Did Apollo leave poop on the moon?Is it ethical for Chang'e-4 to bring an entire ecosystem to the moon?Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?How was dust-mitigation addressed during the Apollo program?How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Why were the “perfectly functioning” seismometers placed by Apollo 12, 14, 15 and 16 astronauts all shut off in 1977?Were the Apollo lunar ALSEP transmitter signals ever analyzed or used after the experiments were shut down?How exactly did the floor of an Apollo LM look like after EVA(s)? Seeking photo!How would the Apollo telescope have worked in the Apollo command module? Where would it be located and how would it be operated?Should there be black crosses from the Réseau plate in this Apollo mission photograph? If so, where are they?Did Apollo-11 astronauts rehearse their photoshoots on Earth?How long were the Apollo astronauts allowed to breathe 100% oxygen at 1 atmosphere continuously?How “hard” did Apollo 12 turn left just before it landed?

Plato and the knowledge of the forms

Did silent film actors actually say their lines or did they simply improvise “dialogue” while being filmed?

Our group keeps dying during the Lost Mine of Phandelver campaign. What are we doing wrong?

Find only those folders that contain a File with the same name as the Folder

Identify Batman without getting caught

Write The Shortest Program To Check If A Binary Tree Is Balanced

A Checkmate of Dubious Legality

Traveling from Germany to other countries by train?

How to approach protecting my code as a research assistant? Should I be worried in the first place?

Ancients don't give a full level?

Whats the difference between <processors> and <pipelines> in Sitecore configuration?

How can I perform a deterministic physics simulation?

Does the length of a password for Wi-Fi affect speed?

The meaning of "scale" in "because diversions scale so easily wealth becomes concentrated"

How easy is it to get a gun illegally in the United States?

Examples of hyperbolic groups

Probably terminated or laid off soon; confront or not?

Can I enter Switzerland with only my London Driver's License?

Does a 4 bladed prop have almost twice the thrust of a 2 bladed prop?

How important is it to have a spot meter on the light meter?

Is space radiation a risk for space film photography, and how is this prevented?

Tile the chessboard with four-colored triominoes

A verb for when some rights are not violated?

Why am I not getting stuck in the loop



Did Apollo leave poop on the moon?


Is it ethical for Chang'e-4 to bring an entire ecosystem to the moon?Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?How was dust-mitigation addressed during the Apollo program?How did the Apollo astronauts train for the 1/6G lunar landing?Why were the “perfectly functioning” seismometers placed by Apollo 12, 14, 15 and 16 astronauts all shut off in 1977?Were the Apollo lunar ALSEP transmitter signals ever analyzed or used after the experiments were shut down?How exactly did the floor of an Apollo LM look like after EVA(s)? Seeking photo!How would the Apollo telescope have worked in the Apollo command module? Where would it be located and how would it be operated?Should there be black crosses from the Réseau plate in this Apollo mission photograph? If so, where are they?Did Apollo-11 astronauts rehearse their photoshoots on Earth?How long were the Apollo astronauts allowed to breathe 100% oxygen at 1 atmosphere continuously?How “hard” did Apollo 12 turn left just before it landed?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


If you google the question, you will find an abundance of sources discussing the alleged fact that the Apollo missions left bags of fecal matter on the moon. A conversation on reddit got me looking deeper. Someone claimed that the story of Apollo astronauts leaving bags of poop on the moon is an urban legend started by a misunderstanding.



At first glance, I was incredulous. There were lots of sources, even NASA employees and scientists, talking about the poop on the moon. However, I noticed that all of these sources were recent. None of them contemporary. When I started digging into what evidence was used for this claim, I found most people pointed to catalogs such as this, which reference emesis bags. However, emesis is vomit, and while it is conceivable these bags may have been used for defecation, that is not definitive. They were supposed to use fecal collection bags. More critically, an official source claims the emesis bags left were empty spares.



[As Russell mentions in the comments, these catalogs also have "defecation collection device" listed, but those may also be empty spares.]



We have had a related question here:



Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?



In this question it is discussed that defecation on the moon may not have occurred. However, it lacks a definitive answer to this question.



Is there contemporary evidence for the claim that bags containing fecal matter were left on the moon? Or have any of the Apollo astronauts explicitly verified this claim since the Apollo program ended? If not, is it possible to indicate whether the claims are plausible or straight-up legend?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    8 hours ago

















6












$begingroup$


If you google the question, you will find an abundance of sources discussing the alleged fact that the Apollo missions left bags of fecal matter on the moon. A conversation on reddit got me looking deeper. Someone claimed that the story of Apollo astronauts leaving bags of poop on the moon is an urban legend started by a misunderstanding.



At first glance, I was incredulous. There were lots of sources, even NASA employees and scientists, talking about the poop on the moon. However, I noticed that all of these sources were recent. None of them contemporary. When I started digging into what evidence was used for this claim, I found most people pointed to catalogs such as this, which reference emesis bags. However, emesis is vomit, and while it is conceivable these bags may have been used for defecation, that is not definitive. They were supposed to use fecal collection bags. More critically, an official source claims the emesis bags left were empty spares.



[As Russell mentions in the comments, these catalogs also have "defecation collection device" listed, but those may also be empty spares.]



We have had a related question here:



Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?



In this question it is discussed that defecation on the moon may not have occurred. However, it lacks a definitive answer to this question.



Is there contemporary evidence for the claim that bags containing fecal matter were left on the moon? Or have any of the Apollo astronauts explicitly verified this claim since the Apollo program ended? If not, is it possible to indicate whether the claims are plausible or straight-up legend?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    8 hours ago













6












6








6





$begingroup$


If you google the question, you will find an abundance of sources discussing the alleged fact that the Apollo missions left bags of fecal matter on the moon. A conversation on reddit got me looking deeper. Someone claimed that the story of Apollo astronauts leaving bags of poop on the moon is an urban legend started by a misunderstanding.



At first glance, I was incredulous. There were lots of sources, even NASA employees and scientists, talking about the poop on the moon. However, I noticed that all of these sources were recent. None of them contemporary. When I started digging into what evidence was used for this claim, I found most people pointed to catalogs such as this, which reference emesis bags. However, emesis is vomit, and while it is conceivable these bags may have been used for defecation, that is not definitive. They were supposed to use fecal collection bags. More critically, an official source claims the emesis bags left were empty spares.



[As Russell mentions in the comments, these catalogs also have "defecation collection device" listed, but those may also be empty spares.]



We have had a related question here:



Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?



In this question it is discussed that defecation on the moon may not have occurred. However, it lacks a definitive answer to this question.



Is there contemporary evidence for the claim that bags containing fecal matter were left on the moon? Or have any of the Apollo astronauts explicitly verified this claim since the Apollo program ended? If not, is it possible to indicate whether the claims are plausible or straight-up legend?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




If you google the question, you will find an abundance of sources discussing the alleged fact that the Apollo missions left bags of fecal matter on the moon. A conversation on reddit got me looking deeper. Someone claimed that the story of Apollo astronauts leaving bags of poop on the moon is an urban legend started by a misunderstanding.



At first glance, I was incredulous. There were lots of sources, even NASA employees and scientists, talking about the poop on the moon. However, I noticed that all of these sources were recent. None of them contemporary. When I started digging into what evidence was used for this claim, I found most people pointed to catalogs such as this, which reference emesis bags. However, emesis is vomit, and while it is conceivable these bags may have been used for defecation, that is not definitive. They were supposed to use fecal collection bags. More critically, an official source claims the emesis bags left were empty spares.



[As Russell mentions in the comments, these catalogs also have "defecation collection device" listed, but those may also be empty spares.]



We have had a related question here:



Did astronauts on the moon poop in front of each other?



In this question it is discussed that defecation on the moon may not have occurred. However, it lacks a definitive answer to this question.



Is there contemporary evidence for the claim that bags containing fecal matter were left on the moon? Or have any of the Apollo astronauts explicitly verified this claim since the Apollo program ended? If not, is it possible to indicate whether the claims are plausible or straight-up legend?







the-moon apollo-program astronaut-lifestyle waste






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago







called2voyage

















asked 9 hours ago









called2voyagecalled2voyage

17.5k7 gold badges81 silver badges131 bronze badges




17.5k7 gold badges81 silver badges131 bronze badges










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    8 hours ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
    $endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    8 hours ago







3




3




$begingroup$
A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
A former colleague of mine claimed to have had the job of collecting returned 'Apollo bags' at KSC and bringing them back to JSC for analysis. I assumed these were bags from the CM, but now I wish I had asked more questions. I wonder if I could contact that guy somehow....
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
9 hours ago













$begingroup$
The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
The second page of the catalog you link says "Defecation collection device [4]" as part of the Apollo 11 material. The Apollo 12, 14, 16, and 17 lists also include them.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
9 hours ago













$begingroup$
@RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
@RussellBorogove Yes, but the question is, do we have proof it was used, or was it also a spare?
$endgroup$
– called2voyage
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
A16 transcript at 191:19:09. Post-docking, during preparation for LM jettison, CAPCOM Haise reminds the crew to transfer "the used fecal-urine bags". history.nasa.gov/afj/ap16fj/24_Day9_Pt1.html
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
8 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

I believe used fecal bags from the LM were normally supposed to be transferred back to the CSM and returned with the crew to Earth for analysis.



In the Apollo 15 flight journal, in the annotation after 174:14:00, we have this:




[As Apollo 15 disappears behind the Moon, Al switches on the Gamma-ray Spectrometer, X-ray Spectrometer and the Alpha Particle Spectrometer. The crew transfer all required items from the LM aided by a list in the Flight Plan that includes notes on where each item should be stored. The list includes film magazines, bagged rock and soil samples, core tubes including the very long deep core, food, used urine and fecal bags, and one of the OPS packages from the surface.]




That annotation was added after the fact, but in the Apollo 16 flight journal, at 191:19:09, while preparing to close out the LM for jettison, CAPCOM Haise gives the crew a checklist of items to transfer to the CSM:




191 19 09 Haise: Okay. Another little block you might write out to the left there, label it "Transfer Items." And, maybe you've already done some of these, but this will take care of some of the ones we missed having you do yesterday. And they're the PTK(?) [PPK], the Flight Kit, the purse with the unused food, and the used fecal-urine bags, and lastly the DSEA.




This doesn't speak directly to the earlier flights, but given that the used bags on the CSM were retained for analysis from day one, I think this would have been the procedure for all the moon landings. It also doesn't even prove fecal bags were used in the LM on Apollo 16; Haise almost certainly meant "if any were used, transfer them, and please don't tell me about it".



I can't swear Aldrin didn't toss a used diaper onto the moon, but I am strongly leaning towards "Myth: Busted" here.



Since the earlier flights involved shorter lunar stays, it's less likely that fecal bags were used at all; having to do one's business in the cramped LM cabin next to your crewmate would not have been pleasant. Lomotil and willpower can get you through two days pretty easily.



Table 2 in SP-368 Biomedical Results of Apollo appears to enumerate all the collected fecal samples from the Apollo missions, but unfortunately doesn't give timestamps or origin locations for them; it is also thus inconclusive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    56 mins ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37952%2fdid-apollo-leave-poop-on-the-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

I believe used fecal bags from the LM were normally supposed to be transferred back to the CSM and returned with the crew to Earth for analysis.



In the Apollo 15 flight journal, in the annotation after 174:14:00, we have this:




[As Apollo 15 disappears behind the Moon, Al switches on the Gamma-ray Spectrometer, X-ray Spectrometer and the Alpha Particle Spectrometer. The crew transfer all required items from the LM aided by a list in the Flight Plan that includes notes on where each item should be stored. The list includes film magazines, bagged rock and soil samples, core tubes including the very long deep core, food, used urine and fecal bags, and one of the OPS packages from the surface.]




That annotation was added after the fact, but in the Apollo 16 flight journal, at 191:19:09, while preparing to close out the LM for jettison, CAPCOM Haise gives the crew a checklist of items to transfer to the CSM:




191 19 09 Haise: Okay. Another little block you might write out to the left there, label it "Transfer Items." And, maybe you've already done some of these, but this will take care of some of the ones we missed having you do yesterday. And they're the PTK(?) [PPK], the Flight Kit, the purse with the unused food, and the used fecal-urine bags, and lastly the DSEA.




This doesn't speak directly to the earlier flights, but given that the used bags on the CSM were retained for analysis from day one, I think this would have been the procedure for all the moon landings. It also doesn't even prove fecal bags were used in the LM on Apollo 16; Haise almost certainly meant "if any were used, transfer them, and please don't tell me about it".



I can't swear Aldrin didn't toss a used diaper onto the moon, but I am strongly leaning towards "Myth: Busted" here.



Since the earlier flights involved shorter lunar stays, it's less likely that fecal bags were used at all; having to do one's business in the cramped LM cabin next to your crewmate would not have been pleasant. Lomotil and willpower can get you through two days pretty easily.



Table 2 in SP-368 Biomedical Results of Apollo appears to enumerate all the collected fecal samples from the Apollo missions, but unfortunately doesn't give timestamps or origin locations for them; it is also thus inconclusive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    56 mins ago
















8












$begingroup$

I believe used fecal bags from the LM were normally supposed to be transferred back to the CSM and returned with the crew to Earth for analysis.



In the Apollo 15 flight journal, in the annotation after 174:14:00, we have this:




[As Apollo 15 disappears behind the Moon, Al switches on the Gamma-ray Spectrometer, X-ray Spectrometer and the Alpha Particle Spectrometer. The crew transfer all required items from the LM aided by a list in the Flight Plan that includes notes on where each item should be stored. The list includes film magazines, bagged rock and soil samples, core tubes including the very long deep core, food, used urine and fecal bags, and one of the OPS packages from the surface.]




That annotation was added after the fact, but in the Apollo 16 flight journal, at 191:19:09, while preparing to close out the LM for jettison, CAPCOM Haise gives the crew a checklist of items to transfer to the CSM:




191 19 09 Haise: Okay. Another little block you might write out to the left there, label it "Transfer Items." And, maybe you've already done some of these, but this will take care of some of the ones we missed having you do yesterday. And they're the PTK(?) [PPK], the Flight Kit, the purse with the unused food, and the used fecal-urine bags, and lastly the DSEA.




This doesn't speak directly to the earlier flights, but given that the used bags on the CSM were retained for analysis from day one, I think this would have been the procedure for all the moon landings. It also doesn't even prove fecal bags were used in the LM on Apollo 16; Haise almost certainly meant "if any were used, transfer them, and please don't tell me about it".



I can't swear Aldrin didn't toss a used diaper onto the moon, but I am strongly leaning towards "Myth: Busted" here.



Since the earlier flights involved shorter lunar stays, it's less likely that fecal bags were used at all; having to do one's business in the cramped LM cabin next to your crewmate would not have been pleasant. Lomotil and willpower can get you through two days pretty easily.



Table 2 in SP-368 Biomedical Results of Apollo appears to enumerate all the collected fecal samples from the Apollo missions, but unfortunately doesn't give timestamps or origin locations for them; it is also thus inconclusive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    56 mins ago














8












8








8





$begingroup$

I believe used fecal bags from the LM were normally supposed to be transferred back to the CSM and returned with the crew to Earth for analysis.



In the Apollo 15 flight journal, in the annotation after 174:14:00, we have this:




[As Apollo 15 disappears behind the Moon, Al switches on the Gamma-ray Spectrometer, X-ray Spectrometer and the Alpha Particle Spectrometer. The crew transfer all required items from the LM aided by a list in the Flight Plan that includes notes on where each item should be stored. The list includes film magazines, bagged rock and soil samples, core tubes including the very long deep core, food, used urine and fecal bags, and one of the OPS packages from the surface.]




That annotation was added after the fact, but in the Apollo 16 flight journal, at 191:19:09, while preparing to close out the LM for jettison, CAPCOM Haise gives the crew a checklist of items to transfer to the CSM:




191 19 09 Haise: Okay. Another little block you might write out to the left there, label it "Transfer Items." And, maybe you've already done some of these, but this will take care of some of the ones we missed having you do yesterday. And they're the PTK(?) [PPK], the Flight Kit, the purse with the unused food, and the used fecal-urine bags, and lastly the DSEA.




This doesn't speak directly to the earlier flights, but given that the used bags on the CSM were retained for analysis from day one, I think this would have been the procedure for all the moon landings. It also doesn't even prove fecal bags were used in the LM on Apollo 16; Haise almost certainly meant "if any were used, transfer them, and please don't tell me about it".



I can't swear Aldrin didn't toss a used diaper onto the moon, but I am strongly leaning towards "Myth: Busted" here.



Since the earlier flights involved shorter lunar stays, it's less likely that fecal bags were used at all; having to do one's business in the cramped LM cabin next to your crewmate would not have been pleasant. Lomotil and willpower can get you through two days pretty easily.



Table 2 in SP-368 Biomedical Results of Apollo appears to enumerate all the collected fecal samples from the Apollo missions, but unfortunately doesn't give timestamps or origin locations for them; it is also thus inconclusive.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



I believe used fecal bags from the LM were normally supposed to be transferred back to the CSM and returned with the crew to Earth for analysis.



In the Apollo 15 flight journal, in the annotation after 174:14:00, we have this:




[As Apollo 15 disappears behind the Moon, Al switches on the Gamma-ray Spectrometer, X-ray Spectrometer and the Alpha Particle Spectrometer. The crew transfer all required items from the LM aided by a list in the Flight Plan that includes notes on where each item should be stored. The list includes film magazines, bagged rock and soil samples, core tubes including the very long deep core, food, used urine and fecal bags, and one of the OPS packages from the surface.]




That annotation was added after the fact, but in the Apollo 16 flight journal, at 191:19:09, while preparing to close out the LM for jettison, CAPCOM Haise gives the crew a checklist of items to transfer to the CSM:




191 19 09 Haise: Okay. Another little block you might write out to the left there, label it "Transfer Items." And, maybe you've already done some of these, but this will take care of some of the ones we missed having you do yesterday. And they're the PTK(?) [PPK], the Flight Kit, the purse with the unused food, and the used fecal-urine bags, and lastly the DSEA.




This doesn't speak directly to the earlier flights, but given that the used bags on the CSM were retained for analysis from day one, I think this would have been the procedure for all the moon landings. It also doesn't even prove fecal bags were used in the LM on Apollo 16; Haise almost certainly meant "if any were used, transfer them, and please don't tell me about it".



I can't swear Aldrin didn't toss a used diaper onto the moon, but I am strongly leaning towards "Myth: Busted" here.



Since the earlier flights involved shorter lunar stays, it's less likely that fecal bags were used at all; having to do one's business in the cramped LM cabin next to your crewmate would not have been pleasant. Lomotil and willpower can get you through two days pretty easily.



Table 2 in SP-368 Biomedical Results of Apollo appears to enumerate all the collected fecal samples from the Apollo missions, but unfortunately doesn't give timestamps or origin locations for them; it is also thus inconclusive.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove

101k3 gold badges353 silver badges437 bronze badges




101k3 gold badges353 silver badges437 bronze badges










  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    56 mins ago













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
    $endgroup$
    – called2voyage
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    "Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
    $endgroup$
    – DrSheldon
    57 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
    $endgroup$
    – Russell Borogove
    56 mins ago








2




2




$begingroup$
I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
$endgroup$
– called2voyage
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
I hope we get a more definitive answer than this, but at the very least we can say it is sounding unlikely.
$endgroup$
– called2voyage
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
"Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
57 mins ago




$begingroup$
"Urine-fecal bag" doesn't sound right at all. Urine collection and disposal was a very different process with different equipment than fecal collection. Also, a diaper that is worn but never soiled would be considered a "used" device. Urine devices that had been worn would also count as "used".
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
57 mins ago












$begingroup$
@DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
56 mins ago





$begingroup$
@DrSheldon Yes, they're two separate things, about which I assume Fred Haise does not want to talk about in detail or at length. He means "fecal and/or urine bags and, really, I don't need to know." (The transcripts are full of "says X, means Y" annotations.)
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
56 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37952%2fdid-apollo-leave-poop-on-the-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)