How to use source_location in a variadic template function?Issue converting a macro with variable args (…) into constexpr variadic templateHow do you set, clear, and toggle a single bit?How do I iterate over the words of a string?Can templates only be implemented in header files?Calling a function for each variadic template argument and an arrayVariadic Template Parameter Packs with Alternating Typesstd::bind with variadic template functionVariadic Template Functions: No matching function for call, std::endlC++ errors with Variadic templateMixing const and non-const variables on variadic template

Adding things to bunches of things vs multiplication

Why was ramjet fuel used as hydraulic fluid during Saturn V checkout?

Saying something to a foreign coworker who uses "you people"

Does the Temple of the Gods spell nullify critical hits?

Why is the name Bergson pronounced like Berksonne?

How to use source_location in a variadic template function?

Would it be illegal for Facebook to actively promote a political agenda?

Independence of Mean and Variance of Discrete Uniform Distributions

Chess software to analyze games

Which basis does the wavefunction collapse to?

Do predators tend to have vertical slit pupils versus horizontal for prey animals?

Can the front glass be repaired of a broken lens?

Does git delete empty folders?

Why should P.I be willing to write strong LOR even if that means losing a undergraduate from his/her lab?

Do living authors still get paid royalties for their old work?

Are there reliable, formulaic ways to form chords on the guitar?

Why don't politicians push for fossil fuel reduction by pointing out their scarcity?

Build a mob of suspiciously happy lenny faces ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

My father gets angry everytime I pass Salam, that means I should stop saying Salam when he's around?

Designing a prison for a telekinetic race

How do we test and determine if a USB cable+connector is version 2, 3.0 or 3.1?

Why doesn't mathematics collapse down, even though humans quite often make mistakes in their proofs?

Are there categories whose internal hom is somewhat 'exotic'?

Best model for precedence constraints within scheduling problem



How to use source_location in a variadic template function?


Issue converting a macro with variable args (…) into constexpr variadic templateHow do you set, clear, and toggle a single bit?How do I iterate over the words of a string?Can templates only be implemented in header files?Calling a function for each variadic template argument and an arrayVariadic Template Parameter Packs with Alternating Typesstd::bind with variadic template functionVariadic Template Functions: No matching function for call, std::endlC++ errors with Variadic templateMixing const and non-const variables on variadic template






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








7















The C++20 feature std::source_location is used to capture information about the context in which a function is called.
When I try to use it with a variadic template function, I encountered a problem: I can't see a place to put the source_location parameter.



The following doesn't work because variadic parameters have to be at the end:



// doesn't work
template <typename... Args>
void debug(Args&&... args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


The following doesn't work either because the caller will be screwed up by the parameter inserted in between:



// doesn't work either, because ...
template <typename... Args>
void debug(const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current(),
Args&&... args);

// the caller will get confused
debug(42); // error: cannot convert 42 to std::source_location


I was informed in a comment that std::source_location works seamlessly with variadic templates, but I struggle to figure out how. How can I use std::source_location with variadic template functions?










share|improve this question





















  • 2





    Perhaps make debug a macro that will call the real "debug" function with the std::source_location::current() call at the correct argument position (first)?

    – Some programmer dude
    8 hours ago











  • Regarding the removed comments that resulted in the edit: can't we have auto function arguments in templates in c++20?

    – eerorika
    8 hours ago







  • 1





    @Someprogrammerdude That will work correctly, but I consider that only a fallback if there's no better method. Using a macro defeats the purpose of std::source_location in some way IMO :(

    – L. F.
    8 hours ago











  • @eerorika Yes, auto is allowed in the parameter, but then we can provide 42 or "foo" as the source location.

    – L. F.
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @NicolBolas You are right, being a regular object that can be passed around with its value unchanged is definitely an advantage of source_location. But I’d say the ability to get rid of macros is also an advantage, and that is the purpose I “intended” to defeat. Therefore I agree that the sentence is incomplet, but it is not incorrekt, is it? So it didn’t make much sense to me that it is nonsense. (I don’t know how to produce bad formatting here ...)

    – L. F.
    6 hours ago

















7















The C++20 feature std::source_location is used to capture information about the context in which a function is called.
When I try to use it with a variadic template function, I encountered a problem: I can't see a place to put the source_location parameter.



The following doesn't work because variadic parameters have to be at the end:



// doesn't work
template <typename... Args>
void debug(Args&&... args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


The following doesn't work either because the caller will be screwed up by the parameter inserted in between:



// doesn't work either, because ...
template <typename... Args>
void debug(const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current(),
Args&&... args);

// the caller will get confused
debug(42); // error: cannot convert 42 to std::source_location


I was informed in a comment that std::source_location works seamlessly with variadic templates, but I struggle to figure out how. How can I use std::source_location with variadic template functions?










share|improve this question





















  • 2





    Perhaps make debug a macro that will call the real "debug" function with the std::source_location::current() call at the correct argument position (first)?

    – Some programmer dude
    8 hours ago











  • Regarding the removed comments that resulted in the edit: can't we have auto function arguments in templates in c++20?

    – eerorika
    8 hours ago







  • 1





    @Someprogrammerdude That will work correctly, but I consider that only a fallback if there's no better method. Using a macro defeats the purpose of std::source_location in some way IMO :(

    – L. F.
    8 hours ago











  • @eerorika Yes, auto is allowed in the parameter, but then we can provide 42 or "foo" as the source location.

    – L. F.
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @NicolBolas You are right, being a regular object that can be passed around with its value unchanged is definitely an advantage of source_location. But I’d say the ability to get rid of macros is also an advantage, and that is the purpose I “intended” to defeat. Therefore I agree that the sentence is incomplet, but it is not incorrekt, is it? So it didn’t make much sense to me that it is nonsense. (I don’t know how to produce bad formatting here ...)

    – L. F.
    6 hours ago













7












7








7


4






The C++20 feature std::source_location is used to capture information about the context in which a function is called.
When I try to use it with a variadic template function, I encountered a problem: I can't see a place to put the source_location parameter.



The following doesn't work because variadic parameters have to be at the end:



// doesn't work
template <typename... Args>
void debug(Args&&... args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


The following doesn't work either because the caller will be screwed up by the parameter inserted in between:



// doesn't work either, because ...
template <typename... Args>
void debug(const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current(),
Args&&... args);

// the caller will get confused
debug(42); // error: cannot convert 42 to std::source_location


I was informed in a comment that std::source_location works seamlessly with variadic templates, but I struggle to figure out how. How can I use std::source_location with variadic template functions?










share|improve this question
















The C++20 feature std::source_location is used to capture information about the context in which a function is called.
When I try to use it with a variadic template function, I encountered a problem: I can't see a place to put the source_location parameter.



The following doesn't work because variadic parameters have to be at the end:



// doesn't work
template <typename... Args>
void debug(Args&&... args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


The following doesn't work either because the caller will be screwed up by the parameter inserted in between:



// doesn't work either, because ...
template <typename... Args>
void debug(const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current(),
Args&&... args);

// the caller will get confused
debug(42); // error: cannot convert 42 to std::source_location


I was informed in a comment that std::source_location works seamlessly with variadic templates, but I struggle to figure out how. How can I use std::source_location with variadic template functions?







c++ variadic-templates c++20 default-arguments std-source-location






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









einpoklum

42.3k28 gold badges147 silver badges292 bronze badges




42.3k28 gold badges147 silver badges292 bronze badges










asked 8 hours ago









L. F.L. F.

7,0175 gold badges19 silver badges45 bronze badges




7,0175 gold badges19 silver badges45 bronze badges










  • 2





    Perhaps make debug a macro that will call the real "debug" function with the std::source_location::current() call at the correct argument position (first)?

    – Some programmer dude
    8 hours ago











  • Regarding the removed comments that resulted in the edit: can't we have auto function arguments in templates in c++20?

    – eerorika
    8 hours ago







  • 1





    @Someprogrammerdude That will work correctly, but I consider that only a fallback if there's no better method. Using a macro defeats the purpose of std::source_location in some way IMO :(

    – L. F.
    8 hours ago











  • @eerorika Yes, auto is allowed in the parameter, but then we can provide 42 or "foo" as the source location.

    – L. F.
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @NicolBolas You are right, being a regular object that can be passed around with its value unchanged is definitely an advantage of source_location. But I’d say the ability to get rid of macros is also an advantage, and that is the purpose I “intended” to defeat. Therefore I agree that the sentence is incomplet, but it is not incorrekt, is it? So it didn’t make much sense to me that it is nonsense. (I don’t know how to produce bad formatting here ...)

    – L. F.
    6 hours ago












  • 2





    Perhaps make debug a macro that will call the real "debug" function with the std::source_location::current() call at the correct argument position (first)?

    – Some programmer dude
    8 hours ago











  • Regarding the removed comments that resulted in the edit: can't we have auto function arguments in templates in c++20?

    – eerorika
    8 hours ago







  • 1





    @Someprogrammerdude That will work correctly, but I consider that only a fallback if there's no better method. Using a macro defeats the purpose of std::source_location in some way IMO :(

    – L. F.
    8 hours ago











  • @eerorika Yes, auto is allowed in the parameter, but then we can provide 42 or "foo" as the source location.

    – L. F.
    8 hours ago






  • 1





    @NicolBolas You are right, being a regular object that can be passed around with its value unchanged is definitely an advantage of source_location. But I’d say the ability to get rid of macros is also an advantage, and that is the purpose I “intended” to defeat. Therefore I agree that the sentence is incomplet, but it is not incorrekt, is it? So it didn’t make much sense to me that it is nonsense. (I don’t know how to produce bad formatting here ...)

    – L. F.
    6 hours ago







2




2





Perhaps make debug a macro that will call the real "debug" function with the std::source_location::current() call at the correct argument position (first)?

– Some programmer dude
8 hours ago





Perhaps make debug a macro that will call the real "debug" function with the std::source_location::current() call at the correct argument position (first)?

– Some programmer dude
8 hours ago













Regarding the removed comments that resulted in the edit: can't we have auto function arguments in templates in c++20?

– eerorika
8 hours ago






Regarding the removed comments that resulted in the edit: can't we have auto function arguments in templates in c++20?

– eerorika
8 hours ago





1




1





@Someprogrammerdude That will work correctly, but I consider that only a fallback if there's no better method. Using a macro defeats the purpose of std::source_location in some way IMO :(

– L. F.
8 hours ago





@Someprogrammerdude That will work correctly, but I consider that only a fallback if there's no better method. Using a macro defeats the purpose of std::source_location in some way IMO :(

– L. F.
8 hours ago













@eerorika Yes, auto is allowed in the parameter, but then we can provide 42 or "foo" as the source location.

– L. F.
8 hours ago





@eerorika Yes, auto is allowed in the parameter, but then we can provide 42 or "foo" as the source location.

– L. F.
8 hours ago




1




1





@NicolBolas You are right, being a regular object that can be passed around with its value unchanged is definitely an advantage of source_location. But I’d say the ability to get rid of macros is also an advantage, and that is the purpose I “intended” to defeat. Therefore I agree that the sentence is incomplet, but it is not incorrekt, is it? So it didn’t make much sense to me that it is nonsense. (I don’t know how to produce bad formatting here ...)

– L. F.
6 hours ago





@NicolBolas You are right, being a regular object that can be passed around with its value unchanged is definitely an advantage of source_location. But I’d say the ability to get rid of macros is also an advantage, and that is the purpose I “intended” to defeat. Therefore I agree that the sentence is incomplet, but it is not incorrekt, is it? So it didn’t make much sense to me that it is nonsense. (I don’t know how to produce bad formatting here ...)

– L. F.
6 hours ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4














template <typename... Ts>
struct debug

debug(Ts&&... ts, const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());
;

template <typename... Ts>
debug(Ts&&...) -> debug<Ts...>;


Test:



int main()

debug(5, 'A', 3.14f, "foo");



DEMO






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Great! This is the most elegant solution so far! Such creative usage of deduction guides

    – L. F.
    5 hours ago


















3














template <typename... Args>
void debug(Args&&... args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


"works", but requires to specify template arguments as there are non deducible as there are not last:



debug<int>(42);


Demo



Possible (not perfect) alternatives include:




  • use overloads with hard coded limit (old possible way to "handle" variadic):



    // 0 arguments
    void debug(const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // 1 argument
    template <typename T0>
    void debug(T0&& t0,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // 2 arguments
    template <typename T0, typename T1>
    void debug(T0&& t0, T1&& t1,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // ...


    Demo




  • to put source_location at first position, without default:



    template <typename... Args>
    void debug(const std::source_location& loc, Args&&... args);


    and



    debug(std::source_location::current(), 42);


    Demo




  • similarly to overloads, but just use tuple as group



    template <typename Tuple>
    void debug(Tuple&& t,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


    or



    template <typename ... Ts>
    void debug(const std::tuple<Ts...>& t,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


    with usage



    debug(std::make_tuple(42));


    Demo







share|improve this answer



























  • I like your first alternative the best. While it's ugly code, it's the most convenient to use, and that's what's most important.

    – einpoklum
    5 hours ago


















1














Not a great solution but... what about place the variadic arguments in a std::tuple?



I mean... something as



template <typename... Args>
void debug (std::tuple<Args...> && t_args,
std::source_location const & loc = std::source_location::current());


Unfortunately, this way you have to explicitly call std::make_tuple calling it



debug(std::make_tuple(1, 2l, 3ll));





share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    @L.F. - sorry: maybe I've misunderstood: do you mean that do you want substitute a variadic macro with a template variadic function?

    – max66
    8 hours ago











  • My original question doesn’t make sense at all. I have updated my question to make the actual question stand out. Ignore the variadic macros. Sorry!

    – L. F.
    7 hours ago












  • @L.F. - I see... well, my answer remain almost the same but the needs of explicitly call std::make_tuple() make it less interesting.

    – max66
    7 hours ago


















1














Just put your arguments in a tuple, no macro needed.



#include <source_location>
#include <tuple>

template <typename... Args>
void debug(
std::tuple<Args...> args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current())

std::cout
<< "debug() called from source location "
<< loc.file_name() << ":" << loc.line() << 'n';



And this works*.



Technically you could just write:



template <typename T>
void debug(
T arg,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current())

std::cout
<< "debug() called from source location "
<< loc.file_name() << ":" << loc.line() << 'n';



but then you'd probably have to jump through some hoops to get the argument types.




* In the linked-to example, I'm using <experimental/source_location> because that's what compilers accept right now. Also, I added some code for printing the argument tuple.






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    "this works just fine" You mean, besides the fact that you have to put the values in a tuple? And therefore have to deal with a lot of pointless syntax to actually extract and use them for their intended purpose?

    – Nicol Bolas
    7 hours ago











  • @NicolBolas: s/a lot of/a bit of/ ; But - see edit.

    – einpoklum
    7 hours ago












  • That all depends on what you're doing with them. In a variadic template, formatting all of the values to a stream is trivial and easily readable. In your version, it is neither. It's doable, but not pretty.

    – Nicol Bolas
    7 hours ago












  • @NicolBolas: You might prefer that, but I would say it is just stylistic "problem" to iterate over tuple/variadic template.

    – Jarod42
    6 hours ago













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f57547273%2fhow-to-use-source-location-in-a-variadic-template-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














template <typename... Ts>
struct debug

debug(Ts&&... ts, const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());
;

template <typename... Ts>
debug(Ts&&...) -> debug<Ts...>;


Test:



int main()

debug(5, 'A', 3.14f, "foo");



DEMO






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Great! This is the most elegant solution so far! Such creative usage of deduction guides

    – L. F.
    5 hours ago















4














template <typename... Ts>
struct debug

debug(Ts&&... ts, const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());
;

template <typename... Ts>
debug(Ts&&...) -> debug<Ts...>;


Test:



int main()

debug(5, 'A', 3.14f, "foo");



DEMO






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Great! This is the most elegant solution so far! Such creative usage of deduction guides

    – L. F.
    5 hours ago













4












4








4







template <typename... Ts>
struct debug

debug(Ts&&... ts, const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());
;

template <typename... Ts>
debug(Ts&&...) -> debug<Ts...>;


Test:



int main()

debug(5, 'A', 3.14f, "foo");



DEMO






share|improve this answer













template <typename... Ts>
struct debug

debug(Ts&&... ts, const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());
;

template <typename... Ts>
debug(Ts&&...) -> debug<Ts...>;


Test:



int main()

debug(5, 'A', 3.14f, "foo");



DEMO







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 5 hours ago









Piotr SkotnickiPiotr Skotnicki

36.1k4 gold badges75 silver badges123 bronze badges




36.1k4 gold badges75 silver badges123 bronze badges










  • 2





    Great! This is the most elegant solution so far! Such creative usage of deduction guides

    – L. F.
    5 hours ago












  • 2





    Great! This is the most elegant solution so far! Such creative usage of deduction guides

    – L. F.
    5 hours ago







2




2





Great! This is the most elegant solution so far! Such creative usage of deduction guides

– L. F.
5 hours ago





Great! This is the most elegant solution so far! Such creative usage of deduction guides

– L. F.
5 hours ago













3














template <typename... Args>
void debug(Args&&... args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


"works", but requires to specify template arguments as there are non deducible as there are not last:



debug<int>(42);


Demo



Possible (not perfect) alternatives include:




  • use overloads with hard coded limit (old possible way to "handle" variadic):



    // 0 arguments
    void debug(const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // 1 argument
    template <typename T0>
    void debug(T0&& t0,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // 2 arguments
    template <typename T0, typename T1>
    void debug(T0&& t0, T1&& t1,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // ...


    Demo




  • to put source_location at first position, without default:



    template <typename... Args>
    void debug(const std::source_location& loc, Args&&... args);


    and



    debug(std::source_location::current(), 42);


    Demo




  • similarly to overloads, but just use tuple as group



    template <typename Tuple>
    void debug(Tuple&& t,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


    or



    template <typename ... Ts>
    void debug(const std::tuple<Ts...>& t,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


    with usage



    debug(std::make_tuple(42));


    Demo







share|improve this answer



























  • I like your first alternative the best. While it's ugly code, it's the most convenient to use, and that's what's most important.

    – einpoklum
    5 hours ago















3














template <typename... Args>
void debug(Args&&... args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


"works", but requires to specify template arguments as there are non deducible as there are not last:



debug<int>(42);


Demo



Possible (not perfect) alternatives include:




  • use overloads with hard coded limit (old possible way to "handle" variadic):



    // 0 arguments
    void debug(const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // 1 argument
    template <typename T0>
    void debug(T0&& t0,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // 2 arguments
    template <typename T0, typename T1>
    void debug(T0&& t0, T1&& t1,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // ...


    Demo




  • to put source_location at first position, without default:



    template <typename... Args>
    void debug(const std::source_location& loc, Args&&... args);


    and



    debug(std::source_location::current(), 42);


    Demo




  • similarly to overloads, but just use tuple as group



    template <typename Tuple>
    void debug(Tuple&& t,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


    or



    template <typename ... Ts>
    void debug(const std::tuple<Ts...>& t,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


    with usage



    debug(std::make_tuple(42));


    Demo







share|improve this answer



























  • I like your first alternative the best. While it's ugly code, it's the most convenient to use, and that's what's most important.

    – einpoklum
    5 hours ago













3












3








3







template <typename... Args>
void debug(Args&&... args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


"works", but requires to specify template arguments as there are non deducible as there are not last:



debug<int>(42);


Demo



Possible (not perfect) alternatives include:




  • use overloads with hard coded limit (old possible way to "handle" variadic):



    // 0 arguments
    void debug(const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // 1 argument
    template <typename T0>
    void debug(T0&& t0,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // 2 arguments
    template <typename T0, typename T1>
    void debug(T0&& t0, T1&& t1,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // ...


    Demo




  • to put source_location at first position, without default:



    template <typename... Args>
    void debug(const std::source_location& loc, Args&&... args);


    and



    debug(std::source_location::current(), 42);


    Demo




  • similarly to overloads, but just use tuple as group



    template <typename Tuple>
    void debug(Tuple&& t,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


    or



    template <typename ... Ts>
    void debug(const std::tuple<Ts...>& t,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


    with usage



    debug(std::make_tuple(42));


    Demo







share|improve this answer















template <typename... Args>
void debug(Args&&... args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


"works", but requires to specify template arguments as there are non deducible as there are not last:



debug<int>(42);


Demo



Possible (not perfect) alternatives include:




  • use overloads with hard coded limit (old possible way to "handle" variadic):



    // 0 arguments
    void debug(const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // 1 argument
    template <typename T0>
    void debug(T0&& t0,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // 2 arguments
    template <typename T0, typename T1>
    void debug(T0&& t0, T1&& t1,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());

    // ...


    Demo




  • to put source_location at first position, without default:



    template <typename... Args>
    void debug(const std::source_location& loc, Args&&... args);


    and



    debug(std::source_location::current(), 42);


    Demo




  • similarly to overloads, but just use tuple as group



    template <typename Tuple>
    void debug(Tuple&& t,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


    or



    template <typename ... Ts>
    void debug(const std::tuple<Ts...>& t,
    const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current());


    with usage



    debug(std::make_tuple(42));


    Demo








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 7 hours ago









Jarod42Jarod42

129k12 gold badges114 silver badges202 bronze badges




129k12 gold badges114 silver badges202 bronze badges















  • I like your first alternative the best. While it's ugly code, it's the most convenient to use, and that's what's most important.

    – einpoklum
    5 hours ago

















  • I like your first alternative the best. While it's ugly code, it's the most convenient to use, and that's what's most important.

    – einpoklum
    5 hours ago
















I like your first alternative the best. While it's ugly code, it's the most convenient to use, and that's what's most important.

– einpoklum
5 hours ago





I like your first alternative the best. While it's ugly code, it's the most convenient to use, and that's what's most important.

– einpoklum
5 hours ago











1














Not a great solution but... what about place the variadic arguments in a std::tuple?



I mean... something as



template <typename... Args>
void debug (std::tuple<Args...> && t_args,
std::source_location const & loc = std::source_location::current());


Unfortunately, this way you have to explicitly call std::make_tuple calling it



debug(std::make_tuple(1, 2l, 3ll));





share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    @L.F. - sorry: maybe I've misunderstood: do you mean that do you want substitute a variadic macro with a template variadic function?

    – max66
    8 hours ago











  • My original question doesn’t make sense at all. I have updated my question to make the actual question stand out. Ignore the variadic macros. Sorry!

    – L. F.
    7 hours ago












  • @L.F. - I see... well, my answer remain almost the same but the needs of explicitly call std::make_tuple() make it less interesting.

    – max66
    7 hours ago















1














Not a great solution but... what about place the variadic arguments in a std::tuple?



I mean... something as



template <typename... Args>
void debug (std::tuple<Args...> && t_args,
std::source_location const & loc = std::source_location::current());


Unfortunately, this way you have to explicitly call std::make_tuple calling it



debug(std::make_tuple(1, 2l, 3ll));





share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    @L.F. - sorry: maybe I've misunderstood: do you mean that do you want substitute a variadic macro with a template variadic function?

    – max66
    8 hours ago











  • My original question doesn’t make sense at all. I have updated my question to make the actual question stand out. Ignore the variadic macros. Sorry!

    – L. F.
    7 hours ago












  • @L.F. - I see... well, my answer remain almost the same but the needs of explicitly call std::make_tuple() make it less interesting.

    – max66
    7 hours ago













1












1








1







Not a great solution but... what about place the variadic arguments in a std::tuple?



I mean... something as



template <typename... Args>
void debug (std::tuple<Args...> && t_args,
std::source_location const & loc = std::source_location::current());


Unfortunately, this way you have to explicitly call std::make_tuple calling it



debug(std::make_tuple(1, 2l, 3ll));





share|improve this answer















Not a great solution but... what about place the variadic arguments in a std::tuple?



I mean... something as



template <typename... Args>
void debug (std::tuple<Args...> && t_args,
std::source_location const & loc = std::source_location::current());


Unfortunately, this way you have to explicitly call std::make_tuple calling it



debug(std::make_tuple(1, 2l, 3ll));






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









max66max66

44.7k7 gold badges48 silver badges78 bronze badges




44.7k7 gold badges48 silver badges78 bronze badges










  • 1





    @L.F. - sorry: maybe I've misunderstood: do you mean that do you want substitute a variadic macro with a template variadic function?

    – max66
    8 hours ago











  • My original question doesn’t make sense at all. I have updated my question to make the actual question stand out. Ignore the variadic macros. Sorry!

    – L. F.
    7 hours ago












  • @L.F. - I see... well, my answer remain almost the same but the needs of explicitly call std::make_tuple() make it less interesting.

    – max66
    7 hours ago












  • 1





    @L.F. - sorry: maybe I've misunderstood: do you mean that do you want substitute a variadic macro with a template variadic function?

    – max66
    8 hours ago











  • My original question doesn’t make sense at all. I have updated my question to make the actual question stand out. Ignore the variadic macros. Sorry!

    – L. F.
    7 hours ago












  • @L.F. - I see... well, my answer remain almost the same but the needs of explicitly call std::make_tuple() make it less interesting.

    – max66
    7 hours ago







1




1





@L.F. - sorry: maybe I've misunderstood: do you mean that do you want substitute a variadic macro with a template variadic function?

– max66
8 hours ago





@L.F. - sorry: maybe I've misunderstood: do you mean that do you want substitute a variadic macro with a template variadic function?

– max66
8 hours ago













My original question doesn’t make sense at all. I have updated my question to make the actual question stand out. Ignore the variadic macros. Sorry!

– L. F.
7 hours ago






My original question doesn’t make sense at all. I have updated my question to make the actual question stand out. Ignore the variadic macros. Sorry!

– L. F.
7 hours ago














@L.F. - I see... well, my answer remain almost the same but the needs of explicitly call std::make_tuple() make it less interesting.

– max66
7 hours ago





@L.F. - I see... well, my answer remain almost the same but the needs of explicitly call std::make_tuple() make it less interesting.

– max66
7 hours ago











1














Just put your arguments in a tuple, no macro needed.



#include <source_location>
#include <tuple>

template <typename... Args>
void debug(
std::tuple<Args...> args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current())

std::cout
<< "debug() called from source location "
<< loc.file_name() << ":" << loc.line() << 'n';



And this works*.



Technically you could just write:



template <typename T>
void debug(
T arg,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current())

std::cout
<< "debug() called from source location "
<< loc.file_name() << ":" << loc.line() << 'n';



but then you'd probably have to jump through some hoops to get the argument types.




* In the linked-to example, I'm using <experimental/source_location> because that's what compilers accept right now. Also, I added some code for printing the argument tuple.






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    "this works just fine" You mean, besides the fact that you have to put the values in a tuple? And therefore have to deal with a lot of pointless syntax to actually extract and use them for their intended purpose?

    – Nicol Bolas
    7 hours ago











  • @NicolBolas: s/a lot of/a bit of/ ; But - see edit.

    – einpoklum
    7 hours ago












  • That all depends on what you're doing with them. In a variadic template, formatting all of the values to a stream is trivial and easily readable. In your version, it is neither. It's doable, but not pretty.

    – Nicol Bolas
    7 hours ago












  • @NicolBolas: You might prefer that, but I would say it is just stylistic "problem" to iterate over tuple/variadic template.

    – Jarod42
    6 hours ago















1














Just put your arguments in a tuple, no macro needed.



#include <source_location>
#include <tuple>

template <typename... Args>
void debug(
std::tuple<Args...> args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current())

std::cout
<< "debug() called from source location "
<< loc.file_name() << ":" << loc.line() << 'n';



And this works*.



Technically you could just write:



template <typename T>
void debug(
T arg,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current())

std::cout
<< "debug() called from source location "
<< loc.file_name() << ":" << loc.line() << 'n';



but then you'd probably have to jump through some hoops to get the argument types.




* In the linked-to example, I'm using <experimental/source_location> because that's what compilers accept right now. Also, I added some code for printing the argument tuple.






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    "this works just fine" You mean, besides the fact that you have to put the values in a tuple? And therefore have to deal with a lot of pointless syntax to actually extract and use them for their intended purpose?

    – Nicol Bolas
    7 hours ago











  • @NicolBolas: s/a lot of/a bit of/ ; But - see edit.

    – einpoklum
    7 hours ago












  • That all depends on what you're doing with them. In a variadic template, formatting all of the values to a stream is trivial and easily readable. In your version, it is neither. It's doable, but not pretty.

    – Nicol Bolas
    7 hours ago












  • @NicolBolas: You might prefer that, but I would say it is just stylistic "problem" to iterate over tuple/variadic template.

    – Jarod42
    6 hours ago













1












1








1







Just put your arguments in a tuple, no macro needed.



#include <source_location>
#include <tuple>

template <typename... Args>
void debug(
std::tuple<Args...> args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current())

std::cout
<< "debug() called from source location "
<< loc.file_name() << ":" << loc.line() << 'n';



And this works*.



Technically you could just write:



template <typename T>
void debug(
T arg,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current())

std::cout
<< "debug() called from source location "
<< loc.file_name() << ":" << loc.line() << 'n';



but then you'd probably have to jump through some hoops to get the argument types.




* In the linked-to example, I'm using <experimental/source_location> because that's what compilers accept right now. Also, I added some code for printing the argument tuple.






share|improve this answer















Just put your arguments in a tuple, no macro needed.



#include <source_location>
#include <tuple>

template <typename... Args>
void debug(
std::tuple<Args...> args,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current())

std::cout
<< "debug() called from source location "
<< loc.file_name() << ":" << loc.line() << 'n';



And this works*.



Technically you could just write:



template <typename T>
void debug(
T arg,
const std::source_location& loc = std::source_location::current())

std::cout
<< "debug() called from source location "
<< loc.file_name() << ":" << loc.line() << 'n';



but then you'd probably have to jump through some hoops to get the argument types.




* In the linked-to example, I'm using <experimental/source_location> because that's what compilers accept right now. Also, I added some code for printing the argument tuple.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 hours ago

























answered 7 hours ago









einpoklumeinpoklum

42.3k28 gold badges147 silver badges292 bronze badges




42.3k28 gold badges147 silver badges292 bronze badges










  • 1





    "this works just fine" You mean, besides the fact that you have to put the values in a tuple? And therefore have to deal with a lot of pointless syntax to actually extract and use them for their intended purpose?

    – Nicol Bolas
    7 hours ago











  • @NicolBolas: s/a lot of/a bit of/ ; But - see edit.

    – einpoklum
    7 hours ago












  • That all depends on what you're doing with them. In a variadic template, formatting all of the values to a stream is trivial and easily readable. In your version, it is neither. It's doable, but not pretty.

    – Nicol Bolas
    7 hours ago












  • @NicolBolas: You might prefer that, but I would say it is just stylistic "problem" to iterate over tuple/variadic template.

    – Jarod42
    6 hours ago












  • 1





    "this works just fine" You mean, besides the fact that you have to put the values in a tuple? And therefore have to deal with a lot of pointless syntax to actually extract and use them for their intended purpose?

    – Nicol Bolas
    7 hours ago











  • @NicolBolas: s/a lot of/a bit of/ ; But - see edit.

    – einpoklum
    7 hours ago












  • That all depends on what you're doing with them. In a variadic template, formatting all of the values to a stream is trivial and easily readable. In your version, it is neither. It's doable, but not pretty.

    – Nicol Bolas
    7 hours ago












  • @NicolBolas: You might prefer that, but I would say it is just stylistic "problem" to iterate over tuple/variadic template.

    – Jarod42
    6 hours ago







1




1





"this works just fine" You mean, besides the fact that you have to put the values in a tuple? And therefore have to deal with a lot of pointless syntax to actually extract and use them for their intended purpose?

– Nicol Bolas
7 hours ago





"this works just fine" You mean, besides the fact that you have to put the values in a tuple? And therefore have to deal with a lot of pointless syntax to actually extract and use them for their intended purpose?

– Nicol Bolas
7 hours ago













@NicolBolas: s/a lot of/a bit of/ ; But - see edit.

– einpoklum
7 hours ago






@NicolBolas: s/a lot of/a bit of/ ; But - see edit.

– einpoklum
7 hours ago














That all depends on what you're doing with them. In a variadic template, formatting all of the values to a stream is trivial and easily readable. In your version, it is neither. It's doable, but not pretty.

– Nicol Bolas
7 hours ago






That all depends on what you're doing with them. In a variadic template, formatting all of the values to a stream is trivial and easily readable. In your version, it is neither. It's doable, but not pretty.

– Nicol Bolas
7 hours ago














@NicolBolas: You might prefer that, but I would say it is just stylistic "problem" to iterate over tuple/variadic template.

– Jarod42
6 hours ago





@NicolBolas: You might prefer that, but I would say it is just stylistic "problem" to iterate over tuple/variadic template.

– Jarod42
6 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f57547273%2fhow-to-use-source-location-in-a-variadic-template-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)