Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address?How big is the UTXO database?UTXO all sent to change address?Editing the utxo database?get the location of UTXO datautxo vs account-modelHow can I get UTXO for a specific address?Zcash T-address address wise UTXO transaction list both testnet and mainnet APII seem to have too many unspent outputs for my given balance. What am I missing?Uneconomical UTXO requestedBitcoin address generation and UTXO scanning
How can I perform a deterministic physics simulation?
Not been paid even after reminding the Treasurer; what should I do?
How to approach protecting my code as a research assistant? Should I be worried in the first place?
Why do proponents of guns oppose gun competency tests?
Does a 4 bladed prop have almost twice the thrust of a 2 bladed prop?
Is DC heating faster than AC heating?
How many years before enough atoms of your body are replaced to survive the sudden disappearance of the original body’s atoms?
Does a humanoid possessed by a ghost register as undead to a paladin's Divine Sense?
The meaning of "scale" in "because diversions scale so easily wealth becomes concentrated"
Is "safes" an acceptable alternative to "makes safe"
How to switch an 80286 from protected to real mode?
What is the probability of a biased coin coming up heads given that a liar is claiming that the coin came up heads?
Write The Shortest Program To Check If A Binary Tree Is Balanced
Whats the difference between <processors> and <pipelines> in Sitecore configuration?
Why do dragons like shiny stuff?
Is a switch from R to Python worth it?
I was contacted by a private bank overseas to get my inheritance
How does LIDAR avoid getting confused in an environment being scanned by hundreds of other LIDAR?
Ancients don't give a full level?
Non-small objects in categories
Can attackers change the public key of certificate during the SSL handshake
Why private jets such as GulfStream ones fly higher than other civil jets?
How to check a file was encrypted (really & correctly)
Why am I not getting stuck in the loop
Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address?
How big is the UTXO database?UTXO all sent to change address?Editing the utxo database?get the location of UTXO datautxo vs account-modelHow can I get UTXO for a specific address?Zcash T-address address wise UTXO transaction list both testnet and mainnet APII seem to have too many unspent outputs for my given balance. What am I missing?Uneconomical UTXO requestedBitcoin address generation and UTXO scanning
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.
Or am I missing something completely?
I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?
Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?
Thank-you!
utxo
asked 8 hours ago
wild_nothingwild_nothing
1083 bronze badges
New contributor
wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.
Or am I missing something completely?
I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?
Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?
Thank-you!
utxo
asked 8 hours ago
wild_nothingwild_nothing
1083 bronze badges
New contributor
wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.
Or am I missing something completely?
I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?
Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?
Thank-you!
utxo
asked 8 hours ago
wild_nothingwild_nothing
1083 bronze badges
New contributor
wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.
Or am I missing something completely?
I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?
Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?
Thank-you!
utxo
utxo
asked 8 hours ago
wild_nothingwild_nothing
1083 bronze badges
New contributor
wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
wild_nothingwild_nothing
1083 bronze badges
New contributor
wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
wild_nothingwild_nothing
1083 bronze badges
New contributor
wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
wild_nothingwild_nothing
1083 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
wild_nothingwild_nothing
1083 bronze badges
1083 bronze badges
New contributor
wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
wild_nothing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.
Not really. A UTXO is more like a particular bill or coin in that it's a specific "chunk" of value.
The reason UTXO is a concept is because bitcoin is designed as a set of UTXOs rather than as a balance. It's the same way cash is designed as a set of bills and coins rather than a balance. When you say, "I have $100.43 in cash", you mean that you have some set of bills and coins whose value totals to that amount. This is analogous to a set of UTXOs in bitcoin.
Or am I missing something completely?
I think what you're missing is that bitcoin was not designed to have accounts with balances as the primary implementation but to instead have a set of unspent outputs.
I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?
The blockchain doesn't care about addresses. If you have two UTXOs that you have the correct key(s) to claim, you can form a transaction that claims those two UTXOs and creates some new UTXOs as its output.
Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?
A "current address balance" is the total value of all the UTXOs a particular key can claim.
answered 8 hours ago
David SchwartzDavid Schwartz
46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges
So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?
– wild_nothing
7 hours ago
3
If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.
– David Schwartz
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "308"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
wild_nothing is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbitcoin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89620%2fis-utxo-synonymous-with-leftover-money-in-an-address%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.
Not really. A UTXO is more like a particular bill or coin in that it's a specific "chunk" of value.
The reason UTXO is a concept is because bitcoin is designed as a set of UTXOs rather than as a balance. It's the same way cash is designed as a set of bills and coins rather than a balance. When you say, "I have $100.43 in cash", you mean that you have some set of bills and coins whose value totals to that amount. This is analogous to a set of UTXOs in bitcoin.
Or am I missing something completely?
I think what you're missing is that bitcoin was not designed to have accounts with balances as the primary implementation but to instead have a set of unspent outputs.
I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?
The blockchain doesn't care about addresses. If you have two UTXOs that you have the correct key(s) to claim, you can form a transaction that claims those two UTXOs and creates some new UTXOs as its output.
Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?
A "current address balance" is the total value of all the UTXOs a particular key can claim.
answered 8 hours ago
David SchwartzDavid Schwartz
46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges
So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?
– wild_nothing
7 hours ago
3
If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.
– David Schwartz
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.
Not really. A UTXO is more like a particular bill or coin in that it's a specific "chunk" of value.
The reason UTXO is a concept is because bitcoin is designed as a set of UTXOs rather than as a balance. It's the same way cash is designed as a set of bills and coins rather than a balance. When you say, "I have $100.43 in cash", you mean that you have some set of bills and coins whose value totals to that amount. This is analogous to a set of UTXOs in bitcoin.
Or am I missing something completely?
I think what you're missing is that bitcoin was not designed to have accounts with balances as the primary implementation but to instead have a set of unspent outputs.
I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?
The blockchain doesn't care about addresses. If you have two UTXOs that you have the correct key(s) to claim, you can form a transaction that claims those two UTXOs and creates some new UTXOs as its output.
Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?
A "current address balance" is the total value of all the UTXOs a particular key can claim.
answered 8 hours ago
David SchwartzDavid Schwartz
46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges
So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?
– wild_nothing
7 hours ago
3
If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.
– David Schwartz
7 hours ago
add a comment |
Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.
Not really. A UTXO is more like a particular bill or coin in that it's a specific "chunk" of value.
The reason UTXO is a concept is because bitcoin is designed as a set of UTXOs rather than as a balance. It's the same way cash is designed as a set of bills and coins rather than a balance. When you say, "I have $100.43 in cash", you mean that you have some set of bills and coins whose value totals to that amount. This is analogous to a set of UTXOs in bitcoin.
Or am I missing something completely?
I think what you're missing is that bitcoin was not designed to have accounts with balances as the primary implementation but to instead have a set of unspent outputs.
I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?
The blockchain doesn't care about addresses. If you have two UTXOs that you have the correct key(s) to claim, you can form a transaction that claims those two UTXOs and creates some new UTXOs as its output.
Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?
A "current address balance" is the total value of all the UTXOs a particular key can claim.
answered 8 hours ago
David SchwartzDavid Schwartz
46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges
Is UTXO synonymous with leftover money in an address and the only reason UTXO is even a concept is due to security concerns of not changing an address after every transaction? Hence, your "unspent outputs" must be moved to x address.
Not really. A UTXO is more like a particular bill or coin in that it's a specific "chunk" of value.
The reason UTXO is a concept is because bitcoin is designed as a set of UTXOs rather than as a balance. It's the same way cash is designed as a set of bills and coins rather than a balance. When you say, "I have $100.43 in cash", you mean that you have some set of bills and coins whose value totals to that amount. This is analogous to a set of UTXOs in bitcoin.
Or am I missing something completely?
I think what you're missing is that bitcoin was not designed to have accounts with balances as the primary implementation but to instead have a set of unspent outputs.
I read that you might have $10 balance in an address but your UTXOs might be $2 and $8 in the same address. How does this affect execution of a transaction on the blockchain?
The blockchain doesn't care about addresses. If you have two UTXOs that you have the correct key(s) to claim, you can form a transaction that claims those two UTXOs and creates some new UTXOs as its output.
Can somebody please shed some light on the difference between UTXOs and current address balance?
A "current address balance" is the total value of all the UTXOs a particular key can claim.
answered 8 hours ago
David SchwartzDavid Schwartz
46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
David SchwartzDavid Schwartz
46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
David SchwartzDavid Schwartz
46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
David SchwartzDavid Schwartz
46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges
46.1k5 gold badges95 silver badges165 bronze badges
So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?
– wild_nothing
7 hours ago
3
If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.
– David Schwartz
7 hours ago
add a comment |
So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?
– wild_nothing
7 hours ago
3
If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.
– David Schwartz
7 hours ago
So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?
– wild_nothing
7 hours ago
So what you're saying is that a (non HD) private key can have one address and multiple UTXOs which total the balance on that address?
– wild_nothing
7 hours ago
3
3
If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.
– David Schwartz
7 hours ago
If you total the UTXOs, you get a number that you can think of as the balance on that address. But the blockchain itself doesn't give that number any particular meaning -- it's just UTXOs.
– David Schwartz
7 hours ago
add a comment |
wild_nothing is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
wild_nothing is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
wild_nothing is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
wild_nothing is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Bitcoin Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbitcoin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f89620%2fis-utxo-synonymous-with-leftover-money-in-an-address%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
