Did Apollo leave poop on the moon?Is it ethical for Chang'e-4 to bring an entire ecosystem to the moon?Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?How was dust-mitigation addressed during the Apollo program?How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Why were the “perfectly functioning” seismometers placed by Apollo 12, 14, 15 and 16 astronauts all shut off in 1977?Were the Apollo lunar ALSEP transmitter signals ever analyzed or used after the experiments were shut down?How exactly did the floor of an Apollo LM look like after EVA(s)? Seeking photo!How would the Apollo telescope have worked in the Apollo command module? Where would it be located and how would it be operated?Should there be black crosses from the Réseau plate in this Apollo mission photograph? If so, where are they?Did Apollo-11 astronauts rehearse their photoshoots on Earth?How long were the Apollo astronauts allowed to breathe 100% oxygen at 1 atmosphere continuously?How “hard” did Apollo 12 turn left just before it landed?

Plato and the knowledge of the forms

Did silent film actors actually say their lines or did they simply improvise “dialogue” while being filmed?

Our group keeps dying during the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign. What are we doing wrong?

Find only those folders that contain a File with the same name as the Folder

Identify Batman without getting caught

Write The Shortest Program To Check If A Binary Tree Is Balanced

A Checkmate of Dubious Legality

Traveling from Germany to other countries by train?

How to approach protecting my code as a research assistant? Should I be worried in the first place?

Ancients don't give a full level?

Whats the difference between <processors> and <pipelines> in Sitecore configuration?

How can I perform a deterministic physics simulation?

Does the length of a password for Wi-Fi affect speed?

The meaning of "scale" in "because diversions scale so easily wealth becomes concentrated"

How easy is it to get a gun illegally in the United States?

Examples of hyperbolic groups

Probably terminated or laid off soon; confront or not?

Can I enter Switzerland with only my London Driver's License?

Does a 4 bladed prop have almost twice the thrust of a 2 bladed prop?

How important is it to have a spot meter on the light meter?

Is space radiation a risk for space film photography, and how is this prevented?

Tile the chessboard with four-colored triominoes

A verb for when some rights are not violated?

Why am I not getting stuck in the loop



Did Apollo leave poop on the moon?


Is it ethical for Chang'e-4 to bring an entire ecosystem to the moon?Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?How was dust-mitigation addressed during the Apollo program?How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Why were the “perfectly functioning” seismometers placed by Apollo 12, 14, 15 and 16 astronauts all shut off in 1977?Were the Apollo lunar ALSEP transmitter signals ever analyzed or used after the experiments were shut down?How exactly did the floor of an Apollo LM look like after EVA(s)? Seeking photo!How would the Apollo telescope have worked in the Apollo command module? Where would it be located and how would it be operated?Should there be black crosses from the Réseau plate in this Apollo mission photograph? If so, where are they?Did Apollo-11 astronauts rehearse their photoshoots on Earth?How long were the Apollo astronauts allowed to breathe 100% oxygen at 1 atmosphere continuously?How “hard” did Apollo 12 turn left just before it landed?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


If you google the question, you will find an abundance of sources discussing the alleged fact that the Apollo missions left bags of fecal matter on the moon. A conversation on reddit got me looking deeper. Someone claimed that the story of Apollo astronauts leaving bags of poop on the moon is an urban legend started by a misunderstanding.



At first glance, I was incredulous. There were lots of sources, even NASA employees and scientists, talking about the poop on the moon. However, I noticed that all of these sources were recent. None of them contemporary. When I started digging into what evidence was used for this claim, I found most people pointed to catalogs such as this, which reference emesis bags. However, emesis is vomit, and while it is conceivable these bags may have been used for defecation, that is not definitive. They were supposed to use fecal collection bags. More critically, an official source claims the emesis bags left were empty spares.



[As Russell mentions in the comments, these catalogs also have "defecation collection device" listed, but those may also be empty spares.]



We have had a related question here:



Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?



In this question it is discussed that defecation on the moon may not have occurred. However, it lacks a definitive answer to this question.



Is there contemporary evidence for the claim that bags containing fecal matter were left on the moon? Or have any of the Apollo astronauts explicitly verified this claim since the Apollo program ended? If not, is it possible to indicate whether the claims are plausible or straight-up legend?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    8 hours ago

















6












$begingroup$


If you google the question, you will find an abundance of sources discussing the alleged fact that the Apollo missions left bags of fecal matter on the moon. A conversation on reddit got me looking deeper. Someone claimed that the story of Apollo astronauts leaving bags of poop on the moon is an urban legend started by a misunderstanding.



At first glance, I was incredulous. There were lots of sources, even NASA employees and scientists, talking about the poop on the moon. However, I noticed that all of these sources were recent. None of them contemporary. When I started digging into what evidence was used for this claim, I found most people pointed to catalogs such as this, which reference emesis bags. However, emesis is vomit, and while it is conceivable these bags may have been used for defecation, that is not definitive. They were supposed to use fecal collection bags. More critically, an official source claims the emesis bags left were empty spares.



[As Russell mentions in the comments, these catalogs also have "defecation collection device" listed, but those may also be empty spares.]



We have had a related question here:



Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?



In this question it is discussed that defecation on the moon may not have occurred. However, it lacks a definitive answer to this question.



Is there contemporary evidence for the claim that bags containing fecal matter were left on the moon? Or have any of the Apollo astronauts explicitly verified this claim since the Apollo program ended? If not, is it possible to indicate whether the claims are plausible or straight-up legend?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    8 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


If you google the question, you will find an abundance of sources discussing the alleged fact that the Apollo missions left bags of fecal matter on the moon. A conversation on reddit got me looking deeper. Someone claimed that the story of Apollo astronauts leaving bags of poop on the moon is an urban legend started by a misunderstanding.



At first glance, I was incredulous. There were lots of sources, even NASA employees and scientists, talking about the poop on the moon. However, I noticed that all of these sources were recent. None of them contemporary. When I started digging into what evidence was used for this claim, I found most people pointed to catalogs such as this, which reference emesis bags. However, emesis is vomit, and while it is conceivable these bags may have been used for defecation, that is not definitive. They were supposed to use fecal collection bags. More critically, an official source claims the emesis bags left were empty spares.



[As Russell mentions in the comments, these catalogs also have "defecation collection device" listed, but those may also be empty spares.]



We have had a related question here:



Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?



In this question it is discussed that defecation on the moon may not have occurred. However, it lacks a definitive answer to this question.



Is there contemporary evidence for the claim that bags containing fecal matter were left on the moon? Or have any of the Apollo astronauts explicitly verified this claim since the Apollo program ended? If not, is it possible to indicate whether the claims are plausible or straight-up legend?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




If you google the question, you will find an abundance of sources discussing the alleged fact that the Apollo missions left bags of fecal matter on the moon. A conversation on reddit got me looking deeper. Someone claimed that the story of Apollo astronauts leaving bags of poop on the moon is an urban legend started by a misunderstanding.



At first glance, I was incredulous. There were lots of sources, even NASA employees and scientists, talking about the poop on the moon. However, I noticed that all of these sources were recent. None of them contemporary. When I started digging into what evidence was used for this claim, I found most people pointed to catalogs such as this, which reference emesis bags. However, emesis is vomit, and while it is conceivable these bags may have been used for defecation, that is not definitive. They were supposed to use fecal collection bags. More critically, an official source claims the emesis bags left were empty spares.



[As Russell mentions in the comments, these catalogs also have "defecation collection device" listed, but those may also be empty spares.]



We have had a related question here:



Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?



In this question it is discussed that defecation on the moon may not have occurred. However, it lacks a definitive answer to this question.



Is there contemporary evidence for the claim that bags containing fecal matter were left on the moon? Or have any of the Apollo astronauts explicitly verified this claim since the Apollo program ended? If not, is it possible to indicate whether the claims are plausible or straight-up legend?







the-moon apollo-program astronaut-lifestyle waste






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago







called2voyage

















asked 9 hours ago









called2voyagecalled2voyage

17.5k7 gold badges81 silver badges131 bronze badges




17.5k7 gold badges81 silver badges131 bronze badges










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    8 hours ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    8 hours ago







3




3




$begingroup$
A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
9 hours ago













$begingroup$
The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
9 hours ago













$begingroup$
@RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
@RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

I believe used fecal bags from the LM were normally supposed to be transferred back to the CSM and returned with the crew to Earth for analysis.



In the Apollo 15 flight journal, in the annotation after 174:14:00, we have this:




[As Apollo 15 disappears behind the Moon, Al switches on the Gamma-ray Spectrometer, X-ray Spectrometer and the Alpha Particle Spectrometer. The crew transfer all required items from the LM aided by a list in the Flight Plan that includes notes on where each item should be stored. The list includes film magazines, bagged rock and soil samples, core tubes including the very long deep core, food, used urine and fecal bags, and one of the OPS packages from the surface.]




That annotation was added after the fact, but in the Apollo 16 flight journal, at 191:19:09, while preparing to close out the LM for jettison, CAPCOM Haise gives the crew a checklist of items to transfer to the CSM:




191 19 09 Haise: Okay. Another little block you might write out to the left there, label it "Transfer Items." And, maybe you've already done some of these, but this will take care of some of the ones we missed having you do yesterday. And they're the PTK(?) [PPK], the Flight Kit, the purse with the unused food, and the used fecal-urine bags, and lastly the DSEA.




This doesn't speak directly to the earlier flights, but given that the used bags on the CSM were retained for analysis from day one, I think this would have been the procedure for all the moon landings. It also doesn't even prove fecal bags were used in the LM on Apollo 16; Haise almost certainly meant "if any were used, transfer them, and please don't tell me about it".



I can't swear Aldrin didn't toss a used diaper onto the moon, but I am strongly leaning towards "Myth: Busted" here.



Since the earlier flights involved shorter lunar stays, it's less likely that fecal bags were used at all; having to do one's business in the cramped LM cabin next to your crewmate would not have been pleasant. Lomotil and willpower can get you through two days pretty easily.



Table 2 in SP-368 Biomedical Results of Apollo appears to enumerate all the collected fecal samples from the Apollo missions, but unfortunately doesn't give timestamps or origin locations for them; it is also thus inconclusive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    56 mins ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37952%2fdid-apollo-leave-poop-on-the-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

I believe used fecal bags from the LM were normally supposed to be transferred back to the CSM and returned with the crew to Earth for analysis.



In the Apollo 15 flight journal, in the annotation after 174:14:00, we have this:




[As Apollo 15 disappears behind the Moon, Al switches on the Gamma-ray Spectrometer, X-ray Spectrometer and the Alpha Particle Spectrometer. The crew transfer all required items from the LM aided by a list in the Flight Plan that includes notes on where each item should be stored. The list includes film magazines, bagged rock and soil samples, core tubes including the very long deep core, food, used urine and fecal bags, and one of the OPS packages from the surface.]




That annotation was added after the fact, but in the Apollo 16 flight journal, at 191:19:09, while preparing to close out the LM for jettison, CAPCOM Haise gives the crew a checklist of items to transfer to the CSM:




191 19 09 Haise: Okay. Another little block you might write out to the left there, label it "Transfer Items." And, maybe you've already done some of these, but this will take care of some of the ones we missed having you do yesterday. And they're the PTK(?) [PPK], the Flight Kit, the purse with the unused food, and the used fecal-urine bags, and lastly the DSEA.




This doesn't speak directly to the earlier flights, but given that the used bags on the CSM were retained for analysis from day one, I think this would have been the procedure for all the moon landings. It also doesn't even prove fecal bags were used in the LM on Apollo 16; Haise almost certainly meant "if any were used, transfer them, and please don't tell me about it".



I can't swear Aldrin didn't toss a used diaper onto the moon, but I am strongly leaning towards "Myth: Busted" here.



Since the earlier flights involved shorter lunar stays, it's less likely that fecal bags were used at all; having to do one's business in the cramped LM cabin next to your crewmate would not have been pleasant. Lomotil and willpower can get you through two days pretty easily.



Table 2 in SP-368 Biomedical Results of Apollo appears to enumerate all the collected fecal samples from the Apollo missions, but unfortunately doesn't give timestamps or origin locations for them; it is also thus inconclusive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    56 mins ago
















8












$begingroup$

I believe used fecal bags from the LM were normally supposed to be transferred back to the CSM and returned with the crew to Earth for analysis.



In the Apollo 15 flight journal, in the annotation after 174:14:00, we have this:




[As Apollo 15 disappears behind the Moon, Al switches on the Gamma-ray Spectrometer, X-ray Spectrometer and the Alpha Particle Spectrometer. The crew transfer all required items from the LM aided by a list in the Flight Plan that includes notes on where each item should be stored. The list includes film magazines, bagged rock and soil samples, core tubes including the very long deep core, food, used urine and fecal bags, and one of the OPS packages from the surface.]




That annotation was added after the fact, but in the Apollo 16 flight journal, at 191:19:09, while preparing to close out the LM for jettison, CAPCOM Haise gives the crew a checklist of items to transfer to the CSM:




191 19 09 Haise: Okay. Another little block you might write out to the left there, label it "Transfer Items." And, maybe you've already done some of these, but this will take care of some of the ones we missed having you do yesterday. And they're the PTK(?) [PPK], the Flight Kit, the purse with the unused food, and the used fecal-urine bags, and lastly the DSEA.




This doesn't speak directly to the earlier flights, but given that the used bags on the CSM were retained for analysis from day one, I think this would have been the procedure for all the moon landings. It also doesn't even prove fecal bags were used in the LM on Apollo 16; Haise almost certainly meant "if any were used, transfer them, and please don't tell me about it".



I can't swear Aldrin didn't toss a used diaper onto the moon, but I am strongly leaning towards "Myth: Busted" here.



Since the earlier flights involved shorter lunar stays, it's less likely that fecal bags were used at all; having to do one's business in the cramped LM cabin next to your crewmate would not have been pleasant. Lomotil and willpower can get you through two days pretty easily.



Table 2 in SP-368 Biomedical Results of Apollo appears to enumerate all the collected fecal samples from the Apollo missions, but unfortunately doesn't give timestamps or origin locations for them; it is also thus inconclusive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    56 mins ago














8












8








8





$begingroup$

I believe used fecal bags from the LM were normally supposed to be transferred back to the CSM and returned with the crew to Earth for analysis.



In the Apollo 15 flight journal, in the annotation after 174:14:00, we have this:




[As Apollo 15 disappears behind the Moon, Al switches on the Gamma-ray Spectrometer, X-ray Spectrometer and the Alpha Particle Spectrometer. The crew transfer all required items from the LM aided by a list in the Flight Plan that includes notes on where each item should be stored. The list includes film magazines, bagged rock and soil samples, core tubes including the very long deep core, food, used urine and fecal bags, and one of the OPS packages from the surface.]




That annotation was added after the fact, but in the Apollo 16 flight journal, at 191:19:09, while preparing to close out the LM for jettison, CAPCOM Haise gives the crew a checklist of items to transfer to the CSM:




191 19 09 Haise: Okay. Another little block you might write out to the left there, label it "Transfer Items." And, maybe you've already done some of these, but this will take care of some of the ones we missed having you do yesterday. And they're the PTK(?) [PPK], the Flight Kit, the purse with the unused food, and the used fecal-urine bags, and lastly the DSEA.




This doesn't speak directly to the earlier flights, but given that the used bags on the CSM were retained for analysis from day one, I think this would have been the procedure for all the moon landings. It also doesn't even prove fecal bags were used in the LM on Apollo 16; Haise almost certainly meant "if any were used, transfer them, and please don't tell me about it".



I can't swear Aldrin didn't toss a used diaper onto the moon, but I am strongly leaning towards "Myth: Busted" here.



Since the earlier flights involved shorter lunar stays, it's less likely that fecal bags were used at all; having to do one's business in the cramped LM cabin next to your crewmate would not have been pleasant. Lomotil and willpower can get you through two days pretty easily.



Table 2 in SP-368 Biomedical Results of Apollo appears to enumerate all the collected fecal samples from the Apollo missions, but unfortunately doesn't give timestamps or origin locations for them; it is also thus inconclusive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



I believe used fecal bags from the LM were normally supposed to be transferred back to the CSM and returned with the crew to Earth for analysis.



In the Apollo 15 flight journal, in the annotation after 174:14:00, we have this:




[As Apollo 15 disappears behind the Moon, Al switches on the Gamma-ray Spectrometer, X-ray Spectrometer and the Alpha Particle Spectrometer. The crew transfer all required items from the LM aided by a list in the Flight Plan that includes notes on where each item should be stored. The list includes film magazines, bagged rock and soil samples, core tubes including the very long deep core, food, used urine and fecal bags, and one of the OPS packages from the surface.]




That annotation was added after the fact, but in the Apollo 16 flight journal, at 191:19:09, while preparing to close out the LM for jettison, CAPCOM Haise gives the crew a checklist of items to transfer to the CSM:




191 19 09 Haise: Okay. Another little block you might write out to the left there, label it "Transfer Items." And, maybe you've already done some of these, but this will take care of some of the ones we missed having you do yesterday. And they're the PTK(?) [PPK], the Flight Kit, the purse with the unused food, and the used fecal-urine bags, and lastly the DSEA.




This doesn't speak directly to the earlier flights, but given that the used bags on the CSM were retained for analysis from day one, I think this would have been the procedure for all the moon landings. It also doesn't even prove fecal bags were used in the LM on Apollo 16; Haise almost certainly meant "if any were used, transfer them, and please don't tell me about it".



I can't swear Aldrin didn't toss a used diaper onto the moon, but I am strongly leaning towards "Myth: Busted" here.



Since the earlier flights involved shorter lunar stays, it's less likely that fecal bags were used at all; having to do one's business in the cramped LM cabin next to your crewmate would not have been pleasant. Lomotil and willpower can get you through two days pretty easily.



Table 2 in SP-368 Biomedical Results of Apollo appears to enumerate all the collected fecal samples from the Apollo missions, but unfortunately doesn't give timestamps or origin locations for them; it is also thus inconclusive.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove

101k3 gold badges353 silver badges437 bronze badges




101k3 gold badges353 silver badges437 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    56 mins ago













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    56 mins ago








2




2




$begingroup$
I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
$endgroup$
– called2voyage
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
$endgroup$
– called2voyage
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
"Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
57 mins ago




$begingroup$
"Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
57 mins ago












$begingroup$
@DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
56 mins ago





$begingroup$
@DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
56 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37952%2fdid-apollo-leave-poop-on-the-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу