Is it possible to see individual photons impressioning film?Reflectance vs. Thin Metal film Thickness GraphIs it possible to charge photonsHow photons represent colors that you see?Pattern on mesh office chair emulates thin film interference for curved surface. Possible to form an equation?How do we see? Where do the photons disappear?All possible photons wavelengthsInterference between two photons, tensor product of individual wave functions?how to see photonsHow is it possible for other animals to have better night vision than humans, who can detect individual photons?Thin Film Interference Maxima Calculation
Is a request to book a business flight ticket for a graduate student an unreasonable one?
Is it possible to set permissions on schema fields to restrict editing of them to certain users?
Is there any reason why MCU changed the Snap to Blip
Can Jimmy hang on his rope?
What happens when adult Billy Batson says "Shazam"?
Integer Lists of Noah
Is it possible to split a vertex?
What in New Testament invalidates God’s commandments from the Old Testament?
Why do we need common sense in AI?
The joke office
What's it called when the bad guy gets eaten?
How to drill holes in 3/8" steel plates?
How many tone holes are there actually in different orchestral woodwind instruments?
Why does the Antonov AN-225 not have any winglets?
Is it okay to use open source code to do an interview task?
Why does wrapping Aluminium foil around my food help it keep warm, aluminium be good conductor should have no effect?
What would +1/+2/+3 items be called in game?
pattern recognition riddle
What's the point of having a RAID 1 configuration over incremental backups to a secondary drive?
Why did Old English lose both thorn and eth?
Why did Harry Potter get a bedroom?
Data Encryption by Application vs Data Encryption in Database
Proof of Isoperimetric Inequality using Curve Shortening Flow
What are the original Russian words for a prostitute?
Is it possible to see individual photons impressioning film?
Reflectance vs. Thin Metal film Thickness GraphIs it possible to charge photonsHow photons represent colors that you see?Pattern on mesh office chair emulates thin film interference for curved surface. Possible to form an equation?How do we see? Where do the photons disappear?All possible photons wavelengthsInterference between two photons, tensor product of individual wave functions?how to see photonsHow is it possible for other animals to have better night vision than humans, who can detect individual photons?Thin Film Interference Maxima Calculation
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
As part of a course in physics teaching, I am developing a small curriculum that will teach (the basics of) quantum mechanics to high school students.
I need a simple way to show the quantization of light. My uni lecturer suggested that low-light photography shows grainy pictures because of individual photons hitting the sensors in discrete points, which shows that they are not diffuse waves.
I have been unable to find anything confirming this on the internet, much less a picture or even better video showing the effect.
I suppose I'm looking for something similar to this video of Tonomura's experiment on the quantization of electrons.
Thank you for your time.
EDIT: I am not actually looking for the equipment. Mere footage of the equipment would be more than adequate. (Just like I won't try to replicate Tonomura in a classroom, but I will show its video)
quantum-mechanics visible-light education
New contributor
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As part of a course in physics teaching, I am developing a small curriculum that will teach (the basics of) quantum mechanics to high school students.
I need a simple way to show the quantization of light. My uni lecturer suggested that low-light photography shows grainy pictures because of individual photons hitting the sensors in discrete points, which shows that they are not diffuse waves.
I have been unable to find anything confirming this on the internet, much less a picture or even better video showing the effect.
I suppose I'm looking for something similar to this video of Tonomura's experiment on the quantization of electrons.
Thank you for your time.
EDIT: I am not actually looking for the equipment. Mere footage of the equipment would be more than adequate. (Just like I won't try to replicate Tonomura in a classroom, but I will show its video)
quantum-mechanics visible-light education
New contributor
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As part of a course in physics teaching, I am developing a small curriculum that will teach (the basics of) quantum mechanics to high school students.
I need a simple way to show the quantization of light. My uni lecturer suggested that low-light photography shows grainy pictures because of individual photons hitting the sensors in discrete points, which shows that they are not diffuse waves.
I have been unable to find anything confirming this on the internet, much less a picture or even better video showing the effect.
I suppose I'm looking for something similar to this video of Tonomura's experiment on the quantization of electrons.
Thank you for your time.
EDIT: I am not actually looking for the equipment. Mere footage of the equipment would be more than adequate. (Just like I won't try to replicate Tonomura in a classroom, but I will show its video)
quantum-mechanics visible-light education
New contributor
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
As part of a course in physics teaching, I am developing a small curriculum that will teach (the basics of) quantum mechanics to high school students.
I need a simple way to show the quantization of light. My uni lecturer suggested that low-light photography shows grainy pictures because of individual photons hitting the sensors in discrete points, which shows that they are not diffuse waves.
I have been unable to find anything confirming this on the internet, much less a picture or even better video showing the effect.
I suppose I'm looking for something similar to this video of Tonomura's experiment on the quantization of electrons.
Thank you for your time.
EDIT: I am not actually looking for the equipment. Mere footage of the equipment would be more than adequate. (Just like I won't try to replicate Tonomura in a classroom, but I will show its video)
quantum-mechanics visible-light education
quantum-mechanics visible-light education
New contributor
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 6 hours ago
Riccardo Orlando
New contributor
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 10 hours ago
Riccardo OrlandoRiccardo Orlando
1135 bronze badges
1135 bronze badges
New contributor
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are a number of videos online of optical interference patterns being built up at the level of single photons. For instance there is this short YouTube video taken in 2008 at Leiden University using an intensified CCD or ICCD camera (essentially a CCD with a phospher screen that is sensitive at the single photon level). As described in the details on the YouTube page:
This movie has been captured with an intensified CCD camera. The movie consists of 200 frames, with exposure times ranging between 0,025 milliseconds and 6,000 milliseconds. It shows how individual photons, transmitted through a double slit, form an interference pattern. It shows wave-particle duality of light.
There is also a much longer video on YouTube here, but there is no information on where this video was taken or any of the parameters used.
If you are looking for a source that gives a more in-depth explanation of how you might actually do these types of experiments (including still images of actual experimental resutls), I recommend something along the lines of this 14 minute lecture by Alain Aspect. A screenshot of one of the experimental result slides from this video is shown below

$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Film with silver halide grains is a bit old fashioned, also slow (you need to develop the film).
A photon-counting image sensor would be clearer, but more expensive. This is research: https://www.laserfocusworld.com/test-measurement/research/article/16555293/advances-in-detectors-the-quanta-image-sensor-qis-making-every-photon-count
Amateur astronomers might have something.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Silver halide film doesn't really respond to single photons; it takes four photons, absorbed within a short period of time, to expose a silver halide crystal in the film. An imaging photomultiplier or other photon-counting image sensor would be better, as @Pieter pointed out.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I doubt if there are cheap and quick solutions - photomultipliers usually cost $1000 or more.
@Pieter mentioned amateur astronomers, and I guess what they do is use cooled CCD or CMOS sensors for imaging in an extremely low-light, extremely long-exposure condition (and this is the condition you would need to demonstrate the grainy images of photons eventually smoothening). At room temperature, the dark noise of typical camera is too high, and that is why you need to cool the sensors to very low temperatures (~ -50 C or lower) using things like thermoelectric coolers (TEC) or Peltier coolers (and you will need some vacuum around your cooled sensor to avoid condensation).
There are some online tutorials on modifying consumer-grade DSLR cameras to Peltier-cooled cameras suitable for astro-photography. But DSLR cameras themselves are not cheap, and there is a lot of modification going on, so again this is not a cheap and quick solution.
As a side note, if your camera sensor is not good, it will have a poor read-out noise, and your image noise will be dominated by electron noise from reading-out procedure instead of the shot noise of your light, even when you have eliminated the problem of hot thermal electrons. But if your camera supports hardware binning of multiple pixels, you can circumvent that problem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490439%2fis-it-possible-to-see-individual-photons-impressioning-film%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There are a number of videos online of optical interference patterns being built up at the level of single photons. For instance there is this short YouTube video taken in 2008 at Leiden University using an intensified CCD or ICCD camera (essentially a CCD with a phospher screen that is sensitive at the single photon level). As described in the details on the YouTube page:
This movie has been captured with an intensified CCD camera. The movie consists of 200 frames, with exposure times ranging between 0,025 milliseconds and 6,000 milliseconds. It shows how individual photons, transmitted through a double slit, form an interference pattern. It shows wave-particle duality of light.
There is also a much longer video on YouTube here, but there is no information on where this video was taken or any of the parameters used.
If you are looking for a source that gives a more in-depth explanation of how you might actually do these types of experiments (including still images of actual experimental resutls), I recommend something along the lines of this 14 minute lecture by Alain Aspect. A screenshot of one of the experimental result slides from this video is shown below

$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are a number of videos online of optical interference patterns being built up at the level of single photons. For instance there is this short YouTube video taken in 2008 at Leiden University using an intensified CCD or ICCD camera (essentially a CCD with a phospher screen that is sensitive at the single photon level). As described in the details on the YouTube page:
This movie has been captured with an intensified CCD camera. The movie consists of 200 frames, with exposure times ranging between 0,025 milliseconds and 6,000 milliseconds. It shows how individual photons, transmitted through a double slit, form an interference pattern. It shows wave-particle duality of light.
There is also a much longer video on YouTube here, but there is no information on where this video was taken or any of the parameters used.
If you are looking for a source that gives a more in-depth explanation of how you might actually do these types of experiments (including still images of actual experimental resutls), I recommend something along the lines of this 14 minute lecture by Alain Aspect. A screenshot of one of the experimental result slides from this video is shown below

$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are a number of videos online of optical interference patterns being built up at the level of single photons. For instance there is this short YouTube video taken in 2008 at Leiden University using an intensified CCD or ICCD camera (essentially a CCD with a phospher screen that is sensitive at the single photon level). As described in the details on the YouTube page:
This movie has been captured with an intensified CCD camera. The movie consists of 200 frames, with exposure times ranging between 0,025 milliseconds and 6,000 milliseconds. It shows how individual photons, transmitted through a double slit, form an interference pattern. It shows wave-particle duality of light.
There is also a much longer video on YouTube here, but there is no information on where this video was taken or any of the parameters used.
If you are looking for a source that gives a more in-depth explanation of how you might actually do these types of experiments (including still images of actual experimental resutls), I recommend something along the lines of this 14 minute lecture by Alain Aspect. A screenshot of one of the experimental result slides from this video is shown below

$endgroup$
There are a number of videos online of optical interference patterns being built up at the level of single photons. For instance there is this short YouTube video taken in 2008 at Leiden University using an intensified CCD or ICCD camera (essentially a CCD with a phospher screen that is sensitive at the single photon level). As described in the details on the YouTube page:
This movie has been captured with an intensified CCD camera. The movie consists of 200 frames, with exposure times ranging between 0,025 milliseconds and 6,000 milliseconds. It shows how individual photons, transmitted through a double slit, form an interference pattern. It shows wave-particle duality of light.
There is also a much longer video on YouTube here, but there is no information on where this video was taken or any of the parameters used.
If you are looking for a source that gives a more in-depth explanation of how you might actually do these types of experiments (including still images of actual experimental resutls), I recommend something along the lines of this 14 minute lecture by Alain Aspect. A screenshot of one of the experimental result slides from this video is shown below

answered 6 hours ago
Punk_PhysicistPunk_Physicist
2,3057 silver badges18 bronze badges
2,3057 silver badges18 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Film with silver halide grains is a bit old fashioned, also slow (you need to develop the film).
A photon-counting image sensor would be clearer, but more expensive. This is research: https://www.laserfocusworld.com/test-measurement/research/article/16555293/advances-in-detectors-the-quanta-image-sensor-qis-making-every-photon-count
Amateur astronomers might have something.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Film with silver halide grains is a bit old fashioned, also slow (you need to develop the film).
A photon-counting image sensor would be clearer, but more expensive. This is research: https://www.laserfocusworld.com/test-measurement/research/article/16555293/advances-in-detectors-the-quanta-image-sensor-qis-making-every-photon-count
Amateur astronomers might have something.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Film with silver halide grains is a bit old fashioned, also slow (you need to develop the film).
A photon-counting image sensor would be clearer, but more expensive. This is research: https://www.laserfocusworld.com/test-measurement/research/article/16555293/advances-in-detectors-the-quanta-image-sensor-qis-making-every-photon-count
Amateur astronomers might have something.
$endgroup$
Film with silver halide grains is a bit old fashioned, also slow (you need to develop the film).
A photon-counting image sensor would be clearer, but more expensive. This is research: https://www.laserfocusworld.com/test-measurement/research/article/16555293/advances-in-detectors-the-quanta-image-sensor-qis-making-every-photon-count
Amateur astronomers might have something.
answered 10 hours ago
PieterPieter
9,7923 gold badges18 silver badges39 bronze badges
9,7923 gold badges18 silver badges39 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Silver halide film doesn't really respond to single photons; it takes four photons, absorbed within a short period of time, to expose a silver halide crystal in the film. An imaging photomultiplier or other photon-counting image sensor would be better, as @Pieter pointed out.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Silver halide film doesn't really respond to single photons; it takes four photons, absorbed within a short period of time, to expose a silver halide crystal in the film. An imaging photomultiplier or other photon-counting image sensor would be better, as @Pieter pointed out.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Silver halide film doesn't really respond to single photons; it takes four photons, absorbed within a short period of time, to expose a silver halide crystal in the film. An imaging photomultiplier or other photon-counting image sensor would be better, as @Pieter pointed out.
$endgroup$
Silver halide film doesn't really respond to single photons; it takes four photons, absorbed within a short period of time, to expose a silver halide crystal in the film. An imaging photomultiplier or other photon-counting image sensor would be better, as @Pieter pointed out.
answered 9 hours ago
S. McGrewS. McGrew
10.9k2 gold badges13 silver badges43 bronze badges
10.9k2 gold badges13 silver badges43 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I doubt if there are cheap and quick solutions - photomultipliers usually cost $1000 or more.
@Pieter mentioned amateur astronomers, and I guess what they do is use cooled CCD or CMOS sensors for imaging in an extremely low-light, extremely long-exposure condition (and this is the condition you would need to demonstrate the grainy images of photons eventually smoothening). At room temperature, the dark noise of typical camera is too high, and that is why you need to cool the sensors to very low temperatures (~ -50 C or lower) using things like thermoelectric coolers (TEC) or Peltier coolers (and you will need some vacuum around your cooled sensor to avoid condensation).
There are some online tutorials on modifying consumer-grade DSLR cameras to Peltier-cooled cameras suitable for astro-photography. But DSLR cameras themselves are not cheap, and there is a lot of modification going on, so again this is not a cheap and quick solution.
As a side note, if your camera sensor is not good, it will have a poor read-out noise, and your image noise will be dominated by electron noise from reading-out procedure instead of the shot noise of your light, even when you have eliminated the problem of hot thermal electrons. But if your camera supports hardware binning of multiple pixels, you can circumvent that problem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I doubt if there are cheap and quick solutions - photomultipliers usually cost $1000 or more.
@Pieter mentioned amateur astronomers, and I guess what they do is use cooled CCD or CMOS sensors for imaging in an extremely low-light, extremely long-exposure condition (and this is the condition you would need to demonstrate the grainy images of photons eventually smoothening). At room temperature, the dark noise of typical camera is too high, and that is why you need to cool the sensors to very low temperatures (~ -50 C or lower) using things like thermoelectric coolers (TEC) or Peltier coolers (and you will need some vacuum around your cooled sensor to avoid condensation).
There are some online tutorials on modifying consumer-grade DSLR cameras to Peltier-cooled cameras suitable for astro-photography. But DSLR cameras themselves are not cheap, and there is a lot of modification going on, so again this is not a cheap and quick solution.
As a side note, if your camera sensor is not good, it will have a poor read-out noise, and your image noise will be dominated by electron noise from reading-out procedure instead of the shot noise of your light, even when you have eliminated the problem of hot thermal electrons. But if your camera supports hardware binning of multiple pixels, you can circumvent that problem.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I doubt if there are cheap and quick solutions - photomultipliers usually cost $1000 or more.
@Pieter mentioned amateur astronomers, and I guess what they do is use cooled CCD or CMOS sensors for imaging in an extremely low-light, extremely long-exposure condition (and this is the condition you would need to demonstrate the grainy images of photons eventually smoothening). At room temperature, the dark noise of typical camera is too high, and that is why you need to cool the sensors to very low temperatures (~ -50 C or lower) using things like thermoelectric coolers (TEC) or Peltier coolers (and you will need some vacuum around your cooled sensor to avoid condensation).
There are some online tutorials on modifying consumer-grade DSLR cameras to Peltier-cooled cameras suitable for astro-photography. But DSLR cameras themselves are not cheap, and there is a lot of modification going on, so again this is not a cheap and quick solution.
As a side note, if your camera sensor is not good, it will have a poor read-out noise, and your image noise will be dominated by electron noise from reading-out procedure instead of the shot noise of your light, even when you have eliminated the problem of hot thermal electrons. But if your camera supports hardware binning of multiple pixels, you can circumvent that problem.
$endgroup$
I doubt if there are cheap and quick solutions - photomultipliers usually cost $1000 or more.
@Pieter mentioned amateur astronomers, and I guess what they do is use cooled CCD or CMOS sensors for imaging in an extremely low-light, extremely long-exposure condition (and this is the condition you would need to demonstrate the grainy images of photons eventually smoothening). At room temperature, the dark noise of typical camera is too high, and that is why you need to cool the sensors to very low temperatures (~ -50 C or lower) using things like thermoelectric coolers (TEC) or Peltier coolers (and you will need some vacuum around your cooled sensor to avoid condensation).
There are some online tutorials on modifying consumer-grade DSLR cameras to Peltier-cooled cameras suitable for astro-photography. But DSLR cameras themselves are not cheap, and there is a lot of modification going on, so again this is not a cheap and quick solution.
As a side note, if your camera sensor is not good, it will have a poor read-out noise, and your image noise will be dominated by electron noise from reading-out procedure instead of the shot noise of your light, even when you have eliminated the problem of hot thermal electrons. But if your camera supports hardware binning of multiple pixels, you can circumvent that problem.
answered 6 hours ago
wccwcc
1,3141 gold badge3 silver badges18 bronze badges
1,3141 gold badge3 silver badges18 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Riccardo Orlando is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490439%2fis-it-possible-to-see-individual-photons-impressioning-film%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown