Why is 6. Nge2 better, and 7. d5 a nessecary push in this game?Why 8…Na6 was played in the immortal draw?Analysis of positional play by a very aggressive playerWhy does white exchange knight for a pawn here?analysis of a position - why is my move so bad?Why is exposing my queen for capture better in this position (According to computer analysis)?Why does Caruana kick Aronian's bishop?Why couldn't I win this Maroczy Bind (vs 2000)?Moving a pawn to attack a piece on the 5th or 4th rankWeakening the kingside with g5

Is it impolite to ask for halal food when traveling to and in Thailand?

Do wheelchair-accessible aircraft exist?

Sort by contiguous digits as a single number

Why did UK NHS pay for homeopathic treatments?

What benefits does the Power Word Kill spell have?

Safe to use 220V electric clothes dryer when building has been bridged down to 110V?

How can this Stack Exchange site have an animated favicon?

Youtube not blocked by iptables

What should I consider when deciding whether to delay an exam?

How 象【しょう】 ( ≈かたち、 すがた、ようす) and 象【ぞう】 (どうぶつ) got to be written with the same kanji?

practicality of 30 year fix mortgage at 55 years of age

How can an attacker use robots.txt?

Is there any relation/leak between two sections of LM358 op-amp?

Lost Update Understanding

Averting Bathos

1, 2, 4, 8, 16, ... 33?

Why is a road bike faster than a city bike with the same effort? & how much faster it can be?

What secular civic space would pioneers build for small frontier towns?

Why weren't the Death Star plans transmitted electronically?

Why does (inf + 0j)*1 evaluate to inf + nanj?

Is it possible to encode a message in such a way that can only be read by someone or something capable of seeing into the very near future?

Is it acceptable to say that a reviewer's concern is not going to be addressed because then the paper would be too long?

OSM Thunderforest API keys in QGIS3

Is the use of language other than English 'Reasonable Suspicion' for detention?



Why is 6. Nge2 better, and 7. d5 a nessecary push in this game?


Why 8…Na6 was played in the immortal draw?Analysis of positional play by a very aggressive playerWhy does white exchange knight for a pawn here?analysis of a position - why is my move so bad?Why is exposing my queen for capture better in this position (According to computer analysis)?Why does Caruana kick Aronian's bishop?Why couldn't I win this Maroczy Bind (vs 2000)?Moving a pawn to attack a piece on the 5th or 4th rankWeakening the kingside with g5






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I have two questions about a recent game that I played on Lichess.




Question 1:



Why is it necessary for White to push d5 now in the game, in this position, and why is Be3 a blunder?



enter image description here
I did play d5 later in the game on move 10, but I cannot understand why, if no disruptive move such c5 or a welltimed e5 (although probably impossible here) is made, I should push d5 at all.




Question 2:



Why is e2 the best position for the King's knight, and not f3 in the next diagram (on move 6 by White)?



enter image description here



There does not appear to be any annoying pin of the knight on f3 by a bishop on g4. Plus, I do not think it is disadvantageous to have doubled pawns on my position(if needed I could play Bd2 when Black plays Bb4). Lastly, and more importantly, the knight on f3 can jump to e5 if possible.










share|improve this question
































    3















    I have two questions about a recent game that I played on Lichess.




    Question 1:



    Why is it necessary for White to push d5 now in the game, in this position, and why is Be3 a blunder?



    enter image description here
    I did play d5 later in the game on move 10, but I cannot understand why, if no disruptive move such c5 or a welltimed e5 (although probably impossible here) is made, I should push d5 at all.




    Question 2:



    Why is e2 the best position for the King's knight, and not f3 in the next diagram (on move 6 by White)?



    enter image description here



    There does not appear to be any annoying pin of the knight on f3 by a bishop on g4. Plus, I do not think it is disadvantageous to have doubled pawns on my position(if needed I could play Bd2 when Black plays Bb4). Lastly, and more importantly, the knight on f3 can jump to e5 if possible.










    share|improve this question




























      3












      3








      3








      I have two questions about a recent game that I played on Lichess.




      Question 1:



      Why is it necessary for White to push d5 now in the game, in this position, and why is Be3 a blunder?



      enter image description here
      I did play d5 later in the game on move 10, but I cannot understand why, if no disruptive move such c5 or a welltimed e5 (although probably impossible here) is made, I should push d5 at all.




      Question 2:



      Why is e2 the best position for the King's knight, and not f3 in the next diagram (on move 6 by White)?



      enter image description here



      There does not appear to be any annoying pin of the knight on f3 by a bishop on g4. Plus, I do not think it is disadvantageous to have doubled pawns on my position(if needed I could play Bd2 when Black plays Bb4). Lastly, and more importantly, the knight on f3 can jump to e5 if possible.










      share|improve this question
















      I have two questions about a recent game that I played on Lichess.




      Question 1:



      Why is it necessary for White to push d5 now in the game, in this position, and why is Be3 a blunder?



      enter image description here
      I did play d5 later in the game on move 10, but I cannot understand why, if no disruptive move such c5 or a welltimed e5 (although probably impossible here) is made, I should push d5 at all.




      Question 2:



      Why is e2 the best position for the King's knight, and not f3 in the next diagram (on move 6 by White)?



      enter image description here



      There does not appear to be any annoying pin of the knight on f3 by a bishop on g4. Plus, I do not think it is disadvantageous to have doubled pawns on my position(if needed I could play Bd2 when Black plays Bb4). Lastly, and more importantly, the knight on f3 can jump to e5 if possible.







      analysis positional-play






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago









      Rewan Demontay

      2,0302 gold badges10 silver badges35 bronze badges




      2,0302 gold badges10 silver badges35 bronze badges










      asked 9 hours ago









      Maths64Maths64

      7234 silver badges17 bronze badges




      7234 silver badges17 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4
















          1) After 7.Be3 Bxc3 8.bxc3, Black could have won the e4-pawn with ...Nxe4. The purpose behind 7.d5 would have been to block the b7-bishop, preventing Black from winning the pawn.



          2) I don't think 6.Nf3 is that much worse than 6.Nge2. Lichess still says White's better by 0.7. But the advantage of Nge2 is that it protects the c3-knight and after 6...Bb4 you can play 7.0-0 with no issues. Since now 7...Bxc3 is answered with 8.Nxc3, and you still have a knight on c3 (preventing Black from winning the e4-pawn).






          share|improve this answer
































            3
















            Nf3 is not horrible (it actually transposes into a position that Kasparov once had as White, and won.) I think the reason the engine doesn't like it is that after your proposed Nf3 Bb4 Bd2, Black may play Bxc3. If that knight is on f3, than after you retake with Bxc3 or bxc3, Black can safely take on e4. If instead the knight was on d2, then you just play Nxc3 and e4 is defended. (See the blunder by Black a little later where he doesn't take on e4.) You do have other options after Nf3 to not lose the pawn, but your pawns may get doubled.






            share|improve this answer





























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "435"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );














              draft saved

              draft discarded
















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26420%2fwhy-is-6-nge2-better-and-7-d5-a-nessecary-push-in-this-game%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              4
















              1) After 7.Be3 Bxc3 8.bxc3, Black could have won the e4-pawn with ...Nxe4. The purpose behind 7.d5 would have been to block the b7-bishop, preventing Black from winning the pawn.



              2) I don't think 6.Nf3 is that much worse than 6.Nge2. Lichess still says White's better by 0.7. But the advantage of Nge2 is that it protects the c3-knight and after 6...Bb4 you can play 7.0-0 with no issues. Since now 7...Bxc3 is answered with 8.Nxc3, and you still have a knight on c3 (preventing Black from winning the e4-pawn).






              share|improve this answer





























                4
















                1) After 7.Be3 Bxc3 8.bxc3, Black could have won the e4-pawn with ...Nxe4. The purpose behind 7.d5 would have been to block the b7-bishop, preventing Black from winning the pawn.



                2) I don't think 6.Nf3 is that much worse than 6.Nge2. Lichess still says White's better by 0.7. But the advantage of Nge2 is that it protects the c3-knight and after 6...Bb4 you can play 7.0-0 with no issues. Since now 7...Bxc3 is answered with 8.Nxc3, and you still have a knight on c3 (preventing Black from winning the e4-pawn).






                share|improve this answer



























                  4














                  4










                  4









                  1) After 7.Be3 Bxc3 8.bxc3, Black could have won the e4-pawn with ...Nxe4. The purpose behind 7.d5 would have been to block the b7-bishop, preventing Black from winning the pawn.



                  2) I don't think 6.Nf3 is that much worse than 6.Nge2. Lichess still says White's better by 0.7. But the advantage of Nge2 is that it protects the c3-knight and after 6...Bb4 you can play 7.0-0 with no issues. Since now 7...Bxc3 is answered with 8.Nxc3, and you still have a knight on c3 (preventing Black from winning the e4-pawn).






                  share|improve this answer













                  1) After 7.Be3 Bxc3 8.bxc3, Black could have won the e4-pawn with ...Nxe4. The purpose behind 7.d5 would have been to block the b7-bishop, preventing Black from winning the pawn.



                  2) I don't think 6.Nf3 is that much worse than 6.Nge2. Lichess still says White's better by 0.7. But the advantage of Nge2 is that it protects the c3-knight and after 6...Bb4 you can play 7.0-0 with no issues. Since now 7...Bxc3 is answered with 8.Nxc3, and you still have a knight on c3 (preventing Black from winning the e4-pawn).







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  Inertial IgnoranceInertial Ignorance

                  7,0145 silver badges16 bronze badges




                  7,0145 silver badges16 bronze badges


























                      3
















                      Nf3 is not horrible (it actually transposes into a position that Kasparov once had as White, and won.) I think the reason the engine doesn't like it is that after your proposed Nf3 Bb4 Bd2, Black may play Bxc3. If that knight is on f3, than after you retake with Bxc3 or bxc3, Black can safely take on e4. If instead the knight was on d2, then you just play Nxc3 and e4 is defended. (See the blunder by Black a little later where he doesn't take on e4.) You do have other options after Nf3 to not lose the pawn, but your pawns may get doubled.






                      share|improve this answer































                        3
















                        Nf3 is not horrible (it actually transposes into a position that Kasparov once had as White, and won.) I think the reason the engine doesn't like it is that after your proposed Nf3 Bb4 Bd2, Black may play Bxc3. If that knight is on f3, than after you retake with Bxc3 or bxc3, Black can safely take on e4. If instead the knight was on d2, then you just play Nxc3 and e4 is defended. (See the blunder by Black a little later where he doesn't take on e4.) You do have other options after Nf3 to not lose the pawn, but your pawns may get doubled.






                        share|improve this answer





























                          3














                          3










                          3









                          Nf3 is not horrible (it actually transposes into a position that Kasparov once had as White, and won.) I think the reason the engine doesn't like it is that after your proposed Nf3 Bb4 Bd2, Black may play Bxc3. If that knight is on f3, than after you retake with Bxc3 or bxc3, Black can safely take on e4. If instead the knight was on d2, then you just play Nxc3 and e4 is defended. (See the blunder by Black a little later where he doesn't take on e4.) You do have other options after Nf3 to not lose the pawn, but your pawns may get doubled.






                          share|improve this answer















                          Nf3 is not horrible (it actually transposes into a position that Kasparov once had as White, and won.) I think the reason the engine doesn't like it is that after your proposed Nf3 Bb4 Bd2, Black may play Bxc3. If that knight is on f3, than after you retake with Bxc3 or bxc3, Black can safely take on e4. If instead the knight was on d2, then you just play Nxc3 and e4 is defended. (See the blunder by Black a little later where he doesn't take on e4.) You do have other options after Nf3 to not lose the pawn, but your pawns may get doubled.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 7 hours ago

























                          answered 8 hours ago









                          D MD M

                          5,92414 silver badges34 bronze badges




                          5,92414 silver badges34 bronze badges































                              draft saved

                              draft discarded















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f26420%2fwhy-is-6-nge2-better-and-7-d5-a-nessecary-push-in-this-game%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                              Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                              19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу