Bigger equation in text-mode mathoverline outside of math modeShow inline math as if it were display mathInline equation in latex with textHow to number an inline-math equation?Larger font size in math display equation environment?Resizing LaTeX Math mode fontLabeling equations and math modeMultialign in math mode for linear equation systemErrors in math modeMath equation display issues

Cryptography and elliptic curves

Improving Sati-Sampajañña (situative wisdom)

Succinct and gender-neutral Russian word for "writer"

Why was wildfire not used during the Battle of Winterfell?

Is a vertical stabiliser needed for straight line flight in a glider?

Can 'sudo apt-get remove [write]' destroy my Ubuntu?

How are one-time password generators like Google Authenticator different from having two passwords?

What was the plan for an abort of the Enola Gay's mission to drop the atomic bomb?

Why do protein solutions have to be alkalised in biuret test?

Would encrypting a database protect against a compromised admin account?

What's the difference between const array and static const array in C/C++

Is there an application which does HTTP PUT?

Why do Thanos' punches not kill Captain America or at least cause some mortal injuries?

Is it a good idea to copy a trader when investing?

How to make a language evolve quickly?

Why does increasing the sampling rate make implementing an anti-aliasing filter easier?

Passport stamps art, can it be done?

No such column 'DeveloperName' on entity 'RecordType' after Summer '19 release on sandbox

Further factorisation of a difference of cubes?

Series that evaluates to different values upon changing order of summation

How do I compare the result of "1d20+x, with advantage" to "1d20+y, without advantage", assuming x < y?

Is ‘despite that’ right?

Can the president of the United States be guilty of insider trading?

Why does it take longer to fly from London to Xi'an than to Beijing



Bigger equation in text-mode math


overline outside of math modeShow inline math as if it were display mathInline equation in latex with textHow to number an inline-math equation?Larger font size in math display equation environment?Resizing LaTeX Math mode fontLabeling equations and math modeMultialign in math mode for linear equation systemErrors in math modeMath equation display issues













2















I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation environment -- but in inline-math mode, say



$E=mc^2$


How can I enlarge it?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1





    Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

    – John Kormylo
    2 hours ago















2















I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation environment -- but in inline-math mode, say



$E=mc^2$


How can I enlarge it?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1





    Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

    – John Kormylo
    2 hours ago













2












2








2


1






I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation environment -- but in inline-math mode, say



$E=mc^2$


How can I enlarge it?










share|improve this question









New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I want to write a "big" equation, not in display-math mode -- as given by the equation environment -- but in inline-math mode, say



$E=mc^2$


How can I enlarge it?







math-mode equations fontsize






share|improve this question









New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Mico

290k32398786




290k32398786






New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 3 hours ago









QuintisQuintis

111




111




New contributor



Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Quintis is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 1





    Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

    – John Kormylo
    2 hours ago












  • 1





    Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

    – marmot
    3 hours ago







  • 1





    There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

    – John Kormylo
    2 hours ago







1




1





Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

– marmot
3 hours ago






Welcome to TeX-SE! Something like documentclassarticle usepackagerelsize begindocument $mathlargermathlargermathlargerE=mc^2$ compare to $E=mc^2$ enddocument ? Of course, if you add more or less mathlargers then the thing will grow less or more.

– marmot
3 hours ago





1




1





There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

– John Kormylo
2 hours ago





There is also $displaystyle E=mc^2$ which should raise the exponent some. The default is textstyle.

– John Kormylo
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Will one of large, Large, LARGE, huge, or Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackagexcolor
begindocument
obeylines
tiny $E=mc^2$
scriptsize $E=mc^2$
footnotesize $E=mc^2$
small $E=mc^2$
colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
large $E=mc^2$
Large $E=mc^2$
LARGE $E=mc^2$
huge $E=mc^2$
Huge $E=mc^2$
enddocument


Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.






share|improve this answer






























    2














    Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.



    Output



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagegraphicx% scalebox

    newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1

    begindocument
    noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
    enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
    % or using the enlargeMath command that we
    % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
    enlargeMath$X_2^2$
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer























    • You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

      – Mico
      1 hour ago












    • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

      – M. Al Jumaily
      1 hour ago











    • scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

      – Mico
      1 hour ago












    • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

      – M. Al Jumaily
      1 hour ago






    • 1





      If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

      – Mico
      1 hour ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490066%2fbigger-equation-in-text-mode-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    Will one of large, Large, LARGE, huge, or Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagexcolor
    begindocument
    obeylines
    tiny $E=mc^2$
    scriptsize $E=mc^2$
    footnotesize $E=mc^2$
    small $E=mc^2$
    colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
    large $E=mc^2$
    Large $E=mc^2$
    LARGE $E=mc^2$
    huge $E=mc^2$
    Huge $E=mc^2$
    enddocument


    Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.






    share|improve this answer



























      2














      Will one of large, Large, LARGE, huge, or Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.



      enter image description here



      documentclassarticle
      usepackagexcolor
      begindocument
      obeylines
      tiny $E=mc^2$
      scriptsize $E=mc^2$
      footnotesize $E=mc^2$
      small $E=mc^2$
      colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
      large $E=mc^2$
      Large $E=mc^2$
      LARGE $E=mc^2$
      huge $E=mc^2$
      Huge $E=mc^2$
      enddocument


      Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.






      share|improve this answer

























        2












        2








        2







        Will one of large, Large, LARGE, huge, or Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.



        enter image description here



        documentclassarticle
        usepackagexcolor
        begindocument
        obeylines
        tiny $E=mc^2$
        scriptsize $E=mc^2$
        footnotesize $E=mc^2$
        small $E=mc^2$
        colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
        large $E=mc^2$
        Large $E=mc^2$
        LARGE $E=mc^2$
        huge $E=mc^2$
        Huge $E=mc^2$
        enddocument


        Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.






        share|improve this answer













        Will one of large, Large, LARGE, huge, or Huge do? Observe that because these commands are text-mode commands, they must be executed before entering math mode.



        enter image description here



        documentclassarticle
        usepackagexcolor
        begindocument
        obeylines
        tiny $E=mc^2$
        scriptsize $E=mc^2$
        footnotesize $E=mc^2$
        small $E=mc^2$
        colorred $E=mc^2$ --- texttttextbackslash normalsize % normalsize is the default
        large $E=mc^2$
        Large $E=mc^2$
        LARGE $E=mc^2$
        huge $E=mc^2$
        Huge $E=mc^2$
        enddocument


        Note the use of the curly braces to limit the scope of the size-setting switches.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        MicoMico

        290k32398786




        290k32398786





















            2














            Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.



            Output



            documentclassarticle
            usepackagegraphicx% scalebox

            newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1

            begindocument
            noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
            enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
            % or using the enlargeMath command that we
            % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
            enlargeMath$X_2^2$
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer























            • You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago











            • scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago















            2














            Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.



            Output



            documentclassarticle
            usepackagegraphicx% scalebox

            newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1

            begindocument
            noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
            enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
            % or using the enlargeMath command that we
            % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
            enlargeMath$X_2^2$
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer























            • You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago











            • scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago













            2












            2








            2







            Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.



            Output



            documentclassarticle
            usepackagegraphicx% scalebox

            newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1

            begindocument
            noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
            enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
            % or using the enlargeMath command that we
            % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
            enlargeMath$X_2^2$
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer













            Welcome to TeX.SE! There are different solutions given in the comment section but here's another one that could be less verbose and customizable.



            Output



            documentclassarticle
            usepackagegraphicx% scalebox

            newcommandenlargeMath[1]scalebox2#1

            begindocument
            noindent Normal font: $X_2^2$\[1ex]
            enlarged font: scalebox2$X_2^2$\[1ex]
            % or using the enlargeMath command that we
            % defined to eliminate the scale factor.
            enlargeMath$X_2^2$
            enddocument






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            M. Al JumailyM. Al Jumaily

            841129




            841129












            • You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago











            • scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago

















            • You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago











            • scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago












            • Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

              – M. Al Jumaily
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

              – Mico
              1 hour ago
















            You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

            – Mico
            1 hour ago






            You may want to mention what the difference is between scalebox2$X_2^2$ and huge$X_2^2$. Or, maybe more easily, you could discuss the difference between scalebox2.06X and huge X. (Hint: It matters that Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing.)

            – Mico
            1 hour ago














            To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

            – M. Al Jumaily
            1 hour ago





            To be honest, I don't know the difference. Kindly explain and if the answer needs to be edited, by all means, go ahead!

            – M. Al Jumaily
            1 hour ago













            scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

            – Mico
            1 hour ago






            scalebox scales its contents linearly, by the factor given in the first argument. But if you compare the outputs of scalebox2.5X and Huge X, notice that the latter letter is drawn more finely, i.e, with thinner strokes; also, the serifs are shorter. Conversely, when comparing the outputs of scalebox0.5X and tiny X, notice that the latter letter's strokes are much thicker. Computer Modern fonts employ optical sizing: larger-than-normal letters are drawn with thinner strokes, while smaller-than-normal letters are drawn with heavier strokes. This improves legibility.

            – Mico
            1 hour ago














            Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

            – M. Al Jumaily
            1 hour ago





            Thanks for the explanation. In your opinion, when should you use tiny, Huge, etc. vs scalebox?

            – M. Al Jumaily
            1 hour ago




            1




            1





            If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

            – Mico
            1 hour ago





            If the enlarging steps conform to the factor-1.2 progression (as is the case for normalsize-large-Large etc), and if the font in use employs optical scaling (as is the case for Computer Modern), then it's probably a good idea to employ large, Large, etc. If, however, if the required magnification cannot be achieved by large, Large, etc, or if the (math) font doesn't employ optical scaling, scalebox is more convenient.

            – Mico
            1 hour ago










            Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Quintis is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490066%2fbigger-equation-in-text-mode-math%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

            Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

            Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)