Possible to ground-fault protect both legs of a MWBC with two single-pole breakers?Why two breakers (one for the line, one for the neutral) on a single-phase line?Upgrading 2 breakers to AFCI, always tripsMulti-Wire Branched Circuit and GFCIWiring Options for 14/3 NM-B Cable and Two Single Pole 15 Amp Circuit BreakersMWBC (Multi-Wire-Branched-Circuit) w/out joined breakers, how best to fix?Best way to get both 120V and 220V from existing multiwire branch circuit (MWBC)2 wires with same neutral in a tandem circuit breaker on the same legIs it safe to use two single-pole breakers for a 240 V circuit?Understanding the wiring of 2-Pole Quad Circuit BreakersNeed help understanding amperage ratings for panels and sub panels

In which case does the Security misconfiguration vulnerability apply to?

Help, I cannot decide when to start the story

Are those flyers about apartment purchase a scam?

Do Reform Jews believe in a theistic God?

How would timezones work on a planet 100 times the size of our Earth

Boss asked a co-worker to assault me

Why aren’t there water shutoff valves for each room?

How to Check all AD userers for "blank" password?

Why is statically linking glibc discouraged?

Who invented Monoid?

Are there any other rule mechanics that could grant Thieves' Cant?

Why is there a large performance impact when looping over an array over 240 elements?

How to "add" units to results of pgfmathsetmacro?

Is there any way to stop a user from creating executables and running them?

How can I find an old paper when the usual methods fail?

Is it okay to write non-offensive humor into meeting minutes?

What is a good class if we remove subclasses?

How should I write this passage to make it the most readable?

Simplification of numbers

Tempoverlustspiel

Do beef farmed pastures net remove carbon emissions?

Submitting a new paper just after another was accepted by the same journal

What is a "soap"?

Does Nightpack Ambusher's second ability trigger if I cast spells during the end step?



Possible to ground-fault protect both legs of a MWBC with two single-pole breakers?


Why two breakers (one for the line, one for the neutral) on a single-phase line?Upgrading 2 breakers to AFCI, always tripsMulti-Wire Branched Circuit and GFCIWiring Options for 14/3 NM-B Cable and Two Single Pole 15 Amp Circuit BreakersMWBC (Multi-Wire-Branched-Circuit) w/out joined breakers, how best to fix?Best way to get both 120V and 220V from existing multiwire branch circuit (MWBC)2 wires with same neutral in a tandem circuit breaker on the same legIs it safe to use two single-pole breakers for a 240 V circuit?Understanding the wiring of 2-Pole Quad Circuit BreakersNeed help understanding amperage ratings for panels and sub panels






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















To get a MWBC working, with both legs GF protected, I installed 2 Single Pole GFI breakers, on adjacent slots, with a handle-tie. Since there are 2 lugs for Neutral wires, and only one neutral coming in, I used two pieces of white 12 awg to wire nut to the neutral coming in.



It doesn't work, trips as soon as it's flipped on.



I even opened the circuit at the first box, (so i kknow it's not an actual ground-fault) and it still trips, even though neither leg of the circuit could possible be conducting at all!



I was told I could use 2 single-pole breakers w/ handle tie to get both legs of the circuit GF protected, but this appears to not be the case. Am I wiring it wrong? Also, how is it possible for them to both trip when neither is conducting?










share|improve this question






























    1















    To get a MWBC working, with both legs GF protected, I installed 2 Single Pole GFI breakers, on adjacent slots, with a handle-tie. Since there are 2 lugs for Neutral wires, and only one neutral coming in, I used two pieces of white 12 awg to wire nut to the neutral coming in.



    It doesn't work, trips as soon as it's flipped on.



    I even opened the circuit at the first box, (so i kknow it's not an actual ground-fault) and it still trips, even though neither leg of the circuit could possible be conducting at all!



    I was told I could use 2 single-pole breakers w/ handle tie to get both legs of the circuit GF protected, but this appears to not be the case. Am I wiring it wrong? Also, how is it possible for them to both trip when neither is conducting?










    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1








      To get a MWBC working, with both legs GF protected, I installed 2 Single Pole GFI breakers, on adjacent slots, with a handle-tie. Since there are 2 lugs for Neutral wires, and only one neutral coming in, I used two pieces of white 12 awg to wire nut to the neutral coming in.



      It doesn't work, trips as soon as it's flipped on.



      I even opened the circuit at the first box, (so i kknow it's not an actual ground-fault) and it still trips, even though neither leg of the circuit could possible be conducting at all!



      I was told I could use 2 single-pole breakers w/ handle tie to get both legs of the circuit GF protected, but this appears to not be the case. Am I wiring it wrong? Also, how is it possible for them to both trip when neither is conducting?










      share|improve this question














      To get a MWBC working, with both legs GF protected, I installed 2 Single Pole GFI breakers, on adjacent slots, with a handle-tie. Since there are 2 lugs for Neutral wires, and only one neutral coming in, I used two pieces of white 12 awg to wire nut to the neutral coming in.



      It doesn't work, trips as soon as it's flipped on.



      I even opened the circuit at the first box, (so i kknow it's not an actual ground-fault) and it still trips, even though neither leg of the circuit could possible be conducting at all!



      I was told I could use 2 single-pole breakers w/ handle tie to get both legs of the circuit GF protected, but this appears to not be the case. Am I wiring it wrong? Also, how is it possible for them to both trip when neither is conducting?







      electrical electrical-panel circuit-breaker gfci mwbc






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      mb91mb91

      262 bronze badges




      262 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Whoever told you that was referring to ***A***FCI breakers, and only in the context of a GE panel.



          In every other case, they don't know what they're talking about.



          A GFCI operates by comparing the currents on all the normal/intended conductors to assure that current in = current out To do that, it needs access to all the conductors at once (not ground). That way it can account for the several ways current can flow in in MWBC.




          Theres another mistake here: paralleling. You are not allowed to have two redundant routes for the same current, and you created a situation where neutral can go through either GFCI. That is the thing never to do.



          Paralleling is allowed with large cables and special equipment made for the purpose, but "#12" and "two GFCIs" are definitely not it :)




          If the "someone" happened to be a person at a big-box home improvement store, that is a sign to stop listening to those people. Their advice is no good. A manager at a real electrical supply told me he visits big-box stores regularly to size up the staff and hire away anyone competent. That is the place to go for electrical gear. Tell them you are sick of being overcharged by Home Depot, and see what they say.






          share|improve this answer


































            3














            Never gonna work. Sorry, but even if you might be able to get one at a time to work, GFCI on MWBC is based on the breaker comparing "all hot" to "all neutral". Two electrically separate breakers simply can't do that. The handle tie requirement satisfies the general MWBC safety issue of making sure that if one is off for maintenance then the other is off as well. Options:



            • Double GFCI breaker


            • Two single regular breakers with handle tie and install single GFCI where needed at point of use (e.g., kitchen or bathroom).


            GFCI is perfectly effective at point of use. AFCI is best at breaker or very close to it.






            share|improve this answer



























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "73"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f171175%2fpossible-to-ground-fault-protect-both-legs-of-a-mwbc-with-two-single-pole-breake%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4














              Whoever told you that was referring to ***A***FCI breakers, and only in the context of a GE panel.



              In every other case, they don't know what they're talking about.



              A GFCI operates by comparing the currents on all the normal/intended conductors to assure that current in = current out To do that, it needs access to all the conductors at once (not ground). That way it can account for the several ways current can flow in in MWBC.




              Theres another mistake here: paralleling. You are not allowed to have two redundant routes for the same current, and you created a situation where neutral can go through either GFCI. That is the thing never to do.



              Paralleling is allowed with large cables and special equipment made for the purpose, but "#12" and "two GFCIs" are definitely not it :)




              If the "someone" happened to be a person at a big-box home improvement store, that is a sign to stop listening to those people. Their advice is no good. A manager at a real electrical supply told me he visits big-box stores regularly to size up the staff and hire away anyone competent. That is the place to go for electrical gear. Tell them you are sick of being overcharged by Home Depot, and see what they say.






              share|improve this answer































                4














                Whoever told you that was referring to ***A***FCI breakers, and only in the context of a GE panel.



                In every other case, they don't know what they're talking about.



                A GFCI operates by comparing the currents on all the normal/intended conductors to assure that current in = current out To do that, it needs access to all the conductors at once (not ground). That way it can account for the several ways current can flow in in MWBC.




                Theres another mistake here: paralleling. You are not allowed to have two redundant routes for the same current, and you created a situation where neutral can go through either GFCI. That is the thing never to do.



                Paralleling is allowed with large cables and special equipment made for the purpose, but "#12" and "two GFCIs" are definitely not it :)




                If the "someone" happened to be a person at a big-box home improvement store, that is a sign to stop listening to those people. Their advice is no good. A manager at a real electrical supply told me he visits big-box stores regularly to size up the staff and hire away anyone competent. That is the place to go for electrical gear. Tell them you are sick of being overcharged by Home Depot, and see what they say.






                share|improve this answer





























                  4












                  4








                  4







                  Whoever told you that was referring to ***A***FCI breakers, and only in the context of a GE panel.



                  In every other case, they don't know what they're talking about.



                  A GFCI operates by comparing the currents on all the normal/intended conductors to assure that current in = current out To do that, it needs access to all the conductors at once (not ground). That way it can account for the several ways current can flow in in MWBC.




                  Theres another mistake here: paralleling. You are not allowed to have two redundant routes for the same current, and you created a situation where neutral can go through either GFCI. That is the thing never to do.



                  Paralleling is allowed with large cables and special equipment made for the purpose, but "#12" and "two GFCIs" are definitely not it :)




                  If the "someone" happened to be a person at a big-box home improvement store, that is a sign to stop listening to those people. Their advice is no good. A manager at a real electrical supply told me he visits big-box stores regularly to size up the staff and hire away anyone competent. That is the place to go for electrical gear. Tell them you are sick of being overcharged by Home Depot, and see what they say.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Whoever told you that was referring to ***A***FCI breakers, and only in the context of a GE panel.



                  In every other case, they don't know what they're talking about.



                  A GFCI operates by comparing the currents on all the normal/intended conductors to assure that current in = current out To do that, it needs access to all the conductors at once (not ground). That way it can account for the several ways current can flow in in MWBC.




                  Theres another mistake here: paralleling. You are not allowed to have two redundant routes for the same current, and you created a situation where neutral can go through either GFCI. That is the thing never to do.



                  Paralleling is allowed with large cables and special equipment made for the purpose, but "#12" and "two GFCIs" are definitely not it :)




                  If the "someone" happened to be a person at a big-box home improvement store, that is a sign to stop listening to those people. Their advice is no good. A manager at a real electrical supply told me he visits big-box stores regularly to size up the staff and hire away anyone competent. That is the place to go for electrical gear. Tell them you are sick of being overcharged by Home Depot, and see what they say.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 8 hours ago

























                  answered 8 hours ago









                  HarperHarper

                  91.6k6 gold badges66 silver badges189 bronze badges




                  91.6k6 gold badges66 silver badges189 bronze badges


























                      3














                      Never gonna work. Sorry, but even if you might be able to get one at a time to work, GFCI on MWBC is based on the breaker comparing "all hot" to "all neutral". Two electrically separate breakers simply can't do that. The handle tie requirement satisfies the general MWBC safety issue of making sure that if one is off for maintenance then the other is off as well. Options:



                      • Double GFCI breaker


                      • Two single regular breakers with handle tie and install single GFCI where needed at point of use (e.g., kitchen or bathroom).


                      GFCI is perfectly effective at point of use. AFCI is best at breaker or very close to it.






                      share|improve this answer





























                        3














                        Never gonna work. Sorry, but even if you might be able to get one at a time to work, GFCI on MWBC is based on the breaker comparing "all hot" to "all neutral". Two electrically separate breakers simply can't do that. The handle tie requirement satisfies the general MWBC safety issue of making sure that if one is off for maintenance then the other is off as well. Options:



                        • Double GFCI breaker


                        • Two single regular breakers with handle tie and install single GFCI where needed at point of use (e.g., kitchen or bathroom).


                        GFCI is perfectly effective at point of use. AFCI is best at breaker or very close to it.






                        share|improve this answer



























                          3












                          3








                          3







                          Never gonna work. Sorry, but even if you might be able to get one at a time to work, GFCI on MWBC is based on the breaker comparing "all hot" to "all neutral". Two electrically separate breakers simply can't do that. The handle tie requirement satisfies the general MWBC safety issue of making sure that if one is off for maintenance then the other is off as well. Options:



                          • Double GFCI breaker


                          • Two single regular breakers with handle tie and install single GFCI where needed at point of use (e.g., kitchen or bathroom).


                          GFCI is perfectly effective at point of use. AFCI is best at breaker or very close to it.






                          share|improve this answer













                          Never gonna work. Sorry, but even if you might be able to get one at a time to work, GFCI on MWBC is based on the breaker comparing "all hot" to "all neutral". Two electrically separate breakers simply can't do that. The handle tie requirement satisfies the general MWBC safety issue of making sure that if one is off for maintenance then the other is off as well. Options:



                          • Double GFCI breaker


                          • Two single regular breakers with handle tie and install single GFCI where needed at point of use (e.g., kitchen or bathroom).


                          GFCI is perfectly effective at point of use. AFCI is best at breaker or very close to it.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 8 hours ago









                          manassehkatzmanassehkatz

                          16.3k1 gold badge23 silver badges51 bronze badges




                          16.3k1 gold badge23 silver badges51 bronze badges






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Home Improvement Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f171175%2fpossible-to-ground-fault-protect-both-legs-of-a-mwbc-with-two-single-pole-breake%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                              Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                              19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу