Bigger equation in text-mode mathoverline outside of math modeShow inline math as if it were display mathInline equation in latex with textHow to number an inline-math equation?Larger font size in math display equation environment?Resizing LaTeX Math mode fontLabeling equations and math modeMultialign in math mode for linear equation systemErrors in math modeMath equation display issues

Cryptography and elliptic curves

Improving Sati-Sampajañña (situative wisdom)

Succinct and gender-neutral Russian word for "writer"

Why was wildfire not used during the Battle of Winterfell?

Is a vertical stabiliser needed for straight line flight in a glider?

Can 'sudo apt-get remove [write]' destroy my Ubuntu?

How are one-time password generators like Google Authenticator different from having two passwords?

What was the plan for an abort of the Enola Gay's mission to drop the atomic bomb?

Why do protein solutions have to be alkalised in biuret test?

Would encrypting a database protect against a compromised admin account?

What's the difference between const array and static const array in C/C++

Is there an application which does HTTP PUT?

Why do Thanos' punches not kill Captain America or at least cause some mortal injuries?

Is it a good idea to copy a trader when investing?

How to make a language evolve quickly?

Why does increasing the sampling rate make implementing an anti-aliasing filter easier?

Passport stamps art, can it be done?

No such column 'DeveloperName' on entity 'RecordType' after Summer '19 release on sandbox

Further factorisation of a difference of cubes?

Series that evaluates to different values upon changing order of summation

How do I compare the result of "1d20+x, with advantage" to "1d20+y, without advantage", assuming x < y?

Is ‘despite that’ right?

Can the president of the United States be guilty of insider trading?

Why does it take longer to fly from London to Xi'an than to Beijing



Bigger equation in text-mode math


overline outside of math modeShow inline math as if it were display mathInline equation in latex with textHow to number an inline-math equation?Larger font size in math display equation environment?Resizing LaTeX Math mode fontLabeling equations and math modeMultialign in math mode for linear equation systemErrors in math modeMath equation display issues













2















I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation environment -- but in inline-math mode, say



$E=mc^2$


How can I enlarge it?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1





    Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

    – John Kormylo
    2 hours ago















2















I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation environment -- but in inline-math mode, say



$E=mc^2$


How can I enlarge it?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1





    Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

    – John Kormylo
    2 hours ago













2












2








2


1






I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation environment -- but in inline-math mode, say



$E=mc^2$


How can I enlarge it?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation environment -- but in inline-math mode, say



$E=mc^2$


How can I enlarge it?







math-mode equations fontsize






share|improve this question









New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Mico

290k32398786




290k32398786






New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 3 hours ago









QuintisQuintis

111




111




New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 1





    Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

    – John Kormylo
    2 hours ago












  • 1





    Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

    – John Kormylo
    2 hours ago







1




1





Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

– marmot
3 hours ago






Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

– marmot
3 hours ago





1




1





There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

– John Kormylo
2 hours ago





There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

– John Kormylo
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Will one of large, Large, LARGE, huge, or Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
obeylines
tiny $E=mc^2$
scriptsize $E=mc^2$
footnotesize $E=mc^2$
small $E=mc^2$
colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
large $E=mc^2$
Large $E=mc^2$
LARGE $E=mc^2$
huge $E=mc^2$
Huge $E=mc^2$
enddocument


Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.






share|improve this answer






























    2














    Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.



    Output



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagegraphicx% scalebox

    newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1

    begindocument
    noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
    enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
    % or using the enlargeMath command that we
    % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
    enlargeMath$X_2^2$
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer























    • You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

      – Mico
      1 hour ago












    • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

      – M. Al Jumaily
      1 hour ago











    • scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

      – Mico
      1 hour ago












    • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

      – M. Al Jumaily
      1 hour ago






    • 1





      If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

      – Mico
      1 hour ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490066%2fbigger-equation-in-text-mode-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    Will one of large, Large, LARGE, huge, or Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagexcolor
    begindocument
    obeylines
    tiny $E=mc^2$
    scriptsize $E=mc^2$
    footnotesize $E=mc^2$
    small $E=mc^2$
    colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
    large $E=mc^2$
    Large $E=mc^2$
    LARGE $E=mc^2$
    huge $E=mc^2$
    Huge $E=mc^2$
    enddocument


    Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.






    share|improve this answer



























      2














      Will one of large, Large, LARGE, huge, or Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.



      enter image description here



      documentclassarticle
      usepackagexcolor
      begindocument
      obeylines
      tiny $E=mc^2$
      scriptsize $E=mc^2$
      footnotesize $E=mc^2$
      small $E=mc^2$
      colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
      large $E=mc^2$
      Large $E=mc^2$
      LARGE $E=mc^2$
      huge $E=mc^2$
      Huge $E=mc^2$
      enddocument


      Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.






      share|improve this answer

























        2












        2








        2







        Will one of large, Large, LARGE, huge, or Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.



        enter image description here



        documentclassarticle
        usepackagexcolor
        begindocument
        obeylines
        tiny $E=mc^2$
        scriptsize $E=mc^2$
        footnotesize $E=mc^2$
        small $E=mc^2$
        colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
        large $E=mc^2$
        Large $E=mc^2$
        LARGE $E=mc^2$
        huge $E=mc^2$
        Huge $E=mc^2$
        enddocument


        Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.






        share|improve this answer













        Will one of large, Large, LARGE, huge, or Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.



        enter image description here



        documentclassarticle
        usepackagexcolor
        begindocument
        obeylines
        tiny $E=mc^2$
        scriptsize $E=mc^2$
        footnotesize $E=mc^2$
        small $E=mc^2$
        colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
        large $E=mc^2$
        Large $E=mc^2$
        LARGE $E=mc^2$
        huge $E=mc^2$
        Huge $E=mc^2$
        enddocument


        Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        MicoMico

        290k32398786




        290k32398786





















            2














            Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.



            Output



            documentclassarticle
            usepackagegraphicx% scalebox

            newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1

            begindocument
            noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
            enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
            % or using the enlargeMath command that we
            % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
            enlargeMath$X_2^2$
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer























            • You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago











            • scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago















            2














            Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.



            Output



            documentclassarticle
            usepackagegraphicx% scalebox

            newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1

            begindocument
            noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
            enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
            % or using the enlargeMath command that we
            % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
            enlargeMath$X_2^2$
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer























            • You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago











            • scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago













            2












            2








            2







            Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.



            Output



            documentclassarticle
            usepackagegraphicx% scalebox

            newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1

            begindocument
            noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
            enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
            % or using the enlargeMath command that we
            % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
            enlargeMath$X_2^2$
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer













            Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.



            Output



            documentclassarticle
            usepackagegraphicx% scalebox

            newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1

            begindocument
            noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
            enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
            % or using the enlargeMath command that we
            % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
            enlargeMath$X_2^2$
            enddocument






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            M. Al JumailyM. Al Jumaily

            841129




            841129












            • You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago











            • scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago

















            • You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago











            • scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago
















            You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

            – Mico
            1 hour ago






            You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

            – Mico
            1 hour ago














            To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

            – M. Al Jumaily
            1 hour ago





            To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

            – M. Al Jumaily
            1 hour ago













            scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

            – Mico
            1 hour ago






            scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

            – Mico
            1 hour ago














            Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

            – M. Al Jumaily
            1 hour ago





            Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

            – M. Al Jumaily
            1 hour ago




            1




            1





            If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

            – Mico
            1 hour ago





            If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

            – Mico
            1 hour ago










            Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490066%2fbigger-equation-in-text-mode-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

            Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

            Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)