How would timezones work on a planet 100 times the size of our EarthHow would rogue planet civilization track the passage of time?On a planet without seasons, how would people track years?Creating a realistic timekeeping system for a fantasy worldMultiple moons orbiting a gas giant: How would I calculate how long it appears for a closer moon to orbit the planet from a further-out moon?Acceptable time countHow do I calculate solar altitude and hour angle from the surface of another planet?How to distinguish the different phases of the day when the sun rises and sets multiple times?
Heating Margarine in Pan = loss of calories?
If "more guns less crime", how do gun advocates explain that the EU has less crime than the US?
A continuous water "planet" ring around a star
Why are Tucker and Malcolm not dead?
80's/90's superhero cartoon with a man on fire and a man who made ice runways like Frozone
Heat equation: Squiggly lines
Do beef farmed pastures net remove carbon emissions?
Is it okay for a ticket seller in the USA to refuse to give you your change, keep it for themselves and claim it's a tip?
Solution to German Tank Problem
PhD advisor lost funding, need advice
Can a PC use the Levitate spell to avoid movement speed reduction from exhaustion?
Should I not go forward with internship interview process if I don't have the time to prepare properly?
How to describe accents?
Graphs for which a calculus student can reasonably compute the arclength
How would timezones work on a planet 100 times the size of our Earth
Loading military units into ships optimally, using backtracking
The cat ate your input again!
How do some PhD students get 10+ papers? Is that what I need for landing good faculty position?
Why command hierarchy, if the chain of command is standing next to each other?
Why does the standard fingering / strumming for a D maj chord leave out the 5th string?
Plotting octahedron inside the sphere and sphere inside the cube
Is there any way to stop a user from creating executables and running them?
Is There a Tool to Select Files to Download From an Org in VSCode?
Safest way to store environment variable value in a file
How would timezones work on a planet 100 times the size of our Earth
How would rogue planet civilization track the passage of time?On a planet without seasons, how would people track years?Creating a realistic timekeeping system for a fantasy worldMultiple moons orbiting a gas giant: How would I calculate how long it appears for a closer moon to orbit the planet from a further-out moon?Acceptable time countHow do I calculate solar altitude and hour angle from the surface of another planet?How to distinguish the different phases of the day when the sun rises and sets multiple times?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I thought the answer would be simple and maybe it is, but it's just rattling my brain.
If there was a planet 100 times the circumference of Earth, assuming everything is similar to Earth, 1 day (1 rotation) is 24 hours (therefore the planet will be spinning faster than Earth?) so I was wondering:
Would there still be 24 time zones, one for each hour? As the planet is just a sphere and the sun would just simply hit the areas it can see regardless of the larger size. So I'm assuming there would only 24 zones.
But trying to imagine someone getting up in China the same time someone gets up on the west coast of America is getting to me, but since the planet must be spinning faster to compensate, it should make sense?
time-keeping
New contributor
$endgroup$
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
I thought the answer would be simple and maybe it is, but it's just rattling my brain.
If there was a planet 100 times the circumference of Earth, assuming everything is similar to Earth, 1 day (1 rotation) is 24 hours (therefore the planet will be spinning faster than Earth?) so I was wondering:
Would there still be 24 time zones, one for each hour? As the planet is just a sphere and the sun would just simply hit the areas it can see regardless of the larger size. So I'm assuming there would only 24 zones.
But trying to imagine someone getting up in China the same time someone gets up on the west coast of America is getting to me, but since the planet must be spinning faster to compensate, it should make sense?
time-keeping
New contributor
$endgroup$
13
$begingroup$
On the planet wich is 1 000 000 (one million) times more massive than Earth, no one would ever get up. It would be a star, not a planet.
$endgroup$
– ksbes
17 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
BTW, Earth has 37 time zones -- but that's because there are a number of off-longitude and half-hour zones.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
17 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
While a rotation may take 24 hours, is that what the natives consider "a day"? Do they divide a day into 24 "hours"? 30 "reps"? 18 "toqs"?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
You're talking about a body a little under half the radius of the sun, and, if its composition is similar to Earth's, far more massive, carefully consider if you actually need something that big, having built many huge worlds they're rarely worth the effort.
$endgroup$
– Ash
16 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Your "America vs China" comparison falls down on the fact that the curvature would be so much less: while the physical distance is large, the time difference between noon in each would be much less. On the other hand, "Flat Earth" might get more traction!
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
15 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
I thought the answer would be simple and maybe it is, but it's just rattling my brain.
If there was a planet 100 times the circumference of Earth, assuming everything is similar to Earth, 1 day (1 rotation) is 24 hours (therefore the planet will be spinning faster than Earth?) so I was wondering:
Would there still be 24 time zones, one for each hour? As the planet is just a sphere and the sun would just simply hit the areas it can see regardless of the larger size. So I'm assuming there would only 24 zones.
But trying to imagine someone getting up in China the same time someone gets up on the west coast of America is getting to me, but since the planet must be spinning faster to compensate, it should make sense?
time-keeping
New contributor
$endgroup$
I thought the answer would be simple and maybe it is, but it's just rattling my brain.
If there was a planet 100 times the circumference of Earth, assuming everything is similar to Earth, 1 day (1 rotation) is 24 hours (therefore the planet will be spinning faster than Earth?) so I was wondering:
Would there still be 24 time zones, one for each hour? As the planet is just a sphere and the sun would just simply hit the areas it can see regardless of the larger size. So I'm assuming there would only 24 zones.
But trying to imagine someone getting up in China the same time someone gets up on the west coast of America is getting to me, but since the planet must be spinning faster to compensate, it should make sense?
time-keeping
time-keeping
New contributor
New contributor
edited 16 hours ago
a CVn♦
22.6k13 gold badges94 silver badges185 bronze badges
22.6k13 gold badges94 silver badges185 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 17 hours ago
Joseph WebberJoseph Webber
367 bronze badges
367 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
13
$begingroup$
On the planet wich is 1 000 000 (one million) times more massive than Earth, no one would ever get up. It would be a star, not a planet.
$endgroup$
– ksbes
17 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
BTW, Earth has 37 time zones -- but that's because there are a number of off-longitude and half-hour zones.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
17 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
While a rotation may take 24 hours, is that what the natives consider "a day"? Do they divide a day into 24 "hours"? 30 "reps"? 18 "toqs"?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
You're talking about a body a little under half the radius of the sun, and, if its composition is similar to Earth's, far more massive, carefully consider if you actually need something that big, having built many huge worlds they're rarely worth the effort.
$endgroup$
– Ash
16 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Your "America vs China" comparison falls down on the fact that the curvature would be so much less: while the physical distance is large, the time difference between noon in each would be much less. On the other hand, "Flat Earth" might get more traction!
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
15 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
13
$begingroup$
On the planet wich is 1 000 000 (one million) times more massive than Earth, no one would ever get up. It would be a star, not a planet.
$endgroup$
– ksbes
17 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
BTW, Earth has 37 time zones -- but that's because there are a number of off-longitude and half-hour zones.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
17 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
While a rotation may take 24 hours, is that what the natives consider "a day"? Do they divide a day into 24 "hours"? 30 "reps"? 18 "toqs"?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
You're talking about a body a little under half the radius of the sun, and, if its composition is similar to Earth's, far more massive, carefully consider if you actually need something that big, having built many huge worlds they're rarely worth the effort.
$endgroup$
– Ash
16 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Your "America vs China" comparison falls down on the fact that the curvature would be so much less: while the physical distance is large, the time difference between noon in each would be much less. On the other hand, "Flat Earth" might get more traction!
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
15 hours ago
13
13
$begingroup$
On the planet wich is 1 000 000 (one million) times more massive than Earth, no one would ever get up. It would be a star, not a planet.
$endgroup$
– ksbes
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
On the planet wich is 1 000 000 (one million) times more massive than Earth, no one would ever get up. It would be a star, not a planet.
$endgroup$
– ksbes
17 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
BTW, Earth has 37 time zones -- but that's because there are a number of off-longitude and half-hour zones.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
BTW, Earth has 37 time zones -- but that's because there are a number of off-longitude and half-hour zones.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
17 hours ago
7
7
$begingroup$
While a rotation may take 24 hours, is that what the natives consider "a day"? Do they divide a day into 24 "hours"? 30 "reps"? 18 "toqs"?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
While a rotation may take 24 hours, is that what the natives consider "a day"? Do they divide a day into 24 "hours"? 30 "reps"? 18 "toqs"?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
You're talking about a body a little under half the radius of the sun, and, if its composition is similar to Earth's, far more massive, carefully consider if you actually need something that big, having built many huge worlds they're rarely worth the effort.
$endgroup$
– Ash
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
You're talking about a body a little under half the radius of the sun, and, if its composition is similar to Earth's, far more massive, carefully consider if you actually need something that big, having built many huge worlds they're rarely worth the effort.
$endgroup$
– Ash
16 hours ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Your "America vs China" comparison falls down on the fact that the curvature would be so much less: while the physical distance is large, the time difference between noon in each would be much less. On the other hand, "Flat Earth" might get more traction!
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
15 hours ago
$begingroup$
Your "America vs China" comparison falls down on the fact that the curvature would be so much less: while the physical distance is large, the time difference between noon in each would be much less. On the other hand, "Flat Earth" might get more traction!
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
15 hours ago
|
show 6 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You don't need to consider another planet, Earth is sufficient for this question.
The real problem is in thinking of time zones as a natural phenomenon. They aren't.
Take where I am right now. I'm located somewhat west of the center of my timezeone, so my clock is 20 minutes faster than a sun-based clock. And then there is daylight saving time, which adds another hour. Does it bother me (and others) that our clocks are "wrong" by an hour and twenty minutes? Not at all. Most people aren't even aware of the concept.
Take China as a larger example. By the sun, one end of the country is 4 hours different from the other end. But unlike other countries, China has only 1 official time zone, not 5. When some people get up and have breakfast their clocks will say 6:00, while for other people it will say 10:00. But in both cases, the sun has just risen. For some people "noon" is at 10:00, for others it is at 14:00. The official clock time doesn't match the sun's clock, but people get used to it.
And as for making a planet larger, it makes no difference. We can already see that situation here on Earth.
At the equator, 1-hour time zones are about 1000 miles across, but farther north, the lengths of the latitudes get smaller.
Iceland's time zone is only 440 miles across.
Even farther north, at Alert, Nunavut, Canada, the timezone is only 135 miles across.
Stand near the North Pole (or South Pole), and walk around it. You'll have to change your watch by an hour after each step.
Obviously time zones can become confusing and inconvenient when they are too small, but in such situations (remember, the zones are an entirely artificial human invention) it's common to designate the whole area as a single time zone (typically UTC) even though it spans many, or even all, actual time zones.
But in the OP situation, everything is larger, not smaller, so, except near the poles, time zones would be even less of a problem than they are on Earth.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I disagree about most people (in the US, anyway) not being aware of DST. The twise a year change is at best a considerable inconvenience. At worst, it's been correlated with an increase in heart attacks, strokes, and automobile accidents.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I sense some confusion in your ideas, let's try to set things straight.
a planet 100 times the size of earth, assuming everything is similar to earth, 1 day (1 rotation) is 24 hours (therefore the planet will be spinning faster than earth?)
Setting aside the plausibility of such a planet, Earth does a complete rotation around itself in 24 hours. This planet does a complete rotation around itself in 24 hours. The rotational velocity is the same for both.
Would there still be 24 time zones, one for each hour?
In principle yes, but it can also be that, due to the larger linear distances between the zone extremes, half hour time zones can be used. Don't forget time zones are just a convention, in the past each city had its own time.
But trying to imagine someone getting up in China the same time someone gets up on the west coast of America is getting to me,
This is blatantly false: if you look at the official time zones on Earth,
You see that while China is +8 UTC, America west coast is -8 UTC. This means 16 hours difference.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The comment about China and America was due to the distance, not the actual time zone difference, as the average timezone distance I found was around 1035 miles, while a world, where that's scaled by 100, would mean I assumed the sizes of the timezone would expand as well. The distance between China and California is around 6687 miles.
$endgroup$
– Joseph Webber
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Actually it's 8 hours difference the other way around.
$endgroup$
– Paŭlo Ebermann
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the planet rotates at the same rate as Earth, it'll have the same difference in sunrise, sunset, noon and midnight times for a given number of degrees of longitude, so will have the same "number of time zones" as Earth. These zones will naturally be much wider than those on Earth, but they'll work just the same way -- including needing a "date line" so you don't lose a day if you circumnavigate to the west (as Magellan's crew did).
However: The United States (prior to the annexation of Alaska and Hawaii in 1959) had four time zones for a width of around 3000 miles. If the United States were, instead, 300,000 miles wide, there might well be three hundred time zones. Why?
Time zones originally came from railroads. Before the 1860s, each town would set its clocks based on (usually) local noon, because it's easy to measure. But with railroads and telegraphs, it was necessary to know what time the train would arrive and depart -- which meant it was necessary, as well, to know what time it was in Tempe when you were leaving Kansas City. Having only four zones for the whole nation meant you could know that Tempe, Sheridan, and Butte had their clocks set the same -- and telegraphy made this actually practical, by allowing near-instantaneous transmission of time synchronizing signals.
But trains can only travel a few hundred miles in a day (at least with early steam technology), so there's no need to have time zones as coarse as 75,000 miles across -- there might well be "minute" zones, and they'd still be wider than the "hour" zones we have on Earth.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What if they decide to make time zones half-hourly, and have 48 that are 50-times as wide as ours? Or minutely, and have 1440 time zones that are 5/3 as wide as ours?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's up to your railroaders and telegraphers. But why would you need a time zone to be 35,000+ miles across? It'd take a full day to cross it, even in a 747.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Chronocidal Then again, minute zones have the issue of requiring a table to tell what time it is virtually anywhere. I can remember the zones of most of Earth's major cities, but with 1440 zones (and ten thousand times as many cities as Earth) there's just no way...
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
As you say, 10,000 times as many cities. By comparison, Earth has less than 5,000 cities, so you're looking at more than 2 cities for every city on Earth per city on Earth! I think you'd be hard pressed just to remember the major Countries, let alone Cities
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
The idea of 300 time zones is intriguing, but there's not really a need to have time zones that are less coarse than 75,000 miles across, either. The idea is to have standardized clock times that roughly correspond to solar times. Geographically larger time zones would correspond equally well to solar times, so chopping them into more, smaller time zones gets you a system that's more complex but ultimately not much more useful. I don't care if solar noon comes at 12:15 or 12:30.
$endgroup$
– Nuclear Wang
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
"Timezone" are all "subjective"! It was first created by Scottish-born Canadian Sir Sandford Fleming in 1876. It's all for us-human-being's convenience!
The very fact that the timezone lines on Earth are all crooked at many places prove it!
The Greenland lay across 5 timezones! But they don't like the idea and make the whole chunk of land under 1 timezone!
And if you across the sea from the Northwest coast to Quttinirpaaq National Park, you had "jumped" across "TWO" timezones!
And certain countries have "Daylight Saving Time"! Which means in the same timezone, the time is different in Summer and Winter time!
That further proved that "time and timezone" are all for "OUR" convenience!
So to come back to your question, you could have "as many timezones as you want"!
You can even divide the globe into "15-minute-timezones" if you so wish!
And that might be a better idea since your planet is SO~ big!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Joseph Webber is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152759%2fhow-would-timezones-work-on-a-planet-100-times-the-size-of-our-earth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You don't need to consider another planet, Earth is sufficient for this question.
The real problem is in thinking of time zones as a natural phenomenon. They aren't.
Take where I am right now. I'm located somewhat west of the center of my timezeone, so my clock is 20 minutes faster than a sun-based clock. And then there is daylight saving time, which adds another hour. Does it bother me (and others) that our clocks are "wrong" by an hour and twenty minutes? Not at all. Most people aren't even aware of the concept.
Take China as a larger example. By the sun, one end of the country is 4 hours different from the other end. But unlike other countries, China has only 1 official time zone, not 5. When some people get up and have breakfast their clocks will say 6:00, while for other people it will say 10:00. But in both cases, the sun has just risen. For some people "noon" is at 10:00, for others it is at 14:00. The official clock time doesn't match the sun's clock, but people get used to it.
And as for making a planet larger, it makes no difference. We can already see that situation here on Earth.
At the equator, 1-hour time zones are about 1000 miles across, but farther north, the lengths of the latitudes get smaller.
Iceland's time zone is only 440 miles across.
Even farther north, at Alert, Nunavut, Canada, the timezone is only 135 miles across.
Stand near the North Pole (or South Pole), and walk around it. You'll have to change your watch by an hour after each step.
Obviously time zones can become confusing and inconvenient when they are too small, but in such situations (remember, the zones are an entirely artificial human invention) it's common to designate the whole area as a single time zone (typically UTC) even though it spans many, or even all, actual time zones.
But in the OP situation, everything is larger, not smaller, so, except near the poles, time zones would be even less of a problem than they are on Earth.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I disagree about most people (in the US, anyway) not being aware of DST. The twise a year change is at best a considerable inconvenience. At worst, it's been correlated with an increase in heart attacks, strokes, and automobile accidents.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You don't need to consider another planet, Earth is sufficient for this question.
The real problem is in thinking of time zones as a natural phenomenon. They aren't.
Take where I am right now. I'm located somewhat west of the center of my timezeone, so my clock is 20 minutes faster than a sun-based clock. And then there is daylight saving time, which adds another hour. Does it bother me (and others) that our clocks are "wrong" by an hour and twenty minutes? Not at all. Most people aren't even aware of the concept.
Take China as a larger example. By the sun, one end of the country is 4 hours different from the other end. But unlike other countries, China has only 1 official time zone, not 5. When some people get up and have breakfast their clocks will say 6:00, while for other people it will say 10:00. But in both cases, the sun has just risen. For some people "noon" is at 10:00, for others it is at 14:00. The official clock time doesn't match the sun's clock, but people get used to it.
And as for making a planet larger, it makes no difference. We can already see that situation here on Earth.
At the equator, 1-hour time zones are about 1000 miles across, but farther north, the lengths of the latitudes get smaller.
Iceland's time zone is only 440 miles across.
Even farther north, at Alert, Nunavut, Canada, the timezone is only 135 miles across.
Stand near the North Pole (or South Pole), and walk around it. You'll have to change your watch by an hour after each step.
Obviously time zones can become confusing and inconvenient when they are too small, but in such situations (remember, the zones are an entirely artificial human invention) it's common to designate the whole area as a single time zone (typically UTC) even though it spans many, or even all, actual time zones.
But in the OP situation, everything is larger, not smaller, so, except near the poles, time zones would be even less of a problem than they are on Earth.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I disagree about most people (in the US, anyway) not being aware of DST. The twise a year change is at best a considerable inconvenience. At worst, it's been correlated with an increase in heart attacks, strokes, and automobile accidents.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You don't need to consider another planet, Earth is sufficient for this question.
The real problem is in thinking of time zones as a natural phenomenon. They aren't.
Take where I am right now. I'm located somewhat west of the center of my timezeone, so my clock is 20 minutes faster than a sun-based clock. And then there is daylight saving time, which adds another hour. Does it bother me (and others) that our clocks are "wrong" by an hour and twenty minutes? Not at all. Most people aren't even aware of the concept.
Take China as a larger example. By the sun, one end of the country is 4 hours different from the other end. But unlike other countries, China has only 1 official time zone, not 5. When some people get up and have breakfast their clocks will say 6:00, while for other people it will say 10:00. But in both cases, the sun has just risen. For some people "noon" is at 10:00, for others it is at 14:00. The official clock time doesn't match the sun's clock, but people get used to it.
And as for making a planet larger, it makes no difference. We can already see that situation here on Earth.
At the equator, 1-hour time zones are about 1000 miles across, but farther north, the lengths of the latitudes get smaller.
Iceland's time zone is only 440 miles across.
Even farther north, at Alert, Nunavut, Canada, the timezone is only 135 miles across.
Stand near the North Pole (or South Pole), and walk around it. You'll have to change your watch by an hour after each step.
Obviously time zones can become confusing and inconvenient when they are too small, but in such situations (remember, the zones are an entirely artificial human invention) it's common to designate the whole area as a single time zone (typically UTC) even though it spans many, or even all, actual time zones.
But in the OP situation, everything is larger, not smaller, so, except near the poles, time zones would be even less of a problem than they are on Earth.
$endgroup$
You don't need to consider another planet, Earth is sufficient for this question.
The real problem is in thinking of time zones as a natural phenomenon. They aren't.
Take where I am right now. I'm located somewhat west of the center of my timezeone, so my clock is 20 minutes faster than a sun-based clock. And then there is daylight saving time, which adds another hour. Does it bother me (and others) that our clocks are "wrong" by an hour and twenty minutes? Not at all. Most people aren't even aware of the concept.
Take China as a larger example. By the sun, one end of the country is 4 hours different from the other end. But unlike other countries, China has only 1 official time zone, not 5. When some people get up and have breakfast their clocks will say 6:00, while for other people it will say 10:00. But in both cases, the sun has just risen. For some people "noon" is at 10:00, for others it is at 14:00. The official clock time doesn't match the sun's clock, but people get used to it.
And as for making a planet larger, it makes no difference. We can already see that situation here on Earth.
At the equator, 1-hour time zones are about 1000 miles across, but farther north, the lengths of the latitudes get smaller.
Iceland's time zone is only 440 miles across.
Even farther north, at Alert, Nunavut, Canada, the timezone is only 135 miles across.
Stand near the North Pole (or South Pole), and walk around it. You'll have to change your watch by an hour after each step.
Obviously time zones can become confusing and inconvenient when they are too small, but in such situations (remember, the zones are an entirely artificial human invention) it's common to designate the whole area as a single time zone (typically UTC) even though it spans many, or even all, actual time zones.
But in the OP situation, everything is larger, not smaller, so, except near the poles, time zones would be even less of a problem than they are on Earth.
answered 16 hours ago
Ray ButterworthRay Butterworth
1,8421 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
1,8421 gold badge4 silver badges13 bronze badges
$begingroup$
I disagree about most people (in the US, anyway) not being aware of DST. The twise a year change is at best a considerable inconvenience. At worst, it's been correlated with an increase in heart attacks, strokes, and automobile accidents.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I disagree about most people (in the US, anyway) not being aware of DST. The twise a year change is at best a considerable inconvenience. At worst, it's been correlated with an increase in heart attacks, strokes, and automobile accidents.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
I disagree about most people (in the US, anyway) not being aware of DST. The twise a year change is at best a considerable inconvenience. At worst, it's been correlated with an increase in heart attacks, strokes, and automobile accidents.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
53 mins ago
$begingroup$
I disagree about most people (in the US, anyway) not being aware of DST. The twise a year change is at best a considerable inconvenience. At worst, it's been correlated with an increase in heart attacks, strokes, and automobile accidents.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
53 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I sense some confusion in your ideas, let's try to set things straight.
a planet 100 times the size of earth, assuming everything is similar to earth, 1 day (1 rotation) is 24 hours (therefore the planet will be spinning faster than earth?)
Setting aside the plausibility of such a planet, Earth does a complete rotation around itself in 24 hours. This planet does a complete rotation around itself in 24 hours. The rotational velocity is the same for both.
Would there still be 24 time zones, one for each hour?
In principle yes, but it can also be that, due to the larger linear distances between the zone extremes, half hour time zones can be used. Don't forget time zones are just a convention, in the past each city had its own time.
But trying to imagine someone getting up in China the same time someone gets up on the west coast of America is getting to me,
This is blatantly false: if you look at the official time zones on Earth,
You see that while China is +8 UTC, America west coast is -8 UTC. This means 16 hours difference.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The comment about China and America was due to the distance, not the actual time zone difference, as the average timezone distance I found was around 1035 miles, while a world, where that's scaled by 100, would mean I assumed the sizes of the timezone would expand as well. The distance between China and California is around 6687 miles.
$endgroup$
– Joseph Webber
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Actually it's 8 hours difference the other way around.
$endgroup$
– Paŭlo Ebermann
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I sense some confusion in your ideas, let's try to set things straight.
a planet 100 times the size of earth, assuming everything is similar to earth, 1 day (1 rotation) is 24 hours (therefore the planet will be spinning faster than earth?)
Setting aside the plausibility of such a planet, Earth does a complete rotation around itself in 24 hours. This planet does a complete rotation around itself in 24 hours. The rotational velocity is the same for both.
Would there still be 24 time zones, one for each hour?
In principle yes, but it can also be that, due to the larger linear distances between the zone extremes, half hour time zones can be used. Don't forget time zones are just a convention, in the past each city had its own time.
But trying to imagine someone getting up in China the same time someone gets up on the west coast of America is getting to me,
This is blatantly false: if you look at the official time zones on Earth,
You see that while China is +8 UTC, America west coast is -8 UTC. This means 16 hours difference.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The comment about China and America was due to the distance, not the actual time zone difference, as the average timezone distance I found was around 1035 miles, while a world, where that's scaled by 100, would mean I assumed the sizes of the timezone would expand as well. The distance between China and California is around 6687 miles.
$endgroup$
– Joseph Webber
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Actually it's 8 hours difference the other way around.
$endgroup$
– Paŭlo Ebermann
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I sense some confusion in your ideas, let's try to set things straight.
a planet 100 times the size of earth, assuming everything is similar to earth, 1 day (1 rotation) is 24 hours (therefore the planet will be spinning faster than earth?)
Setting aside the plausibility of such a planet, Earth does a complete rotation around itself in 24 hours. This planet does a complete rotation around itself in 24 hours. The rotational velocity is the same for both.
Would there still be 24 time zones, one for each hour?
In principle yes, but it can also be that, due to the larger linear distances between the zone extremes, half hour time zones can be used. Don't forget time zones are just a convention, in the past each city had its own time.
But trying to imagine someone getting up in China the same time someone gets up on the west coast of America is getting to me,
This is blatantly false: if you look at the official time zones on Earth,
You see that while China is +8 UTC, America west coast is -8 UTC. This means 16 hours difference.
$endgroup$
I sense some confusion in your ideas, let's try to set things straight.
a planet 100 times the size of earth, assuming everything is similar to earth, 1 day (1 rotation) is 24 hours (therefore the planet will be spinning faster than earth?)
Setting aside the plausibility of such a planet, Earth does a complete rotation around itself in 24 hours. This planet does a complete rotation around itself in 24 hours. The rotational velocity is the same for both.
Would there still be 24 time zones, one for each hour?
In principle yes, but it can also be that, due to the larger linear distances between the zone extremes, half hour time zones can be used. Don't forget time zones are just a convention, in the past each city had its own time.
But trying to imagine someone getting up in China the same time someone gets up on the west coast of America is getting to me,
This is blatantly false: if you look at the official time zones on Earth,
You see that while China is +8 UTC, America west coast is -8 UTC. This means 16 hours difference.
edited 6 hours ago
Community♦
1
1
answered 17 hours ago
L.Dutch♦L.Dutch
108k33 gold badges256 silver badges520 bronze badges
108k33 gold badges256 silver badges520 bronze badges
$begingroup$
The comment about China and America was due to the distance, not the actual time zone difference, as the average timezone distance I found was around 1035 miles, while a world, where that's scaled by 100, would mean I assumed the sizes of the timezone would expand as well. The distance between China and California is around 6687 miles.
$endgroup$
– Joseph Webber
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Actually it's 8 hours difference the other way around.
$endgroup$
– Paŭlo Ebermann
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The comment about China and America was due to the distance, not the actual time zone difference, as the average timezone distance I found was around 1035 miles, while a world, where that's scaled by 100, would mean I assumed the sizes of the timezone would expand as well. The distance between China and California is around 6687 miles.
$endgroup$
– Joseph Webber
17 hours ago
3
$begingroup$
Actually it's 8 hours difference the other way around.
$endgroup$
– Paŭlo Ebermann
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
The comment about China and America was due to the distance, not the actual time zone difference, as the average timezone distance I found was around 1035 miles, while a world, where that's scaled by 100, would mean I assumed the sizes of the timezone would expand as well. The distance between China and California is around 6687 miles.
$endgroup$
– Joseph Webber
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
The comment about China and America was due to the distance, not the actual time zone difference, as the average timezone distance I found was around 1035 miles, while a world, where that's scaled by 100, would mean I assumed the sizes of the timezone would expand as well. The distance between China and California is around 6687 miles.
$endgroup$
– Joseph Webber
17 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Actually it's 8 hours difference the other way around.
$endgroup$
– Paŭlo Ebermann
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Actually it's 8 hours difference the other way around.
$endgroup$
– Paŭlo Ebermann
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the planet rotates at the same rate as Earth, it'll have the same difference in sunrise, sunset, noon and midnight times for a given number of degrees of longitude, so will have the same "number of time zones" as Earth. These zones will naturally be much wider than those on Earth, but they'll work just the same way -- including needing a "date line" so you don't lose a day if you circumnavigate to the west (as Magellan's crew did).
However: The United States (prior to the annexation of Alaska and Hawaii in 1959) had four time zones for a width of around 3000 miles. If the United States were, instead, 300,000 miles wide, there might well be three hundred time zones. Why?
Time zones originally came from railroads. Before the 1860s, each town would set its clocks based on (usually) local noon, because it's easy to measure. But with railroads and telegraphs, it was necessary to know what time the train would arrive and depart -- which meant it was necessary, as well, to know what time it was in Tempe when you were leaving Kansas City. Having only four zones for the whole nation meant you could know that Tempe, Sheridan, and Butte had their clocks set the same -- and telegraphy made this actually practical, by allowing near-instantaneous transmission of time synchronizing signals.
But trains can only travel a few hundred miles in a day (at least with early steam technology), so there's no need to have time zones as coarse as 75,000 miles across -- there might well be "minute" zones, and they'd still be wider than the "hour" zones we have on Earth.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What if they decide to make time zones half-hourly, and have 48 that are 50-times as wide as ours? Or minutely, and have 1440 time zones that are 5/3 as wide as ours?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's up to your railroaders and telegraphers. But why would you need a time zone to be 35,000+ miles across? It'd take a full day to cross it, even in a 747.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Chronocidal Then again, minute zones have the issue of requiring a table to tell what time it is virtually anywhere. I can remember the zones of most of Earth's major cities, but with 1440 zones (and ten thousand times as many cities as Earth) there's just no way...
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
As you say, 10,000 times as many cities. By comparison, Earth has less than 5,000 cities, so you're looking at more than 2 cities for every city on Earth per city on Earth! I think you'd be hard pressed just to remember the major Countries, let alone Cities
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
The idea of 300 time zones is intriguing, but there's not really a need to have time zones that are less coarse than 75,000 miles across, either. The idea is to have standardized clock times that roughly correspond to solar times. Geographically larger time zones would correspond equally well to solar times, so chopping them into more, smaller time zones gets you a system that's more complex but ultimately not much more useful. I don't care if solar noon comes at 12:15 or 12:30.
$endgroup$
– Nuclear Wang
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
If the planet rotates at the same rate as Earth, it'll have the same difference in sunrise, sunset, noon and midnight times for a given number of degrees of longitude, so will have the same "number of time zones" as Earth. These zones will naturally be much wider than those on Earth, but they'll work just the same way -- including needing a "date line" so you don't lose a day if you circumnavigate to the west (as Magellan's crew did).
However: The United States (prior to the annexation of Alaska and Hawaii in 1959) had four time zones for a width of around 3000 miles. If the United States were, instead, 300,000 miles wide, there might well be three hundred time zones. Why?
Time zones originally came from railroads. Before the 1860s, each town would set its clocks based on (usually) local noon, because it's easy to measure. But with railroads and telegraphs, it was necessary to know what time the train would arrive and depart -- which meant it was necessary, as well, to know what time it was in Tempe when you were leaving Kansas City. Having only four zones for the whole nation meant you could know that Tempe, Sheridan, and Butte had their clocks set the same -- and telegraphy made this actually practical, by allowing near-instantaneous transmission of time synchronizing signals.
But trains can only travel a few hundred miles in a day (at least with early steam technology), so there's no need to have time zones as coarse as 75,000 miles across -- there might well be "minute" zones, and they'd still be wider than the "hour" zones we have on Earth.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What if they decide to make time zones half-hourly, and have 48 that are 50-times as wide as ours? Or minutely, and have 1440 time zones that are 5/3 as wide as ours?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's up to your railroaders and telegraphers. But why would you need a time zone to be 35,000+ miles across? It'd take a full day to cross it, even in a 747.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Chronocidal Then again, minute zones have the issue of requiring a table to tell what time it is virtually anywhere. I can remember the zones of most of Earth's major cities, but with 1440 zones (and ten thousand times as many cities as Earth) there's just no way...
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
As you say, 10,000 times as many cities. By comparison, Earth has less than 5,000 cities, so you're looking at more than 2 cities for every city on Earth per city on Earth! I think you'd be hard pressed just to remember the major Countries, let alone Cities
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
The idea of 300 time zones is intriguing, but there's not really a need to have time zones that are less coarse than 75,000 miles across, either. The idea is to have standardized clock times that roughly correspond to solar times. Geographically larger time zones would correspond equally well to solar times, so chopping them into more, smaller time zones gets you a system that's more complex but ultimately not much more useful. I don't care if solar noon comes at 12:15 or 12:30.
$endgroup$
– Nuclear Wang
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
If the planet rotates at the same rate as Earth, it'll have the same difference in sunrise, sunset, noon and midnight times for a given number of degrees of longitude, so will have the same "number of time zones" as Earth. These zones will naturally be much wider than those on Earth, but they'll work just the same way -- including needing a "date line" so you don't lose a day if you circumnavigate to the west (as Magellan's crew did).
However: The United States (prior to the annexation of Alaska and Hawaii in 1959) had four time zones for a width of around 3000 miles. If the United States were, instead, 300,000 miles wide, there might well be three hundred time zones. Why?
Time zones originally came from railroads. Before the 1860s, each town would set its clocks based on (usually) local noon, because it's easy to measure. But with railroads and telegraphs, it was necessary to know what time the train would arrive and depart -- which meant it was necessary, as well, to know what time it was in Tempe when you were leaving Kansas City. Having only four zones for the whole nation meant you could know that Tempe, Sheridan, and Butte had their clocks set the same -- and telegraphy made this actually practical, by allowing near-instantaneous transmission of time synchronizing signals.
But trains can only travel a few hundred miles in a day (at least with early steam technology), so there's no need to have time zones as coarse as 75,000 miles across -- there might well be "minute" zones, and they'd still be wider than the "hour" zones we have on Earth.
$endgroup$
If the planet rotates at the same rate as Earth, it'll have the same difference in sunrise, sunset, noon and midnight times for a given number of degrees of longitude, so will have the same "number of time zones" as Earth. These zones will naturally be much wider than those on Earth, but they'll work just the same way -- including needing a "date line" so you don't lose a day if you circumnavigate to the west (as Magellan's crew did).
However: The United States (prior to the annexation of Alaska and Hawaii in 1959) had four time zones for a width of around 3000 miles. If the United States were, instead, 300,000 miles wide, there might well be three hundred time zones. Why?
Time zones originally came from railroads. Before the 1860s, each town would set its clocks based on (usually) local noon, because it's easy to measure. But with railroads and telegraphs, it was necessary to know what time the train would arrive and depart -- which meant it was necessary, as well, to know what time it was in Tempe when you were leaving Kansas City. Having only four zones for the whole nation meant you could know that Tempe, Sheridan, and Butte had their clocks set the same -- and telegraphy made this actually practical, by allowing near-instantaneous transmission of time synchronizing signals.
But trains can only travel a few hundred miles in a day (at least with early steam technology), so there's no need to have time zones as coarse as 75,000 miles across -- there might well be "minute" zones, and they'd still be wider than the "hour" zones we have on Earth.
edited 16 hours ago
answered 17 hours ago
Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon
8,56715 silver badges38 bronze badges
8,56715 silver badges38 bronze badges
$begingroup$
What if they decide to make time zones half-hourly, and have 48 that are 50-times as wide as ours? Or minutely, and have 1440 time zones that are 5/3 as wide as ours?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's up to your railroaders and telegraphers. But why would you need a time zone to be 35,000+ miles across? It'd take a full day to cross it, even in a 747.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Chronocidal Then again, minute zones have the issue of requiring a table to tell what time it is virtually anywhere. I can remember the zones of most of Earth's major cities, but with 1440 zones (and ten thousand times as many cities as Earth) there's just no way...
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
As you say, 10,000 times as many cities. By comparison, Earth has less than 5,000 cities, so you're looking at more than 2 cities for every city on Earth per city on Earth! I think you'd be hard pressed just to remember the major Countries, let alone Cities
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
The idea of 300 time zones is intriguing, but there's not really a need to have time zones that are less coarse than 75,000 miles across, either. The idea is to have standardized clock times that roughly correspond to solar times. Geographically larger time zones would correspond equally well to solar times, so chopping them into more, smaller time zones gets you a system that's more complex but ultimately not much more useful. I don't care if solar noon comes at 12:15 or 12:30.
$endgroup$
– Nuclear Wang
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
What if they decide to make time zones half-hourly, and have 48 that are 50-times as wide as ours? Or minutely, and have 1440 time zones that are 5/3 as wide as ours?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's up to your railroaders and telegraphers. But why would you need a time zone to be 35,000+ miles across? It'd take a full day to cross it, even in a 747.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Chronocidal Then again, minute zones have the issue of requiring a table to tell what time it is virtually anywhere. I can remember the zones of most of Earth's major cities, but with 1440 zones (and ten thousand times as many cities as Earth) there's just no way...
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
As you say, 10,000 times as many cities. By comparison, Earth has less than 5,000 cities, so you're looking at more than 2 cities for every city on Earth per city on Earth! I think you'd be hard pressed just to remember the major Countries, let alone Cities
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
The idea of 300 time zones is intriguing, but there's not really a need to have time zones that are less coarse than 75,000 miles across, either. The idea is to have standardized clock times that roughly correspond to solar times. Geographically larger time zones would correspond equally well to solar times, so chopping them into more, smaller time zones gets you a system that's more complex but ultimately not much more useful. I don't care if solar noon comes at 12:15 or 12:30.
$endgroup$
– Nuclear Wang
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
What if they decide to make time zones half-hourly, and have 48 that are 50-times as wide as ours? Or minutely, and have 1440 time zones that are 5/3 as wide as ours?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
What if they decide to make time zones half-hourly, and have 48 that are 50-times as wide as ours? Or minutely, and have 1440 time zones that are 5/3 as wide as ours?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's up to your railroaders and telegraphers. But why would you need a time zone to be 35,000+ miles across? It'd take a full day to cross it, even in a 747.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's up to your railroaders and telegraphers. But why would you need a time zone to be 35,000+ miles across? It'd take a full day to cross it, even in a 747.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Chronocidal Then again, minute zones have the issue of requiring a table to tell what time it is virtually anywhere. I can remember the zones of most of Earth's major cities, but with 1440 zones (and ten thousand times as many cities as Earth) there's just no way...
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Chronocidal Then again, minute zones have the issue of requiring a table to tell what time it is virtually anywhere. I can remember the zones of most of Earth's major cities, but with 1440 zones (and ten thousand times as many cities as Earth) there's just no way...
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
16 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
As you say, 10,000 times as many cities. By comparison, Earth has less than 5,000 cities, so you're looking at more than 2 cities for every city on Earth per city on Earth! I think you'd be hard pressed just to remember the major Countries, let alone Cities
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
As you say, 10,000 times as many cities. By comparison, Earth has less than 5,000 cities, so you're looking at more than 2 cities for every city on Earth per city on Earth! I think you'd be hard pressed just to remember the major Countries, let alone Cities
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
The idea of 300 time zones is intriguing, but there's not really a need to have time zones that are less coarse than 75,000 miles across, either. The idea is to have standardized clock times that roughly correspond to solar times. Geographically larger time zones would correspond equally well to solar times, so chopping them into more, smaller time zones gets you a system that's more complex but ultimately not much more useful. I don't care if solar noon comes at 12:15 or 12:30.
$endgroup$
– Nuclear Wang
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
The idea of 300 time zones is intriguing, but there's not really a need to have time zones that are less coarse than 75,000 miles across, either. The idea is to have standardized clock times that roughly correspond to solar times. Geographically larger time zones would correspond equally well to solar times, so chopping them into more, smaller time zones gets you a system that's more complex but ultimately not much more useful. I don't care if solar noon comes at 12:15 or 12:30.
$endgroup$
– Nuclear Wang
8 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
"Timezone" are all "subjective"! It was first created by Scottish-born Canadian Sir Sandford Fleming in 1876. It's all for us-human-being's convenience!
The very fact that the timezone lines on Earth are all crooked at many places prove it!
The Greenland lay across 5 timezones! But they don't like the idea and make the whole chunk of land under 1 timezone!
And if you across the sea from the Northwest coast to Quttinirpaaq National Park, you had "jumped" across "TWO" timezones!
And certain countries have "Daylight Saving Time"! Which means in the same timezone, the time is different in Summer and Winter time!
That further proved that "time and timezone" are all for "OUR" convenience!
So to come back to your question, you could have "as many timezones as you want"!
You can even divide the globe into "15-minute-timezones" if you so wish!
And that might be a better idea since your planet is SO~ big!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Timezone" are all "subjective"! It was first created by Scottish-born Canadian Sir Sandford Fleming in 1876. It's all for us-human-being's convenience!
The very fact that the timezone lines on Earth are all crooked at many places prove it!
The Greenland lay across 5 timezones! But they don't like the idea and make the whole chunk of land under 1 timezone!
And if you across the sea from the Northwest coast to Quttinirpaaq National Park, you had "jumped" across "TWO" timezones!
And certain countries have "Daylight Saving Time"! Which means in the same timezone, the time is different in Summer and Winter time!
That further proved that "time and timezone" are all for "OUR" convenience!
So to come back to your question, you could have "as many timezones as you want"!
You can even divide the globe into "15-minute-timezones" if you so wish!
And that might be a better idea since your planet is SO~ big!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Timezone" are all "subjective"! It was first created by Scottish-born Canadian Sir Sandford Fleming in 1876. It's all for us-human-being's convenience!
The very fact that the timezone lines on Earth are all crooked at many places prove it!
The Greenland lay across 5 timezones! But they don't like the idea and make the whole chunk of land under 1 timezone!
And if you across the sea from the Northwest coast to Quttinirpaaq National Park, you had "jumped" across "TWO" timezones!
And certain countries have "Daylight Saving Time"! Which means in the same timezone, the time is different in Summer and Winter time!
That further proved that "time and timezone" are all for "OUR" convenience!
So to come back to your question, you could have "as many timezones as you want"!
You can even divide the globe into "15-minute-timezones" if you so wish!
And that might be a better idea since your planet is SO~ big!
$endgroup$
"Timezone" are all "subjective"! It was first created by Scottish-born Canadian Sir Sandford Fleming in 1876. It's all for us-human-being's convenience!
The very fact that the timezone lines on Earth are all crooked at many places prove it!
The Greenland lay across 5 timezones! But they don't like the idea and make the whole chunk of land under 1 timezone!
And if you across the sea from the Northwest coast to Quttinirpaaq National Park, you had "jumped" across "TWO" timezones!
And certain countries have "Daylight Saving Time"! Which means in the same timezone, the time is different in Summer and Winter time!
That further proved that "time and timezone" are all for "OUR" convenience!
So to come back to your question, you could have "as many timezones as you want"!
You can even divide the globe into "15-minute-timezones" if you so wish!
And that might be a better idea since your planet is SO~ big!
edited 16 hours ago
answered 16 hours ago
PiggyChu001PiggyChu001
1279 bronze badges
1279 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Joseph Webber is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joseph Webber is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joseph Webber is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Joseph Webber is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f152759%2fhow-would-timezones-work-on-a-planet-100-times-the-size-of-our-earth%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
13
$begingroup$
On the planet wich is 1 000 000 (one million) times more massive than Earth, no one would ever get up. It would be a star, not a planet.
$endgroup$
– ksbes
17 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
BTW, Earth has 37 time zones -- but that's because there are a number of off-longitude and half-hour zones.
$endgroup$
– Zeiss Ikon
17 hours ago
7
$begingroup$
While a rotation may take 24 hours, is that what the natives consider "a day"? Do they divide a day into 24 "hours"? 30 "reps"? 18 "toqs"?
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
You're talking about a body a little under half the radius of the sun, and, if its composition is similar to Earth's, far more massive, carefully consider if you actually need something that big, having built many huge worlds they're rarely worth the effort.
$endgroup$
– Ash
16 hours ago
4
$begingroup$
Your "America vs China" comparison falls down on the fact that the curvature would be so much less: while the physical distance is large, the time difference between noon in each would be much less. On the other hand, "Flat Earth" might get more traction!
$endgroup$
– Chronocidal
15 hours ago