Submitting a new paper just after another was accepted by the same journalIs it okay to inquire about the status of a paper when the online submission system shows no update three months after submission?Understanding a proposed schedule of a journal special issueEditor's mail with no reviewer's commentSubmitting a note on the falsehood of a conjecture to the journal the conjecture originally appeared inSecond round of review is taking longer than the first oneSubmitting a previously rejected paper to a different journalAdding a citation after paper is accepted
How far did Gandalf and the Balrog drop from the bridge in Moria?
How does "Te vas a cansar" mean "You're going to get tired"?
The cat ate your input again!
0xF1 opcode-prefix on i80286
Is There a Tool to Select Files to Download From an Org in VSCode?
Heating Margarine in Pan = loss of calories?
Markov-chain sentence generator in Python
Solution to German Tank Problem
Bitcoin successfully deducted on sender wallet but did not reach receiver wallet
How do some PhD students get 10+ papers? Is that what I need for landing good faculty position?
Boss wants me to ignore a software license
Can "être sur" mean "to be about" ?
Plotting octahedron inside the sphere and sphere inside the cube
First amendment and employment: Can a police department terminate an officer for speech?
Generate Brainfuck for the numbers 1–255
Are employers legally allowed to pay employees in goods and services equal to or greater than the minimum wage?
Is there a SQL/english like language that lets you define formulations given some data?
Random Double Arc Endpoint Angles
What is this "Table of astronomy" about?
80's/90's superhero cartoon with a man on fire and a man who made ice runways like Frozone
Is this n-speak?
Can sampling rate be a floating point number?
How are you supposed to know the strumming pattern for a song from the "chord sheet music"?
A Non Math Puzzle. What is the middle number?
Submitting a new paper just after another was accepted by the same journal
Is it okay to inquire about the status of a paper when the online submission system shows no update three months after submission?Understanding a proposed schedule of a journal special issueEditor's mail with no reviewer's commentSubmitting a note on the falsehood of a conjecture to the journal the conjecture originally appeared inSecond round of review is taking longer than the first oneSubmitting a previously rejected paper to a different journalAdding a citation after paper is accepted
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
In my subfield, there is a highly regarded journal. I just finished a manuscript, which I thought would be suitable and ‘good enough’ for this journal.
Coincidentally, another manuscript that I had originally submitted to the journal two years ago, after long periods of waiting, revision, etc. just got accepted by this journal.
Should I adapt my plans in any way? Does it seem like I am ‘journal-hogging’ or gaming the system if I submit a new paper literally days after the last one has been accepted?
publications journals paper-submission
edited 8 hours ago
Wrzlprmft♦
37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges194 bronze badges
asked 15 hours ago
MKRMKR
5903 silver badges11 bronze badges
add a comment |
In my subfield, there is a highly regarded journal. I just finished a manuscript, which I thought would be suitable and ‘good enough’ for this journal.
Coincidentally, another manuscript that I had originally submitted to the journal two years ago, after long periods of waiting, revision, etc. just got accepted by this journal.
Should I adapt my plans in any way? Does it seem like I am ‘journal-hogging’ or gaming the system if I submit a new paper literally days after the last one has been accepted?
publications journals paper-submission
edited 8 hours ago
Wrzlprmft♦
37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges194 bronze badges
asked 15 hours ago
MKRMKR
5903 silver badges11 bronze badges
4
As long as they get accepted, you can submit as many papers as you want.
– Norbert
15 hours ago
@Norbert: OK, I probably should have written "Will it hurt the chances of the new paper being accepted?"
– MKR
15 hours ago
10
I fail to see the rationale behind your question. If you would submit papers and they would keep being rejected, the editors might get annoyed, obviously. But if you had a paper accepted -- this is, it was up to the level of the journal -- why should they dislike other papers of yours? (And as to the frequency, this is highly field dependent!)
– Norbert
15 hours ago
Glad to see that my concerns are perceived as unfounded then.
– MKR
15 hours ago
Seems also fine to me. You have no bad intentions and your paper seems to be of high quality since it was accepted. Thus, even the Journal might like your idea of submitting another paper ;-)
– J-Kun
14 hours ago
add a comment |
In my subfield, there is a highly regarded journal. I just finished a manuscript, which I thought would be suitable and ‘good enough’ for this journal.
Coincidentally, another manuscript that I had originally submitted to the journal two years ago, after long periods of waiting, revision, etc. just got accepted by this journal.
Should I adapt my plans in any way? Does it seem like I am ‘journal-hogging’ or gaming the system if I submit a new paper literally days after the last one has been accepted?
publications journals paper-submission
edited 8 hours ago
Wrzlprmft♦
37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges194 bronze badges
asked 15 hours ago
MKRMKR
5903 silver badges11 bronze badges
In my subfield, there is a highly regarded journal. I just finished a manuscript, which I thought would be suitable and ‘good enough’ for this journal.
Coincidentally, another manuscript that I had originally submitted to the journal two years ago, after long periods of waiting, revision, etc. just got accepted by this journal.
Should I adapt my plans in any way? Does it seem like I am ‘journal-hogging’ or gaming the system if I submit a new paper literally days after the last one has been accepted?
publications journals paper-submission
publications journals paper-submission
edited 8 hours ago
Wrzlprmft♦
37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges194 bronze badges
asked 15 hours ago
MKRMKR
5903 silver badges11 bronze badges
edited 8 hours ago
Wrzlprmft♦
37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges194 bronze badges
asked 15 hours ago
MKRMKR
5903 silver badges11 bronze badges
edited 8 hours ago
Wrzlprmft♦
37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges194 bronze badges
edited 8 hours ago
Wrzlprmft♦
37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges194 bronze badges
edited 8 hours ago
Wrzlprmft♦
37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges194 bronze badges
37.1k12 gold badges117 silver badges194 bronze badges
asked 15 hours ago
MKRMKR
5903 silver badges11 bronze badges
asked 15 hours ago
MKRMKR
5903 silver badges11 bronze badges
asked 15 hours ago
MKRMKR
5903 silver badges11 bronze badges
5903 silver badges11 bronze badges
4
As long as they get accepted, you can submit as many papers as you want.
– Norbert
15 hours ago
@Norbert: OK, I probably should have written "Will it hurt the chances of the new paper being accepted?"
– MKR
15 hours ago
10
I fail to see the rationale behind your question. If you would submit papers and they would keep being rejected, the editors might get annoyed, obviously. But if you had a paper accepted -- this is, it was up to the level of the journal -- why should they dislike other papers of yours? (And as to the frequency, this is highly field dependent!)
– Norbert
15 hours ago
Glad to see that my concerns are perceived as unfounded then.
– MKR
15 hours ago
Seems also fine to me. You have no bad intentions and your paper seems to be of high quality since it was accepted. Thus, even the Journal might like your idea of submitting another paper ;-)
– J-Kun
14 hours ago
add a comment |
4
As long as they get accepted, you can submit as many papers as you want.
– Norbert
15 hours ago
@Norbert: OK, I probably should have written "Will it hurt the chances of the new paper being accepted?"
– MKR
15 hours ago
10
I fail to see the rationale behind your question. If you would submit papers and they would keep being rejected, the editors might get annoyed, obviously. But if you had a paper accepted -- this is, it was up to the level of the journal -- why should they dislike other papers of yours? (And as to the frequency, this is highly field dependent!)
– Norbert
15 hours ago
Glad to see that my concerns are perceived as unfounded then.
– MKR
15 hours ago
Seems also fine to me. You have no bad intentions and your paper seems to be of high quality since it was accepted. Thus, even the Journal might like your idea of submitting another paper ;-)
– J-Kun
14 hours ago
4
4
As long as they get accepted, you can submit as many papers as you want.
– Norbert
15 hours ago
As long as they get accepted, you can submit as many papers as you want.
– Norbert
15 hours ago
@Norbert: OK, I probably should have written "Will it hurt the chances of the new paper being accepted?"
– MKR
15 hours ago
@Norbert: OK, I probably should have written "Will it hurt the chances of the new paper being accepted?"
– MKR
15 hours ago
10
10
I fail to see the rationale behind your question. If you would submit papers and they would keep being rejected, the editors might get annoyed, obviously. But if you had a paper accepted -- this is, it was up to the level of the journal -- why should they dislike other papers of yours? (And as to the frequency, this is highly field dependent!)
– Norbert
15 hours ago
I fail to see the rationale behind your question. If you would submit papers and they would keep being rejected, the editors might get annoyed, obviously. But if you had a paper accepted -- this is, it was up to the level of the journal -- why should they dislike other papers of yours? (And as to the frequency, this is highly field dependent!)
– Norbert
15 hours ago
Glad to see that my concerns are perceived as unfounded then.
– MKR
15 hours ago
Glad to see that my concerns are perceived as unfounded then.
– MKR
15 hours ago
Seems also fine to me. You have no bad intentions and your paper seems to be of high quality since it was accepted. Thus, even the Journal might like your idea of submitting another paper ;-)
– J-Kun
14 hours ago
Seems also fine to me. You have no bad intentions and your paper seems to be of high quality since it was accepted. Thus, even the Journal might like your idea of submitting another paper ;-)
– J-Kun
14 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
With one paper every two years I don’t think you will be seen as gaming the system.
Go ahead and submit.
answered 15 hours ago
Solar MikeSolar Mike
20.3k6 gold badges39 silver badges74 bronze badges
4
If the OP would produce ten top-quality papers a year and submit them there, why would this be seen as gaming the system?
– Norbert
13 hours ago
@Norbert are you suggesting the OP does that? Not mentioned in the original post... Why have you picked 10?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
6
You say "one paper every two years" does not look like gaming the system. This suggests that in your eyes there is a threshold at which this would be seen as gaming the system, regardless of the quality of the papers. At how many papers per year would you draw that threshold?
– Norbert
12 hours ago
@Norbert You are welcome to post your own new question asking that.
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
add a comment |
If your submissions to the journal are being accepted, there is nothing wrong with submitting more papers to the journal: It means that your submissions are up to the standard of the journal, and you should feel free to submit further papers to that journal at the rate at which you can produce content of that quality.
It would be different if your submissions keep being rejected at that journal. In that case, you should reconsider whether your work is suitable for that venue, and if you submit to the journal at a too high rate, this might well annoy the editors.
As to which rate of submissions is acceptable (in case they are rejected), this is highly dependent on the field and journal, so it is hard to give a conclusive number. (In my field, one rejected a paper every two years even in a top journal wouldn't be seen as an issue by most people.)
answered 13 hours ago
NorbertNorbert
2811 silver badge6 bronze badges
New contributor
Norbert is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Any evidence for the number you state?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
In my opinion, this is more related to the researcher's profile. Consider, for example, that I have a rejected paper in journal A a year ago. In the meantime, I have published a couple of papers in the top journals of my field which are better than A. Would it be inappropriate to submit to A after one year? The key is to not be perceived as a delusional researcher who constantly tries to publish unimportant results in good journals.
– CTNT
12 hours ago
@CTNT Sure, but if it were constantly unimportant results submitted to a top journal, this would result in regular rejections. The OP had a manuscript accepted, so in that case, there is no issue to submit further papers to that journal.
– Norbert
11 hours ago
@SolarMike What could constitute reasonable evidence, to start with? (But one paper every two years would be ~20 papers in an academic life-time, and even less as a senior author, which is not that much.)
– Norbert
11 hours ago
If you fail to see the rationale behind the question, as per your comment above, then how do you rate your answer?
– Solar Mike
11 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134580%2fsubmitting-a-new-paper-just-after-another-was-accepted-by-the-same-journal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
With one paper every two years I don’t think you will be seen as gaming the system.
Go ahead and submit.
answered 15 hours ago
Solar MikeSolar Mike
20.3k6 gold badges39 silver badges74 bronze badges
4
If the OP would produce ten top-quality papers a year and submit them there, why would this be seen as gaming the system?
– Norbert
13 hours ago
@Norbert are you suggesting the OP does that? Not mentioned in the original post... Why have you picked 10?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
6
You say "one paper every two years" does not look like gaming the system. This suggests that in your eyes there is a threshold at which this would be seen as gaming the system, regardless of the quality of the papers. At how many papers per year would you draw that threshold?
– Norbert
12 hours ago
@Norbert You are welcome to post your own new question asking that.
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
add a comment |
With one paper every two years I don’t think you will be seen as gaming the system.
Go ahead and submit.
answered 15 hours ago
Solar MikeSolar Mike
20.3k6 gold badges39 silver badges74 bronze badges
4
If the OP would produce ten top-quality papers a year and submit them there, why would this be seen as gaming the system?
– Norbert
13 hours ago
@Norbert are you suggesting the OP does that? Not mentioned in the original post... Why have you picked 10?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
6
You say "one paper every two years" does not look like gaming the system. This suggests that in your eyes there is a threshold at which this would be seen as gaming the system, regardless of the quality of the papers. At how many papers per year would you draw that threshold?
– Norbert
12 hours ago
@Norbert You are welcome to post your own new question asking that.
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
add a comment |
With one paper every two years I don’t think you will be seen as gaming the system.
Go ahead and submit.
answered 15 hours ago
Solar MikeSolar Mike
20.3k6 gold badges39 silver badges74 bronze badges
With one paper every two years I don’t think you will be seen as gaming the system.
Go ahead and submit.
answered 15 hours ago
Solar MikeSolar Mike
20.3k6 gold badges39 silver badges74 bronze badges
answered 15 hours ago
Solar MikeSolar Mike
20.3k6 gold badges39 silver badges74 bronze badges
answered 15 hours ago
Solar MikeSolar Mike
20.3k6 gold badges39 silver badges74 bronze badges
answered 15 hours ago
Solar MikeSolar Mike
20.3k6 gold badges39 silver badges74 bronze badges
20.3k6 gold badges39 silver badges74 bronze badges
4
If the OP would produce ten top-quality papers a year and submit them there, why would this be seen as gaming the system?
– Norbert
13 hours ago
@Norbert are you suggesting the OP does that? Not mentioned in the original post... Why have you picked 10?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
6
You say "one paper every two years" does not look like gaming the system. This suggests that in your eyes there is a threshold at which this would be seen as gaming the system, regardless of the quality of the papers. At how many papers per year would you draw that threshold?
– Norbert
12 hours ago
@Norbert You are welcome to post your own new question asking that.
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
add a comment |
4
If the OP would produce ten top-quality papers a year and submit them there, why would this be seen as gaming the system?
– Norbert
13 hours ago
@Norbert are you suggesting the OP does that? Not mentioned in the original post... Why have you picked 10?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
6
You say "one paper every two years" does not look like gaming the system. This suggests that in your eyes there is a threshold at which this would be seen as gaming the system, regardless of the quality of the papers. At how many papers per year would you draw that threshold?
– Norbert
12 hours ago
@Norbert You are welcome to post your own new question asking that.
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
4
4
If the OP would produce ten top-quality papers a year and submit them there, why would this be seen as gaming the system?
– Norbert
13 hours ago
If the OP would produce ten top-quality papers a year and submit them there, why would this be seen as gaming the system?
– Norbert
13 hours ago
@Norbert are you suggesting the OP does that? Not mentioned in the original post... Why have you picked 10?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
@Norbert are you suggesting the OP does that? Not mentioned in the original post... Why have you picked 10?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
6
6
You say "one paper every two years" does not look like gaming the system. This suggests that in your eyes there is a threshold at which this would be seen as gaming the system, regardless of the quality of the papers. At how many papers per year would you draw that threshold?
– Norbert
12 hours ago
You say "one paper every two years" does not look like gaming the system. This suggests that in your eyes there is a threshold at which this would be seen as gaming the system, regardless of the quality of the papers. At how many papers per year would you draw that threshold?
– Norbert
12 hours ago
@Norbert You are welcome to post your own new question asking that.
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
@Norbert You are welcome to post your own new question asking that.
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
add a comment |
If your submissions to the journal are being accepted, there is nothing wrong with submitting more papers to the journal: It means that your submissions are up to the standard of the journal, and you should feel free to submit further papers to that journal at the rate at which you can produce content of that quality.
It would be different if your submissions keep being rejected at that journal. In that case, you should reconsider whether your work is suitable for that venue, and if you submit to the journal at a too high rate, this might well annoy the editors.
As to which rate of submissions is acceptable (in case they are rejected), this is highly dependent on the field and journal, so it is hard to give a conclusive number. (In my field, one rejected a paper every two years even in a top journal wouldn't be seen as an issue by most people.)
answered 13 hours ago
NorbertNorbert
2811 silver badge6 bronze badges
New contributor
Norbert is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Any evidence for the number you state?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
In my opinion, this is more related to the researcher's profile. Consider, for example, that I have a rejected paper in journal A a year ago. In the meantime, I have published a couple of papers in the top journals of my field which are better than A. Would it be inappropriate to submit to A after one year? The key is to not be perceived as a delusional researcher who constantly tries to publish unimportant results in good journals.
– CTNT
12 hours ago
@CTNT Sure, but if it were constantly unimportant results submitted to a top journal, this would result in regular rejections. The OP had a manuscript accepted, so in that case, there is no issue to submit further papers to that journal.
– Norbert
11 hours ago
@SolarMike What could constitute reasonable evidence, to start with? (But one paper every two years would be ~20 papers in an academic life-time, and even less as a senior author, which is not that much.)
– Norbert
11 hours ago
If you fail to see the rationale behind the question, as per your comment above, then how do you rate your answer?
– Solar Mike
11 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
If your submissions to the journal are being accepted, there is nothing wrong with submitting more papers to the journal: It means that your submissions are up to the standard of the journal, and you should feel free to submit further papers to that journal at the rate at which you can produce content of that quality.
It would be different if your submissions keep being rejected at that journal. In that case, you should reconsider whether your work is suitable for that venue, and if you submit to the journal at a too high rate, this might well annoy the editors.
As to which rate of submissions is acceptable (in case they are rejected), this is highly dependent on the field and journal, so it is hard to give a conclusive number. (In my field, one rejected a paper every two years even in a top journal wouldn't be seen as an issue by most people.)
answered 13 hours ago
NorbertNorbert
2811 silver badge6 bronze badges
New contributor
Norbert is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Any evidence for the number you state?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
In my opinion, this is more related to the researcher's profile. Consider, for example, that I have a rejected paper in journal A a year ago. In the meantime, I have published a couple of papers in the top journals of my field which are better than A. Would it be inappropriate to submit to A after one year? The key is to not be perceived as a delusional researcher who constantly tries to publish unimportant results in good journals.
– CTNT
12 hours ago
@CTNT Sure, but if it were constantly unimportant results submitted to a top journal, this would result in regular rejections. The OP had a manuscript accepted, so in that case, there is no issue to submit further papers to that journal.
– Norbert
11 hours ago
@SolarMike What could constitute reasonable evidence, to start with? (But one paper every two years would be ~20 papers in an academic life-time, and even less as a senior author, which is not that much.)
– Norbert
11 hours ago
If you fail to see the rationale behind the question, as per your comment above, then how do you rate your answer?
– Solar Mike
11 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
If your submissions to the journal are being accepted, there is nothing wrong with submitting more papers to the journal: It means that your submissions are up to the standard of the journal, and you should feel free to submit further papers to that journal at the rate at which you can produce content of that quality.
It would be different if your submissions keep being rejected at that journal. In that case, you should reconsider whether your work is suitable for that venue, and if you submit to the journal at a too high rate, this might well annoy the editors.
As to which rate of submissions is acceptable (in case they are rejected), this is highly dependent on the field and journal, so it is hard to give a conclusive number. (In my field, one rejected a paper every two years even in a top journal wouldn't be seen as an issue by most people.)
answered 13 hours ago
NorbertNorbert
2811 silver badge6 bronze badges
New contributor
Norbert is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
If your submissions to the journal are being accepted, there is nothing wrong with submitting more papers to the journal: It means that your submissions are up to the standard of the journal, and you should feel free to submit further papers to that journal at the rate at which you can produce content of that quality.
It would be different if your submissions keep being rejected at that journal. In that case, you should reconsider whether your work is suitable for that venue, and if you submit to the journal at a too high rate, this might well annoy the editors.
As to which rate of submissions is acceptable (in case they are rejected), this is highly dependent on the field and journal, so it is hard to give a conclusive number. (In my field, one rejected a paper every two years even in a top journal wouldn't be seen as an issue by most people.)
answered 13 hours ago
NorbertNorbert
2811 silver badge6 bronze badges
New contributor
Norbert is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 13 hours ago
NorbertNorbert
2811 silver badge6 bronze badges
New contributor
Norbert is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 13 hours ago
NorbertNorbert
2811 silver badge6 bronze badges
answered 13 hours ago
NorbertNorbert
2811 silver badge6 bronze badges
2811 silver badge6 bronze badges
New contributor
Norbert is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Norbert is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Any evidence for the number you state?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
In my opinion, this is more related to the researcher's profile. Consider, for example, that I have a rejected paper in journal A a year ago. In the meantime, I have published a couple of papers in the top journals of my field which are better than A. Would it be inappropriate to submit to A after one year? The key is to not be perceived as a delusional researcher who constantly tries to publish unimportant results in good journals.
– CTNT
12 hours ago
@CTNT Sure, but if it were constantly unimportant results submitted to a top journal, this would result in regular rejections. The OP had a manuscript accepted, so in that case, there is no issue to submit further papers to that journal.
– Norbert
11 hours ago
@SolarMike What could constitute reasonable evidence, to start with? (But one paper every two years would be ~20 papers in an academic life-time, and even less as a senior author, which is not that much.)
– Norbert
11 hours ago
If you fail to see the rationale behind the question, as per your comment above, then how do you rate your answer?
– Solar Mike
11 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Any evidence for the number you state?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
In my opinion, this is more related to the researcher's profile. Consider, for example, that I have a rejected paper in journal A a year ago. In the meantime, I have published a couple of papers in the top journals of my field which are better than A. Would it be inappropriate to submit to A after one year? The key is to not be perceived as a delusional researcher who constantly tries to publish unimportant results in good journals.
– CTNT
12 hours ago
@CTNT Sure, but if it were constantly unimportant results submitted to a top journal, this would result in regular rejections. The OP had a manuscript accepted, so in that case, there is no issue to submit further papers to that journal.
– Norbert
11 hours ago
@SolarMike What could constitute reasonable evidence, to start with? (But one paper every two years would be ~20 papers in an academic life-time, and even less as a senior author, which is not that much.)
– Norbert
11 hours ago
If you fail to see the rationale behind the question, as per your comment above, then how do you rate your answer?
– Solar Mike
11 hours ago
Any evidence for the number you state?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
Any evidence for the number you state?
– Solar Mike
12 hours ago
In my opinion, this is more related to the researcher's profile. Consider, for example, that I have a rejected paper in journal A a year ago. In the meantime, I have published a couple of papers in the top journals of my field which are better than A. Would it be inappropriate to submit to A after one year? The key is to not be perceived as a delusional researcher who constantly tries to publish unimportant results in good journals.
– CTNT
12 hours ago
In my opinion, this is more related to the researcher's profile. Consider, for example, that I have a rejected paper in journal A a year ago. In the meantime, I have published a couple of papers in the top journals of my field which are better than A. Would it be inappropriate to submit to A after one year? The key is to not be perceived as a delusional researcher who constantly tries to publish unimportant results in good journals.
– CTNT
12 hours ago
@CTNT Sure, but if it were constantly unimportant results submitted to a top journal, this would result in regular rejections. The OP had a manuscript accepted, so in that case, there is no issue to submit further papers to that journal.
– Norbert
11 hours ago
@CTNT Sure, but if it were constantly unimportant results submitted to a top journal, this would result in regular rejections. The OP had a manuscript accepted, so in that case, there is no issue to submit further papers to that journal.
– Norbert
11 hours ago
@SolarMike What could constitute reasonable evidence, to start with? (But one paper every two years would be ~20 papers in an academic life-time, and even less as a senior author, which is not that much.)
– Norbert
11 hours ago
@SolarMike What could constitute reasonable evidence, to start with? (But one paper every two years would be ~20 papers in an academic life-time, and even less as a senior author, which is not that much.)
– Norbert
11 hours ago
If you fail to see the rationale behind the question, as per your comment above, then how do you rate your answer?
– Solar Mike
11 hours ago
If you fail to see the rationale behind the question, as per your comment above, then how do you rate your answer?
– Solar Mike
11 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134580%2fsubmitting-a-new-paper-just-after-another-was-accepted-by-the-same-journal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
As long as they get accepted, you can submit as many papers as you want.
– Norbert
15 hours ago
@Norbert: OK, I probably should have written "Will it hurt the chances of the new paper being accepted?"
– MKR
15 hours ago
10
I fail to see the rationale behind your question. If you would submit papers and they would keep being rejected, the editors might get annoyed, obviously. But if you had a paper accepted -- this is, it was up to the level of the journal -- why should they dislike other papers of yours? (And as to the frequency, this is highly field dependent!)
– Norbert
15 hours ago
Glad to see that my concerns are perceived as unfounded then.
– MKR
15 hours ago
Seems also fine to me. You have no bad intentions and your paper seems to be of high quality since it was accepted. Thus, even the Journal might like your idea of submitting another paper ;-)
– J-Kun
14 hours ago