Bigger equation in text-mode mathoverline outside of math modeShow inline math as if it were display mathInline equation in latex with textHow to number an inline-math equation?Larger font size in math display equation environment?Resizing LaTeX Math mode fontLabeling equations and math modeMultialign in math mode for linear equation systemErrors in math modeMath equation display issues
Cryptography and elliptic curves
Improving Sati-Sampajañña (situative wisdom)
Succinct and gender-neutral Russian word for "writer"
Why was wildfire not used during the Battle of Winterfell?
Is a vertical stabiliser needed for straight line flight in a glider?
Can 'sudo apt-get remove [write]' destroy my Ubuntu?
How are one-time password generators like Google Authenticator different from having two passwords?
What was the plan for an abort of the Enola Gay's mission to drop the atomic bomb?
Why do protein solutions have to be alkalised in biuret test?
Would encrypting a database protect against a compromised admin account?
What's the difference between const array and static const array in C/C++
Is there an application which does HTTP PUT?
Why do Thanos' punches not kill Captain America or at least cause some mortal injuries?
Is it a good idea to copy a trader when investing?
How to make a language evolve quickly?
Why does increasing the sampling rate make implementing an anti-aliasing filter easier?
Passport stamps art, can it be done?
No such column 'DeveloperName' on entity 'RecordType' after Summer '19 release on sandbox
Further factorisation of a difference of cubes?
Series that evaluates to different values upon changing order of summation
How do I compare the result of "1d20+x, with advantage" to "1d20+y, without advantage", assuming x < y?
Is ‘despite that’ right?
Can the president of the United States be guilty of insider trading?
Why does it take longer to fly from London to Xi'an than to Beijing
Bigger equation in text-mode math
overline outside of math modeShow inline math as if it were display mathInline equation in latex with textHow to number an inline-math equation?Larger font size in math display equation environment?Resizing LaTeX Math mode fontLabeling equations and math modeMultialign in math mode for linear equation systemErrors in math modeMath equation display issues
I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation
environment -- but in inline-math mode, say
$E=mc^2$
How can I enlarge it?
math-mode equations fontsize
New contributor
add a comment |
I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation
environment -- but in inline-math mode, say
$E=mc^2$
How can I enlarge it?
math-mode equations fontsize
New contributor
1
Welcome to TeX-SE! Something likedocumentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument
? Of course, if you add more or lessmathlarger
s then the thing will grow less or more.
– marmot
3 hours ago
1
There is also$displaystyle E=mc^2$
which should raise the exponent some. The default istextstyle
.
– John Kormylo
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation
environment -- but in inline-math mode, say
$E=mc^2$
How can I enlarge it?
math-mode equations fontsize
New contributor
I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation
environment -- but in inline-math mode, say
$E=mc^2$
How can I enlarge it?
math-mode equations fontsize
math-mode equations fontsize
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
Mico
290k32398786
290k32398786
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
QuintisQuintis
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
1
Welcome to TeX-SE! Something likedocumentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument
? Of course, if you add more or lessmathlarger
s then the thing will grow less or more.
– marmot
3 hours ago
1
There is also$displaystyle E=mc^2$
which should raise the exponent some. The default istextstyle
.
– John Kormylo
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Welcome to TeX-SE! Something likedocumentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument
? Of course, if you add more or lessmathlarger
s then the thing will grow less or more.
– marmot
3 hours ago
1
There is also$displaystyle E=mc^2$
which should raise the exponent some. The default istextstyle
.
– John Kormylo
2 hours ago
1
1
Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like
documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument
? Of course, if you add more or less mathlarger
s then the thing will grow less or more.– marmot
3 hours ago
Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like
documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument
? Of course, if you add more or less mathlarger
s then the thing will grow less or more.– marmot
3 hours ago
1
1
There is also
$displaystyle E=mc^2$
which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle
.– John Kormylo
2 hours ago
There is also
$displaystyle E=mc^2$
which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle
.– John Kormylo
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Will one of large
, Large
, LARGE
, huge
, or Huge
do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.
documentclassarticle
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
obeylines
tiny $E=mc^2$
scriptsize $E=mc^2$
footnotesize $E=mc^2$
small $E=mc^2$
colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
large $E=mc^2$
Large $E=mc^2$
LARGE $E=mc^2$
huge $E=mc^2$
Huge $E=mc^2$
enddocument
Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.
documentclassarticle
usepackagegraphicx% scalebox
newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1
begindocument
noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
% or using the enlargeMath command that we
% defined to eliminate the scale factor.
enlargeMath$X_2^2$
enddocument
You may want to mention what the difference is betweenscalebox2$X_2^2$
andhuge$X_2^2$
. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference betweenscalebox2.06X
andhuge X
. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)
– Mico
1 hour ago
To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
scalebox
scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs ofscalebox2.5X
andHuge X
, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs ofscalebox0.5X
andtiny X
, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.
– Mico
1 hour ago
Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you usetiny
,Huge
, etc. vsscalebox
?
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
1
If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case fornormalsize-large-Large
etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employlarge
,Large
, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved bylarge
,Large
, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling,scalebox
is more convenient.
– Mico
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490066%2fbigger-equation-in-text-mode-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Will one of large
, Large
, LARGE
, huge
, or Huge
do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.
documentclassarticle
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
obeylines
tiny $E=mc^2$
scriptsize $E=mc^2$
footnotesize $E=mc^2$
small $E=mc^2$
colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
large $E=mc^2$
Large $E=mc^2$
LARGE $E=mc^2$
huge $E=mc^2$
Huge $E=mc^2$
enddocument
Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.
add a comment |
Will one of large
, Large
, LARGE
, huge
, or Huge
do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.
documentclassarticle
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
obeylines
tiny $E=mc^2$
scriptsize $E=mc^2$
footnotesize $E=mc^2$
small $E=mc^2$
colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
large $E=mc^2$
Large $E=mc^2$
LARGE $E=mc^2$
huge $E=mc^2$
Huge $E=mc^2$
enddocument
Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.
add a comment |
Will one of large
, Large
, LARGE
, huge
, or Huge
do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.
documentclassarticle
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
obeylines
tiny $E=mc^2$
scriptsize $E=mc^2$
footnotesize $E=mc^2$
small $E=mc^2$
colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
large $E=mc^2$
Large $E=mc^2$
LARGE $E=mc^2$
huge $E=mc^2$
Huge $E=mc^2$
enddocument
Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.
Will one of large
, Large
, LARGE
, huge
, or Huge
do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.
documentclassarticle
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
obeylines
tiny $E=mc^2$
scriptsize $E=mc^2$
footnotesize $E=mc^2$
small $E=mc^2$
colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
large $E=mc^2$
Large $E=mc^2$
LARGE $E=mc^2$
huge $E=mc^2$
Huge $E=mc^2$
enddocument
Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.
answered 2 hours ago
MicoMico
290k32398786
290k32398786
add a comment |
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.
documentclassarticle
usepackagegraphicx% scalebox
newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1
begindocument
noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
% or using the enlargeMath command that we
% defined to eliminate the scale factor.
enlargeMath$X_2^2$
enddocument
You may want to mention what the difference is betweenscalebox2$X_2^2$
andhuge$X_2^2$
. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference betweenscalebox2.06X
andhuge X
. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)
– Mico
1 hour ago
To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
scalebox
scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs ofscalebox2.5X
andHuge X
, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs ofscalebox0.5X
andtiny X
, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.
– Mico
1 hour ago
Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you usetiny
,Huge
, etc. vsscalebox
?
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
1
If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case fornormalsize-large-Large
etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employlarge
,Large
, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved bylarge
,Large
, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling,scalebox
is more convenient.
– Mico
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.
documentclassarticle
usepackagegraphicx% scalebox
newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1
begindocument
noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
% or using the enlargeMath command that we
% defined to eliminate the scale factor.
enlargeMath$X_2^2$
enddocument
You may want to mention what the difference is betweenscalebox2$X_2^2$
andhuge$X_2^2$
. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference betweenscalebox2.06X
andhuge X
. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)
– Mico
1 hour ago
To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
scalebox
scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs ofscalebox2.5X
andHuge X
, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs ofscalebox0.5X
andtiny X
, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.
– Mico
1 hour ago
Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you usetiny
,Huge
, etc. vsscalebox
?
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
1
If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case fornormalsize-large-Large
etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employlarge
,Large
, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved bylarge
,Large
, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling,scalebox
is more convenient.
– Mico
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.
documentclassarticle
usepackagegraphicx% scalebox
newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1
begindocument
noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
% or using the enlargeMath command that we
% defined to eliminate the scale factor.
enlargeMath$X_2^2$
enddocument
Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.
documentclassarticle
usepackagegraphicx% scalebox
newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1
begindocument
noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
% or using the enlargeMath command that we
% defined to eliminate the scale factor.
enlargeMath$X_2^2$
enddocument
answered 1 hour ago
M. Al JumailyM. Al Jumaily
841129
841129
You may want to mention what the difference is betweenscalebox2$X_2^2$
andhuge$X_2^2$
. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference betweenscalebox2.06X
andhuge X
. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)
– Mico
1 hour ago
To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
scalebox
scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs ofscalebox2.5X
andHuge X
, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs ofscalebox0.5X
andtiny X
, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.
– Mico
1 hour ago
Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you usetiny
,Huge
, etc. vsscalebox
?
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
1
If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case fornormalsize-large-Large
etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employlarge
,Large
, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved bylarge
,Large
, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling,scalebox
is more convenient.
– Mico
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
You may want to mention what the difference is betweenscalebox2$X_2^2$
andhuge$X_2^2$
. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference betweenscalebox2.06X
andhuge X
. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)
– Mico
1 hour ago
To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
scalebox
scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs ofscalebox2.5X
andHuge X
, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs ofscalebox0.5X
andtiny X
, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.
– Mico
1 hour ago
Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you usetiny
,Huge
, etc. vsscalebox
?
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
1
If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case fornormalsize-large-Large
etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employlarge
,Large
, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved bylarge
,Large
, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling,scalebox
is more convenient.
– Mico
1 hour ago
You may want to mention what the difference is between
scalebox2$X_2^2$
and huge$X_2^2$
. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X
and huge X
. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)– Mico
1 hour ago
You may want to mention what the difference is between
scalebox2$X_2^2$
and huge$X_2^2$
. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X
and huge X
. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)– Mico
1 hour ago
To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!
– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
scalebox
scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X
and Huge X
, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X
and tiny X
, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.– Mico
1 hour ago
scalebox
scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X
and Huge X
, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X
and tiny X
, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.– Mico
1 hour ago
Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use
tiny
, Huge
, etc. vs scalebox
?– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use
tiny
, Huge
, etc. vs scalebox
?– M. Al Jumaily
1 hour ago
1
1
If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for
normalsize-large-Large
etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large
, Large
, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large
, Large
, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox
is more convenient.– Mico
1 hour ago
If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for
normalsize-large-Large
etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large
, Large
, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large
, Large
, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox
is more convenient.– Mico
1 hour ago
|
show 1 more comment
Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490066%2fbigger-equation-in-text-mode-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like
documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument
? Of course, if you add more or lessmathlarger
s then the thing will grow less or more.– marmot
3 hours ago
1
There is also
$displaystyle E=mc^2$
which should raise the exponent some. The default istextstyle
.– John Kormylo
2 hours ago