonstrating the goggles, the Doctor shows the narrator a device he has invented, but as yet tried out only on mice, for transporting bodies physically into the other dimension:




"You mean," I gasped, "that you have invented a way of getting there?"



"Exactly."



"But how?"



"Briefly, by altering the present rate of vibration and bringing it in harmony with that prevailing in the other dimension. Obviously, if my body can be made to vibrate in accord with the blue world, I shall manifest there and not here. At least, I think so."



He led the way to what looked not unlike a big wringing machine of the roller type. The rollers, however, were of fine wire coils, interlockingly arranged, and there were twelve of them supported above a large tub filled with a metallic fluid. Several powerful looking electric batteries lay at the tub's base, on the floor.



"This," said the Doctor, laying his hand affectionately on the complicated apparatus, "is the Re-vibrator. The person or thing to be re-vibrated is run through those rollers, at the same time an alternating current of electricity is maintained in the wire coils which affects the molecules of matter and brings about the vibratory change. Just how this is done, I cannot tell you, for I do not know; but take my word for it, it is done."



I stared at the inert piece of machinery with mixed emotions. That anyone or anything could be run through its rollers to another dimension seemed the height of absurdity. Yet, after my experience with the glasses, I was distrustful of my own doubt.







share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Lovecraft's "From Beyond", written in 1920 but not published until 1934, has a very similar theme. I wonder if there was some connection/shared inspiration for the two stories, or if it's just a coincidence.

    – Geoffrey Brent
    yesterday











  • Another relatively early one is The Ultimate Adventure by L. Ron Hubbard, published 1939.

    – Wildcard
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Wildcard I haven't read that one; I'll have to look it up. "Parallel worlds" stories were thick on the ground by the 1930s. Another famous one is "The Gostak and the Doshes" by Miles J. Breuer, M.D. (1930).

    – user14111
    yesterday


















25















According to the Wikipedia article on Parallel Universes, In one of the stories-within-a-story of Thousand And One Nights, "The Adventures of Bulukiya",




the protagonist Bulukiya [learns] of alternative worlds/universes that are similar to but still distinct from his own.




I don't know if you consider 1001 Nights as a human belief system, but I think it might fit. Since 1001 Nights has stories dating back to the 10th century and maybe older, this seems like a likely candidate.






share|improve this answer
































    16















    Wikipedia has this to say:




    One of the first science fiction examples is Murray Leinster's
    Sidewise in Time, in which portions of alternative universes replace
    corresponding geographical regions in this universe. Sidewise in Time
    describes it in the manner that similar to requiring both longitude
    and latitude coordinates in order to mark your location on Earth, so
    too does time: travelling along latitude is akin to time travel moving
    through past, present and future, while travelling along longitude is
    to travel perpendicular to time and to other realities, hence the name
    of the short story. Thus, another common term for a parallel universe
    is "another dimension", stemming from the idea that if the 4th
    dimension is time, the 5th dimension - a direction at a right angle to
    the fourth - are alternate realities.




    According to the page on the story itself,




    "Sidewise in Time" is a science fiction short story by American writer
    Murray Leinster that was first published in the June 1934 issue of
    Astounding Stories. "Sidewise in Time" served as the title story for
    Leinster's second story collection in 1950.




    So as far as "scientifically explained" alternate timelines, the date to beat is 1934.






    share|improve this answer






















    • 2





      A few years ago there was a question on here about the earliest SF story to use a "multiverse" concept, and I nominated Murray Leinster's "Sideways in Time." (My answer wasn't the one that got accepted, though.) scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/148015/…

      – Lorendiac
      Aug 30 at 1:38






    • 1





      That beats H. Beam Piper's influential Paratime series by more than a decade.

      – PM 2Ring
      Aug 30 at 3:58


















    14















    I have been reminded that a related question, What was the earliest SF work that used the idea of the "Multiverse"?, was asked a couple of years ago, at which time I gave the following answer, which was accepted:



    1915: A Drop in Infinity, a novel by Gerald Grogan, available at the Internet Archive. Reviewed by Everett F. Bleiler in Science-Fiction: The Early Years:




    A robinsonade in the fourth dimension.

    Jack Thorpe and Marjorie Matthews are walking along the shore in Cornwall when a seeming eccentric asks them directions. They humor him by showing the way, whereupon he produces a revolver and takes them captive. A scientist who has worked in dimensional research, he is brilliant, but unfortunately mad and irresponsible. He thinks of himself as a hubble-bubble, and so the characters call him.

    The Hubble-Bubble reveals that he has obtained access, via the fourth dimension, to two other worlds which in modern terminology amount to parallel worlds. His technique involves electricity, vibrations, and a mental set. He now offers Jack and Marjorie the choice of death or entry to another world, which he claims is much like earth in fauna and flora, but without human or other intelligent life.

    Jack and Marjorie have little choice, and in a short time find themselves in the world they later call Marjorie-land. Making the best of the situation, they work out a Crusoe-like primitive culture, building a house, cultivating certain plants, and domesticating animals. From time to time a few other humans are dropped in with them, a total of four batches in all. Most of them are congenial, but Michael Quelch, a lazy, vicious Cockney will eventually cause trouble.

    On one occasion the Hubble-Bubble's apparatus seems to have "backfired," and Jack is temporarily returned to our world. But he makes terms of a sort with the mad scientist and goes back to Marjorie-land.

    Time passes. Jack and Marjorie have two children, and the colonists thrive. Life seems reasonably secure and happy. But then Quelch causes trouble. Thinking that Jack is dead when he does not return on time from a journey of exploration, Quelch tries to seize control of the settlement, rape Marjorie, and murder the children. Fortunately, as in a novel by Edgar Rice Burroughs, Jack returns in the nick of time. After some complications Jack reluctantly sets out to hunt Quelch down and kill him, but Quelch is found dead of natural causes.

    After a time it becomes apparent that the Hubble-Bubble is also dead and that the small human colony in Marjorie-land is permanently isolated.

    The story is told by Thorpe, a generation or two later.

    In the first part of the book, the treatment is flippant, but the story soon settles down to a rather dull development. Of historical interest as a very early parallel worlds story.







    share|improve this answer
































      12















      So I'm just going to be that guy and say, "The question is wrong."



      You've explicitly disallowed religious texts from answers, but it means you'll never get the truth. In reality, the most well-documented, best-protected documents are those considered sacred by the people who wrote them. We will naturally see far more ancient documentation on religion and politics than anything else.



      But just because something is part of a culture's mythology doesn't mean they believe it as fact. And things believed as fact aren't immune to being partially retold as fiction. The idea that modern sci-fi and fantasy writers didn't take many ideas from religion seems patently absurd to me.



      Nat mentions in a comment,




      ... Paradise Lost was also a fictional work, but I've heard Christians cite it as actual religion. So where's the line? And if the line's original intention, then Dante's Inferno was clearly intended as fiction, yet it discusses alternate realms. Earlier works exploring the "underworld" were likely meant as fictions, too. Some argue that the Garden of Eden, from the start of the Bible, was also intended as allegory. I guess it just gets hard to tell what the original intention is once a work's old enough.




      I would take it one step further and say that even if these original pieces were intended to be truth, there's no way other people haven't been creating deliberately fictional stories for just as long. Modern sci-fi is just the latest in a very long string of such stories stretching to before recorded history.



      A note on Stack policies regarding religious beliefs and "sci-fi" or "fantasy".



      To avoid turning the entire forum into a giant religious debate (and probably other reasons), there's a policy about not treating religious teachings or beliefs as fiction. But we're not treating these beliefs as either fact or fiction here. We're just noting that the concepts existed in some form.



      If Odin came to Earth and gave the ancient Norse a physical tour of Valhalla, the concepts written about wouldn't be any more influential than if the entire story was invented around campfires over the centuries. This answer doesn't care one way or the other about the origin of the beliefs. Just that these beliefs were almost certainly the origin of many stories.



      What is an alternate reality / parallel dimension, anyway?



      Different people will, of course, differ in opinion on the exact definitions. But a simple definition of a parallel dimension is any physical location you can't access via normal travel through 3-space. Or 2-space if you're a Flatlander.



      An alternate reality is any type of parallel universe that largely mirrors Earth (or the protagonist's homeworld if they're not from Earth) but has various shades of differences. Some of these are caused by branching timelines, such that normal Earth and alternate Earth were one and the same at some point in their shared past. Some are only superficially similar. Some invoke some type of shadow people, who not only mimic humans on Earth, but specific humans currently alive.



      I doubt many ancient civilizations (if any) understood the concept of a separate 3-space reached by traveling ana or kata along a fourth spatial dimension. You could, of course, arbitrarily define parallel universes as requiring some such convention. But there are two problems with this.



      First, not all dimension hopping is done via a fourth dimension. Narnia is reached through a wardrobe that makes no mention of dimensions. It's entirely possible for the wardrobe to connect directly between worlds without any external notion of direction. So you'd be arbitrarily defining many modern "parallel dimensions" as not being such.



      Second, it completely misses the point of looking for a historical source of the trope if we only include highly pedantic definitions of the trope and act as if instances of the trope meeting these pedantic criteria were conceived in a vacuum.



      What about the origin of "dimensions" themselves? (c. 1754)



      The earliest example of the word "dimension" being used to refer to the modern mathematical concepts is from 17544 when Jean Baptiste le Rond d’Alembert wrote5




      "I said earlier that it is impossible to conceive of more than three dimensions (italics of d'Alembert). A clever acquaintance of mine [un homme d'esprit de ma connaissance] believes that one might nevertheless consider timespan as a fourth dimension, and that the product of time with volume would in a certain manner be a product of four dimensions; this idea may be contested, but it has, it would seem to me, some merit, if only because of its novelty" [D'Alembert 1751-, Vol. IV, lOlO]."




      Clearly, the idea existed before this article was published, but we have no way of knowing how long before.



      What I'm having no luck finding is a source for the first time the mathematical concept of traveling through a higher dimension is published. Clearly, d'Alembert is only talking about representing time as a dimension, not as a means of travel to another world.



      But I would say this puts a reasonably firm cap on the oldest material that could use this trope in its most pedantic form as being early to mid 1700s.



      The Field of Reeds (the Egyptian afterlife, c. 2700 BC), the earliest recorded alternate reality / parallel dimension story I could find.



      We can go back to ancient Egypt (c. 2700-1800 BC) and find mythology relating to an afterlife.1 2 The deceased's soul leaves its body then travels to the Hall of Truth, (hopefully) passing various tests before approaching the Lake of Flowers, where a ferryman, Hraf-hef, would take the soul to the Field of Reeds, a paradise version of home where things were better and nobody died.



      This is about as close to an "alternate universe" as you can get without using the label. Sure, you have to die to get there, but it's a physical location that largely mirrors Earth that can't be reached by conventional travel.



      Arabian Nights -- The Adventures of Bulukiya (c. 750 AD), the oldest fictional alternate reality / parallel dimension story I could find (not verified).



      This answer comes from another question asking about the first record of explicit portals used to travel to another world.7



      According to the other scifi.se answer, and Wikipedia8, the story has elements of portals, other worlds, oh my! But I read through the story itself9 and couldn't find anything along those lines. I scanned through the days after the story heading but saw nothing there either, except mentions of the afterlife and Allah having created our world and the worlds of Hell and Heaven.



      This would beat my next contender, but only if it actually contains these plot elements.



      One thing to note here, is that the author of Arabian Nights is clearly influenced by religious mythology, and consistently writes from a pro-religion perspective. Whenever he mentions Allah or Muhammad, he interjects some type of reverent comment to ensure nobody believes those are just characters in a story.




      ‘O my mother, I have found, in one of my father’s treasuries, a book containing a description of Mohammed (whom Allah bless and keep!)



      in that island he saw serpents as big as camels and palm trees, which repeated the names of Allah (be He extolled and exalted!) and blessed Mohammed (whom the Lord assain and save!)




      Even if it's not dimension-hopping, it's clear evidence of old fiction directly including religious mythology into the fiction's mythology without treating the religion itself as fiction.



      The Divine Comedy (c. 1321 AD), the first alternate reality / parallel dimension (probably) fictional story I can verify.



      In The Divine Comedy3, the protagonist (and author), Dante Alighieri starts on Earth, travels through Hell, and ends up in Heaven.



      The descent into Hell could be literal enough. The Earth is rather large and could potentially contain a vast chasm underneath.



      But Heaven is reached by ascending from the Mount of Purgatory (an island in the ocean) after emerging from the bowels of Hell. And it's described as copies of our solar system, with Earth, Mars, the Moon, etc. being present along with several mythological constructs such as the Empyrean.



      Again, this very snugly fits into the definition of not only a parallel dimension, but an alternate reality. It's a place that exists alongside ours, only accessible via some portal to Hell, and has a close resemblance to our Earth.



      Note that there is some contention that The Divine Comedy was believed by the author to be some kind of spiritual journey, and might fall under the banner of "religious belief". However, most people would consider it a work of fiction, and it was labeled such officially by the Catholic Church of the era.6



      1Egyptian Book of the Dead from the Ancient History Encyclopedia
      2Egyptian Afterlife - The Field of Reeds from the Ancient History Encyclopedia
      3The Divine Comedy from Cummings Study Guides.
      4Four-dimensional Space article on Wikipedia.
      5d'Alembert and the Fourth Dimension by Rosine G. Van Oss via Science Direct.
      6Quora Forum Post by Sonia Fanucchi.
      7What is the first instance of a portal to another world?, answer by OrangeDog.
      8One Thousand and One Nights article on Wikipedia.
      9The Adventures of Bulukiya from the Adelaide ebooks collection. Note that it's a small part of a large page which the link should take you to.






      share|improve this answer



























      • Hubbard started Scientology explicitly as a religion.

        – JRE
        yesterday











      • @JRE: I think you're right. I just quoted the comment from elsewhere on the page verbatim. It was the intent behind the comment I was interested in.

        – MichaelS
        yesterday











      • I 100% agree with you that the concept was found in religious beliefs long before the modern science fiction version.

        – CJ Dennis
        yesterday











      • I thought Stack policy was that religious works are not to be considered science fiction or fantasy and therefore are off topic and/or shouldn’t be used as answers.

        – Todd Wilcox
        yesterday











      • @JRE Scientology was started as a religion, based on Hubbard's novels.

        – Clearer
        yesterday



















      6















      While it’s not fictional itself, it seems worth mentioning Hugh Everett III’s 1957 scientific paper (and PhD thesis) The Theory of the Universal Wave Function, which was the first thing to give an actual scientific basis to parallel universes, and turned such stories into science fiction instead of fantasy.






      share|improve this answer

























      • This is the paper that introduces what we now call the "many-worlds interpretation" of quantum mechanics, which is a term that readers may be more familiar with than "the universal wave function is objectively real", which is the central thesis of the paper.

        – Jörg W Mittag
        yesterday












      • To my knowledge, many-worlds interpretations (MWI) have zero confirmation in real science, and are merely of philosophical interest. Also, the instant a story allows people to travel between these branching timelines, it's no longer MWI in a remotely Everettian sense. Pedantically, sci-fi and fantasy are merely separated by whether we see them as really old or futuristic in theme. Very few sci-fi notions have any meaningful basis in real science, and most fantasy tropes are just sci-fi tropes drawn with a fantasy brush. However, Everett's paper is most certainly the basis for a lot of fiction.

        – MichaelS
        yesterday











      • @MichaelS The many worlds interpretation has exactly as much confirmation as the Copenhagen interpretation, or any other interpretation that hasn’t actually been disproven. It is fully consistent with every experiment and observation that have ever been conducted.

        – Mike Scott
        22 hours ago











      • @MikeScott: Fairies in the garden are also fully consistent with every experiment and observation that has ever been conducted. That doesn't mean putting them in your sci-fi show makes them "science-based". That the Copenhagen interpretation is in the same category is irrelevant.

        – MichaelS
        20 hours ago


















      6















      The concept of alternate dimensions/realities—also known as a multiverse—has strong roots in various religions and dates back thousands of years B.C.



      Multiverses are not a modern or new concept. The concept of the multiverse has been explored for thousands of years to attempt to explain basic human existence, life and death… The ultimate “why” of this all.



      And as with many things, Wikipedia sums things up nicely:




      The concept of a multiverse is explored in various religious cosmologies that propose that the totality of existence comprises multiple or infinitely many universes, including our own. Usually, such beliefs include a creation myth, a history, a worldview and a prediction of the eventual fate or destiny of the world.




      And even describes Hindu cosmology as well:




      For example, Hindu cosmology includes the idea of an infinite cycle of births and deaths and an infinite number of universes with each cycle lasting 8.64 billion years.




      As well as Kabbalah-based (Jewish mystical) theories:




      There are five worlds between the Creator and our world. Each of them consists of five Partzufim and each Partzuf of five Sefirot. In total there are 125 levels between us and the Creator. Malchut, moving through all these levels, reaches the last one, and in this way, Behina Dalet, the only creation, merges with the four previous phases.




      The concept of multiverses has existed since humans have imagined virtually anything. Heck, ever write? Where does what you write come from? And how is it that you wish to write about it and then share it with others to—hopefully—inspire them?



      Sorry to sound hokey, but the world of creativity, fiction and science fiction is based upon someone creating another world that you—the reader—will then enter by consuming (reading, viewing, experiencing, etc…) their work. And pretty much all superhero stories no matter what are based on a god—or group of gods—coming to some place and saving people.



      No matter how “Down to Earth” or relatable a superhero is, they are ultimately a “god” in the universe they inhabit. And all of these universes are unique and distinct from other universes created by others.






      share|improve this answer






















      • 1





        More proof that religious texts are the best record we have of the science fiction idea of the multiverse.

        – paqogomez
        8 hours ago


















      5















      One very famous example of visiting the future, coming back, and creating a different timeline is Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, from 1843. You’ve all read it: “Assure me that I yet may change these shadows you have shown me, by an altered life!”






      share|improve this answer
































        5















        If the question is, as you put it, "was there a definitive early example which defined and popularized the concept", one has to bring up H.G. Wells's 1923 utopian novel Men Like Gods as an early example.



        Men Like Gods was written by a well-known author of the time, published in the US and UK, and received widespread critical attention. It even attracted a famous parody, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. (It's not the concept of the multiverse being parodied; instead, it's Wells's utopian ideas).



        The concept is introduced and explained in Chapter 4:




        Serpentine had the manner of one who is taking great pains to be as simple as possible with a rather intricate question. He spoke, as it were, in propositions with a pause between each. "It had long been known," he began, "that the possible number of dimensions, like the possible number of anything else that could be enumerated, was unlimited!"



        Yes, Mr. Barnstaple had got that, but it proved too much for Mr. Freddy Mush.



        "Oh, Lord!" he said. "Dimensions!" and dropped his eye-glass and became despondently inattentive.




        A little later:




        Serpentine proceeded to explain that just as it would be possible for any number of practically two-dimensional universes to lie side by side, like sheets of paper, in a three-dimensional space, so in the many-dimensional space about which the ill-equipped human mind is still slowly and painfully acquiring knowledge, it is possible for an innumerable quantity of practically three-dimensional universes to lie, as it were, side by side and to undergo a roughly parallel movement through time. The speculative work of Lonestone and Cephalus had long since given the soundest basis for the belief that there actually were a very great number of such space-and-time universes, parallel to one another and resembling each other, nearly but not exactly, much as the leaves of a book might resemble one another. All of them would have duration, all of them would be gravitating systems—



        (Mr. Burleigh shook his head to show that still he didn't see it.)



        —And those lying closest together would most nearly resemble each other.




        Source: Project Gutenberg (my emphasis)






        share|improve this answer



























        • Looks like @CBredlow already mentioned this in the duplicate question.

          – Spencer
          12 hours ago



















        4















        Borges wrote a number of stories on the topic. The Garden of Forking Paths in 1941 and A New Refutation of Time in 1944. I think this is the one where he talks about a father putting a heavy iron sphere on the back of his son, crushing him so his double in another reality could fly.



        Investigation of Borges' antecedents and footnotes would be a fertile ground for exploration of this concept.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor



        Flaxeed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















        • Hi, welcome to SF&F! As it stands, this isn't a bad answer, but you yourself note that without examining his influences it's probably incomplete. Is there any chance you could either include a list of or links to at least some of the works that you suggest should be examined?

          – DavidW
          2 days ago











        • That would be decidedly un-Borgesian. But I would direct OP more to 19th century (and earlier) philosophical romances instead of 20th century science fiction.

          – Flaxeed
          2 days ago














        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "186"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f218232%2fwas-there-an-original-and-definitive-use-of-alternate-dimensions-realities-in-fi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        11 Answers
        11






        active

        oldest

        votes








        11 Answers
        11






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        42















        Maybe not exactly what the OP is looking for, but we'd be remiss if we went without mentioning




        Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions



        Published in 1884, Flatland depicts a 2-D world inhabited by polygons and lines, which then interacts with a 1-D world inhabited by points, a 3-D world inhabited by a sphere, and a 0-D world which is a point.



        While none of these worlds could really be described as alternate or parallel dimensions to our own (or a fictional Earth-like dimension), they could be thought of as alternate dimensions to each other.






        share|improve this answer



























        • This is an intriguing answer. Even if the concept of "dimension" in Flatland is somewhat literal, it very well could have influenced the use of that term in its broader sense of "reality". And the story by analogy seems like a potentially huge influence on writers who followed. Some references or evidence of the latter would be fascinating.

          – DaveInCaz
          2 days ago






        • 1





          IIRC, Flatland existed within our universe, as the narrator was a 3-D person observing the 2-D inhabitants who lived on it.

          – Barmar
          2 days ago






        • 10





          @Barmar - the narrator is A. Square, a Flatlander, who has a vision of visiting Lineland and failing to convince the Linelanders of the existence of a second dimension before being visited by a Sphere and eventually is convinced himself of the existence of a third dimension. However, when enboldened by this, he suggests to the Sphere that there might be more dimensions, the Sphere rejects it as a ridiculous concept. And A. Square is imprisoned as a lunatic by his fellow flatlanders when he later attempts to tell them about the 3rd dimension. The Sphere is the only 3D "person".

          – Paul Sinclair
          2 days ago












        • @PaulSinclair Thanks for the correction -- I just remembered that there was some interaction between Flatland and the surrounding 3-D universe.

          – Barmar
          yesterday















        42















        Maybe not exactly what the OP is looking for, but we'd be remiss if we went without mentioning




        Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions



        Published in 1884, Flatland depicts a 2-D world inhabited by polygons and lines, which then interacts with a 1-D world inhabited by points, a 3-D world inhabited by a sphere, and a 0-D world which is a point.



        While none of these worlds could really be described as alternate or parallel dimensions to our own (or a fictional Earth-like dimension), they could be thought of as alternate dimensions to each other.






        share|improve this answer



























        • This is an intriguing answer. Even if the concept of "dimension" in Flatland is somewhat literal, it very well could have influenced the use of that term in its broader sense of "reality". And the story by analogy seems like a potentially huge influence on writers who followed. Some references or evidence of the latter would be fascinating.

          – DaveInCaz
          2 days ago






        • 1





          IIRC, Flatland existed within our universe, as the narrator was a 3-D person observing the 2-D inhabitants who lived on it.

          – Barmar
          2 days ago






        • 10





          @Barmar - the narrator is A. Square, a Flatlander, who has a vision of visiting Lineland and failing to convince the Linelanders of the existence of a second dimension before being visited by a Sphere and eventually is convinced himself of the existence of a third dimension. However, when enboldened by this, he suggests to the Sphere that there might be more dimensions, the Sphere rejects it as a ridiculous concept. And A. Square is imprisoned as a lunatic by his fellow flatlanders when he later attempts to tell them about the 3rd dimension. The Sphere is the only 3D "person".

          – Paul Sinclair
          2 days ago












        • @PaulSinclair Thanks for the correction -- I just remembered that there was some interaction between Flatland and the surrounding 3-D universe.

          – Barmar
          yesterday













        42














        42










        42









        Maybe not exactly what the OP is looking for, but we'd be remiss if we went without mentioning




        Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions



        Published in 1884, Flatland depicts a 2-D world inhabited by polygons and lines, which then interacts with a 1-D world inhabited by points, a 3-D world inhabited by a sphere, and a 0-D world which is a point.



        While none of these worlds could really be described as alternate or parallel dimensions to our own (or a fictional Earth-like dimension), they could be thought of as alternate dimensions to each other.






        share|improve this answer















        Maybe not exactly what the OP is looking for, but we'd be remiss if we went without mentioning




        Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions



        Published in 1884, Flatland depicts a 2-D world inhabited by polygons and lines, which then interacts with a 1-D world inhabited by points, a 3-D world inhabited by a sphere, and a 0-D world which is a point.



        While none of these worlds could really be described as alternate or parallel dimensions to our own (or a fictional Earth-like dimension), they could be thought of as alternate dimensions to each other.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago









        Jontia

        6,2223 gold badges26 silver badges54 bronze badges




        6,2223 gold badges26 silver badges54 bronze badges










        answered Aug 30 at 1:19









        Arcanist LupusArcanist Lupus

        4,45114 silver badges31 bronze badges




        4,45114 silver badges31 bronze badges















        • This is an intriguing answer. Even if the concept of "dimension" in Flatland is somewhat literal, it very well could have influenced the use of that term in its broader sense of "reality". And the story by analogy seems like a potentially huge influence on writers who followed. Some references or evidence of the latter would be fascinating.

          – DaveInCaz
          2 days ago






        • 1





          IIRC, Flatland existed within our universe, as the narrator was a 3-D person observing the 2-D inhabitants who lived on it.

          – Barmar
          2 days ago






        • 10





          @Barmar - the narrator is A. Square, a Flatlander, who has a vision of visiting Lineland and failing to convince the Linelanders of the existence of a second dimension before being visited by a Sphere and eventually is convinced himself of the existence of a third dimension. However, when enboldened by this, he suggests to the Sphere that there might be more dimensions, the Sphere rejects it as a ridiculous concept. And A. Square is imprisoned as a lunatic by his fellow flatlanders when he later attempts to tell them about the 3rd dimension. The Sphere is the only 3D "person".

          – Paul Sinclair
          2 days ago












        • @PaulSinclair Thanks for the correction -- I just remembered that there was some interaction between Flatland and the surrounding 3-D universe.

          – Barmar
          yesterday

















        • This is an intriguing answer. Even if the concept of "dimension" in Flatland is somewhat literal, it very well could have influenced the use of that term in its broader sense of "reality". And the story by analogy seems like a potentially huge influence on writers who followed. Some references or evidence of the latter would be fascinating.

          – DaveInCaz
          2 days ago






        • 1





          IIRC, Flatland existed within our universe, as the narrator was a 3-D person observing the 2-D inhabitants who lived on it.

          – Barmar
          2 days ago






        • 10





          @Barmar - the narrator is A. Square, a Flatlander, who has a vision of visiting Lineland and failing to convince the Linelanders of the existence of a second dimension before being visited by a Sphere and eventually is convinced himself of the existence of a third dimension. However, when enboldened by this, he suggests to the Sphere that there might be more dimensions, the Sphere rejects it as a ridiculous concept. And A. Square is imprisoned as a lunatic by his fellow flatlanders when he later attempts to tell them about the 3rd dimension. The Sphere is the only 3D "person".

          – Paul Sinclair
          2 days ago












        • @PaulSinclair Thanks for the correction -- I just remembered that there was some interaction between Flatland and the surrounding 3-D universe.

          – Barmar
          yesterday
















        This is an intriguing answer. Even if the concept of "dimension" in Flatland is somewhat literal, it very well could have influenced the use of that term in its broader sense of "reality". And the story by analogy seems like a potentially huge influence on writers who followed. Some references or evidence of the latter would be fascinating.

        – DaveInCaz
        2 days ago





        This is an intriguing answer. Even if the concept of "dimension" in Flatland is somewhat literal, it very well could have influenced the use of that term in its broader sense of "reality". And the story by analogy seems like a potentially huge influence on writers who followed. Some references or evidence of the latter would be fascinating.

        – DaveInCaz
        2 days ago




        1




        1





        IIRC, Flatland existed within our universe, as the narrator was a 3-D person observing the 2-D inhabitants who lived on it.

        – Barmar
        2 days ago





        IIRC, Flatland existed within our universe, as the narrator was a 3-D person observing the 2-D inhabitants who lived on it.

        – Barmar
        2 days ago




        10




        10





        @Barmar - the narrator is A. Square, a Flatlander, who has a vision of visiting Lineland and failing to convince the Linelanders of the existence of a second dimension before being visited by a Sphere and eventually is convinced himself of the existence of a third dimension. However, when enboldened by this, he suggests to the Sphere that there might be more dimensions, the Sphere rejects it as a ridiculous concept. And A. Square is imprisoned as a lunatic by his fellow flatlanders when he later attempts to tell them about the 3rd dimension. The Sphere is the only 3D "person".

        – Paul Sinclair
        2 days ago






        @Barmar - the narrator is A. Square, a Flatlander, who has a vision of visiting Lineland and failing to convince the Linelanders of the existence of a second dimension before being visited by a Sphere and eventually is convinced himself of the existence of a third dimension. However, when enboldened by this, he suggests to the Sphere that there might be more dimensions, the Sphere rejects it as a ridiculous concept. And A. Square is imprisoned as a lunatic by his fellow flatlanders when he later attempts to tell them about the 3rd dimension. The Sphere is the only 3D "person".

        – Paul Sinclair
        2 days ago














        @PaulSinclair Thanks for the correction -- I just remembered that there was some interaction between Flatland and the surrounding 3-D universe.

        – Barmar
        yesterday





        @PaulSinclair Thanks for the correction -- I just remembered that there was some interaction between Flatland and the surrounding 3-D universe.

        – Barmar
        yesterday













        35















        1928: "The Blue Dimension", a short story by Francis Flagg, published in Amazing Stories, June 1928, available at the Internet Archive.



        The first-person narrator's friend, a retired optometrist, has discovered that there are coexistent worlds separated from ours by different rates of vibration:




        "[. . .] Consider that we are living at a certain rate of vibration. Everything vibrating within range of our own rate would manifest itself to us as matter, that is, as concrete material, such as mountains, trees, cats, birds, snakes, etc. Anything below or above our range would to us be merely
        space, non-existent. You follow me?"



        "Not quite," I confessed.



        "Well, let me put it differently. You know there are sounds so high in frequency or pitch that the human ear cannot hear them, and vice versa, so low as to be inaudible."



        "I understand that."



        "Good. Then please remember that everything we observe around us, the smoke of factories, the red of sunset, houses, trees, animals, men, are all things manifesting themselves to us at varying degrees of vibration. At a certain rate they impinge on the ear as sound, the eye as color, the tongue as taste, the flesh as feeling. If that be true, then there must be a wealth of things all around us we cannot taste, handle or see."



        [. . . .]



        "Robert," said the Doctor impressively, "the world, as we know it, the world of our five senses, has been pretty well explored. Lots of people think there remains nothing more to discover. But what if someone were to open the way into those hidden realms all around us, the countless planes above and below! Think of the strange races that might be found, the new lands that might be visited, the wealth of knowledge that might be garnered!"




        The narrator tries on a pair of goggles the Doctor has devised to see into another dimension:




        "I beg you not to be in the least alarmed, no matter what you see. Remember to keep quiet and not to endanger these lenses by any sudden move. Bear in mind the fact that you are in no bodily danger, that I am constantly by your side in this workshop, and tell
        me, if you can, what you see."



        With that the eye-glasses were brought down until the rest-piece fitted the nose, and the side-flaps drawn back, were made fast in the rear. For a moment I was dazzled. My blinking eyes were lost in a maze of contrasting crystals. Then, so suddenly as to galvanize me with the shock, the crystals merged into one harmonious whole, seemed to expand, clarify, and I was gazing — gazing through the incredible aisles of a blue forest. It was a blue world that I saw. The trees, the giant ferns, the sucker-like blooms, were all blue. Not one prevailing shade of blue, no. The flowers, in some cases, were almost purplish red, and in others, shaded away into the most delicious contrasts of creamy whites and yellows. But the predominating color was blue. What could be seen of
        the sky was greenish blue. The very atmosphere had a bluish tinge, as if the winds were colored and could be seen. Whichever way I looked, the blue forest was before me. I turned my head. It was on either side of me — behind me. A shiver of fear ran down my back.




        After demonstrating the goggles, the Doctor shows the narrator a device he has invented, but as yet tried out only on mice, for transporting bodies physically into the other dimension:




        "You mean," I gasped, "that you have invented a way of getting there?"



        "Exactly."



        "But how?"



        "Briefly, by altering the present rate of vibration and bringing it in harmony with that prevailing in the other dimension. Obviously, if my body can be made to vibrate in accord with the blue world, I shall manifest there and not here. At least, I think so."



        He led the way to what looked not unlike a big wringing machine of the roller type. The rollers, however, were of fine wire coils, interlockingly arranged, and there were twelve of them supported above a large tub filled with a metallic fluid. Several powerful looking electric batteries lay at the tub's base, on the floor.



        "This," said the Doctor, laying his hand affectionately on the complicated apparatus, "is the Re-vibrator. The person or thing to be re-vibrated is run through those rollers, at the same time an alternating current of electricity is maintained in the wire coils which affects the molecules of matter and brings about the vibratory change. Just how this is done, I cannot tell you, for I do not know; but take my word for it, it is done."



        I stared at the inert piece of machinery with mixed emotions. That anyone or anything could be run through its rollers to another dimension seemed the height of absurdity. Yet, after my experience with the glasses, I was distrustful of my own doubt.







        share|improve this answer




















        • 1





          Lovecraft's "From Beyond", written in 1920 but not published until 1934, has a very similar theme. I wonder if there was some connection/shared inspiration for the two stories, or if it's just a coincidence.

          – Geoffrey Brent
          yesterday











        • Another relatively early one is The Ultimate Adventure by L. Ron Hubbard, published 1939.

          – Wildcard
          yesterday






        • 1





          @Wildcard I haven't read that one; I'll have to look it up. "Parallel worlds" stories were thick on the ground by the 1930s. Another famous one is "The Gostak and the Doshes" by Miles J. Breuer, M.D. (1930).

          – user14111
          yesterday















        35















        1928: "The Blue Dimension", a short story by Francis Flagg, published in Amazing Stories, June 1928, available at the Internet Archive.



        The first-person narrator's friend, a retired optometrist, has discovered that there are coexistent worlds separated from ours by different rates of vibration:




        "[. . .] Consider that we are living at a certain rate of vibration. Everything vibrating within range of our own rate would manifest itself to us as matter, that is, as concrete material, such as mountains, trees, cats, birds, snakes, etc. Anything below or above our range would to us be merely
        space, non-existent. You follow me?"



        "Not quite," I confessed.



        "Well, let me put it differently. You know there are sounds so high in frequency or pitch that the human ear cannot hear them, and vice versa, so low as to be inaudible."



        "I understand that."



        "Good. Then please remember that everything we observe around us, the smoke of factories, the red of sunset, houses, trees, animals, men, are all things manifesting themselves to us at varying degrees of vibration. At a certain rate they impinge on the ear as sound, the eye as color, the tongue as taste, the flesh as feeling. If that be true, then there must be a wealth of things all around us we cannot taste, handle or see."



        [. . . .]



        "Robert," said the Doctor impressively, "the world, as we know it, the world of our five senses, has been pretty well explored. Lots of people think there remains nothing more to discover. But what if someone were to open the way into those hidden realms all around us, the countless planes above and below! Think of the strange races that might be found, the new lands that might be visited, the wealth of knowledge that might be garnered!"




        The narrator tries on a pair of goggles the Doctor has devised to see into another dimension:




        "I beg you not to be in the least alarmed, no matter what you see. Remember to keep quiet and not to endanger these lenses by any sudden move. Bear in mind the fact that you are in no bodily danger, that I am constantly by your side in this workshop, and tell
        me, if you can, what you see."



        With that the eye-glasses were brought down until the rest-piece fitted the nose, and the side-flaps drawn back, were made fast in the rear. For a moment I was dazzled. My blinking eyes were lost in a maze of contrasting crystals. Then, so suddenly as to galvanize me with the shock, the crystals merged into one harmonious whole, seemed to expand, clarify, and I was gazing — gazing through the incredible aisles of a blue forest. It was a blue world that I saw. The trees, the giant ferns, the sucker-like blooms, were all blue. Not one prevailing shade of blue, no. The flowers, in some cases, were almost purplish red, and in others, shaded away into the most delicious contrasts of creamy whites and yellows. But the predominating color was blue. What could be seen of
        the sky was greenish blue. The very atmosphere had a bluish tinge, as if the winds were colored and could be seen. Whichever way I looked, the blue forest was before me. I turned my head. It was on either side of me — behind me. A shiver of fear ran down my back.




        After demonstrating the goggles, the Doctor shows the narrator a device he has invented, but as yet tried out only on mice, for transporting bodies physically into the other dimension:




        "You mean," I gasped, "that you have invented a way of getting there?"



        "Exactly."



        "But how?"



        "Briefly, by altering the present rate of vibration and bringing it in harmony with that prevailing in the other dimension. Obviously, if my body can be made to vibrate in accord with the blue world, I shall manifest there and not here. At least, I think so."



        He led the way to what looked not unlike a big wringing machine of the roller type. The rollers, however, were of fine wire coils, interlockingly arranged, and there were twelve of them supported above a large tub filled with a metallic fluid. Several powerful looking electric batteries lay at the tub's base, on the floor.



        "This," said the Doctor, laying his hand affectionately on the complicated apparatus, "is the Re-vibrator. The person or thing to be re-vibrated is run through those rollers, at the same time an alternating current of electricity is maintained in the wire coils which affects the molecules of matter and brings about the vibratory change. Just how this is done, I cannot tell you, for I do not know; but take my word for it, it is done."



        I stared at the inert piece of machinery with mixed emotions. That anyone or anything could be run through its rollers to another dimension seemed the height of absurdity. Yet, after my experience with the glasses, I was distrustful of my own doubt.







        share|improve this answer




















        • 1





          Lovecraft's "From Beyond", written in 1920 but not published until 1934, has a very similar theme. I wonder if there was some connection/shared inspiration for the two stories, or if it's just a coincidence.

          – Geoffrey Brent
          yesterday











        • Another relatively early one is The Ultimate Adventure by L. Ron Hubbard, published 1939.

          – Wildcard
          yesterday






        • 1





          @Wildcard I haven't read that one; I'll have to look it up. "Parallel worlds" stories were thick on the ground by the 1930s. Another famous one is "The Gostak and the Doshes" by Miles J. Breuer, M.D. (1930).

          – user14111
          yesterday













        35














        35










        35









        1928: "The Blue Dimension", a short story by Francis Flagg, published in Amazing Stories, June 1928, available at the Internet Archive.



        The first-person narrator's friend, a retired optometrist, has discovered that there are coexistent worlds separated from ours by different rates of vibration:




        "[. . .] Consider that we are living at a certain rate of vibration. Everything vibrating within range of our own rate would manifest itself to us as matter, that is, as concrete material, such as mountains, trees, cats, birds, snakes, etc. Anything below or above our range would to us be merely
        space, non-existent. You follow me?"



        "Not quite," I confessed.



        "Well, let me put it differently. You know there are sounds so high in frequency or pitch that the human ear cannot hear them, and vice versa, so low as to be inaudible."



        "I understand that."



        "Good. Then please remember that everything we observe around us, the smoke of factories, the red of sunset, houses, trees, animals, men, are all things manifesting themselves to us at varying degrees of vibration. At a certain rate they impinge on the ear as sound, the eye as color, the tongue as taste, the flesh as feeling. If that be true, then there must be a wealth of things all around us we cannot taste, handle or see."



        [. . . .]



        "Robert," said the Doctor impressively, "the world, as we know it, the world of our five senses, has been pretty well explored. Lots of people think there remains nothing more to discover. But what if someone were to open the way into those hidden realms all around us, the countless planes above and below! Think of the strange races that might be found, the new lands that might be visited, the wealth of knowledge that might be garnered!"




        The narrator tries on a pair of goggles the Doctor has devised to see into another dimension:




        "I beg you not to be in the least alarmed, no matter what you see. Remember to keep quiet and not to endanger these lenses by any sudden move. Bear in mind the fact that you are in no bodily danger, that I am constantly by your side in this workshop, and tell
        me, if you can, what you see."



        With that the eye-glasses were brought down until the rest-piece fitted the nose, and the side-flaps drawn back, were made fast in the rear. For a moment I was dazzled. My blinking eyes were lost in a maze of contrasting crystals. Then, so suddenly as to galvanize me with the shock, the crystals merged into one harmonious whole, seemed to expand, clarify, and I was gazing — gazing through the incredible aisles of a blue forest. It was a blue world that I saw. The trees, the giant ferns, the sucker-like blooms, were all blue. Not one prevailing shade of blue, no. The flowers, in some cases, were almost purplish red, and in others, shaded away into the most delicious contrasts of creamy whites and yellows. But the predominating color was blue. What could be seen of
        the sky was greenish blue. The very atmosphere had a bluish tinge, as if the winds were colored and could be seen. Whichever way I looked, the blue forest was before me. I turned my head. It was on either side of me — behind me. A shiver of fear ran down my back.




        After demonstrating the goggles, the Doctor shows the narrator a device he has invented, but as yet tried out only on mice, for transporting bodies physically into the other dimension:




        "You mean," I gasped, "that you have invented a way of getting there?"



        "Exactly."



        "But how?"



        "Briefly, by altering the present rate of vibration and bringing it in harmony with that prevailing in the other dimension. Obviously, if my body can be made to vibrate in accord with the blue world, I shall manifest there and not here. At least, I think so."



        He led the way to what looked not unlike a big wringing machine of the roller type. The rollers, however, were of fine wire coils, interlockingly arranged, and there were twelve of them supported above a large tub filled with a metallic fluid. Several powerful looking electric batteries lay at the tub's base, on the floor.



        "This," said the Doctor, laying his hand affectionately on the complicated apparatus, "is the Re-vibrator. The person or thing to be re-vibrated is run through those rollers, at the same time an alternating current of electricity is maintained in the wire coils which affects the molecules of matter and brings about the vibratory change. Just how this is done, I cannot tell you, for I do not know; but take my word for it, it is done."



        I stared at the inert piece of machinery with mixed emotions. That anyone or anything could be run through its rollers to another dimension seemed the height of absurdity. Yet, after my experience with the glasses, I was distrustful of my own doubt.







        share|improve this answer













        1928: "The Blue Dimension", a short story by Francis Flagg, published in Amazing Stories, June 1928, available at the Internet Archive.



        The first-person narrator's friend, a retired optometrist, has discovered that there are coexistent worlds separated from ours by different rates of vibration:




        "[. . .] Consider that we are living at a certain rate of vibration. Everything vibrating within range of our own rate would manifest itself to us as matter, that is, as concrete material, such as mountains, trees, cats, birds, snakes, etc. Anything below or above our range would to us be merely
        space, non-existent. You follow me?"



        "Not quite," I confessed.



        "Well, let me put it differently. You know there are sounds so high in frequency or pitch that the human ear cannot hear them, and vice versa, so low as to be inaudible."



        "I understand that."



        "Good. Then please remember that everything we observe around us, the smoke of factories, the red of sunset, houses, trees, animals, men, are all things manifesting themselves to us at varying degrees of vibration. At a certain rate they impinge on the ear as sound, the eye as color, the tongue as taste, the flesh as feeling. If that be true, then there must be a wealth of things all around us we cannot taste, handle or see."



        [. . . .]



        "Robert," said the Doctor impressively, "the world, as we know it, the world of our five senses, has been pretty well explored. Lots of people think there remains nothing more to discover. But what if someone were to open the way into those hidden realms all around us, the countless planes above and below! Think of the strange races that might be found, the new lands that might be visited, the wealth of knowledge that might be garnered!"




        The narrator tries on a pair of goggles the Doctor has devised to see into another dimension:




        "I beg you not to be in the least alarmed, no matter what you see. Remember to keep quiet and not to endanger these lenses by any sudden move. Bear in mind the fact that you are in no bodily danger, that I am constantly by your side in this workshop, and tell
        me, if you can, what you see."



        With that the eye-glasses were brought down until the rest-piece fitted the nose, and the side-flaps drawn back, were made fast in the rear. For a moment I was dazzled. My blinking eyes were lost in a maze of contrasting crystals. Then, so suddenly as to galvanize me with the shock, the crystals merged into one harmonious whole, seemed to expand, clarify, and I was gazing — gazing through the incredible aisles of a blue forest. It was a blue world that I saw. The trees, the giant ferns, the sucker-like blooms, were all blue. Not one prevailing shade of blue, no. The flowers, in some cases, were almost purplish red, and in others, shaded away into the most delicious contrasts of creamy whites and yellows. But the predominating color was blue. What could be seen of
        the sky was greenish blue. The very atmosphere had a bluish tinge, as if the winds were colored and could be seen. Whichever way I looked, the blue forest was before me. I turned my head. It was on either side of me — behind me. A shiver of fear ran down my back.




        After demonstrating the goggles, the Doctor shows the narrator a device he has invented, but as yet tried out only on mice, for transporting bodies physically into the other dimension:




        "You mean," I gasped, "that you have invented a way of getting there?"



        "Exactly."



        "But how?"



        "Briefly, by altering the present rate of vibration and bringing it in harmony with that prevailing in the other dimension. Obviously, if my body can be made to vibrate in accord with the blue world, I shall manifest there and not here. At least, I think so."



        He led the way to what looked not unlike a big wringing machine of the roller type. The rollers, however, were of fine wire coils, interlockingly arranged, and there were twelve of them supported above a large tub filled with a metallic fluid. Several powerful looking electric batteries lay at the tub's base, on the floor.



        "This," said the Doctor, laying his hand affectionately on the complicated apparatus, "is the Re-vibrator. The person or thing to be re-vibrated is run through those rollers, at the same time an alternating current of electricity is maintained in the wire coils which affects the molecules of matter and brings about the vibratory change. Just how this is done, I cannot tell you, for I do not know; but take my word for it, it is done."



        I stared at the inert piece of machinery with mixed emotions. That anyone or anything could be run through its rollers to another dimension seemed the height of absurdity. Yet, after my experience with the glasses, I was distrustful of my own doubt.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Aug 30 at 3:09









        user14111user14111

        113k6 gold badges463 silver badges582 bronze badges




        113k6 gold badges463 silver badges582 bronze badges










        • 1





          Lovecraft's "From Beyond", written in 1920 but not published until 1934, has a very similar theme. I wonder if there was some connection/shared inspiration for the two stories, or if it's just a coincidence.

          – Geoffrey Brent
          yesterday











        • Another relatively early one is The Ultimate Adventure by L. Ron Hubbard, published 1939.

          – Wildcard
          yesterday






        • 1





          @Wildcard I haven't read that one; I'll have to look it up. "Parallel worlds" stories were thick on the ground by the 1930s. Another famous one is "The Gostak and the Doshes" by Miles J. Breuer, M.D. (1930).

          – user14111
          yesterday












        • 1





          Lovecraft's "From Beyond", written in 1920 but not published until 1934, has a very similar theme. I wonder if there was some connection/shared inspiration for the two stories, or if it's just a coincidence.

          – Geoffrey Brent
          yesterday











        • Another relatively early one is The Ultimate Adventure by L. Ron Hubbard, published 1939.

          – Wildcard
          yesterday






        • 1





          @Wildcard I haven't read that one; I'll have to look it up. "Parallel worlds" stories were thick on the ground by the 1930s. Another famous one is "The Gostak and the Doshes" by Miles J. Breuer, M.D. (1930).

          – user14111
          yesterday







        1




        1





        Lovecraft's "From Beyond", written in 1920 but not published until 1934, has a very similar theme. I wonder if there was some connection/shared inspiration for the two stories, or if it's just a coincidence.

        – Geoffrey Brent
        yesterday





        Lovecraft's "From Beyond", written in 1920 but not published until 1934, has a very similar theme. I wonder if there was some connection/shared inspiration for the two stories, or if it's just a coincidence.

        – Geoffrey Brent
        yesterday













        Another relatively early one is The Ultimate Adventure by L. Ron Hubbard, published 1939.

        – Wildcard
        yesterday





        Another relatively early one is The Ultimate Adventure by L. Ron Hubbard, published 1939.

        – Wildcard
        yesterday




        1




        1





        @Wildcard I haven't read that one; I'll have to look it up. "Parallel worlds" stories were thick on the ground by the 1930s. Another famous one is "The Gostak and the Doshes" by Miles J. Breuer, M.D. (1930).

        – user14111
        yesterday





        @Wildcard I haven't read that one; I'll have to look it up. "Parallel worlds" stories were thick on the ground by the 1930s. Another famous one is "The Gostak and the Doshes" by Miles J. Breuer, M.D. (1930).

        – user14111
        yesterday











        25















        According to the Wikipedia article on Parallel Universes, In one of the stories-within-a-story of Thousand And One Nights, "The Adventures of Bulukiya",




        the protagonist Bulukiya [learns] of alternative worlds/universes that are similar to but still distinct from his own.




        I don't know if you consider 1001 Nights as a human belief system, but I think it might fit. Since 1001 Nights has stories dating back to the 10th century and maybe older, this seems like a likely candidate.






        share|improve this answer





























          25















          According to the Wikipedia article on Parallel Universes, In one of the stories-within-a-story of Thousand And One Nights, "The Adventures of Bulukiya",




          the protagonist Bulukiya [learns] of alternative worlds/universes that are similar to but still distinct from his own.




          I don't know if you consider 1001 Nights as a human belief system, but I think it might fit. Since 1001 Nights has stories dating back to the 10th century and maybe older, this seems like a likely candidate.






          share|improve this answer



























            25














            25










            25









            According to the Wikipedia article on Parallel Universes, In one of the stories-within-a-story of Thousand And One Nights, "The Adventures of Bulukiya",




            the protagonist Bulukiya [learns] of alternative worlds/universes that are similar to but still distinct from his own.




            I don't know if you consider 1001 Nights as a human belief system, but I think it might fit. Since 1001 Nights has stories dating back to the 10th century and maybe older, this seems like a likely candidate.






            share|improve this answer













            According to the Wikipedia article on Parallel Universes, In one of the stories-within-a-story of Thousand And One Nights, "The Adventures of Bulukiya",




            the protagonist Bulukiya [learns] of alternative worlds/universes that are similar to but still distinct from his own.




            I don't know if you consider 1001 Nights as a human belief system, but I think it might fit. Since 1001 Nights has stories dating back to the 10th century and maybe older, this seems like a likely candidate.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            NzallNzall

            2,1141 gold badge14 silver badges32 bronze badges




            2,1141 gold badge14 silver badges32 bronze badges
























                16















                Wikipedia has this to say:




                One of the first science fiction examples is Murray Leinster's
                Sidewise in Time, in which portions of alternative universes replace
                corresponding geographical regions in this universe. Sidewise in Time
                describes it in the manner that similar to requiring both longitude
                and latitude coordinates in order to mark your location on Earth, so
                too does time: travelling along latitude is akin to time travel moving
                through past, present and future, while travelling along longitude is
                to travel perpendicular to time and to other realities, hence the name
                of the short story. Thus, another common term for a parallel universe
                is "another dimension", stemming from the idea that if the 4th
                dimension is time, the 5th dimension - a direction at a right angle to
                the fourth - are alternate realities.




                According to the page on the story itself,




                "Sidewise in Time" is a science fiction short story by American writer
                Murray Leinster that was first published in the June 1934 issue of
                Astounding Stories. "Sidewise in Time" served as the title story for
                Leinster's second story collection in 1950.




                So as far as "scientifically explained" alternate timelines, the date to beat is 1934.






                share|improve this answer






















                • 2





                  A few years ago there was a question on here about the earliest SF story to use a "multiverse" concept, and I nominated Murray Leinster's "Sideways in Time." (My answer wasn't the one that got accepted, though.) scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/148015/…

                  – Lorendiac
                  Aug 30 at 1:38






                • 1





                  That beats H. Beam Piper's influential Paratime series by more than a decade.

                  – PM 2Ring
                  Aug 30 at 3:58















                16















                Wikipedia has this to say:




                One of the first science fiction examples is Murray Leinster's
                Sidewise in Time, in which portions of alternative universes replace
                corresponding geographical regions in this universe. Sidewise in Time
                describes it in the manner that similar to requiring both longitude
                and latitude coordinates in order to mark your location on Earth, so
                too does time: travelling along latitude is akin to time travel moving
                through past, present and future, while travelling along longitude is
                to travel perpendicular to time and to other realities, hence the name
                of the short story. Thus, another common term for a parallel universe
                is "another dimension", stemming from the idea that if the 4th
                dimension is time, the 5th dimension - a direction at a right angle to
                the fourth - are alternate realities.




                According to the page on the story itself,




                "Sidewise in Time" is a science fiction short story by American writer
                Murray Leinster that was first published in the June 1934 issue of
                Astounding Stories. "Sidewise in Time" served as the title story for
                Leinster's second story collection in 1950.




                So as far as "scientifically explained" alternate timelines, the date to beat is 1934.






                share|improve this answer






















                • 2





                  A few years ago there was a question on here about the earliest SF story to use a "multiverse" concept, and I nominated Murray Leinster's "Sideways in Time." (My answer wasn't the one that got accepted, though.) scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/148015/…

                  – Lorendiac
                  Aug 30 at 1:38






                • 1





                  That beats H. Beam Piper's influential Paratime series by more than a decade.

                  – PM 2Ring
                  Aug 30 at 3:58













                16














                16










                16









                Wikipedia has this to say:




                One of the first science fiction examples is Murray Leinster's
                Sidewise in Time, in which portions of alternative universes replace
                corresponding geographical regions in this universe. Sidewise in Time
                describes it in the manner that similar to requiring both longitude
                and latitude coordinates in order to mark your location on Earth, so
                too does time: travelling along latitude is akin to time travel moving
                through past, present and future, while travelling along longitude is
                to travel perpendicular to time and to other realities, hence the name
                of the short story. Thus, another common term for a parallel universe
                is "another dimension", stemming from the idea that if the 4th
                dimension is time, the 5th dimension - a direction at a right angle to
                the fourth - are alternate realities.




                According to the page on the story itself,




                "Sidewise in Time" is a science fiction short story by American writer
                Murray Leinster that was first published in the June 1934 issue of
                Astounding Stories. "Sidewise in Time" served as the title story for
                Leinster's second story collection in 1950.




                So as far as "scientifically explained" alternate timelines, the date to beat is 1934.






                share|improve this answer















                Wikipedia has this to say:




                One of the first science fiction examples is Murray Leinster's
                Sidewise in Time, in which portions of alternative universes replace
                corresponding geographical regions in this universe. Sidewise in Time
                describes it in the manner that similar to requiring both longitude
                and latitude coordinates in order to mark your location on Earth, so
                too does time: travelling along latitude is akin to time travel moving
                through past, present and future, while travelling along longitude is
                to travel perpendicular to time and to other realities, hence the name
                of the short story. Thus, another common term for a parallel universe
                is "another dimension", stemming from the idea that if the 4th
                dimension is time, the 5th dimension - a direction at a right angle to
                the fourth - are alternate realities.




                According to the page on the story itself,




                "Sidewise in Time" is a science fiction short story by American writer
                Murray Leinster that was first published in the June 1934 issue of
                Astounding Stories. "Sidewise in Time" served as the title story for
                Leinster's second story collection in 1950.




                So as far as "scientifically explained" alternate timelines, the date to beat is 1934.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Aug 30 at 0:46

























                answered Aug 30 at 0:41









                NdieCItyNdieCIty

                5618 bronze badges




                5618 bronze badges










                • 2





                  A few years ago there was a question on here about the earliest SF story to use a "multiverse" concept, and I nominated Murray Leinster's "Sideways in Time." (My answer wasn't the one that got accepted, though.) scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/148015/…

                  – Lorendiac
                  Aug 30 at 1:38






                • 1





                  That beats H. Beam Piper's influential Paratime series by more than a decade.

                  – PM 2Ring
                  Aug 30 at 3:58












                • 2





                  A few years ago there was a question on here about the earliest SF story to use a "multiverse" concept, and I nominated Murray Leinster's "Sideways in Time." (My answer wasn't the one that got accepted, though.) scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/148015/…

                  – Lorendiac
                  Aug 30 at 1:38






                • 1





                  That beats H. Beam Piper's influential Paratime series by more than a decade.

                  – PM 2Ring
                  Aug 30 at 3:58







                2




                2





                A few years ago there was a question on here about the earliest SF story to use a "multiverse" concept, and I nominated Murray Leinster's "Sideways in Time." (My answer wasn't the one that got accepted, though.) scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/148015/…

                – Lorendiac
                Aug 30 at 1:38





                A few years ago there was a question on here about the earliest SF story to use a "multiverse" concept, and I nominated Murray Leinster's "Sideways in Time." (My answer wasn't the one that got accepted, though.) scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/148015/…

                – Lorendiac
                Aug 30 at 1:38




                1




                1





                That beats H. Beam Piper's influential Paratime series by more than a decade.

                – PM 2Ring
                Aug 30 at 3:58





                That beats H. Beam Piper's influential Paratime series by more than a decade.

                – PM 2Ring
                Aug 30 at 3:58











                14















                I have been reminded that a related question, What was the earliest SF work that used the idea of the "Multiverse"?, was asked a couple of years ago, at which time I gave the following answer, which was accepted:



                1915: A Drop in Infinity, a novel by Gerald Grogan, available at the Internet Archive. Reviewed by Everett F. Bleiler in Science-Fiction: The Early Years:




                A robinsonade in the fourth dimension.

                Jack Thorpe and Marjorie Matthews are walking along the shore in Cornwall when a seeming eccentric asks them directions. They humor him by showing the way, whereupon he produces a revolver and takes them captive. A scientist who has worked in dimensional research, he is brilliant, but unfortunately mad and irresponsible. He thinks of himself as a hubble-bubble, and so the characters call him.

                The Hubble-Bubble reveals that he has obtained access, via the fourth dimension, to two other worlds which in modern terminology amount to parallel worlds. His technique involves electricity, vibrations, and a mental set. He now offers Jack and Marjorie the choice of death or entry to another world, which he claims is much like earth in fauna and flora, but without human or other intelligent life.

                Jack and Marjorie have little choice, and in a short time find themselves in the world they later call Marjorie-land. Making the best of the situation, they work out a Crusoe-like primitive culture, building a house, cultivating certain plants, and domesticating animals. From time to time a few other humans are dropped in with them, a total of four batches in all. Most of them are congenial, but Michael Quelch, a lazy, vicious Cockney will eventually cause trouble.

                On one occasion the Hubble-Bubble's apparatus seems to have "backfired," and Jack is temporarily returned to our world. But he makes terms of a sort with the mad scientist and goes back to Marjorie-land.

                Time passes. Jack and Marjorie have two children, and the colonists thrive. Life seems reasonably secure and happy. But then Quelch causes trouble. Thinking that Jack is dead when he does not return on time from a journey of exploration, Quelch tries to seize control of the settlement, rape Marjorie, and murder the children. Fortunately, as in a novel by Edgar Rice Burroughs, Jack returns in the nick of time. After some complications Jack reluctantly sets out to hunt Quelch down and kill him, but Quelch is found dead of natural causes.

                After a time it becomes apparent that the Hubble-Bubble is also dead and that the small human colony in Marjorie-land is permanently isolated.

                The story is told by Thorpe, a generation or two later.

                In the first part of the book, the treatment is flippant, but the story soon settles down to a rather dull development. Of historical interest as a very early parallel worlds story.







                share|improve this answer





























                  14















                  I have been reminded that a related question, What was the earliest SF work that used the idea of the "Multiverse"?, was asked a couple of years ago, at which time I gave the following answer, which was accepted:



                  1915: A Drop in Infinity, a novel by Gerald Grogan, available at the Internet Archive. Reviewed by Everett F. Bleiler in Science-Fiction: The Early Years:




                  A robinsonade in the fourth dimension.

                  Jack Thorpe and Marjorie Matthews are walking along the shore in Cornwall when a seeming eccentric asks them directions. They humor him by showing the way, whereupon he produces a revolver and takes them captive. A scientist who has worked in dimensional research, he is brilliant, but unfortunately mad and irresponsible. He thinks of himself as a hubble-bubble, and so the characters call him.

                  The Hubble-Bubble reveals that he has obtained access, via the fourth dimension, to two other worlds which in modern terminology amount to parallel worlds. His technique involves electricity, vibrations, and a mental set. He now offers Jack and Marjorie the choice of death or entry to another world, which he claims is much like earth in fauna and flora, but without human or other intelligent life.

                  Jack and Marjorie have little choice, and in a short time find themselves in the world they later call Marjorie-land. Making the best of the situation, they work out a Crusoe-like primitive culture, building a house, cultivating certain plants, and domesticating animals. From time to time a few other humans are dropped in with them, a total of four batches in all. Most of them are congenial, but Michael Quelch, a lazy, vicious Cockney will eventually cause trouble.

                  On one occasion the Hubble-Bubble's apparatus seems to have "backfired," and Jack is temporarily returned to our world. But he makes terms of a sort with the mad scientist and goes back to Marjorie-land.

                  Time passes. Jack and Marjorie have two children, and the colonists thrive. Life seems reasonably secure and happy. But then Quelch causes trouble. Thinking that Jack is dead when he does not return on time from a journey of exploration, Quelch tries to seize control of the settlement, rape Marjorie, and murder the children. Fortunately, as in a novel by Edgar Rice Burroughs, Jack returns in the nick of time. After some complications Jack reluctantly sets out to hunt Quelch down and kill him, but Quelch is found dead of natural causes.

                  After a time it becomes apparent that the Hubble-Bubble is also dead and that the small human colony in Marjorie-land is permanently isolated.

                  The story is told by Thorpe, a generation or two later.

                  In the first part of the book, the treatment is flippant, but the story soon settles down to a rather dull development. Of historical interest as a very early parallel worlds story.







                  share|improve this answer



























                    14














                    14










                    14









                    I have been reminded that a related question, What was the earliest SF work that used the idea of the "Multiverse"?, was asked a couple of years ago, at which time I gave the following answer, which was accepted:



                    1915: A Drop in Infinity, a novel by Gerald Grogan, available at the Internet Archive. Reviewed by Everett F. Bleiler in Science-Fiction: The Early Years:




                    A robinsonade in the fourth dimension.

                    Jack Thorpe and Marjorie Matthews are walking along the shore in Cornwall when a seeming eccentric asks them directions. They humor him by showing the way, whereupon he produces a revolver and takes them captive. A scientist who has worked in dimensional research, he is brilliant, but unfortunately mad and irresponsible. He thinks of himself as a hubble-bubble, and so the characters call him.

                    The Hubble-Bubble reveals that he has obtained access, via the fourth dimension, to two other worlds which in modern terminology amount to parallel worlds. His technique involves electricity, vibrations, and a mental set. He now offers Jack and Marjorie the choice of death or entry to another world, which he claims is much like earth in fauna and flora, but without human or other intelligent life.

                    Jack and Marjorie have little choice, and in a short time find themselves in the world they later call Marjorie-land. Making the best of the situation, they work out a Crusoe-like primitive culture, building a house, cultivating certain plants, and domesticating animals. From time to time a few other humans are dropped in with them, a total of four batches in all. Most of them are congenial, but Michael Quelch, a lazy, vicious Cockney will eventually cause trouble.

                    On one occasion the Hubble-Bubble's apparatus seems to have "backfired," and Jack is temporarily returned to our world. But he makes terms of a sort with the mad scientist and goes back to Marjorie-land.

                    Time passes. Jack and Marjorie have two children, and the colonists thrive. Life seems reasonably secure and happy. But then Quelch causes trouble. Thinking that Jack is dead when he does not return on time from a journey of exploration, Quelch tries to seize control of the settlement, rape Marjorie, and murder the children. Fortunately, as in a novel by Edgar Rice Burroughs, Jack returns in the nick of time. After some complications Jack reluctantly sets out to hunt Quelch down and kill him, but Quelch is found dead of natural causes.

                    After a time it becomes apparent that the Hubble-Bubble is also dead and that the small human colony in Marjorie-land is permanently isolated.

                    The story is told by Thorpe, a generation or two later.

                    In the first part of the book, the treatment is flippant, but the story soon settles down to a rather dull development. Of historical interest as a very early parallel worlds story.







                    share|improve this answer













                    I have been reminded that a related question, What was the earliest SF work that used the idea of the "Multiverse"?, was asked a couple of years ago, at which time I gave the following answer, which was accepted:



                    1915: A Drop in Infinity, a novel by Gerald Grogan, available at the Internet Archive. Reviewed by Everett F. Bleiler in Science-Fiction: The Early Years:




                    A robinsonade in the fourth dimension.

                    Jack Thorpe and Marjorie Matthews are walking along the shore in Cornwall when a seeming eccentric asks them directions. They humor him by showing the way, whereupon he produces a revolver and takes them captive. A scientist who has worked in dimensional research, he is brilliant, but unfortunately mad and irresponsible. He thinks of himself as a hubble-bubble, and so the characters call him.

                    The Hubble-Bubble reveals that he has obtained access, via the fourth dimension, to two other worlds which in modern terminology amount to parallel worlds. His technique involves electricity, vibrations, and a mental set. He now offers Jack and Marjorie the choice of death or entry to another world, which he claims is much like earth in fauna and flora, but without human or other intelligent life.

                    Jack and Marjorie have little choice, and in a short time find themselves in the world they later call Marjorie-land. Making the best of the situation, they work out a Crusoe-like primitive culture, building a house, cultivating certain plants, and domesticating animals. From time to time a few other humans are dropped in with them, a total of four batches in all. Most of them are congenial, but Michael Quelch, a lazy, vicious Cockney will eventually cause trouble.

                    On one occasion the Hubble-Bubble's apparatus seems to have "backfired," and Jack is temporarily returned to our world. But he makes terms of a sort with the mad scientist and goes back to Marjorie-land.

                    Time passes. Jack and Marjorie have two children, and the colonists thrive. Life seems reasonably secure and happy. But then Quelch causes trouble. Thinking that Jack is dead when he does not return on time from a journey of exploration, Quelch tries to seize control of the settlement, rape Marjorie, and murder the children. Fortunately, as in a novel by Edgar Rice Burroughs, Jack returns in the nick of time. After some complications Jack reluctantly sets out to hunt Quelch down and kill him, but Quelch is found dead of natural causes.

                    After a time it becomes apparent that the Hubble-Bubble is also dead and that the small human colony in Marjorie-land is permanently isolated.

                    The story is told by Thorpe, a generation or two later.

                    In the first part of the book, the treatment is flippant, but the story soon settles down to a rather dull development. Of historical interest as a very early parallel worlds story.








                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 days ago









                    user14111user14111

                    113k6 gold badges463 silver badges582 bronze badges




                    113k6 gold badges463 silver badges582 bronze badges
























                        12















                        So I'm just going to be that guy and say, "The question is wrong."



                        You've explicitly disallowed religious texts from answers, but it means you'll never get the truth. In reality, the most well-documented, best-protected documents are those considered sacred by the people who wrote them. We will naturally see far more ancient documentation on religion and politics than anything else.



                        But just because something is part of a culture's mythology doesn't mean they believe it as fact. And things believed as fact aren't immune to being partially retold as fiction. The idea that modern sci-fi and fantasy writers didn't take many ideas from religion seems patently absurd to me.



                        Nat mentions in a comment,




                        ... Paradise Lost was also a fictional work, but I've heard Christians cite it as actual religion. So where's the line? And if the line's original intention, then Dante's Inferno was clearly intended as fiction, yet it discusses alternate realms. Earlier works exploring the "underworld" were likely meant as fictions, too. Some argue that the Garden of Eden, from the start of the Bible, was also intended as allegory. I guess it just gets hard to tell what the original intention is once a work's old enough.




                        I would take it one step further and say that even if these original pieces were intended to be truth, there's no way other people haven't been creating deliberately fictional stories for just as long. Modern sci-fi is just the latest in a very long string of such stories stretching to before recorded history.



                        A note on Stack policies regarding religious beliefs and "sci-fi" or "fantasy".



                        To avoid turning the entire forum into a giant religious debate (and probably other reasons), there's a policy about not treating religious teachings or beliefs as fiction. But we're not treating these beliefs as either fact or fiction here. We're just noting that the concepts existed in some form.



                        If Odin came to Earth and gave the ancient Norse a physical tour of Valhalla, the concepts written about wouldn't be any more influential than if the entire story was invented around campfires over the centuries. This answer doesn't care one way or the other about the origin of the beliefs. Just that these beliefs were almost certainly the origin of many stories.



                        What is an alternate reality / parallel dimension, anyway?



                        Different people will, of course, differ in opinion on the exact definitions. But a simple definition of a parallel dimension is any physical location you can't access via normal travel through 3-space. Or 2-space if you're a Flatlander.



                        An alternate reality is any type of parallel universe that largely mirrors Earth (or the protagonist's homeworld if they're not from Earth) but has various shades of differences. Some of these are caused by branching timelines, such that normal Earth and alternate Earth were one and the same at some point in their shared past. Some are only superficially similar. Some invoke some type of shadow people, who not only mimic humans on Earth, but specific humans currently alive.



                        I doubt many ancient civilizations (if any) understood the concept of a separate 3-space reached by traveling ana or kata along a fourth spatial dimension. You could, of course, arbitrarily define parallel universes as requiring some such convention. But there are two problems with this.



                        First, not all dimension hopping is done via a fourth dimension. Narnia is reached through a wardrobe that makes no mention of dimensions. It's entirely possible for the wardrobe to connect directly between worlds without any external notion of direction. So you'd be arbitrarily defining many modern "parallel dimensions" as not being such.



                        Second, it completely misses the point of looking for a historical source of the trope if we only include highly pedantic definitions of the trope and act as if instances of the trope meeting these pedantic criteria were conceived in a vacuum.



                        What about the origin of "dimensions" themselves? (c. 1754)



                        The earliest example of the word "dimension" being used to refer to the modern mathematical concepts is from 17544 when Jean Baptiste le Rond d’Alembert wrote5




                        "I said earlier that it is impossible to conceive of more than three dimensions (italics of d'Alembert). A clever acquaintance of mine [un homme d'esprit de ma connaissance] believes that one might nevertheless consider timespan as a fourth dimension, and that the product of time with volume would in a certain manner be a product of four dimensions; this idea may be contested, but it has, it would seem to me, some merit, if only because of its novelty" [D'Alembert 1751-, Vol. IV, lOlO]."




                        Clearly, the idea existed before this article was published, but we have no way of knowing how long before.



                        What I'm having no luck finding is a source for the first time the mathematical concept of traveling through a higher dimension is published. Clearly, d'Alembert is only talking about representing time as a dimension, not as a means of travel to another world.



                        But I would say this puts a reasonably firm cap on the oldest material that could use this trope in its most pedantic form as being early to mid 1700s.



                        The Field of Reeds (the Egyptian afterlife, c. 2700 BC), the earliest recorded alternate reality / parallel dimension story I could find.



                        We can go back to ancient Egypt (c. 2700-1800 BC) and find mythology relating to an afterlife.1 2 The deceased's soul leaves its body then travels to the Hall of Truth, (hopefully) passing various tests before approaching the Lake of Flowers, where a ferryman, Hraf-hef, would take the soul to the Field of Reeds, a paradise version of home where things were better and nobody died.



                        This is about as close to an "alternate universe" as you can get without using the label. Sure, you have to die to get there, but it's a physical location that largely mirrors Earth that can't be reached by conventional travel.



                        Arabian Nights -- The Adventures of Bulukiya (c. 750 AD), the oldest fictional alternate reality / parallel dimension story I could find (not verified).



                        This answer comes from another question asking about the first record of explicit portals used to travel to another world.7



                        According to the other scifi.se answer, and Wikipedia8, the story has elements of portals, other worlds, oh my! But I read through the story itself9 and couldn't find anything along those lines. I scanned through the days after the story heading but saw nothing there either, except mentions of the afterlife and Allah having created our world and the worlds of Hell and Heaven.



                        This would beat my next contender, but only if it actually contains these plot elements.



                        One thing to note here, is that the author of Arabian Nights is clearly influenced by religious mythology, and consistently writes from a pro-religion perspective. Whenever he mentions Allah or Muhammad, he interjects some type of reverent comment to ensure nobody believes those are just characters in a story.




                        ‘O my mother, I have found, in one of my father’s treasuries, a book containing a description of Mohammed (whom Allah bless and keep!)



                        in that island he saw serpents as big as camels and palm trees, which repeated the names of Allah (be He extolled and exalted!) and blessed Mohammed (whom the Lord assain and save!)




                        Even if it's not dimension-hopping, it's clear evidence of old fiction directly including religious mythology into the fiction's mythology without treating the religion itself as fiction.



                        The Divine Comedy (c. 1321 AD), the first alternate reality / parallel dimension (probably) fictional story I can verify.



                        In The Divine Comedy3, the protagonist (and author), Dante Alighieri starts on Earth, travels through Hell, and ends up in Heaven.



                        The descent into Hell could be literal enough. The Earth is rather large and could potentially contain a vast chasm underneath.



                        But Heaven is reached by ascending from the Mount of Purgatory (an island in the ocean) after emerging from the bowels of Hell. And it's described as copies of our solar system, with Earth, Mars, the Moon, etc. being present along with several mythological constructs such as the Empyrean.



                        Again, this very snugly fits into the definition of not only a parallel dimension, but an alternate reality. It's a place that exists alongside ours, only accessible via some portal to Hell, and has a close resemblance to our Earth.



                        Note that there is some contention that The Divine Comedy was believed by the author to be some kind of spiritual journey, and might fall under the banner of "religious belief". However, most people would consider it a work of fiction, and it was labeled such officially by the Catholic Church of the era.6



                        1Egyptian Book of the Dead from the Ancient History Encyclopedia
                        2Egyptian Afterlife - The Field of Reeds from the Ancient History Encyclopedia
                        3The Divine Comedy from Cummings Study Guides.
                        4Four-dimensional Space article on Wikipedia.
                        5d'Alembert and the Fourth Dimension by Rosine G. Van Oss via Science Direct.
                        6Quora Forum Post by Sonia Fanucchi.
                        7What is the first instance of a portal to another world?, answer by OrangeDog.
                        8One Thousand and One Nights article on Wikipedia.
                        9The Adventures of Bulukiya from the Adelaide ebooks collection. Note that it's a small part of a large page which the link should take you to.






                        share|improve this answer



























                        • Hubbard started Scientology explicitly as a religion.

                          – JRE
                          yesterday











                        • @JRE: I think you're right. I just quoted the comment from elsewhere on the page verbatim. It was the intent behind the comment I was interested in.

                          – MichaelS
                          yesterday











                        • I 100% agree with you that the concept was found in religious beliefs long before the modern science fiction version.

                          – CJ Dennis
                          yesterday











                        • I thought Stack policy was that religious works are not to be considered science fiction or fantasy and therefore are off topic and/or shouldn’t be used as answers.

                          – Todd Wilcox
                          yesterday











                        • @JRE Scientology was started as a religion, based on Hubbard's novels.

                          – Clearer
                          yesterday
















                        12















                        So I'm just going to be that guy and say, "The question is wrong."



                        You've explicitly disallowed religious texts from answers, but it means you'll never get the truth. In reality, the most well-documented, best-protected documents are those considered sacred by the people who wrote them. We will naturally see far more ancient documentation on religion and politics than anything else.



                        But just because something is part of a culture's mythology doesn't mean they believe it as fact. And things believed as fact aren't immune to being partially retold as fiction. The idea that modern sci-fi and fantasy writers didn't take many ideas from religion seems patently absurd to me.



                        Nat mentions in a comment,




                        ... Paradise Lost was also a fictional work, but I've heard Christians cite it as actual religion. So where's the line? And if the line's original intention, then Dante's Inferno was clearly intended as fiction, yet it discusses alternate realms. Earlier works exploring the "underworld" were likely meant as fictions, too. Some argue that the Garden of Eden, from the start of the Bible, was also intended as allegory. I guess it just gets hard to tell what the original intention is once a work's old enough.




                        I would take it one step further and say that even if these original pieces were intended to be truth, there's no way other people haven't been creating deliberately fictional stories for just as long. Modern sci-fi is just the latest in a very long string of such stories stretching to before recorded history.



                        A note on Stack policies regarding religious beliefs and "sci-fi" or "fantasy".



                        To avoid turning the entire forum into a giant religious debate (and probably other reasons), there's a policy about not treating religious teachings or beliefs as fiction. But we're not treating these beliefs as either fact or fiction here. We're just noting that the concepts existed in some form.



                        If Odin came to Earth and gave the ancient Norse a physical tour of Valhalla, the concepts written about wouldn't be any more influential than if the entire story was invented around campfires over the centuries. This answer doesn't care one way or the other about the origin of the beliefs. Just that these beliefs were almost certainly the origin of many stories.



                        What is an alternate reality / parallel dimension, anyway?



                        Different people will, of course, differ in opinion on the exact definitions. But a simple definition of a parallel dimension is any physical location you can't access via normal travel through 3-space. Or 2-space if you're a Flatlander.



                        An alternate reality is any type of parallel universe that largely mirrors Earth (or the protagonist's homeworld if they're not from Earth) but has various shades of differences. Some of these are caused by branching timelines, such that normal Earth and alternate Earth were one and the same at some point in their shared past. Some are only superficially similar. Some invoke some type of shadow people, who not only mimic humans on Earth, but specific humans currently alive.



                        I doubt many ancient civilizations (if any) understood the concept of a separate 3-space reached by traveling ana or kata along a fourth spatial dimension. You could, of course, arbitrarily define parallel universes as requiring some such convention. But there are two problems with this.



                        First, not all dimension hopping is done via a fourth dimension. Narnia is reached through a wardrobe that makes no mention of dimensions. It's entirely possible for the wardrobe to connect directly between worlds without any external notion of direction. So you'd be arbitrarily defining many modern "parallel dimensions" as not being such.



                        Second, it completely misses the point of looking for a historical source of the trope if we only include highly pedantic definitions of the trope and act as if instances of the trope meeting these pedantic criteria were conceived in a vacuum.



                        What about the origin of "dimensions" themselves? (c. 1754)



                        The earliest example of the word "dimension" being used to refer to the modern mathematical concepts is from 17544 when Jean Baptiste le Rond d’Alembert wrote5




                        "I said earlier that it is impossible to conceive of more than three dimensions (italics of d'Alembert). A clever acquaintance of mine [un homme d'esprit de ma connaissance] believes that one might nevertheless consider timespan as a fourth dimension, and that the product of time with volume would in a certain manner be a product of four dimensions; this idea may be contested, but it has, it would seem to me, some merit, if only because of its novelty" [D'Alembert 1751-, Vol. IV, lOlO]."




                        Clearly, the idea existed before this article was published, but we have no way of knowing how long before.



                        What I'm having no luck finding is a source for the first time the mathematical concept of traveling through a higher dimension is published. Clearly, d'Alembert is only talking about representing time as a dimension, not as a means of travel to another world.



                        But I would say this puts a reasonably firm cap on the oldest material that could use this trope in its most pedantic form as being early to mid 1700s.



                        The Field of Reeds (the Egyptian afterlife, c. 2700 BC), the earliest recorded alternate reality / parallel dimension story I could find.



                        We can go back to ancient Egypt (c. 2700-1800 BC) and find mythology relating to an afterlife.1 2 The deceased's soul leaves its body then travels to the Hall of Truth, (hopefully) passing various tests before approaching the Lake of Flowers, where a ferryman, Hraf-hef, would take the soul to the Field of Reeds, a paradise version of home where things were better and nobody died.



                        This is about as close to an "alternate universe" as you can get without using the label. Sure, you have to die to get there, but it's a physical location that largely mirrors Earth that can't be reached by conventional travel.



                        Arabian Nights -- The Adventures of Bulukiya (c. 750 AD), the oldest fictional alternate reality / parallel dimension story I could find (not verified).



                        This answer comes from another question asking about the first record of explicit portals used to travel to another world.7



                        According to the other scifi.se answer, and Wikipedia8, the story has elements of portals, other worlds, oh my! But I read through the story itself9 and couldn't find anything along those lines. I scanned through the days after the story heading but saw nothing there either, except mentions of the afterlife and Allah having created our world and the worlds of Hell and Heaven.



                        This would beat my next contender, but only if it actually contains these plot elements.



                        One thing to note here, is that the author of Arabian Nights is clearly influenced by religious mythology, and consistently writes from a pro-religion perspective. Whenever he mentions Allah or Muhammad, he interjects some type of reverent comment to ensure nobody believes those are just characters in a story.




                        ‘O my mother, I have found, in one of my father’s treasuries, a book containing a description of Mohammed (whom Allah bless and keep!)



                        in that island he saw serpents as big as camels and palm trees, which repeated the names of Allah (be He extolled and exalted!) and blessed Mohammed (whom the Lord assain and save!)




                        Even if it's not dimension-hopping, it's clear evidence of old fiction directly including religious mythology into the fiction's mythology without treating the religion itself as fiction.



                        The Divine Comedy (c. 1321 AD), the first alternate reality / parallel dimension (probably) fictional story I can verify.



                        In The Divine Comedy3, the protagonist (and author), Dante Alighieri starts on Earth, travels through Hell, and ends up in Heaven.



                        The descent into Hell could be literal enough. The Earth is rather large and could potentially contain a vast chasm underneath.



                        But Heaven is reached by ascending from the Mount of Purgatory (an island in the ocean) after emerging from the bowels of Hell. And it's described as copies of our solar system, with Earth, Mars, the Moon, etc. being present along with several mythological constructs such as the Empyrean.



                        Again, this very snugly fits into the definition of not only a parallel dimension, but an alternate reality. It's a place that exists alongside ours, only accessible via some portal to Hell, and has a close resemblance to our Earth.



                        Note that there is some contention that The Divine Comedy was believed by the author to be some kind of spiritual journey, and might fall under the banner of "religious belief". However, most people would consider it a work of fiction, and it was labeled such officially by the Catholic Church of the era.6



                        1Egyptian Book of the Dead from the Ancient History Encyclopedia
                        2Egyptian Afterlife - The Field of Reeds from the Ancient History Encyclopedia
                        3The Divine Comedy from Cummings Study Guides.
                        4Four-dimensional Space article on Wikipedia.
                        5d'Alembert and the Fourth Dimension by Rosine G. Van Oss via Science Direct.
                        6Quora Forum Post by Sonia Fanucchi.
                        7What is the first instance of a portal to another world?, answer by OrangeDog.
                        8One Thousand and One Nights article on Wikipedia.
                        9The Adventures of Bulukiya from the Adelaide ebooks collection. Note that it's a small part of a large page which the link should take you to.






                        share|improve this answer



























                        • Hubbard started Scientology explicitly as a religion.

                          – JRE
                          yesterday











                        • @JRE: I think you're right. I just quoted the comment from elsewhere on the page verbatim. It was the intent behind the comment I was interested in.

                          – MichaelS
                          yesterday











                        • I 100% agree with you that the concept was found in religious beliefs long before the modern science fiction version.

                          – CJ Dennis
                          yesterday











                        • I thought Stack policy was that religious works are not to be considered science fiction or fantasy and therefore are off topic and/or shouldn’t be used as answers.

                          – Todd Wilcox
                          yesterday











                        • @JRE Scientology was started as a religion, based on Hubbard's novels.

                          – Clearer
                          yesterday














                        12














                        12










                        12









                        So I'm just going to be that guy and say, "The question is wrong."



                        You've explicitly disallowed religious texts from answers, but it means you'll never get the truth. In reality, the most well-documented, best-protected documents are those considered sacred by the people who wrote them. We will naturally see far more ancient documentation on religion and politics than anything else.



                        But just because something is part of a culture's mythology doesn't mean they believe it as fact. And things believed as fact aren't immune to being partially retold as fiction. The idea that modern sci-fi and fantasy writers didn't take many ideas from religion seems patently absurd to me.



                        Nat mentions in a comment,




                        ... Paradise Lost was also a fictional work, but I've heard Christians cite it as actual religion. So where's the line? And if the line's original intention, then Dante's Inferno was clearly intended as fiction, yet it discusses alternate realms. Earlier works exploring the "underworld" were likely meant as fictions, too. Some argue that the Garden of Eden, from the start of the Bible, was also intended as allegory. I guess it just gets hard to tell what the original intention is once a work's old enough.




                        I would take it one step further and say that even if these original pieces were intended to be truth, there's no way other people haven't been creating deliberately fictional stories for just as long. Modern sci-fi is just the latest in a very long string of such stories stretching to before recorded history.



                        A note on Stack policies regarding religious beliefs and "sci-fi" or "fantasy".



                        To avoid turning the entire forum into a giant religious debate (and probably other reasons), there's a policy about not treating religious teachings or beliefs as fiction. But we're not treating these beliefs as either fact or fiction here. We're just noting that the concepts existed in some form.



                        If Odin came to Earth and gave the ancient Norse a physical tour of Valhalla, the concepts written about wouldn't be any more influential than if the entire story was invented around campfires over the centuries. This answer doesn't care one way or the other about the origin of the beliefs. Just that these beliefs were almost certainly the origin of many stories.



                        What is an alternate reality / parallel dimension, anyway?



                        Different people will, of course, differ in opinion on the exact definitions. But a simple definition of a parallel dimension is any physical location you can't access via normal travel through 3-space. Or 2-space if you're a Flatlander.



                        An alternate reality is any type of parallel universe that largely mirrors Earth (or the protagonist's homeworld if they're not from Earth) but has various shades of differences. Some of these are caused by branching timelines, such that normal Earth and alternate Earth were one and the same at some point in their shared past. Some are only superficially similar. Some invoke some type of shadow people, who not only mimic humans on Earth, but specific humans currently alive.



                        I doubt many ancient civilizations (if any) understood the concept of a separate 3-space reached by traveling ana or kata along a fourth spatial dimension. You could, of course, arbitrarily define parallel universes as requiring some such convention. But there are two problems with this.



                        First, not all dimension hopping is done via a fourth dimension. Narnia is reached through a wardrobe that makes no mention of dimensions. It's entirely possible for the wardrobe to connect directly between worlds without any external notion of direction. So you'd be arbitrarily defining many modern "parallel dimensions" as not being such.



                        Second, it completely misses the point of looking for a historical source of the trope if we only include highly pedantic definitions of the trope and act as if instances of the trope meeting these pedantic criteria were conceived in a vacuum.



                        What about the origin of "dimensions" themselves? (c. 1754)



                        The earliest example of the word "dimension" being used to refer to the modern mathematical concepts is from 17544 when Jean Baptiste le Rond d’Alembert wrote5




                        "I said earlier that it is impossible to conceive of more than three dimensions (italics of d'Alembert). A clever acquaintance of mine [un homme d'esprit de ma connaissance] believes that one might nevertheless consider timespan as a fourth dimension, and that the product of time with volume would in a certain manner be a product of four dimensions; this idea may be contested, but it has, it would seem to me, some merit, if only because of its novelty" [D'Alembert 1751-, Vol. IV, lOlO]."




                        Clearly, the idea existed before this article was published, but we have no way of knowing how long before.



                        What I'm having no luck finding is a source for the first time the mathematical concept of traveling through a higher dimension is published. Clearly, d'Alembert is only talking about representing time as a dimension, not as a means of travel to another world.



                        But I would say this puts a reasonably firm cap on the oldest material that could use this trope in its most pedantic form as being early to mid 1700s.



                        The Field of Reeds (the Egyptian afterlife, c. 2700 BC), the earliest recorded alternate reality / parallel dimension story I could find.



                        We can go back to ancient Egypt (c. 2700-1800 BC) and find mythology relating to an afterlife.1 2 The deceased's soul leaves its body then travels to the Hall of Truth, (hopefully) passing various tests before approaching the Lake of Flowers, where a ferryman, Hraf-hef, would take the soul to the Field of Reeds, a paradise version of home where things were better and nobody died.



                        This is about as close to an "alternate universe" as you can get without using the label. Sure, you have to die to get there, but it's a physical location that largely mirrors Earth that can't be reached by conventional travel.



                        Arabian Nights -- The Adventures of Bulukiya (c. 750 AD), the oldest fictional alternate reality / parallel dimension story I could find (not verified).



                        This answer comes from another question asking about the first record of explicit portals used to travel to another world.7



                        According to the other scifi.se answer, and Wikipedia8, the story has elements of portals, other worlds, oh my! But I read through the story itself9 and couldn't find anything along those lines. I scanned through the days after the story heading but saw nothing there either, except mentions of the afterlife and Allah having created our world and the worlds of Hell and Heaven.



                        This would beat my next contender, but only if it actually contains these plot elements.



                        One thing to note here, is that the author of Arabian Nights is clearly influenced by religious mythology, and consistently writes from a pro-religion perspective. Whenever he mentions Allah or Muhammad, he interjects some type of reverent comment to ensure nobody believes those are just characters in a story.




                        ‘O my mother, I have found, in one of my father’s treasuries, a book containing a description of Mohammed (whom Allah bless and keep!)



                        in that island he saw serpents as big as camels and palm trees, which repeated the names of Allah (be He extolled and exalted!) and blessed Mohammed (whom the Lord assain and save!)




                        Even if it's not dimension-hopping, it's clear evidence of old fiction directly including religious mythology into the fiction's mythology without treating the religion itself as fiction.



                        The Divine Comedy (c. 1321 AD), the first alternate reality / parallel dimension (probably) fictional story I can verify.



                        In The Divine Comedy3, the protagonist (and author), Dante Alighieri starts on Earth, travels through Hell, and ends up in Heaven.



                        The descent into Hell could be literal enough. The Earth is rather large and could potentially contain a vast chasm underneath.



                        But Heaven is reached by ascending from the Mount of Purgatory (an island in the ocean) after emerging from the bowels of Hell. And it's described as copies of our solar system, with Earth, Mars, the Moon, etc. being present along with several mythological constructs such as the Empyrean.



                        Again, this very snugly fits into the definition of not only a parallel dimension, but an alternate reality. It's a place that exists alongside ours, only accessible via some portal to Hell, and has a close resemblance to our Earth.



                        Note that there is some contention that The Divine Comedy was believed by the author to be some kind of spiritual journey, and might fall under the banner of "religious belief". However, most people would consider it a work of fiction, and it was labeled such officially by the Catholic Church of the era.6



                        1Egyptian Book of the Dead from the Ancient History Encyclopedia
                        2Egyptian Afterlife - The Field of Reeds from the Ancient History Encyclopedia
                        3The Divine Comedy from Cummings Study Guides.
                        4Four-dimensional Space article on Wikipedia.
                        5d'Alembert and the Fourth Dimension by Rosine G. Van Oss via Science Direct.
                        6Quora Forum Post by Sonia Fanucchi.
                        7What is the first instance of a portal to another world?, answer by OrangeDog.
                        8One Thousand and One Nights article on Wikipedia.
                        9The Adventures of Bulukiya from the Adelaide ebooks collection. Note that it's a small part of a large page which the link should take you to.






                        share|improve this answer















                        So I'm just going to be that guy and say, "The question is wrong."



                        You've explicitly disallowed religious texts from answers, but it means you'll never get the truth. In reality, the most well-documented, best-protected documents are those considered sacred by the people who wrote them. We will naturally see far more ancient documentation on religion and politics than anything else.



                        But just because something is part of a culture's mythology doesn't mean they believe it as fact. And things believed as fact aren't immune to being partially retold as fiction. The idea that modern sci-fi and fantasy writers didn't take many ideas from religion seems patently absurd to me.



                        Nat mentions in a comment,




                        ... Paradise Lost was also a fictional work, but I've heard Christians cite it as actual religion. So where's the line? And if the line's original intention, then Dante's Inferno was clearly intended as fiction, yet it discusses alternate realms. Earlier works exploring the "underworld" were likely meant as fictions, too. Some argue that the Garden of Eden, from the start of the Bible, was also intended as allegory. I guess it just gets hard to tell what the original intention is once a work's old enough.




                        I would take it one step further and say that even if these original pieces were intended to be truth, there's no way other people haven't been creating deliberately fictional stories for just as long. Modern sci-fi is just the latest in a very long string of such stories stretching to before recorded history.



                        A note on Stack policies regarding religious beliefs and "sci-fi" or "fantasy".



                        To avoid turning the entire forum into a giant religious debate (and probably other reasons), there's a policy about not treating religious teachings or beliefs as fiction. But we're not treating these beliefs as either fact or fiction here. We're just noting that the concepts existed in some form.



                        If Odin came to Earth and gave the ancient Norse a physical tour of Valhalla, the concepts written about wouldn't be any more influential than if the entire story was invented around campfires over the centuries. This answer doesn't care one way or the other about the origin of the beliefs. Just that these beliefs were almost certainly the origin of many stories.



                        What is an alternate reality / parallel dimension, anyway?



                        Different people will, of course, differ in opinion on the exact definitions. But a simple definition of a parallel dimension is any physical location you can't access via normal travel through 3-space. Or 2-space if you're a Flatlander.



                        An alternate reality is any type of parallel universe that largely mirrors Earth (or the protagonist's homeworld if they're not from Earth) but has various shades of differences. Some of these are caused by branching timelines, such that normal Earth and alternate Earth were one and the same at some point in their shared past. Some are only superficially similar. Some invoke some type of shadow people, who not only mimic humans on Earth, but specific humans currently alive.



                        I doubt many ancient civilizations (if any) understood the concept of a separate 3-space reached by traveling ana or kata along a fourth spatial dimension. You could, of course, arbitrarily define parallel universes as requiring some such convention. But there are two problems with this.



                        First, not all dimension hopping is done via a fourth dimension. Narnia is reached through a wardrobe that makes no mention of dimensions. It's entirely possible for the wardrobe to connect directly between worlds without any external notion of direction. So you'd be arbitrarily defining many modern "parallel dimensions" as not being such.



                        Second, it completely misses the point of looking for a historical source of the trope if we only include highly pedantic definitions of the trope and act as if instances of the trope meeting these pedantic criteria were conceived in a vacuum.



                        What about the origin of "dimensions" themselves? (c. 1754)



                        The earliest example of the word "dimension" being used to refer to the modern mathematical concepts is from 17544 when Jean Baptiste le Rond d’Alembert wrote5




                        "I said earlier that it is impossible to conceive of more than three dimensions (italics of d'Alembert). A clever acquaintance of mine [un homme d'esprit de ma connaissance] believes that one might nevertheless consider timespan as a fourth dimension, and that the product of time with volume would in a certain manner be a product of four dimensions; this idea may be contested, but it has, it would seem to me, some merit, if only because of its novelty" [D'Alembert 1751-, Vol. IV, lOlO]."




                        Clearly, the idea existed before this article was published, but we have no way of knowing how long before.



                        What I'm having no luck finding is a source for the first time the mathematical concept of traveling through a higher dimension is published. Clearly, d'Alembert is only talking about representing time as a dimension, not as a means of travel to another world.



                        But I would say this puts a reasonably firm cap on the oldest material that could use this trope in its most pedantic form as being early to mid 1700s.



                        The Field of Reeds (the Egyptian afterlife, c. 2700 BC), the earliest recorded alternate reality / parallel dimension story I could find.



                        We can go back to ancient Egypt (c. 2700-1800 BC) and find mythology relating to an afterlife.1 2 The deceased's soul leaves its body then travels to the Hall of Truth, (hopefully) passing various tests before approaching the Lake of Flowers, where a ferryman, Hraf-hef, would take the soul to the Field of Reeds, a paradise version of home where things were better and nobody died.



                        This is about as close to an "alternate universe" as you can get without using the label. Sure, you have to die to get there, but it's a physical location that largely mirrors Earth that can't be reached by conventional travel.



                        Arabian Nights -- The Adventures of Bulukiya (c. 750 AD), the oldest fictional alternate reality / parallel dimension story I could find (not verified).



                        This answer comes from another question asking about the first record of explicit portals used to travel to another world.7



                        According to the other scifi.se answer, and Wikipedia8, the story has elements of portals, other worlds, oh my! But I read through the story itself9 and couldn't find anything along those lines. I scanned through the days after the story heading but saw nothing there either, except mentions of the afterlife and Allah having created our world and the worlds of Hell and Heaven.



                        This would beat my next contender, but only if it actually contains these plot elements.



                        One thing to note here, is that the author of Arabian Nights is clearly influenced by religious mythology, and consistently writes from a pro-religion perspective. Whenever he mentions Allah or Muhammad, he interjects some type of reverent comment to ensure nobody believes those are just characters in a story.




                        ‘O my mother, I have found, in one of my father’s treasuries, a book containing a description of Mohammed (whom Allah bless and keep!)



                        in that island he saw serpents as big as camels and palm trees, which repeated the names of Allah (be He extolled and exalted!) and blessed Mohammed (whom the Lord assain and save!)




                        Even if it's not dimension-hopping, it's clear evidence of old fiction directly including religious mythology into the fiction's mythology without treating the religion itself as fiction.



                        The Divine Comedy (c. 1321 AD), the first alternate reality / parallel dimension (probably) fictional story I can verify.



                        In The Divine Comedy3, the protagonist (and author), Dante Alighieri starts on Earth, travels through Hell, and ends up in Heaven.



                        The descent into Hell could be literal enough. The Earth is rather large and could potentially contain a vast chasm underneath.



                        But Heaven is reached by ascending from the Mount of Purgatory (an island in the ocean) after emerging from the bowels of Hell. And it's described as copies of our solar system, with Earth, Mars, the Moon, etc. being present along with several mythological constructs such as the Empyrean.



                        Again, this very snugly fits into the definition of not only a parallel dimension, but an alternate reality. It's a place that exists alongside ours, only accessible via some portal to Hell, and has a close resemblance to our Earth.



                        Note that there is some contention that The Divine Comedy was believed by the author to be some kind of spiritual journey, and might fall under the banner of "religious belief". However, most people would consider it a work of fiction, and it was labeled such officially by the Catholic Church of the era.6



                        1Egyptian Book of the Dead from the Ancient History Encyclopedia
                        2Egyptian Afterlife - The Field of Reeds from the Ancient History Encyclopedia
                        3The Divine Comedy from Cummings Study Guides.
                        4Four-dimensional Space article on Wikipedia.
                        5d'Alembert and the Fourth Dimension by Rosine G. Van Oss via Science Direct.
                        6Quora Forum Post by Sonia Fanucchi.
                        7What is the first instance of a portal to another world?, answer by OrangeDog.
                        8One Thousand and One Nights article on Wikipedia.
                        9The Adventures of Bulukiya from the Adelaide ebooks collection. Note that it's a small part of a large page which the link should take you to.







                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited yesterday

























                        answered yesterday









                        MichaelSMichaelS

                        1,1865 silver badges13 bronze badges




                        1,1865 silver badges13 bronze badges















                        • Hubbard started Scientology explicitly as a religion.

                          – JRE
                          yesterday











                        • @JRE: I think you're right. I just quoted the comment from elsewhere on the page verbatim. It was the intent behind the comment I was interested in.

                          – MichaelS
                          yesterday











                        • I 100% agree with you that the concept was found in religious beliefs long before the modern science fiction version.

                          – CJ Dennis
                          yesterday











                        • I thought Stack policy was that religious works are not to be considered science fiction or fantasy and therefore are off topic and/or shouldn’t be used as answers.

                          – Todd Wilcox
                          yesterday











                        • @JRE Scientology was started as a religion, based on Hubbard's novels.

                          – Clearer
                          yesterday


















                        • Hubbard started Scientology explicitly as a religion.

                          – JRE
                          yesterday











                        • @JRE: I think you're right. I just quoted the comment from elsewhere on the page verbatim. It was the intent behind the comment I was interested in.

                          – MichaelS
                          yesterday











                        • I 100% agree with you that the concept was found in religious beliefs long before the modern science fiction version.

                          – CJ Dennis
                          yesterday











                        • I thought Stack policy was that religious works are not to be considered science fiction or fantasy and therefore are off topic and/or shouldn’t be used as answers.

                          – Todd Wilcox
                          yesterday











                        • @JRE Scientology was started as a religion, based on Hubbard's novels.

                          – Clearer
                          yesterday

















                        Hubbard started Scientology explicitly as a religion.

                        – JRE
                        yesterday





                        Hubbard started Scientology explicitly as a religion.

                        – JRE
                        yesterday













                        @JRE: I think you're right. I just quoted the comment from elsewhere on the page verbatim. It was the intent behind the comment I was interested in.

                        – MichaelS
                        yesterday





                        @JRE: I think you're right. I just quoted the comment from elsewhere on the page verbatim. It was the intent behind the comment I was interested in.

                        – MichaelS
                        yesterday













                        I 100% agree with you that the concept was found in religious beliefs long before the modern science fiction version.

                        – CJ Dennis
                        yesterday





                        I 100% agree with you that the concept was found in religious beliefs long before the modern science fiction version.

                        – CJ Dennis
                        yesterday













                        I thought Stack policy was that religious works are not to be considered science fiction or fantasy and therefore are off topic and/or shouldn’t be used as answers.

                        – Todd Wilcox
                        yesterday





                        I thought Stack policy was that religious works are not to be considered science fiction or fantasy and therefore are off topic and/or shouldn’t be used as answers.

                        – Todd Wilcox
                        yesterday













                        @JRE Scientology was started as a religion, based on Hubbard's novels.

                        – Clearer
                        yesterday






                        @JRE Scientology was started as a religion, based on Hubbard's novels.

                        – Clearer
                        yesterday












                        6















                        While it’s not fictional itself, it seems worth mentioning Hugh Everett III’s 1957 scientific paper (and PhD thesis) The Theory of the Universal Wave Function, which was the first thing to give an actual scientific basis to parallel universes, and turned such stories into science fiction instead of fantasy.






                        share|improve this answer

























                        • This is the paper that introduces what we now call the "many-worlds interpretation" of quantum mechanics, which is a term that readers may be more familiar with than "the universal wave function is objectively real", which is the central thesis of the paper.

                          – Jörg W Mittag
                          yesterday












                        • To my knowledge, many-worlds interpretations (MWI) have zero confirmation in real science, and are merely of philosophical interest. Also, the instant a story allows people to travel between these branching timelines, it's no longer MWI in a remotely Everettian sense. Pedantically, sci-fi and fantasy are merely separated by whether we see them as really old or futuristic in theme. Very few sci-fi notions have any meaningful basis in real science, and most fantasy tropes are just sci-fi tropes drawn with a fantasy brush. However, Everett's paper is most certainly the basis for a lot of fiction.

                          – MichaelS
                          yesterday











                        • @MichaelS The many worlds interpretation has exactly as much confirmation as the Copenhagen interpretation, or any other interpretation that hasn’t actually been disproven. It is fully consistent with every experiment and observation that have ever been conducted.

                          – Mike Scott
                          22 hours ago











                        • @MikeScott: Fairies in the garden are also fully consistent with every experiment and observation that has ever been conducted. That doesn't mean putting them in your sci-fi show makes them "science-based". That the Copenhagen interpretation is in the same category is irrelevant.

                          – MichaelS
                          20 hours ago















                        6















                        While it’s not fictional itself, it seems worth mentioning Hugh Everett III’s 1957 scientific paper (and PhD thesis) The Theory of the Universal Wave Function, which was the first thing to give an actual scientific basis to parallel universes, and turned such stories into science fiction instead of fantasy.






                        share|improve this answer

























                        • This is the paper that introduces what we now call the "many-worlds interpretation" of quantum mechanics, which is a term that readers may be more familiar with than "the universal wave function is objectively real", which is the central thesis of the paper.

                          – Jörg W Mittag
                          yesterday












                        • To my knowledge, many-worlds interpretations (MWI) have zero confirmation in real science, and are merely of philosophical interest. Also, the instant a story allows people to travel between these branching timelines, it's no longer MWI in a remotely Everettian sense. Pedantically, sci-fi and fantasy are merely separated by whether we see them as really old or futuristic in theme. Very few sci-fi notions have any meaningful basis in real science, and most fantasy tropes are just sci-fi tropes drawn with a fantasy brush. However, Everett's paper is most certainly the basis for a lot of fiction.

                          – MichaelS
                          yesterday











                        • @MichaelS The many worlds interpretation has exactly as much confirmation as the Copenhagen interpretation, or any other interpretation that hasn’t actually been disproven. It is fully consistent with every experiment and observation that have ever been conducted.

                          – Mike Scott
                          22 hours ago











                        • @MikeScott: Fairies in the garden are also fully consistent with every experiment and observation that has ever been conducted. That doesn't mean putting them in your sci-fi show makes them "science-based". That the Copenhagen interpretation is in the same category is irrelevant.

                          – MichaelS
                          20 hours ago













                        6














                        6










                        6









                        While it’s not fictional itself, it seems worth mentioning Hugh Everett III’s 1957 scientific paper (and PhD thesis) The Theory of the Universal Wave Function, which was the first thing to give an actual scientific basis to parallel universes, and turned such stories into science fiction instead of fantasy.






                        share|improve this answer













                        While it’s not fictional itself, it seems worth mentioning Hugh Everett III’s 1957 scientific paper (and PhD thesis) The Theory of the Universal Wave Function, which was the first thing to give an actual scientific basis to parallel universes, and turned such stories into science fiction instead of fantasy.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered yesterday









                        Mike ScottMike Scott

                        52.6k4 gold badges164 silver badges213 bronze badges




                        52.6k4 gold badges164 silver badges213 bronze badges















                        • This is the paper that introduces what we now call the "many-worlds interpretation" of quantum mechanics, which is a term that readers may be more familiar with than "the universal wave function is objectively real", which is the central thesis of the paper.

                          – Jörg W Mittag
                          yesterday












                        • To my knowledge, many-worlds interpretations (MWI) have zero confirmation in real science, and are merely of philosophical interest. Also, the instant a story allows people to travel between these branching timelines, it's no longer MWI in a remotely Everettian sense. Pedantically, sci-fi and fantasy are merely separated by whether we see them as really old or futuristic in theme. Very few sci-fi notions have any meaningful basis in real science, and most fantasy tropes are just sci-fi tropes drawn with a fantasy brush. However, Everett's paper is most certainly the basis for a lot of fiction.

                          – MichaelS
                          yesterday











                        • @MichaelS The many worlds interpretation has exactly as much confirmation as the Copenhagen interpretation, or any other interpretation that hasn’t actually been disproven. It is fully consistent with every experiment and observation that have ever been conducted.

                          – Mike Scott
                          22 hours ago











                        • @MikeScott: Fairies in the garden are also fully consistent with every experiment and observation that has ever been conducted. That doesn't mean putting them in your sci-fi show makes them "science-based". That the Copenhagen interpretation is in the same category is irrelevant.

                          – MichaelS
                          20 hours ago

















                        • This is the paper that introduces what we now call the "many-worlds interpretation" of quantum mechanics, which is a term that readers may be more familiar with than "the universal wave function is objectively real", which is the central thesis of the paper.

                          – Jörg W Mittag
                          yesterday












                        • To my knowledge, many-worlds interpretations (MWI) have zero confirmation in real science, and are merely of philosophical interest. Also, the instant a story allows people to travel between these branching timelines, it's no longer MWI in a remotely Everettian sense. Pedantically, sci-fi and fantasy are merely separated by whether we see them as really old or futuristic in theme. Very few sci-fi notions have any meaningful basis in real science, and most fantasy tropes are just sci-fi tropes drawn with a fantasy brush. However, Everett's paper is most certainly the basis for a lot of fiction.

                          – MichaelS
                          yesterday











                        • @MichaelS The many worlds interpretation has exactly as much confirmation as the Copenhagen interpretation, or any other interpretation that hasn’t actually been disproven. It is fully consistent with every experiment and observation that have ever been conducted.

                          – Mike Scott
                          22 hours ago











                        • @MikeScott: Fairies in the garden are also fully consistent with every experiment and observation that has ever been conducted. That doesn't mean putting them in your sci-fi show makes them "science-based". That the Copenhagen interpretation is in the same category is irrelevant.

                          – MichaelS
                          20 hours ago
















                        This is the paper that introduces what we now call the "many-worlds interpretation" of quantum mechanics, which is a term that readers may be more familiar with than "the universal wave function is objectively real", which is the central thesis of the paper.

                        – Jörg W Mittag
                        yesterday






                        This is the paper that introduces what we now call the "many-worlds interpretation" of quantum mechanics, which is a term that readers may be more familiar with than "the universal wave function is objectively real", which is the central thesis of the paper.

                        – Jörg W Mittag
                        yesterday














                        To my knowledge, many-worlds interpretations (MWI) have zero confirmation in real science, and are merely of philosophical interest. Also, the instant a story allows people to travel between these branching timelines, it's no longer MWI in a remotely Everettian sense. Pedantically, sci-fi and fantasy are merely separated by whether we see them as really old or futuristic in theme. Very few sci-fi notions have any meaningful basis in real science, and most fantasy tropes are just sci-fi tropes drawn with a fantasy brush. However, Everett's paper is most certainly the basis for a lot of fiction.

                        – MichaelS
                        yesterday





                        To my knowledge, many-worlds interpretations (MWI) have zero confirmation in real science, and are merely of philosophical interest. Also, the instant a story allows people to travel between these branching timelines, it's no longer MWI in a remotely Everettian sense. Pedantically, sci-fi and fantasy are merely separated by whether we see them as really old or futuristic in theme. Very few sci-fi notions have any meaningful basis in real science, and most fantasy tropes are just sci-fi tropes drawn with a fantasy brush. However, Everett's paper is most certainly the basis for a lot of fiction.

                        – MichaelS
                        yesterday













                        @MichaelS The many worlds interpretation has exactly as much confirmation as the Copenhagen interpretation, or any other interpretation that hasn’t actually been disproven. It is fully consistent with every experiment and observation that have ever been conducted.

                        – Mike Scott
                        22 hours ago





                        @MichaelS The many worlds interpretation has exactly as much confirmation as the Copenhagen interpretation, or any other interpretation that hasn’t actually been disproven. It is fully consistent with every experiment and observation that have ever been conducted.

                        – Mike Scott
                        22 hours ago













                        @MikeScott: Fairies in the garden are also fully consistent with every experiment and observation that has ever been conducted. That doesn't mean putting them in your sci-fi show makes them "science-based". That the Copenhagen interpretation is in the same category is irrelevant.

                        – MichaelS
                        20 hours ago





                        @MikeScott: Fairies in the garden are also fully consistent with every experiment and observation that has ever been conducted. That doesn't mean putting them in your sci-fi show makes them "science-based". That the Copenhagen interpretation is in the same category is irrelevant.

                        – MichaelS
                        20 hours ago











                        6















                        The concept of alternate dimensions/realities—also known as a multiverse—has strong roots in various religions and dates back thousands of years B.C.



                        Multiverses are not a modern or new concept. The concept of the multiverse has been explored for thousands of years to attempt to explain basic human existence, life and death… The ultimate “why” of this all.



                        And as with many things, Wikipedia sums things up nicely:




                        The concept of a multiverse is explored in various religious cosmologies that propose that the totality of existence comprises multiple or infinitely many universes, including our own. Usually, such beliefs include a creation myth, a history, a worldview and a prediction of the eventual fate or destiny of the world.




                        And even describes Hindu cosmology as well:




                        For example, Hindu cosmology includes the idea of an infinite cycle of births and deaths and an infinite number of universes with each cycle lasting 8.64 billion years.




                        As well as Kabbalah-based (Jewish mystical) theories:




                        There are five worlds between the Creator and our world. Each of them consists of five Partzufim and each Partzuf of five Sefirot. In total there are 125 levels between us and the Creator. Malchut, moving through all these levels, reaches the last one, and in this way, Behina Dalet, the only creation, merges with the four previous phases.




                        The concept of multiverses has existed since humans have imagined virtually anything. Heck, ever write? Where does what you write come from? And how is it that you wish to write about it and then share it with others to—hopefully—inspire them?



                        Sorry to sound hokey, but the world of creativity, fiction and science fiction is based upon someone creating another world that you—the reader—will then enter by consuming (reading, viewing, experiencing, etc…) their work. And pretty much all superhero stories no matter what are based on a god—or group of gods—coming to some place and saving people.



                        No matter how “Down to Earth” or relatable a superhero is, they are ultimately a “god” in the universe they inhabit. And all of these universes are unique and distinct from other universes created by others.






                        share|improve this answer






















                        • 1





                          More proof that religious texts are the best record we have of the science fiction idea of the multiverse.

                          – paqogomez
                          8 hours ago















                        6















                        The concept of alternate dimensions/realities—also known as a multiverse—has strong roots in various religions and dates back thousands of years B.C.



                        Multiverses are not a modern or new concept. The concept of the multiverse has been explored for thousands of years to attempt to explain basic human existence, life and death… The ultimate “why” of this all.



                        And as with many things, Wikipedia sums things up nicely:




                        The concept of a multiverse is explored in various religious cosmologies that propose that the totality of existence comprises multiple or infinitely many universes, including our own. Usually, such beliefs include a creation myth, a history, a worldview and a prediction of the eventual fate or destiny of the world.




                        And even describes Hindu cosmology as well:




                        For example, Hindu cosmology includes the idea of an infinite cycle of births and deaths and an infinite number of universes with each cycle lasting 8.64 billion years.




                        As well as Kabbalah-based (Jewish mystical) theories:




                        There are five worlds between the Creator and our world. Each of them consists of five Partzufim and each Partzuf of five Sefirot. In total there are 125 levels between us and the Creator. Malchut, moving through all these levels, reaches the last one, and in this way, Behina Dalet, the only creation, merges with the four previous phases.




                        The concept of multiverses has existed since humans have imagined virtually anything. Heck, ever write? Where does what you write come from? And how is it that you wish to write about it and then share it with others to—hopefully—inspire them?



                        Sorry to sound hokey, but the world of creativity, fiction and science fiction is based upon someone creating another world that you—the reader—will then enter by consuming (reading, viewing, experiencing, etc…) their work. And pretty much all superhero stories no matter what are based on a god—or group of gods—coming to some place and saving people.



                        No matter how “Down to Earth” or relatable a superhero is, they are ultimately a “god” in the universe they inhabit. And all of these universes are unique and distinct from other universes created by others.






                        share|improve this answer






















                        • 1





                          More proof that religious texts are the best record we have of the science fiction idea of the multiverse.

                          – paqogomez
                          8 hours ago













                        6














                        6










                        6









                        The concept of alternate dimensions/realities—also known as a multiverse—has strong roots in various religions and dates back thousands of years B.C.



                        Multiverses are not a modern or new concept. The concept of the multiverse has been explored for thousands of years to attempt to explain basic human existence, life and death… The ultimate “why” of this all.



                        And as with many things, Wikipedia sums things up nicely:




                        The concept of a multiverse is explored in various religious cosmologies that propose that the totality of existence comprises multiple or infinitely many universes, including our own. Usually, such beliefs include a creation myth, a history, a worldview and a prediction of the eventual fate or destiny of the world.




                        And even describes Hindu cosmology as well:




                        For example, Hindu cosmology includes the idea of an infinite cycle of births and deaths and an infinite number of universes with each cycle lasting 8.64 billion years.




                        As well as Kabbalah-based (Jewish mystical) theories:




                        There are five worlds between the Creator and our world. Each of them consists of five Partzufim and each Partzuf of five Sefirot. In total there are 125 levels between us and the Creator. Malchut, moving through all these levels, reaches the last one, and in this way, Behina Dalet, the only creation, merges with the four previous phases.




                        The concept of multiverses has existed since humans have imagined virtually anything. Heck, ever write? Where does what you write come from? And how is it that you wish to write about it and then share it with others to—hopefully—inspire them?



                        Sorry to sound hokey, but the world of creativity, fiction and science fiction is based upon someone creating another world that you—the reader—will then enter by consuming (reading, viewing, experiencing, etc…) their work. And pretty much all superhero stories no matter what are based on a god—or group of gods—coming to some place and saving people.



                        No matter how “Down to Earth” or relatable a superhero is, they are ultimately a “god” in the universe they inhabit. And all of these universes are unique and distinct from other universes created by others.






                        share|improve this answer















                        The concept of alternate dimensions/realities—also known as a multiverse—has strong roots in various religions and dates back thousands of years B.C.



                        Multiverses are not a modern or new concept. The concept of the multiverse has been explored for thousands of years to attempt to explain basic human existence, life and death… The ultimate “why” of this all.



                        And as with many things, Wikipedia sums things up nicely:




                        The concept of a multiverse is explored in various religious cosmologies that propose that the totality of existence comprises multiple or infinitely many universes, including our own. Usually, such beliefs include a creation myth, a history, a worldview and a prediction of the eventual fate or destiny of the world.




                        And even describes Hindu cosmology as well:




                        For example, Hindu cosmology includes the idea of an infinite cycle of births and deaths and an infinite number of universes with each cycle lasting 8.64 billion years.




                        As well as Kabbalah-based (Jewish mystical) theories:




                        There are five worlds between the Creator and our world. Each of them consists of five Partzufim and each Partzuf of five Sefirot. In total there are 125 levels between us and the Creator. Malchut, moving through all these levels, reaches the last one, and in this way, Behina Dalet, the only creation, merges with the four previous phases.




                        The concept of multiverses has existed since humans have imagined virtually anything. Heck, ever write? Where does what you write come from? And how is it that you wish to write about it and then share it with others to—hopefully—inspire them?



                        Sorry to sound hokey, but the world of creativity, fiction and science fiction is based upon someone creating another world that you—the reader—will then enter by consuming (reading, viewing, experiencing, etc…) their work. And pretty much all superhero stories no matter what are based on a god—or group of gods—coming to some place and saving people.



                        No matter how “Down to Earth” or relatable a superhero is, they are ultimately a “god” in the universe they inhabit. And all of these universes are unique and distinct from other universes created by others.







                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited 10 hours ago

























                        answered 12 hours ago









                        JakeGouldJakeGould

                        9,0335 gold badges53 silver badges100 bronze badges




                        9,0335 gold badges53 silver badges100 bronze badges










                        • 1





                          More proof that religious texts are the best record we have of the science fiction idea of the multiverse.

                          – paqogomez
                          8 hours ago












                        • 1





                          More proof that religious texts are the best record we have of the science fiction idea of the multiverse.

                          – paqogomez
                          8 hours ago







                        1




                        1





                        More proof that religious texts are the best record we have of the science fiction idea of the multiverse.

                        – paqogomez
                        8 hours ago





                        More proof that religious texts are the best record we have of the science fiction idea of the multiverse.

                        – paqogomez
                        8 hours ago











                        5















                        One very famous example of visiting the future, coming back, and creating a different timeline is Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, from 1843. You’ve all read it: “Assure me that I yet may change these shadows you have shown me, by an altered life!”






                        share|improve this answer





























                          5















                          One very famous example of visiting the future, coming back, and creating a different timeline is Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, from 1843. You’ve all read it: “Assure me that I yet may change these shadows you have shown me, by an altered life!”






                          share|improve this answer



























                            5














                            5










                            5









                            One very famous example of visiting the future, coming back, and creating a different timeline is Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, from 1843. You’ve all read it: “Assure me that I yet may change these shadows you have shown me, by an altered life!”






                            share|improve this answer













                            One very famous example of visiting the future, coming back, and creating a different timeline is Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, from 1843. You’ve all read it: “Assure me that I yet may change these shadows you have shown me, by an altered life!”







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 2 days ago









                            DavislorDavislor

                            1,8583 silver badges10 bronze badges




                            1,8583 silver badges10 bronze badges
























                                5















                                If the question is, as you put it, "was there a definitive early example which defined and popularized the concept", one has to bring up H.G. Wells's 1923 utopian novel Men Like Gods as an early example.



                                Men Like Gods was written by a well-known author of the time, published in the US and UK, and received widespread critical attention. It even attracted a famous parody, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. (It's not the concept of the multiverse being parodied; instead, it's Wells's utopian ideas).



                                The concept is introduced and explained in Chapter 4:




                                Serpentine had the manner of one who is taking great pains to be as simple as possible with a rather intricate question. He spoke, as it were, in propositions with a pause between each. "It had long been known," he began, "that the possible number of dimensions, like the possible number of anything else that could be enumerated, was unlimited!"



                                Yes, Mr. Barnstaple had got that, but it proved too much for Mr. Freddy Mush.



                                "Oh, Lord!" he said. "Dimensions!" and dropped his eye-glass and became despondently inattentive.




                                A little later:




                                Serpentine proceeded to explain that just as it would be possible for any number of practically two-dimensional universes to lie side by side, like sheets of paper, in a three-dimensional space, so in the many-dimensional space about which the ill-equipped human mind is still slowly and painfully acquiring knowledge, it is possible for an innumerable quantity of practically three-dimensional universes to lie, as it were, side by side and to undergo a roughly parallel movement through time. The speculative work of Lonestone and Cephalus had long since given the soundest basis for the belief that there actually were a very great number of such space-and-time universes, parallel to one another and resembling each other, nearly but not exactly, much as the leaves of a book might resemble one another. All of them would have duration, all of them would be gravitating systems—



                                (Mr. Burleigh shook his head to show that still he didn't see it.)



                                —And those lying closest together would most nearly resemble each other.




                                Source: Project Gutenberg (my emphasis)






                                share|improve this answer



























                                • Looks like @CBredlow already mentioned this in the duplicate question.

                                  – Spencer
                                  12 hours ago
















                                5















                                If the question is, as you put it, "was there a definitive early example which defined and popularized the concept", one has to bring up H.G. Wells's 1923 utopian novel Men Like Gods as an early example.



                                Men Like Gods was written by a well-known author of the time, published in the US and UK, and received widespread critical attention. It even attracted a famous parody, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. (It's not the concept of the multiverse being parodied; instead, it's Wells's utopian ideas).



                                The concept is introduced and explained in Chapter 4:




                                Serpentine had the manner of one who is taking great pains to be as simple as possible with a rather intricate question. He spoke, as it were, in propositions with a pause between each. "It had long been known," he began, "that the possible number of dimensions, like the possible number of anything else that could be enumerated, was unlimited!"



                                Yes, Mr. Barnstaple had got that, but it proved too much for Mr. Freddy Mush.



                                "Oh, Lord!" he said. "Dimensions!" and dropped his eye-glass and became despondently inattentive.




                                A little later:




                                Serpentine proceeded to explain that just as it would be possible for any number of practically two-dimensional universes to lie side by side, like sheets of paper, in a three-dimensional space, so in the many-dimensional space about which the ill-equipped human mind is still slowly and painfully acquiring knowledge, it is possible for an innumerable quantity of practically three-dimensional universes to lie, as it were, side by side and to undergo a roughly parallel movement through time. The speculative work of Lonestone and Cephalus had long since given the soundest basis for the belief that there actually were a very great number of such space-and-time universes, parallel to one another and resembling each other, nearly but not exactly, much as the leaves of a book might resemble one another. All of them would have duration, all of them would be gravitating systems—



                                (Mr. Burleigh shook his head to show that still he didn't see it.)



                                —And those lying closest together would most nearly resemble each other.




                                Source: Project Gutenberg (my emphasis)






                                share|improve this answer



























                                • Looks like @CBredlow already mentioned this in the duplicate question.

                                  – Spencer
                                  12 hours ago














                                5














                                5










                                5









                                If the question is, as you put it, "was there a definitive early example which defined and popularized the concept", one has to bring up H.G. Wells's 1923 utopian novel Men Like Gods as an early example.



                                Men Like Gods was written by a well-known author of the time, published in the US and UK, and received widespread critical attention. It even attracted a famous parody, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. (It's not the concept of the multiverse being parodied; instead, it's Wells's utopian ideas).



                                The concept is introduced and explained in Chapter 4:




                                Serpentine had the manner of one who is taking great pains to be as simple as possible with a rather intricate question. He spoke, as it were, in propositions with a pause between each. "It had long been known," he began, "that the possible number of dimensions, like the possible number of anything else that could be enumerated, was unlimited!"



                                Yes, Mr. Barnstaple had got that, but it proved too much for Mr. Freddy Mush.



                                "Oh, Lord!" he said. "Dimensions!" and dropped his eye-glass and became despondently inattentive.




                                A little later:




                                Serpentine proceeded to explain that just as it would be possible for any number of practically two-dimensional universes to lie side by side, like sheets of paper, in a three-dimensional space, so in the many-dimensional space about which the ill-equipped human mind is still slowly and painfully acquiring knowledge, it is possible for an innumerable quantity of practically three-dimensional universes to lie, as it were, side by side and to undergo a roughly parallel movement through time. The speculative work of Lonestone and Cephalus had long since given the soundest basis for the belief that there actually were a very great number of such space-and-time universes, parallel to one another and resembling each other, nearly but not exactly, much as the leaves of a book might resemble one another. All of them would have duration, all of them would be gravitating systems—



                                (Mr. Burleigh shook his head to show that still he didn't see it.)



                                —And those lying closest together would most nearly resemble each other.




                                Source: Project Gutenberg (my emphasis)






                                share|improve this answer















                                If the question is, as you put it, "was there a definitive early example which defined and popularized the concept", one has to bring up H.G. Wells's 1923 utopian novel Men Like Gods as an early example.



                                Men Like Gods was written by a well-known author of the time, published in the US and UK, and received widespread critical attention. It even attracted a famous parody, Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. (It's not the concept of the multiverse being parodied; instead, it's Wells's utopian ideas).



                                The concept is introduced and explained in Chapter 4:




                                Serpentine had the manner of one who is taking great pains to be as simple as possible with a rather intricate question. He spoke, as it were, in propositions with a pause between each. "It had long been known," he began, "that the possible number of dimensions, like the possible number of anything else that could be enumerated, was unlimited!"



                                Yes, Mr. Barnstaple had got that, but it proved too much for Mr. Freddy Mush.



                                "Oh, Lord!" he said. "Dimensions!" and dropped his eye-glass and became despondently inattentive.




                                A little later:




                                Serpentine proceeded to explain that just as it would be possible for any number of practically two-dimensional universes to lie side by side, like sheets of paper, in a three-dimensional space, so in the many-dimensional space about which the ill-equipped human mind is still slowly and painfully acquiring knowledge, it is possible for an innumerable quantity of practically three-dimensional universes to lie, as it were, side by side and to undergo a roughly parallel movement through time. The speculative work of Lonestone and Cephalus had long since given the soundest basis for the belief that there actually were a very great number of such space-and-time universes, parallel to one another and resembling each other, nearly but not exactly, much as the leaves of a book might resemble one another. All of them would have duration, all of them would be gravitating systems—



                                (Mr. Burleigh shook his head to show that still he didn't see it.)



                                —And those lying closest together would most nearly resemble each other.




                                Source: Project Gutenberg (my emphasis)







                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited 12 hours ago

























                                answered 13 hours ago









                                SpencerSpencer

                                1,3931 gold badge7 silver badges23 bronze badges




                                1,3931 gold badge7 silver badges23 bronze badges















                                • Looks like @CBredlow already mentioned this in the duplicate question.

                                  – Spencer
                                  12 hours ago


















                                • Looks like @CBredlow already mentioned this in the duplicate question.

                                  – Spencer
                                  12 hours ago

















                                Looks like @CBredlow already mentioned this in the duplicate question.

                                – Spencer
                                12 hours ago






                                Looks like @CBredlow already mentioned this in the duplicate question.

                                – Spencer
                                12 hours ago












                                4















                                Borges wrote a number of stories on the topic. The Garden of Forking Paths in 1941 and A New Refutation of Time in 1944. I think this is the one where he talks about a father putting a heavy iron sphere on the back of his son, crushing him so his double in another reality could fly.



                                Investigation of Borges' antecedents and footnotes would be a fertile ground for exploration of this concept.






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor



                                Flaxeed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                • Hi, welcome to SF&F! As it stands, this isn't a bad answer, but you yourself note that without examining his influences it's probably incomplete. Is there any chance you could either include a list of or links to at least some of the works that you suggest should be examined?

                                  – DavidW
                                  2 days ago











                                • That would be decidedly un-Borgesian. But I would direct OP more to 19th century (and earlier) philosophical romances instead of 20th century science fiction.

                                  – Flaxeed
                                  2 days ago
















                                4















                                Borges wrote a number of stories on the topic. The Garden of Forking Paths in 1941 and A New Refutation of Time in 1944. I think this is the one where he talks about a father putting a heavy iron sphere on the back of his son, crushing him so his double in another reality could fly.



                                Investigation of Borges' antecedents and footnotes would be a fertile ground for exploration of this concept.






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor



                                Flaxeed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                • Hi, welcome to SF&F! As it stands, this isn't a bad answer, but you yourself note that without examining his influences it's probably incomplete. Is there any chance you could either include a list of or links to at least some of the works that you suggest should be examined?

                                  – DavidW
                                  2 days ago











                                • That would be decidedly un-Borgesian. But I would direct OP more to 19th century (and earlier) philosophical romances instead of 20th century science fiction.

                                  – Flaxeed
                                  2 days ago














                                4














                                4










                                4









                                Borges wrote a number of stories on the topic. The Garden of Forking Paths in 1941 and A New Refutation of Time in 1944. I think this is the one where he talks about a father putting a heavy iron sphere on the back of his son, crushing him so his double in another reality could fly.



                                Investigation of Borges' antecedents and footnotes would be a fertile ground for exploration of this concept.






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor



                                Flaxeed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                Borges wrote a number of stories on the topic. The Garden of Forking Paths in 1941 and A New Refutation of Time in 1944. I think this is the one where he talks about a father putting a heavy iron sphere on the back of his son, crushing him so his double in another reality could fly.



                                Investigation of Borges' antecedents and footnotes would be a fertile ground for exploration of this concept.







                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor



                                Flaxeed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited 2 days ago









                                DavidW

                                12.3k4 gold badges58 silver badges99 bronze badges




                                12.3k4 gold badges58 silver badges99 bronze badges






                                New contributor



                                Flaxeed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                answered 2 days ago









                                FlaxeedFlaxeed

                                411 bronze badge




                                411 bronze badge




                                New contributor



                                Flaxeed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.




                                New contributor




                                Flaxeed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.

















                                • Hi, welcome to SF&F! As it stands, this isn't a bad answer, but you yourself note that without examining his influences it's probably incomplete. Is there any chance you could either include a list of or links to at least some of the works that you suggest should be examined?

                                  – DavidW
                                  2 days ago











                                • That would be decidedly un-Borgesian. But I would direct OP more to 19th century (and earlier) philosophical romances instead of 20th century science fiction.

                                  – Flaxeed
                                  2 days ago


















                                • Hi, welcome to SF&F! As it stands, this isn't a bad answer, but you yourself note that without examining his influences it's probably incomplete. Is there any chance you could either include a list of or links to at least some of the works that you suggest should be examined?

                                  – DavidW
                                  2 days ago











                                • That would be decidedly un-Borgesian. But I would direct OP more to 19th century (and earlier) philosophical romances instead of 20th century science fiction.

                                  – Flaxeed
                                  2 days ago

















                                Hi, welcome to SF&F! As it stands, this isn't a bad answer, but you yourself note that without examining his influences it's probably incomplete. Is there any chance you could either include a list of or links to at least some of the works that you suggest should be examined?

                                – DavidW
                                2 days ago





                                Hi, welcome to SF&F! As it stands, this isn't a bad answer, but you yourself note that without examining his influences it's probably incomplete. Is there any chance you could either include a list of or links to at least some of the works that you suggest should be examined?

                                – DavidW
                                2 days ago













                                That would be decidedly un-Borgesian. But I would direct OP more to 19th century (and earlier) philosophical romances instead of 20th century science fiction.

                                – Flaxeed
                                2 days ago






                                That would be decidedly un-Borgesian. But I would direct OP more to 19th century (and earlier) philosophical romances instead of 20th century science fiction.

                                – Flaxeed
                                2 days ago


















                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f218232%2fwas-there-an-original-and-definitive-use-of-alternate-dimensions-realities-in-fi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                                Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                                19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу