Non-small objects in categoriesWhy aren't all small categories accessible?K-good trees and K-compactness of colimits over K-small downwards-closed subposets (500 point bounty if answered by Midnight EST))What's an example of a locally presentable category “in nature” that's not $aleph_0$-locally presentable?compact objects in model categories and $(infty,1)$-categoriesCompact objects in triangulated and infinity categoriesExistence of Colimits in the Definition of Locally Presentable CategoriesSmall objects vs Compact objectsA model category of abelian categories?What are compact objects in the category of topological spaces?Sufficient sets of colimits in small categories

Non-small objects in categories


Why aren't all small categories accessible?K-good trees and K-compactness of colimits over K-small downwards-closed subposets (500 point bounty if answered by Midnight EST))What's an example of a locally presentable category “in nature” that's not $aleph_0$-locally presentable?compact objects in model categories and $(infty,1)$-categoriesCompact objects in triangulated and infinity categoriesExistence of Colimits in the Definition of Locally Presentable CategoriesSmall objects vs Compact objectsA model category of abelian categories?What are compact objects in the category of topological spaces?Sufficient sets of colimits in small categories













5












$begingroup$


An object $c$ in a category is called small, if there exists some regular cardinal $kappa$ such that $Hom(c,-)$ preserves $kappa$-filtered colimits.



Is there an example of a (locally small) category $C$ and an object $c$ of $C$, such that $c$ is not small, i.e. such that $Hom(c,-)$ doesn't preserve all $kappa$-filtered colimits for any $kappa$ whatsoever?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor



Peter Bonart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$


















    5












    $begingroup$


    An object $c$ in a category is called small, if there exists some regular cardinal $kappa$ such that $Hom(c,-)$ preserves $kappa$-filtered colimits.



    Is there an example of a (locally small) category $C$ and an object $c$ of $C$, such that $c$ is not small, i.e. such that $Hom(c,-)$ doesn't preserve all $kappa$-filtered colimits for any $kappa$ whatsoever?










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor



    Peter Bonart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$
















      5












      5








      5


      1



      $begingroup$


      An object $c$ in a category is called small, if there exists some regular cardinal $kappa$ such that $Hom(c,-)$ preserves $kappa$-filtered colimits.



      Is there an example of a (locally small) category $C$ and an object $c$ of $C$, such that $c$ is not small, i.e. such that $Hom(c,-)$ doesn't preserve all $kappa$-filtered colimits for any $kappa$ whatsoever?










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor



      Peter Bonart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$




      An object $c$ in a category is called small, if there exists some regular cardinal $kappa$ such that $Hom(c,-)$ preserves $kappa$-filtered colimits.



      Is there an example of a (locally small) category $C$ and an object $c$ of $C$, such that $c$ is not small, i.e. such that $Hom(c,-)$ doesn't preserve all $kappa$-filtered colimits for any $kappa$ whatsoever?







      ct.category-theory model-categories






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor



      Peter Bonart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor



      Peter Bonart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor



      Peter Bonart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 9 hours ago









      Peter BonartPeter Bonart

      261 bronze badge




      261 bronze badge




      New contributor



      Peter Bonart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      Peter Bonart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          In the opposite category of the category of sets, and of many algebraic categories, the only small objects are the empty set and the singleton. A conceptual reason for this is Freyd's (or Gabriel and Ulmer's?) theorem that it is impossible for a category and its opposite both to be locally presentable, unless they are both posets.



          Indeed, if $A$ is a set with at least two elements, consider functions $f:0,1^kappato A$ where $kappa$ is some infinite cardinal. If $lambda<kappa$ then $0,1^kappa$ may be viewed as a $lambda$-cofiltered limit of all products of at most $lambda$ of the copies of $0,1$. For $A$ to be $lambda$-small in $mathrmSet^mathrmop$, we would have to be able to guarantee that $f$ depends on at most $lambda$ coordinates in the domain.



          Since the opposite of the category of sets is the category of complete atomic Boolean algebras (CABAs), we can also make this argument directly in there, where it amounts to the fact that there are elements in a coproduct of CABAs that do not come from any smaller sub-coproduct, since we can always take a join or a meet of elements from every term in the coproduct.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$






















            5












            $begingroup$

            In the category $mathsfTop$ of topological spaces and continuous maps the only $lambda$-presentable objects are discrete spaces. This appears 1.14(6) in Locally presentable and Accessible categories by Adamek and Rosicky. The reason is explained in 1.2(10) in the same reference.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$










            • 1




              $begingroup$
              This example is also discussed before Lemma 2.4.1 of Mark Hovey's book Model Categories.
              $endgroup$
              – Reid Barton
              7 hours ago













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "504"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            Peter Bonart is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f337771%2fnon-small-objects-in-categories%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6












            $begingroup$

            In the opposite category of the category of sets, and of many algebraic categories, the only small objects are the empty set and the singleton. A conceptual reason for this is Freyd's (or Gabriel and Ulmer's?) theorem that it is impossible for a category and its opposite both to be locally presentable, unless they are both posets.



            Indeed, if $A$ is a set with at least two elements, consider functions $f:0,1^kappato A$ where $kappa$ is some infinite cardinal. If $lambda<kappa$ then $0,1^kappa$ may be viewed as a $lambda$-cofiltered limit of all products of at most $lambda$ of the copies of $0,1$. For $A$ to be $lambda$-small in $mathrmSet^mathrmop$, we would have to be able to guarantee that $f$ depends on at most $lambda$ coordinates in the domain.



            Since the opposite of the category of sets is the category of complete atomic Boolean algebras (CABAs), we can also make this argument directly in there, where it amounts to the fact that there are elements in a coproduct of CABAs that do not come from any smaller sub-coproduct, since we can always take a join or a meet of elements from every term in the coproduct.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



















              6












              $begingroup$

              In the opposite category of the category of sets, and of many algebraic categories, the only small objects are the empty set and the singleton. A conceptual reason for this is Freyd's (or Gabriel and Ulmer's?) theorem that it is impossible for a category and its opposite both to be locally presentable, unless they are both posets.



              Indeed, if $A$ is a set with at least two elements, consider functions $f:0,1^kappato A$ where $kappa$ is some infinite cardinal. If $lambda<kappa$ then $0,1^kappa$ may be viewed as a $lambda$-cofiltered limit of all products of at most $lambda$ of the copies of $0,1$. For $A$ to be $lambda$-small in $mathrmSet^mathrmop$, we would have to be able to guarantee that $f$ depends on at most $lambda$ coordinates in the domain.



              Since the opposite of the category of sets is the category of complete atomic Boolean algebras (CABAs), we can also make this argument directly in there, where it amounts to the fact that there are elements in a coproduct of CABAs that do not come from any smaller sub-coproduct, since we can always take a join or a meet of elements from every term in the coproduct.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                6












                6








                6





                $begingroup$

                In the opposite category of the category of sets, and of many algebraic categories, the only small objects are the empty set and the singleton. A conceptual reason for this is Freyd's (or Gabriel and Ulmer's?) theorem that it is impossible for a category and its opposite both to be locally presentable, unless they are both posets.



                Indeed, if $A$ is a set with at least two elements, consider functions $f:0,1^kappato A$ where $kappa$ is some infinite cardinal. If $lambda<kappa$ then $0,1^kappa$ may be viewed as a $lambda$-cofiltered limit of all products of at most $lambda$ of the copies of $0,1$. For $A$ to be $lambda$-small in $mathrmSet^mathrmop$, we would have to be able to guarantee that $f$ depends on at most $lambda$ coordinates in the domain.



                Since the opposite of the category of sets is the category of complete atomic Boolean algebras (CABAs), we can also make this argument directly in there, where it amounts to the fact that there are elements in a coproduct of CABAs that do not come from any smaller sub-coproduct, since we can always take a join or a meet of elements from every term in the coproduct.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                In the opposite category of the category of sets, and of many algebraic categories, the only small objects are the empty set and the singleton. A conceptual reason for this is Freyd's (or Gabriel and Ulmer's?) theorem that it is impossible for a category and its opposite both to be locally presentable, unless they are both posets.



                Indeed, if $A$ is a set with at least two elements, consider functions $f:0,1^kappato A$ where $kappa$ is some infinite cardinal. If $lambda<kappa$ then $0,1^kappa$ may be viewed as a $lambda$-cofiltered limit of all products of at most $lambda$ of the copies of $0,1$. For $A$ to be $lambda$-small in $mathrmSet^mathrmop$, we would have to be able to guarantee that $f$ depends on at most $lambda$ coordinates in the domain.



                Since the opposite of the category of sets is the category of complete atomic Boolean algebras (CABAs), we can also make this argument directly in there, where it amounts to the fact that there are elements in a coproduct of CABAs that do not come from any smaller sub-coproduct, since we can always take a join or a meet of elements from every term in the coproduct.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 8 hours ago

























                answered 8 hours ago









                Kevin CarlsonKevin Carlson

                6444 silver badges10 bronze badges




                6444 silver badges10 bronze badges
























                    5












                    $begingroup$

                    In the category $mathsfTop$ of topological spaces and continuous maps the only $lambda$-presentable objects are discrete spaces. This appears 1.14(6) in Locally presentable and Accessible categories by Adamek and Rosicky. The reason is explained in 1.2(10) in the same reference.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$










                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      This example is also discussed before Lemma 2.4.1 of Mark Hovey's book Model Categories.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Reid Barton
                      7 hours ago















                    5












                    $begingroup$

                    In the category $mathsfTop$ of topological spaces and continuous maps the only $lambda$-presentable objects are discrete spaces. This appears 1.14(6) in Locally presentable and Accessible categories by Adamek and Rosicky. The reason is explained in 1.2(10) in the same reference.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$










                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      This example is also discussed before Lemma 2.4.1 of Mark Hovey's book Model Categories.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Reid Barton
                      7 hours ago













                    5












                    5








                    5





                    $begingroup$

                    In the category $mathsfTop$ of topological spaces and continuous maps the only $lambda$-presentable objects are discrete spaces. This appears 1.14(6) in Locally presentable and Accessible categories by Adamek and Rosicky. The reason is explained in 1.2(10) in the same reference.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    In the category $mathsfTop$ of topological spaces and continuous maps the only $lambda$-presentable objects are discrete spaces. This appears 1.14(6) in Locally presentable and Accessible categories by Adamek and Rosicky. The reason is explained in 1.2(10) in the same reference.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 9 hours ago









                    Ivan Di LibertiIvan Di Liberti

                    1,9121 gold badge7 silver badges21 bronze badges




                    1,9121 gold badge7 silver badges21 bronze badges










                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      This example is also discussed before Lemma 2.4.1 of Mark Hovey's book Model Categories.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Reid Barton
                      7 hours ago












                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      This example is also discussed before Lemma 2.4.1 of Mark Hovey's book Model Categories.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Reid Barton
                      7 hours ago







                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    This example is also discussed before Lemma 2.4.1 of Mark Hovey's book Model Categories.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Reid Barton
                    7 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    This example is also discussed before Lemma 2.4.1 of Mark Hovey's book Model Categories.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Reid Barton
                    7 hours ago










                    Peter Bonart is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Peter Bonart is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Peter Bonart is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    Peter Bonart is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f337771%2fnon-small-objects-in-categories%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                    Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                    Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)