How do I interpret improvement in AUC ROC from the business perspective?Classification probability threshold2D binary classificationDownsampling vs upsampling on the significance of the predictors in logistic regressionHow to report average error rate/performance/error metrics from train function in R package caret regarding the hold-out samples from cross-validationAUC vs.Class imbalance in both training data and test dataEffectiveness of Standardization and Normalization in Machine LearningRandom Forest has almost perfect training AUC compared to other modelsAUPRC vs. AUC-ROC?How much higher accuracy of train than test is enough to consider the model overfitted?Two different approaches of oversampling data with GridSearchCV leads to similar test resultsModel Selection with Oversampling/ Cross-Validation leads to similar test results in 2 approaches

On studying Computer Science vs. Software Engineering to become a proficient coder

Can I use my laptop, which says 100-240V, in the USA?

Ex-manager wants to stay in touch, I don't want to

How can a layman easily get the consensus view of what academia *thinks* about a subject?

What to do if SUS scores contradict qualitative feedback?

Find hamming distance between two Strings of equal length in Java

What is the largest number of identical satellites launched together?

Extracting X and Y coordinates from .gpx file using QGIS?

Does SQL Server allow (make visible) DDL inside a transaction to the transaction prior to commit?

What kind of SATA connector is this?

How can I answer high-school writing prompts without sounding weird and fake?

Developers demotivated due to working on same project for more than 2 years

On what legal basis did the UK remove the 'European Union' from its passport?

Earliest use of "rookie"?

Is there any good reason to write "it is easy to see"?

Is Germany still exporting arms to countries involved in Yemen?

How to cope with regret and shame about not fully utilizing opportunities during PhD?

using `is` operator with value type tuples gives error

In books, how many dragons are there in present time?

How can dragons propel their breath attacks to a long distance

what does a native speaker say when he wanted to leave his work?

How does emacs `shell-mode` know to prompt for sudo?

How did Thanos not realise this had happened at the end of Endgame?

Why was Thor doubtful about his worthiness to Mjolnir?



How do I interpret improvement in AUC ROC from the business perspective?


Classification probability threshold2D binary classificationDownsampling vs upsampling on the significance of the predictors in logistic regressionHow to report average error rate/performance/error metrics from train function in R package caret regarding the hold-out samples from cross-validationAUC vs.Class imbalance in both training data and test dataEffectiveness of Standardization and Normalization in Machine LearningRandom Forest has almost perfect training AUC compared to other modelsAUPRC vs. AUC-ROC?How much higher accuracy of train than test is enough to consider the model overfitted?Two different approaches of oversampling data with GridSearchCV leads to similar test resultsModel Selection with Oversampling/ Cross-Validation leads to similar test results in 2 approaches






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


Let's say I'm training a logistic regression model to predict the click-through-rate (CTR) on online display ads. The training dataset consists of positive examples (ads were clicked) and negative ones (ads were not clicked). The binary classifier has achieved 0.7 AUC ROC on test dataset.



Now, instead of using logistic regression, I found that gradient boosting trees performs better, yielding 0.75 AUC ROC on test dataset.



How does the improvement in AUC ROC translate to potential improvement in CTR?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$


















    2












    $begingroup$


    Let's say I'm training a logistic regression model to predict the click-through-rate (CTR) on online display ads. The training dataset consists of positive examples (ads were clicked) and negative ones (ads were not clicked). The binary classifier has achieved 0.7 AUC ROC on test dataset.



    Now, instead of using logistic regression, I found that gradient boosting trees performs better, yielding 0.75 AUC ROC on test dataset.



    How does the improvement in AUC ROC translate to potential improvement in CTR?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Let's say I'm training a logistic regression model to predict the click-through-rate (CTR) on online display ads. The training dataset consists of positive examples (ads were clicked) and negative ones (ads were not clicked). The binary classifier has achieved 0.7 AUC ROC on test dataset.



      Now, instead of using logistic regression, I found that gradient boosting trees performs better, yielding 0.75 AUC ROC on test dataset.



      How does the improvement in AUC ROC translate to potential improvement in CTR?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let's say I'm training a logistic regression model to predict the click-through-rate (CTR) on online display ads. The training dataset consists of positive examples (ads were clicked) and negative ones (ads were not clicked). The binary classifier has achieved 0.7 AUC ROC on test dataset.



      Now, instead of using logistic regression, I found that gradient boosting trees performs better, yielding 0.75 AUC ROC on test dataset.



      How does the improvement in AUC ROC translate to potential improvement in CTR?







      machine-learning classification






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      cwlcwl

      31719




      31719




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          We have no idea. And the AUROC won't help you.



          A statistical model alone does not generate value. (Therefore, you cannot quantify how much more value an improvement in your model yields.)



          What generates value is decisions. Better decisions generate more value. If your improved model leads to better decisions, then it generates more value. But you might also be able to generate more value using the very same model, by changing the way you base decisions on the model.



          Therefore, you will need to think about and possibly simulate how your model is translated into decisions, and you will need to assign a value to each pair (decision, actual outcome). Note that maximizing AUROC may not be the output from your model you need to maximize value. More info at my answer to the earlier "Classification probability threshold".






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "65"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f407990%2fhow-do-i-interpret-improvement-in-auc-roc-from-the-business-perspective%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            We have no idea. And the AUROC won't help you.



            A statistical model alone does not generate value. (Therefore, you cannot quantify how much more value an improvement in your model yields.)



            What generates value is decisions. Better decisions generate more value. If your improved model leads to better decisions, then it generates more value. But you might also be able to generate more value using the very same model, by changing the way you base decisions on the model.



            Therefore, you will need to think about and possibly simulate how your model is translated into decisions, and you will need to assign a value to each pair (decision, actual outcome). Note that maximizing AUROC may not be the output from your model you need to maximize value. More info at my answer to the earlier "Classification probability threshold".






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              We have no idea. And the AUROC won't help you.



              A statistical model alone does not generate value. (Therefore, you cannot quantify how much more value an improvement in your model yields.)



              What generates value is decisions. Better decisions generate more value. If your improved model leads to better decisions, then it generates more value. But you might also be able to generate more value using the very same model, by changing the way you base decisions on the model.



              Therefore, you will need to think about and possibly simulate how your model is translated into decisions, and you will need to assign a value to each pair (decision, actual outcome). Note that maximizing AUROC may not be the output from your model you need to maximize value. More info at my answer to the earlier "Classification probability threshold".






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                We have no idea. And the AUROC won't help you.



                A statistical model alone does not generate value. (Therefore, you cannot quantify how much more value an improvement in your model yields.)



                What generates value is decisions. Better decisions generate more value. If your improved model leads to better decisions, then it generates more value. But you might also be able to generate more value using the very same model, by changing the way you base decisions on the model.



                Therefore, you will need to think about and possibly simulate how your model is translated into decisions, and you will need to assign a value to each pair (decision, actual outcome). Note that maximizing AUROC may not be the output from your model you need to maximize value. More info at my answer to the earlier "Classification probability threshold".






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                We have no idea. And the AUROC won't help you.



                A statistical model alone does not generate value. (Therefore, you cannot quantify how much more value an improvement in your model yields.)



                What generates value is decisions. Better decisions generate more value. If your improved model leads to better decisions, then it generates more value. But you might also be able to generate more value using the very same model, by changing the way you base decisions on the model.



                Therefore, you will need to think about and possibly simulate how your model is translated into decisions, and you will need to assign a value to each pair (decision, actual outcome). Note that maximizing AUROC may not be the output from your model you need to maximize value. More info at my answer to the earlier "Classification probability threshold".







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 4 hours ago









                Stephan KolassaStephan Kolassa

                50.4k8103189




                50.4k8103189



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f407990%2fhow-do-i-interpret-improvement-in-auc-roc-from-the-business-perspective%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Sahara Skak | Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: SaharaWikivoyage raisfeerer: Sahara26° N, 13° O

                    The fall designs the understood secretary. Looking glass Science Shock Discovery Hot Everybody Loves Raymond Smile 곳 서비스 성실하다 Defas Kaloolon Definition: To combine or impregnate with sulphur or any of its compounds as to sulphurize caoutchouc in vulcanizing Flame colored Reason Useful Thin Help 갖다 유명하다 낙엽 장례식 Country Iron Definition: A fencer a gladiator one who exhibits his skill in the use of the sword Definition: The American black throated bunting Spiza Americana Nostalgic Needy Method to my madness 시키다 평가되다 전부 소설가 우아하다 Argument Tin Feeling Representative Gym Music Gaur Chicken 일쑤 코치 편 학생증 The harbor values the sugar. Vasagle Yammoe Enstatite Definition: Capable of being limited Road Neighborly Five Refer Built Kangaroo 비비다 Degree Release Bargain Horse 하루 형님 유교 석 동부 괴롭히다 경제력

                    19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу